Most Viewed Videos

(Reuters) – North Carolina’s elections board on Thursday ordered a new election for a U.S. House seat after officials said corruption surrounding absentee ballots tainted the results of a 2018 vote that has embarrassed the Republican Party.

The bipartisan board’s 5-0 decision came after Republican candidate Mark Harris, confronted by days of evidence that an operative for his campaign orchestrated a ballot fraud scheme, called for a new vote in the state’s 9th Congressional District.

“It’s become clear to me that the public’s confidence in the 9th District seat general election has been undermined to an extent that a new election is warranted,” Harris said on the fourth day of the hearing in Raleigh, the state capital.

Elections Board Chairman Bob Cordle said “the corruption” and “absolute mess” with absentee ballots had cast doubt on the entire contest.

“It certainly was a tainted election,” Cordle said. “The people of North Carolina deserve a fair election.”

The race is the country’s last unsettled 2018 congressional contest, and the outcome will not change the balance of power in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives.

But evidence of ballot fraud by the Harris campaign turned the tables on the Republican Party, which has accused Democrats with little evidence of encouraging individual voter fraud in races such as the 2016 presidential election.

Harris’ request for a new vote came as a surprise after he spent months trying to fend off a rerun. He led Democrat Dan McCready by 905 votes out of 282,717 ballots cast on Nov. 6, but elections officials refused to certify him the winner because of allegations of irregularities in the vote.

The pastor capitulated after his son testified he had warned his father of potential illegal activity by Republican political operative Leslie McCrae Dowless.

North Carolina law requires that a new primary nominating election also be conducted in the district, which covers parts of Charlotte and the southeast of the state. Republicans have held the seat since 1963.

‘ILLEGAL SCHEME’

It is unclear whether Harris, 52, will run again. He told the board he was recovering from an infection last month that led to sepsis and two strokes, and said his illness led to memory lapses during the hearing that made him realize he was not prepared for the “rigours” of the proceeding.

North Carolina’s Democratic Party said the hearing laid bare the Harris campaign’s “illegal scheme to steal an election.” McCready wasted no time in tweeting to supporters to donate to his campaign for the new election.

“Today was a great step forward for democracy in North Carolina,” he tweeted.

If Democrats pick up the seat, they would widen their 235-197 majority in the House after taking control of the chamber from President Donald Trump’s fellow Republicans in the November elections.

State Republicans said they respected Harris’ decision to resolve a “tremendously difficult situation.”

“The people of North Carolina deserve nothing less than the full confidence and trust in the electoral system,” party Chairman Robin Hayes said in a statement.

Earlier on Thursday, Harris said he had known Dowless was going door to door on the candidate’s behalf to help voters obtain absentee ballots, a process that is legal. Harris said Dowless assured him he would not collect the ballots from the voters, which would violate state law.

But residents of at least two counties in the district said Dowless and his paid workers collected incomplete absentee ballots and, in some instances, falsely signed as witnesses and filled in votes for contests left blank, according to testimony at the hearing.

Harris campaign officials said they did not pay Dowless to do anything illegal, and Dowless maintained his innocence.

Reporting by Gabriella Borter in New York and Andrew Hay in New Mexico; Editing by Colleen Jenkins, James Dalgleish and Peter Cooney

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-north-carolina-idUSKCN1QA1W3

Donald J. Trump y campaña política de Donald Trump

Trump Tower

725 Fifth Avenue Manhattan

Nueva York, NY


Sr. Trump, nosotros, periodistas de Univision Noticias, estamos profundamente preocupados por su decisión de revocar las credenciales de prensa del Washington Post.

Su acción no tiene precedente y es peligrosa. En Estados Unidos de América, los principales medios de prensa siempre han tenido acceso a los eventos de campaña de los candidatos presidenciales. Nunca antes se les ha restringido o negado el acceso.

En Estados Unidos los candidatos a puestos públicos siempre han aceptado que parte de la cobertura que recibirán será crítica. Los candidatos usualmente responden a la cobertura desfavorable argumentando que la misma es errónea o injusta. Lo que no hacen – no en Estados Unidos de América – es intentar obstruir la cobertura negándole acceso a la prensa a sus eventos. Hay demasiados lugares en el mundo en los cuales las figuras políticas usan cualquier medio a su disposición para castigar y silenciar la cobertura desfavorable. Estados Unidos no es uno de esos lugares.

El Washington Post es una de las instituciones periodísticas más respetadas e icónicas en Estados Unidos y el mundo. Nosotros en Univision Noticias apoyamos al Washington Post y sus esfuerzos para cubrir estas elecciones de una forma consistente con su política editorial.

Lo exhortamos a que les dé al Washington Post y a sus lectores el respeto que merecen, sin importar lo que usted considere acerca de la cobertura noticiosa del Post. Sobre todas las cosas, lo incitamos a que actúe de acuerdo a los principios democráticos de Estados Unidos de América y a la robusta tradición de libertad de prensa que ellos merecen.

Respetuosamente lo urgimos a usted, señor Trump, a que restituya las credenciales de prensa del Washington Post.



Donald J. Trump and Donald Trump Campaign

Trump Tower

725 Fifth Avenue Manhattan

New York, NY


Mr. Trump, we, as journalists of Univision News, are deeply troubled by your decision to revoke The Washington Post’s press credentials.

Your action is unprecedented and dangerous. In the United States, mainstream press organizations are always granted access to presidential candidates events. Never before have so many of them been denied this access.

In the United States candidates for public office have always accepted that some of the news coverage they receive will be critical. Candidates often answer unfavorable coverage, arguing that it was inaccurate or unfair. What they don’t do – not in the United States – is attempt to choke off coverage by denying press organizations access to campaign events. There are all too many places on earth where political figures use whatever is at their disposal to punish and silence unfavorable news coverage. The U.S. is not one of those places.

The Washington Post is one of the United States’ (and the world’s) most respected and iconic journalistic institutions. We at Univision News stand foursquare with The Washington Post as it endeavors to cover this election in a manner consistent with its own editorial judgment.

We urge you to accord the Washington Post and its readers the respect they deserve, no matter how you regard the Post’s news coverage. Above all, we urge you to accord American democracy and the robust free press tradition that is its hallmark the respect that they deserve.

We respectfully urge you, Mr. Trump, to reinstate The Washington Post’s press credentials.


Source Article from http://www.univision.com/noticias/opinion/carta-abierta-de-periodistas-de-univision-noticias-al-candidato-donald-trump

Senate and House Democrats have different strategies over how to limit President TrumpDonald John TrumpIran says it ‘unintentionally’ shot down Ukrainian plane Puerto Rico hit with another major earthquake as aftershocks continue Trump empathizes with Queen Elizabeth II after Harry and Meghan’s royal exit MORE’s power to take military action against Iran.

Senate Democrats are debating among themselves whether to take up a concurrent resolution passed by the House on Thursday limiting Trump’s war powers, or to stick with a proposal sponsored by Sens. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KaineDem senators say Iran threat to embassies not mentioned in intelligence briefing Democrats brace for round two of impeachment witness fight Overnight Defense: House passes measure to limit Trump on Iran | Pelosi vows vote to end 2002 war authorization | Officials believe Iran accidentally shot down passenger plane MORE (D-Va.) and Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinOvernight Health Care: Kansas leaders reach deal to expand Medicaid | California to launch own prescription drug label | Dem senator offers bill banning e-cigarette flavors Pressure building on Pelosi over articles of impeachment Democrats call for updates on US troop deployments MORE (D-Ill.).

As a concurrent resolution, the House measure doesn’t require Trump’s signature. But it’s not clear whether it would actually tie Trump’s hands. The Supreme Court may ultimately have to decide if it has the binding force of law.

The Senate bill would have the force of law, and it would be significant if approved by the GOP-controlled chamber. But it does require Trump’s signature and has almost no chance of becoming law since it would be vetoed, and would then need 67 votes to override a veto.

“I know it’s being wrestled with, I haven’t heard any update,” said Sen. Jeff MerkleyJeffrey (Jeff) Alan MerkleyOvernight Health Care: Kansas leaders reach deal to expand Medicaid | California to launch own prescription drug label | Dem senator offers bill banning e-cigarette flavors Senators introduce resolution warning that Congress has not authorized Iran war On The Money: Senate panel advances Trump’s new NAFTA despite GOP gripes | Trade deficit falls to three-year low | Senate confirms Trump pick for small business chief MORE (D-Ore.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOvernight Health Care: Trump officials want Supreme Court to delay ObamaCare case | Medicaid expansion linked to decline in opioid deaths | Drug price outrage threatens to be liability for GOP Impeachment trial weighs on 2020 Democrats Voters see slightly more GOP partisanship on impeachment: Poll MORE (D-Calif.) on Thursday touted her chamber’s proposal as having “real teeth.” She said it was significant that Trump could not veto it, as he did to a war powers resolution Congress passed last year requiring him to withdraw U.S. forces from the civil war in Yemen.

“We’re taking this path because it does not require a signature of the president of the United States,” she added. “This is a statement of the Congress of the United States and I will not have that statement be diminished by whether the president will veto it or not.”

Key Democratic senators, however, aren’t convinced this is the way to go.

Kaine said that he will press ahead with his own resolution, which has the support of GOP Sens. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeOvernight Defense: Pompeo defends intel on Soleimani strike | Iraqi PM tells US to start working on plan for withdrawal | Paul, Graham feud deepens over Trump war powers White House spokesman roasted over Obama tweet Gabbard: Appearing on Fox News allows me to speak to Trump MORE (Utah) and Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulOvernight Defense: Pompeo defends intel on Soleimani strike | Iraqi PM tells US to start working on plan for withdrawal | Paul, Graham feud deepens over Trump war powers White House spokesman roasted over Obama tweet The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Pelosi plans to send impeachment articles next week MORE (Ky.).

“The one that I have would go to the president’s desk, if it passes,” he said. “I’m likely to call up mine.”

Kaine noted that his resolution, which is privileged and cannot be blocked from receiving a floor vote, is due to be automatically discharged out of the Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday.

“Mine is on time clock where I could call it up starting next week. Theirs would not be,” he said. “I can get it up promptly and I can get it [passed] on a majority vote.”

Democratic aides in both chambers say that the House-passed war powers resolution would also be considered a privileged measure and guaranteed a vote in the GOP-controlled Senate, but Kaine said it would have to be put on a later timeline since the House just approved it Thursday.

The timing of the war powers debate is in flux because of Trump’s looming impeachment trial.

Pelosi says she will meet with the House Democratic caucus on Tuesday to discuss naming a team of prosecutors and sending the articles of impeachment across the Capitol. As soon as she does, the trial is set to begin immediately.   

Even so, there will be a lull between when senators get sworn in as jurors and the start of opening arguments, when lawmakers will have a chance to act on legislative business.

Kaine has already shopped his legislation to about ten Senate Republicans who are in various stages of reviewing it.

Kaine acknowledged Trump may well veto his war powers resolution but argued that the act of putting it on the president’s desk will send a more powerful message than the concurrent resolution.

“I want to put it on the president’s desk. We did that with the Yemen resolution and even though the president vetoed, they stopped fueling the Saudi jets on the way to bombings. They actually stopped doing the thing we ordered them not to do,” he said, referring to U.S. support of a Saudi-backed coalition fighting in Yemen.

Senate Democrats say they’re keeping their options open and may try to advance both Kaine’s and Pelosi’s competing measures. 

“Those conversations are going on right now,” said a Democratic senator, who requested anonymity to talk about internal discussions. “It doesn’t have to be either/or but I think at some point we should figure out what we’re going to prioritize.”  

Lee, who backs the Kaine-Durbin bill, disputes Pelosi’s argument that the House-passed resolution will have the force of law.

He pointed to the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. Chadha in which the high court ruled in an opinion penned by then Chief Justice Warren Burger that legislation affecting persons outside the legislative branch must be presented to the president for his signature.

“I was surprised when I saw that that resolution was styled as a [House concurrent resolution.] It makes me wonder why they did it that way or whether it might have been a mistake from the outset,” Lee said.

“Prior to the decision by the Supreme Court in INS v. Chadha 1983, you had had an opportunity for Congress through a concurrent resolution to alter the legal status quo that didn’t require presentment to the president. Post Chadha that went away,” he said.

Lee said the House-passed resolution “could never be more than akin to a sense of the House or a sense of the Senate.”

A senior House Democratic aide said that legal question may have to be decided anew by the federal courts.

“There are arguments for why this part of the war powers resolution might not be binding, but we decided to follow the process in the war powers resolution as our first step. It makes Congressional intent crystal clear and the President should respect that,” the aide said.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/477763-democrats-conflicted-over-how-to-limit-trumps-war-powers

CLOSE

In announcing the Doral pick just days earlier, White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney described the resort as “the best place”.
Wochit, Wochit

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said Sunday that President Donald Trump was “honestly surprised at the level of pushback” on plans to host next year’s G-7 summit at his Doral resort in Miami. 

Democrats and some Republicans, as well as government watchdogs, decried the administration’s decision to award the event to one of the president’s properties. Critics rejected Mulvaney’s claim that Doral had been selected as the “perfect” location after an exhaustive search. Many, including former White House officials, said it had the appearance of impropriety and others said it was a violation of the Constitution. 

Trump backed down in the wake of the criticism and declared the event would not be held at his resort “based on both Media & Democrat Crazed and Irrational Hostility.” 

‘There’s a perception of impropriety’: Former White House officials say Doral G-7 breaks precedent

Opinion: G-7 at Trump’s Doral resort? The original sin of this presidency is failure to divest.

Mulvaney said on “Fox News Sunday” that “we are all surprised at the level of pushback” and that it was “the right decision to change.” 

“We’ll have to find someplace else. And my guess is we’ll find someplace else that the media won’t like either for another reason,” he said. 

Mulvaney said Trump “saw an opportunity to take the biggest leaders from around the world, and he wanted to put on the absolute best show.”

“At the end of the day, you know, he still considers himself to be in the hospitality business,” Mulvaney explained. 

“He’s the president of the United States,” host Chris Wallace replied. 

“Yes, but that’s his background. It’s like, I used to be in the real estate business,” Mulvaney said. He tried to get Wallace, the son of “60 Minutes” reporter Mike Wallace, to relate by asking him what he did “before you were in the media.” 

“Nothing. That’s all I’ve ever done,” Wallace said. 

“But he wanted to put on a show. He wanted to take care of folks,” Mulvaney said. “He’s in the hotel business, or at least he was before he was the president.” 

Wallace asked Mulvaney if Trump understood that at the very least, it was a bad choice in terms of appearance.

“Well, I think he knows. He thinks people think it looks lousy,” Mulvaney said. 

More: House Judiciary Committee to investigate Trump’s desire to use his Doral resort to host next G-7 summit

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/20/trump-surprised-pushback-g-7-doral/4047431002/

A grassroots online campaign to fund President Trump’s proposed border wall roared past $8.7 million on Thursday, but questions remained about whether the feds would be able to accept the gift.

As of Thursday evening, 143,821 people had donated $8,742,182 toward Air Force veteran Brian Kolfage’s GoFundMe campaign, titled We the People Will Fund the Wall, just a little over three days after its launch.

The pledge drive aims to raise $1 billion to “uphold our laws, and get this wall BUILT!” Kolfage, a Purple Heart recipient who lost both legs and an arm in Iraq, wrote on the campaign’s Web page. “It’s up to Americans to help out and pitch in to get this project rolling.”

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chair of the House Judiciary Committee and a longtime proponent of tighter border security, hailed the vet’s “impressive” campaign, even as he expressed reservations about allowing private citizens to govern with their wallets.

“I think it’s admirable, and I think that the country should respond,” Goodlatte told The Post. “Obviously, we can’t let citizens raise money and say, ‘The government will spend my money on this purpose.’ ”

According to the Treasury Department, general donations to the feds are directed to a “Gifts to the United States” fund, set aside for “general use” by the federal government or “budget needs.”

Specific federal agencies can’t touch this funding without a congressional appropriation.

Some agencies can accept gifts directly for earmarked purposes, but it was not clear if the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the borders, was among them.

The DHS did not immediately respond to a request for clarification.

Furthermore, GoFundMe’s terms of service prohibit “not using funds for their stated purpose,” meaning that if the DHS were unable to accept the windfall, Kolfage may have to reimburse his campaign’s donors.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2018/12/20/border-wall-gofundme-may-need-to-issue-refunds-after-millions-raised/

The determination on the documents only applied to a set of records provided to the White House on Sept. 8, and Remus wrote: “We continue to review materials you provided to the White House after that date and will respond at an appropriate time.”

Biden’s decision triggers a window of at least 30 days for Trump to challenge the determination in court before the National Archives releases them to the Jan. 6 panel, experts have told POLITICO. It mirrors a similar decision made by Biden and his DOJ earlier this year to waive privilege and and allow former Trump DOJ officials to testify before congressional committees about the former president’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election.

In a Friday letter addressed to Ferriero obtained by POLITICO, Trump said the records sought by the committee would contain information shielded by “executive and other privileges, including but not limited to the presidential communications, deliberative process, and attorney-client privileges.”

Trump indicated that he wished to assert privilege over 45 specific documents identified by the National Archives as responsive to the committee’s request. Those documents, Trump said in the two-page letter, included protected “presidential communications,” as well as deliberative process materials and attorney-client privileged materials.

Trump also indicated he wants to preemptively declare future requests by the panel, “potentially numbering in the millions,” as presumptively barred from release.

“Should the committee persist in seeking other privileged information, I will take all necessary and appropriate steps to defend the Office of the Presidency,” Trump wrote.

The White House’s statement comes after the House select panel investigating the attack announced two close allies of former President Donald Trump — former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and former Pentagon aide Kash Patel — were “engaging with” it on their subpoenas, the panel’s top two lawmakers said Friday.

Panel Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) confirmed in a statement that the two Trump associates had been in touch with the panel. Thompson and Cheney also threatened criminal contempt for former Trump campaign chief Steve Bannon, who had informed the committee he wouldn’t cooperate with their inquiry into the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.

“Though the Select Committee welcomes good-faith engagement with witnesses seeking to cooperate with our investigation, we will not allow any witness to defy a lawful subpoena or attempt to run out the clock, and we will swiftly consider advancing a criminal contempt of Congress referral,” Thompson and Cheney said.

A lawyer for Bannon, Robert Costello, told the committee on Thursday that Bannon would refuse to comply because of Trump’s claim that he can invoke executive privilege to block Bannon’s testimony.

“Until these issues are resolved, we are unable to respond to your request for documents and testimony,” Costello wrote to the Jan. 6 committee. Costello’s letter was first reported by The New York Times; POLITICO reported on Thursday that Trump had instructed Bannon and other former aides subpoenaed by the select panel not to comply with lawmakers’ demands.

It’s a questionable claim from Bannon’s lawyer, because the ex-Trump aide was years removed from the White House by the time the former president’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election — the subject of the committee’s subpoena — began in earnest. Executive privilege is typically reserved for a president’s closest advisers and not meant to be a broad shield for testimony requests.

Any move by the Jan. 6 committee to hold a witness in criminal contempt would first require the panel to vote on a contempt resolution. That resolution would then move to the House floor for a vote.

The select panel investigating the insurrection by Trump supporters had subpoenaed four onetime aides to the former president: former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, longtime Trump adviser Dan Scavino, former Trump Pentagon aide Kash Patel and Bannon. All were asked to provide documents by Thursday, and the panel is also seeking to depose the four men next week.

A lawyer for Meadows didn’t immediately return a request for comment on the subpoena deadline.

Patel said in a statement Thursday that “I will continue to tell the American people the truth about January 6, and I am putting our country and freedoms first through my Fight with Kash initiative.”

Scavino was served with his subpoena Friday, according to two sources familiar with the situation. He was served in New York, according to one of the sources, who noted this was the first time service was attempted, as Scavino has been out in public since the subpoenas were issued.

The Jan. 6 committee declined to comment on the status of the subpoena to Scavino, who was not mentioned in Thompson and Cheney’s statement.

If any of the foursome don’t comply, the committee could seek criminal contempt referrals, which would require the House to take a full floor vote when it returns to session later this month. That move, if taken, would send the matter to the Justice Department for review. It’s unclear whether DOJ would act quickly on any prospective referrals, but members of the Jan. 6 panel have expressed hope that the Biden administration would act urgently.

Next week’s deadline for depositions from the subpoenaed former Trump aides would be more significant, according to sources close to the committee, given that the foursome still has time to comply. If they didn’t show up in the coming weeks, the committee could meet to consider a referral, then vote and send it to the full House for consideration.

Rep. Thompson has indicated he wants to complete its investigation by the spring. That time frame, if the nine-member bipartisan panel wants to stick to it, does not allow for protracted legal battles over enforcing subpoenas or litigating against recalcitrant witnesses.

Heather Caygle and Natasha Korecki contributed to this report

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/08/bannon-jan-6-subpoena-515681

Joe Biden made his first appearance as sitting president on NBC’s “The Tonight Show” Friday and fielded a slew of softball questions from host Jimmy Fallon while bemoaning the lack of civility in politics.

Biden, 79, joined the show virtually for two pre-taped two segments with a fawning Fallon as the two discussed the recent death of Sen. Bob Dole.

“We’re friends, we disagreed, but we were friends,” Biden said of his former GOP adversary.

“We used to have an awful lot of that relationship and it still exists,” he added about his current Republican colleagues.

“Except for the Q-Anon and the extreme elements of the Republican party … it makes it awful hard.”

The two went on to discuss inflation and reminisce about the Kennedy Center Honors.

The president made several attempts at being funny. He admitted he hasn’t looked at his sinking approval ratings lately., He also revealed he can’t cook and his wife, Dr. Jill Biden, makes him eggs.

Aside from cracking a few jokes, President Joe Biden made a serious note to Americans about how frustrated he is about the “politicization” of the vaccine.
Ralph Bavaro/NBC

At one point, after extolling the virtues of the COVID-19 booster shot, he recommended that viewers listen to Fallon’s newly released song “It Was A…(Masked Christmas)” featuring Ariana Grande and Megan Thee Stallion.

Biden also made a serious pitch to Americans, after getting tongue-tied while trying to express his frustration about the “politicization” of the vaccine.

“There’s stuff about ‘Biden’s mandating these things happening.’ Look at it this way: it’s patriotic to get this done,” he said, urging people to get their shots.

“There’s a lot of anxiety and my job is to be straightforward, shoot from the shoulder, let people know exactly what the truth is [and] lay out how I’m gonna try to make life better for them.”

Fallon, who at one point told Biden “you’re a very classy guy,” did manage to get in some solid jabs against the Democrat in his opening monologue.

“He was supposed to be here earlier this week but he lit the Fox Christmas tree on fire,” Fallon cracked.

In 2016, Biden appeared on “The Tonight Show” as outgoing vice president.

He also swung by “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” as president-elect last December, where he defended his son Hunter amid federal investigations into his “tax affairs” and eyebrow-raising business dealings in Ukraine reported by The Post.

Four years earlier, Fallon was widely panned for tousling the hair of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump when the Republican was on the show.

The host said afterwards he “made a mistake” and apologized “if I made anyone mad” for the lighthearted exchange.

The show subsequently fell in the ratings to Colbert’s more political show, although he later came around to relentlessly mocking the ex-prez.

This wasn’t the first time President Biden was on “The Tonight Show”, as — then vice president —the Democrat was seen on the show in 2016 with Jimmy Fallon.
Youtube

Colbert and Fallon made Trump the punchline of 97% of their jokes about the Biden/Trump race in September 2020, according to a study by the Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University.

The first and last sitting president to appear on a late-night show was Barack Obama, who “slow-jammed” the news with Fallon on “The Tonight Show” in 2016, after sitting down with Jay Leno in 2009.

John F Kennedy appeared as a candidate on NBC’s “Tonight Starring Jack Paar,” the precursor to the network’s current program, but with the exception of Richard Nixon, other candidates avoided late-night TV until presidential nominee Bill Clinton showed off his saxophone chops on The Arsenio Hall Show in 1992. His favorability ratings jumped 21 percent the day after the appearance.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/12/11/president-biden-appears-on-tonight-show-jokes-about-his-own-approval-ratings/

Unless the rules change soon, Stephanie Salazar-Rodriguez of Denver expects to spend more than $10,000 on health insurance premiums this year. That’s after losing her job last month — which meant losing her employer’s contribution to her health plan.

Rachel Woolf/KHN


hide caption

toggle caption

Rachel Woolf/KHN

Unless the rules change soon, Stephanie Salazar-Rodriguez of Denver expects to spend more than $10,000 on health insurance premiums this year. That’s after losing her job last month — which meant losing her employer’s contribution to her health plan.

Rachel Woolf/KHN

As President Joe Biden’s pandemic relief package steams through Congress, Democrats have hitched a ride for a top health care priority: strengthening the Affordable Care Act with some of the most significant changes to insurance affordability in more than a decade.

The bill would spend $34 billion to help Americans who buy insurance on the health plan marketplaces created by the ACA through 2022, when the benefits would expire. The Senate sent its relief package, one of the largest in congressional history, back to the House where it could come up as early as Tuesday. where it is expected to pass and then go to Biden for his signature.

Those who have studied the legislation say it would throw a lifeline to lower- and middle-income Americans who have fallen through the cracks of the government’s eligibility requirements for ACA subsidies. Stephanie Salazar-Rodriguez of Denver, for instance, is hopeful the changes the federal bill includes will make a difference. Without those changes, she expects to spend more than $10,000 on premiums this year after losing her primary job — and her health insurance — last month.

Under the current system, if her annual income were $3,000 less per year, ACA subsidies could have reduced her premiums to as little as $3,000 a year. But until and unless the COVID-19 relief bill passes, she’s above the cut-off that makes her eligible for ACA health plan subsidies.

“To me, that’s not affluence,” Salazar-Rodriguez says. “You’re talking about people who are struggling to survive.”

The legislation could also provide relief to others who purchase health insurance on the exchanges: people with lower or middling incomes who currently choose policies with lower premiums but high deductibles. Many with high deductible plans often avoid seeking medical care because they don’t have the cash to cover those costs. Most of the nearly 14 million people enrolled in plans sold on the marketplaces would pay less under the new provisions — with the option to use those savings to buy a different plan with a lower deductible.

The Congressional Budget Office also estimates an additional 1.7 million people would enroll in the exchanges under the proposal, about 1.3 million of whom are currently uninsured.

Republicans, who have repeatedly tried to repeal the ACA, have hammered Democrats over the years with allegations that many of the marketplace plans are not affordable and prevent people from buying insurance coverage. They also have argued that the proposed change in the legislation offers unnecessary help to wealthier Americans while doing nothing to lower the cost of insurance.

Now that Democrats have control of the White House and Congress for the first time since the passage of the ACA, they are moving quickly to make changes they believe improves the landmark health care program. Citing the pandemic, Biden opened a three-month special enrollment period the federal health exchange, allowing people to buy new plans there through through May 15.

The COVID-19 relief package under consideration also includes proposals to increase the affordability of health care for the unemployed.

Those receiving unemployment benefits, who are typically ineligible for subsidies on the exchange, would be eligible this year. The Senate version of the bill would pick up 100% of the cost of premiums for those on COBRA, the program allowing recently unemployed workers to privately purchase coverage offered by their former job, often at a high cost. The House had included a similar provision but it provided only an 85% subsidy. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the House’s COBRA changes would cost nearly $8 billion with about 2.2 million people expected to enroll. The version of the bill the Senate has passed would cover the entire COBRA premium.

The legislation, which includes a bevy of anti-poverty provisions, offers a more generous funding match to about a dozen states that have not expanded Medicaid (the program that covers low-income Americans) in hopes that they will soon opt to do so.

Pandemic spurs effort to improve ACA

Advocates and public health experts say it is critical to help people afford health insurance since millions lost their jobs and their job-based health insurance in the pandemic and another 59,000 Americans, or so, are contracting COVID-19 every day.

Health insurance “just becomes the thing people can’t afford when they’ve lost their job,” says Katie Keith, an expert on the Affordable Care Act with Georgetown University’s Center on Health Insurance Reforms.

About 15 million uninsured people are eligible to buy insurance through the exchanges, most of whom would also be eligible for new or larger subsidies under the proposal, according to KFF. (KHN is an editorially independent program of KFF.)

Under the ACA, subsidies are calculated based on the recipient’s income, age and their area’s average premium costs.

Frederick Isasi, executive director of Families USA, which advocates for health care affordability and supported the passage of the ACA, says that right now more than half of those eligible for coverage cannot afford it. “Health insurance is about financial security and health security,” he adds.

The proposal in the relief bill that was passed by the Senate would ensure that no one who buys a health plan on the exchanges pays more than 8.5% of income for that plan. Currently, subsidies are available only to those making between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level. (For those seeking subsidies in 2021, that income range that qualifies an individual for a subsidy is between $12,760 and $51,040.)

Some marketplace customers near the federal poverty level who now must pay some of the premiums out-of-pocket could qualify for a subsidy that pays the entire cost of a silver, or midlevel, plan.

The change would also benefit Americans who make more than the subsidy cutoff. About 3.4 million uninsured people fall into this category, according to the KFF analysis.

For example, currently, a 60-year-old who makes $50,000 annually pays no more than $410 per month out-of-pocket for a silver plan on the exchanges, with the government chipping in $548 per month.

Meanwhile, a 60-year-old who makes $52,000 annually just $2,000 more per year receives no subsidy under the current rules, and is expected to pay the full premium herself, KFF found, at a cost of about $957 per month for the same plan.

For Salazar-Rodriguez, that cutoff has carried a heavy cost. She was recently laid off from her job at a community health organization that has struggled during the pandemic, and now she pays $913 per month out of her own pocket for insurance.

In a little less than a year, at age 65, she will qualify for Medicare. But for now – and unless and until the COVID-19 relief package passes — her age is a liability. Older, pre-retirement Americans pay some of the highest health insurance premiums in the nation.

Having once worked assisting people enrolling in the health insurance exchanges, Salazar-Rodriguez went straight to the marketplace for coverage when she lost her job. But she was startled to discover how high her premiums would be — and surprised and distressed to see that, because of her income from her other work as a consultant, she is ineligible for a subsidy or Medicaid.

She opted instead for COBRA coverage, which she said was comparable in cost and had more of the benefits she needs than the unsubsidized plans she found on the ACA exchanges in that price range.

Unless something changes soon, she worries she will have to run up her credit card and find extra work to afford her premiums. The pandemic has made forgoing insurance unthinkable, she says. Many of her loved ones have come down with COVID-19. Some friends are still suffering symptoms months after falling ill. She lost a brother-in-law in Texas.

“That’s why I am paying that nearly $1,000 a month,” Salazar-Rodriguez says, “because I know one hospitalization could bankrupt me if I didn’t have it, and I can’t take that chance.”

Some changes to subsidy rules might become permanent

Though the subsidy fixes are temporary, lasting two years to address the economic impacts of the pandemic, experts and lawmakers expect the new subsidy criteria would eventually become permanent.

The KFF analysis found that subsidies would gradually phase out for those with higher incomes — for instance, a single 60-year-old making about $160,000 would not receive a subsidy, because no silver plan would cost more than 8.5% of his income.

Republicans oppose the bill’s proposed enhancements to ACA subsidies. Brian Blase, a senior fellow at the Galen Institute, a nonprofit group that researches free-market approaches to health reform, has criticized the proposal in a recent analysis, saying it shifts the burden of paying premiums from private payers to taxpayers without addressing the causes of high premiums.

He argues a family of four headed by a 60-year-old earning almost $240,000 could, under the proposed restructuring of the law, qualify for a nearly $9,000 subsidy.

The Wall Street Journal seized on Blase’s example in a recent op-ed. “These are not the folks hit hard by the pandemic,” the editorial staff wrote.

Many of the changes the relief package proposes date back to the original passage of the ACA — President Barack Obama’s signature domestic policy that overhauled the nation’s health care system. At the time, those who wrote the law expected Congress would observe how it worked and make adjustments and improvements in it over time. But the law instead became a lightning rod for GOP opposition.

The latest proposal is part of the ACA’s “unfinished business,” says Keith of Georgetown University.

She notes there are other improvements that could be made – remedies for coverage gaps not addressed by this package, such as the so-called family glitch, in which a family’s eligibility for marketplace subsidies is based on the cost of job-based coverage for one individual rather than whether coverage for the family is affordable.

The current bill “is narrow compared to the wish list Democrats have, but it would do so much with premium affordability in this way right now,” Keith says.

Kaiser Health News produces in-depth journalism about health policy issues, and is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs of the Kaiser Family Foundation, an endowed nonprofit.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/03/09/974961743/pandemic-aid-package-includes-some-relief-from-high-health-plan-premiums

A fast-moving wildfire spurred by powerful winds tore across northeastern Sonoma County early Thursday, burning more than 10,000 acres and forcing the evacuation of up to 2,000 residents — including the entire town of Geyserville.

The Kincade Fire was burning near the Geysers geothermal plant in the Mayacamas Mountains with 0% containment, the glow visible for miles. By dawn, the fire had destroyed or damaged at least a dozen homes and other structures along Geyser Road, including at least two large buildings at Crazy Creek Vineyards in the Alexander Valley.

The fire started around 9:25 p.m. Wednesday on John Kincade Road, in an area where the power had been shut off over weather-related concerns, Cal Fire officials said. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. had shut off power to parts of Sonoma and other Northern California counties Wednesday afternoon in an effort to prevent fires from being sparked by power lines damaged or downed by strong winds.

Gusts reached 76 mph overnight on the region’s highest peaks, according to the National Weather Service.

The cause of the fire was not immediately known. PG&E spokeswoman Karly Hernandez said the fire was burning “near the (shut-off) footprint and we are working to gather additional information.” The utility cut power to about 27,830 Sonoma County customers at 3 p.m., she noted.

As crews realized they would need to evacuate residents, one firefighter alerted dispatch that the power was out in the area of the 10000 block of Pine Flat Road and there was “a limited ability to make phone calls. We need to go door to door.”

With electronic evacuation alerts limited to text messages, residents near the fire notified their neighbors while firefighters banged on doors to urge people to leave immediately.

Strong winds and embers pushed the blaze from north to south in steep and rugged terrain, said Amy Head, a Cal Fire battalion chief.

At least 328 firefighters were on the scene, as well as engines, bulldozers and hand crews. At first light Cal Fire planned to put aircraft in the skies for visual inspections and then to battle flames, Head said.

“It’s outpacing us,” Head said of the fire. “We’re just trying to keep up with it and bump ahead of it. It’s growing very rapidly in a short amount of time.”

There were no reports of deaths or injuries.

As the fire spread along Geysers Road, erratic winds kicked up embers and ash that swirled like tiny tornadoes. Along the road, a steady line of bulldozers headed toward the flames as cars filled with evacuees drove to safety.

Flames gutted several structures at the intersection of Red Winery and Geysers Road. A power line drooped over the street at the intersection, and several feet away flames chewed away at a power pole.

With fires still burning small structures, the fire engines at the scene packed up and left.

“More fires to fight,” a firefighter yelled out the window as they pulled away.

One home on Red Winery Road suffered damage when a large tree, cracked at the trunk by strong winds, toppled onto the roof.

By morning, the blaze had pushed west and headed into Alexander Valley vineyards, leaving the hillside to the east of Geysers Road scorched. About a dozen cows huddled together on one small patch of land that hadn’t burned.

Mandatory evacuations were initially ordered for areas east of Highway 128, including the River Rock Casino, according to the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office. Those orders expanded after the blaze jumped Highway 128 and headed west.

“If you’re in Geyserville, leave now,” officials wrote in an alert, urging people in the town of 860 to head south.

Arch Monson, 69, and his family had already fled from their property, Monson Vineyards, on Geysers Road at 3 a.m. They headed downhill to stay with a neighbor.

The fire “was on our property when we left,” Monson said, adding that his family has lived there since 1957. “As we were pulling out, firefighters were pulling in.

“We were hearing explosions — loud booms — presumably from propane tanks,” Monson said. “It seemed like there was a burst of wind and fire was coming down to the valley floor.”

The neighbor’s home to which he’d fled was no longer safe, Monson said. At 5 a.m., they evacuated again.

“We were pretty far away, but we’re seeing live embers in the air swirling around, landing and a lot of thick smoke,” Monson said. “You could see the fire had moved down the foothills. We just could tell it was time to get out. On the road out we saw fences on fire, landscaping, trees on fire.”

Evacuation centers were in place at Windsor High School, 8695 Windsor Road in Windsor, and at the Healdsburg Community Center at 1557 Healdsburg Ave.

Paula Whitehall, 65, was among 10 evacuees who slept at the Healdsburg center. She fled her house on Moody Lane in Geyserville, which was in a power outage area, and she said she didn’t receive any electronic notification of the evacuation.

“The Fire Department came and said we had to leave,” she said.

Whitehall grabbed a change of clothes, dog food, a couple of gallons of water and her corgi mix, Zoey, before going outside with her sister and brother-in-law, who live with her. She saw the fire raging a short distance away on a hill next to the River Rock Casino.

“We could see the flames once we got outside,” said Whitehall, still wearing her pajamas. “I just thought, ‘Here we go again.’

“I guess I should’ve had a bag packed ahead already,” she said, adding, “I am a California girl. Earthquakes, fires, it’s all part of the seasons.”

Karen Vaughan, 56, an Oklahoma native who owns a small travel company and moved to Healdsburg six months ago, said she saw a wall of flames and freaked out, but nobody else in her neighborhood seemed to be bothered. There was an evacuation warning, a step below mandatory-evacuation status, for the northern part of the city.

“I was sitting on my balcony and I looked out and I saw the whole mountainside on fire,” Vaughan said. “It looked like it was coming toward me.”

She rushed to a neighbor’s house, woke her up and tried to get her to leave.

“I said, ‘There’s a big wall of fire,’ and she said, ‘No, I’m staying.’”

Vaughan hopped into her car and drove to the Windsor High School evacuation center.

“I think people are numb and they’re used to it,” she said. “It’s scary is all I can say, and I’m not a fearful person. It looked close, and these fires move quickly.”

Healdsburg Mayor David Hagele said fire is now a yearly trauma.

“This is the new normal that we live in. It’s disheartening and it’s scary for a lot of people because it does bring back a lot of scary memories from a couple of years ago,” Hagele said. “We’re trying to do what we can to help our neighbors to the north.”

Strong winds and warm temperatures spurred the fire into the morning. By 5 a.m., temperatures at the Santa Rosa Airport had reached 77 degrees with 11% humidity, according to the National Weather Service. Winds gusted up to 45 mph in Sonoma County, with calmer conditions expected starting around 10 a.m.

The conditions were nearly the same as when the Tubbs Fire tore through Napa and Sonoma counties two years ago, said meteorologist Ryan Walbrun.

“Pretty much everything lined up: strong winds, dry fuels, hot temperatures and low humidity,” he said. “This is what can happen.”

In a statement, PG&E officials said Wednesday the decision to power down “was based on forecasts of dry, hot and windy weather that poses a higher risk for damage and sparks on the electric system and rapid wildfire spread.”

More planned outages could come this weekend.

PG&E Chief Meterorologist Scott Strenfel said this weekend “could bring the strongest wind event of the season” — even stronger than the winds experienced during the 2017 Wine Country fires.

David Huebel, 40, works as a vineyard manager at Hafner Vineyard, which is seven miles outside of Healdsburg. The property was hit by PG&E’s power shut-off Wednesday afternoon, and at first Huebel was worried only about how the family-run vineyard would finish harvesting its Cabernet Sauvignon.

Then, around 9:35 p.m., Huebel stepped outside to turn off his generator, looked toward the Mayacamas Mountains and saw a faint glow.

“I was asking myself, ‘Is that fire?’” Huebel said. “Everything about the scene was wrong. There shouldn’t have been light right there, it shouldn’t have been orange. It was a couple minutes later I saw a column of smoke. We watched it grow for more than two hours before we left.”

Huebel watched the Tubbs Fire burn across Sonoma County in 2017, from Calistoga to Santa Rosa. The strange light that flickered in the hills never seemed to end. He quickly called his neighbors, alerting them to the new fire.

When the evacuation order for Red Winery Road came at 12:32 a.m., Huebel didn’t hesitate. He left with his wife and two children, 11 and 18.

“Here we go,” he remembers thinking, “this one is too close.”

San Francisco Chronicle staff writers Lauren Hernández and J.D. Morris contributed to this report.

Peter Fimrite, Megan Cassidy, Matthias Gafni and Jill Tucker are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers. Email: pfrimrite@sfchronicle.com, megan.cassidy@sfchronicle.com, matthias.gafni@sfchronicle.com, jtucker@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @pfimrite @meganrcassidy @mgafni @JillTucker

Source Article from https://www.sfchronicle.com/california-wildfires/article/Fire-breaks-out-in-northern-Sonoma-County-near-14558358.php

LIVE UPDATES

This is CNBC’s live blog tracking developments on the war in Ukraine. See below for the latest updates. 

Russia has been forced to move “depleted and disparate” forces to eastern Ukraine, according to the latest intelligence report from the U.K. Defense Ministry on Saturday.

The U.K. said that “many of these units are likely suffering from weakened morale.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s deputy agriculture minister Taras Vysotskiy said Russia has stolen “several hundred thousand tonnes” of grain that farmers had stored in the country, and a group of civilians were evacuated from a besieged steel plant in Mariupol.

The West braces for Russia’s next moves as Ukraine war enters a new phase

The war in Ukraine appears to be entering a new phase after Russia ramped up its threats this week, NBC News reports, with analysts saying that both sides seem prepared for prolonged conflict that could extend beyond the battlefield.

Moscow has escalated a slew of threats, including warnings of nuclear confrontation, energy crises and invasions of new territories. Meanwhile, the U.S. and its allies are preparing new shipments of heavy weapons and military equipment to aid Ukraine.

Earlier this week, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin told reporters after a trip to Kyiv that the U.S. wants to see Russia military weakened to the extent that it can’t do things like invade Ukraine. And on Thursday, President Joe Biden requested Congress to provide $33 billion to Ukraine, including $20 billion for military equipment and assistance.

Read the full NBC News report.

Emma Newburger

UK PM Johnson tells Zelenskyy he is more committed than ever to reinforcing Ukraine

U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a phone call that he is more committed than ever to reinforcing Ukraine and “ensuring Putin fails,” according to a Downing Street statement. It also confirmed that the U.K. will continue to provide additional military aid to Ukrainians.

Johnson also offered Britain’s continued economic and humanitarian support to Ukraine, the statement said.

The leaders also discussed progress of the effort to evacuate the southern city of Mariupol and agreed to remain in close contact on next steps.

— Emma Newburger

Ukraine says 20 civilians evacuated from besieged Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol

A Ukrainian commander said 20 civilians were evacuated Saturday from the Azovstal steel plant in the besieged city of Mariupol, according to a video posted to Telegram and translated by NBC News.

Earlier in the day, Russian state media had reported that 25 civilians were evacuated from the plant. CNBC could not independently confirm either claim.

In recent weeks, Russian forces had all but surrounded the strategic coastal town of Mariupol making the steel facility the city’s last stronghold.

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he personally requested that Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov coordinate an evacuation for civilians trapped in the steel facility during in-person talks in Moscow last week. Following discussions in Moscow, Guterres traveled to Kyiv to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

— Amanda Macias

Ukraine says Russian strike knocks out runway at Odesa airport

A Russian missile strike at the airport in the southwestern port of Odesa — a city that has so far been relatively unscathed in the war — has damaged the runway, and it can no longer be used, the Ukrainian military said on Saturday.

Russia has sporadically targeted Odesa, a Black Sea port, and a week ago, Ukraine said at least eight people were killed in a strike on the city.

“As a result of a missile attack in the Odesa region, the runway at Odesa airport was damaged. Its further use is impossible,” the Ukrainian military said.

There was no immediate word on the strike from the Russian military.

— Reuters

Warren Buffett says there ‘isn’t any solution’ for nuclear war

At the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting on Saturday, Warren Buffett and his executive team were asked about the impact of a potential nuclear war on the conglomerate company.

The 91-year old investor said that the world has been testing its luck since the 1940s with potential global devastation.

“The world is flipping a coin every day as to whether people who can literally destroy the planet as we know it will do it. And, unfortunately, the major problem is with people who have large stocks of nuclear weapons and ICBMs,” Buffett said.

Without referencing the Russia-Ukraine war specifically, Buffett expressed confusion that a country would consider using nuclear weapons in limited fashion “because they are losing a war.”

“If somebody’s willing to kill hundreds of thousands of people … why would they stop?” Buffett said.

As for the business impact, Buffett downplayed the idea that the company could plan to limit the impact of such an event.

“We have no solution for it, and there isn’t any solution for it,” Buffett said.

— Jesse Pound

Bodies of 3 more tortured men found in Bucha, police say

Another mass grave has been found in the Kyiv suburb of Bucha, the scene of alleged mass executions of civilians before its recapture by Ukrainian forces in early March, the head of Kyiv’s regional police force said.

“On April 29, a pit with the bodies of three men was found in the Bucha district,” regional police chief Andriy Nebytov wrote on Facebook. “The victims were tortured for a lengthy period of time. Bullet wounds were found on the extremities of their bodies. In the end, each of the men was shot through the ear.”

“This is another mass burial made by the occupiers in the Bucha district, the long-suffering district where more than a thousand civilians have been killed and tortured,” Nebytov added.

According to Nebytov’s post, the burial site was found in the forest near the village of Myrotske, 6 miles northwest of the town of Bucha. Nebytov said the three bodies were being sent for a forensic examination, following a preliminary inspection by the Kyiv regional police.

— Associated Press

Russian non-proliferation official talks down nuclear threat

Earlier this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the West should not underestimate the elevated risks of nuclear conflict over Ukraine. On Saturday, a top Russian non-proliferation official made less threatening comments.

Vladimir Yermakov, the Russian foreign ministry’s head of nuclear non-proliferation, told the Russian government-controlled TASS news agency that all nuclear powers must stick to the logic laid out in official documents aimed at preventing nuclear war, and Russia believes the risks of nuclear war should be kept to a minimum and that any armed conflict between nuclear powers should be prevented.

The United States government had said after Lavrov’s comments that it did not believe there was a threat of Russia using nuclear weapons despite an escalation in Moscow’s rhetoric. 

Yermakov on Saturday referred in his comments to a joint statement published in January by Russia, China, Britain, the United States and France, in which the five countries — permanent members of the United Nations Security Council — agreed that the further spread of nuclear arms and a nuclear war should be avoided.

“The risks of nuclear war, which should never be unleashed, must be kept to a minimum, in particular through preventing any armed conflict between nuclear powers,” TASS quoted Yermakov as saying on Saturday. “Russia clearly follows this understanding.”

Reuters

Ukrainian official says more prisoners swapped with Russia

Seven Ukrainian soldiers and seven civilians have been released in a prisoner swap Saturday with Russia, according to social media posts from Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Iryna Vereshchuk.

“We’re bringing home 14 of our people: seven military personnel and seven civilians,” Vereshchuk wrote on Facebook and Telegram. “To me, this exchange is special: one of the female soldiers is five months pregnant.”

Earlier this week, Vereshchuk said Russia had handed over 33 Ukrainian soldiers, including 13 officers, in an exchange of prisoners of war.

Vereshchuk did not say how many Russians were involved in the exchanges. As of Saturday afternoon, the most recent swap had not been confirmed by official Russian sources.

Associated Press

Angelina Jolie visiting children in Ukraine

Angelina Jolie is visiting Ukraine to meet children affected by the war and the organizations providing them aid, a spokesperson for the actress and humanitarian told NBC News.

Jolie is calling for an opening of humanitarian corridors to allow for the evacuation of civilians and the ability to deliver humanitarian relief in conflict zones. Ukraine has struggled to open safe corridors for people seeking to flee increasingly dangerous conditions, saying that Russia is making it impossible.

“The purpose of Angelina’s visit is to bear witness to the human impact of the conflict, and to support the civilian population. She met with orphaned and displaced children – including children evacuated from Mariupol – and Ukrainian volunteers and doctors caring for them, as well as local NGOs working on civilian protection,” the spokesperson said.

The visit is being carried out in a private humanitarian capacity, the spokesperson said.

—Jessica Bursztynsky

Ukraine agriculture officials say Russian forces ramped up grain theft in April

Russian forces have ramped up grain theft in areas of Ukraine they invaded and now occupy, according to agriculture officials in the nation under siege.

The Kremlin has denied Ukraine’s account of the matter, saying it did not know where that information was coming from.

Ukraine’s deputy agriculture minister Taras Vysotskiy said on national TV in Ukraine that Russia has already stolen “several hundred thousand tonnes” of 1.5 million tonnes of grain farmers had stored in the country.

Agriculture minister Mykola Solskyi said the grain theft had increased in April, and could comprise a threat to global food security while creating food insecurity in parts of Ukraine that are not controlled by Russia.

Reuters

A look at the mounting damage from the Kremlin’s war — and its cost

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor said there are ways under existing law to get Russian President Vladimir Putin to pay reparations for the Kremlin’s ongoing war in Ukraine.

“One way is we say we will only return the central bank reserves when you put $200 billion into a reconstruction fund and until you do, we keep these $300 billion,” Taylor explained to an audience of international lawyers gathered at the American Bar Association’s annual conference in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

Taylor, the vice president of the Russia and Europe unit at the U.S. Institute of Peace, said that the U.S. and other nations are currently assessing ways in which to change legislation to further hold the Kremlin to account.

Last month, Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal projected that his country would need at least $575 billion to physically rebuild what Russian forces destroyed in just three weeks. Shmyhal’s estimate did not include compensation for deaths and injuries.

After nine weeks of war and failed peace talks, the damage from the Kremlin’s war is mounting. Here is a further look at the devastation.

 — Amanda Macias, Adam Jeffery and Getty Images

Macron pledges ongoing assistance to Ukraine in his second term

French President Emmanuel Macron told Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that he intends to work with allies to “re-establish the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine,” during his second term, according to the presidential Elysee Palace.

Before his re-election last week, Macron held multiple conversations with Zelenskyy and Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

Zelenskyy and Macron spoke again for an hour on Saturday with the French president committing to send more humanitarian assistance and military supplies to aid the nation under siege.

France has already sent 615 tons of equipment and aid to Ukraine, including generators for hospitals, ambulances and food. Macron also recently revealed that France sent anti-tank missiles and truck-mounted cannons, as well as other “consequential equipment” to aid Ukraine.

Associated Press

Russian central bank expects economy to shrink by 8% to 10%

The Russian central bank projected that the economy would shrink by 8% to 10% this year.

The central bank said it cut its key interest rate to 14% and discussed the possibility of lowering rates further in 2022.

“The external environment for the Russian economy remains challenging,” the bank said in a Friday statement. The bank added that it was prepared to step in further to prevent inflation from spiking.

“The current situation is extremely uncertain,” Central Bank of Russia Governor Elvira Nabiullina was quoted as saying by Reuters at a news conference Friday. She downplayed concerns of a sovereign default but acknowledged “difficulties with payments,” according to Russian-state-owned news agency TASS. “I hope that all this will end up successfully,” she added.

Read more on the economic fallout facing Russia.

— Amanda Macias

Zelenskyy says gas prices rising across Ukraine as Russia targets infrastructure

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russia’s attacks on its energy infrastructure have led to “queues and rising prices at gas stations” in many regions of the country, but Ukraine will soon stamp out the fuel shortages.

This week, Russia struck Ukraine’s main fuel producer, the Kremenchuk oil refinery, among other energy infrastructure targets.

“The occupiers are deliberately destroying the infrastructure for the production, supply and storage of fuel,” Zelenskyy said in a nightly video speech on Friday.

While he promised a fix for the energy supply issues, he indicated it won’t be immediate.

“Russia has also blocked our ports, so there are no immediate solutions to replenish the deficit,” Zelenskyy said.

Reuters

EU will reportedly propose a ban on Russian oil

The European Union plans to propose a ban on Russian oil, according to Bloomberg News. Restrictions would be introduced gradually before going into full effect by the end of the year, the outlet said.

A decision on the sanctions could be made as soon as next week, Bloomberg reported. All 27 member states must back the measure to be adopted.

An oil embargo would likely up the ante against Russia. The EU, looking to pressure Putin to stop the war on Ukraine, is the largest consumer of Russian crude and fuel, Bloomberg reported.

Read the full Bloomberg News report here.

— Jessica Bursztynsky

Wives of Mariupol defenders appeal for soldiers’ evacuation

Two Ukrainian women whose husbands are defending a besieged steel plant in the southern city of Mariupol are calling for any evacuation of civilians to also include soldiers, saying they fear the troops will be tortured and killed if left behind and captured by Russian forces.

“The lives of soldiers matter too. We can’t only talk about civilians,” said Yuliia Fedusiuk, 29, the wife of Arseniy Fedusiuk, a member of the Azov Regiment in Mariupol.

She and Kateryna Prokopenko, whose husband, Denys Prokopenko, is the Azov commander, made their appeal in Rome on Friday for international assistance to evacuate the Azovstal plant, the last stronghold of Ukrainian resistance in the strategic and now bombed-out port city.

An estimated 2,000 Ukrainian defenders and 1,000 civilians are holed up in the plant’s vast underground network of bunkers, which are able to withstand airstrikes. But conditions there have grown more dire, with food, water and medicine running out, after Russian forces dropped “bunker busters” and other munitions in recent days.

The United Nations has said Secretary-General António Guterres and Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed on arranging evacuations from the plant during a meeting this week in Moscow, with the U.N. and International Committee of the Red Cross involved. But the discussions as reported by the U.N. concerned civilians, not combatants.

Associated Press

More than a dozen U.S. military flights of security assistance for Ukraine set to arrive

More than a dozen U.S. military cargo flights carrying security assistance for Ukraine are expected to arrive in the region on Saturday.

A senior U.S. Defense official said Phoenix ghost drones, radars and additional artillery rounds were some of the types of military aid on the flights.

The official who spoke on the condition of anonymity, a ground-rule established by the Pentagon, said that U.S. military cargo flights that arrived on Friday carried equipment including small-caliber rounds, 122mm rockets, helmets and body armor.

From heavy artillery to tactical drones to armored vehicles, the U.S. has provided $3.4 billion in weapons to Ukraine since Russia’s invasion two months ago.

Read more about the weapons the U.S. has committed to the fight thus far.

— Amanda Macias

Russia’s foreign minister claims 1 million people evacuated from Ukraine

Russia’s foreign minister says Moscow has evacuated over 1 million people from Ukraine since the war there began.

The comments Saturday by Sergey Lavrov in an interview with Chinese state news agency Xinhua come as Ukraine has accused Moscow of forcefully sending Ukrainians out of the country. Lavrov said that figure included more than 300 Chinese civilians.

Lavrov offered no evidence to support his claim in the interview.

Lavrov also said that negotiations continue between Russia and Ukraine “almost every day.” However, he cautioned that “progress has not been easy.”

Lavrov in part blamed “the bellicose rhetoric and inflammatory actions of Western supporters of the Kyiv regime” for disrupting the talks. However, Russian state TV nightly has had guests suggest that Moscow use nuclear weapons in the conflict.

Associated Press

Lavrov claims West will fight until ‘the last Ukrainian’

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov made another string of assertions in an interview with Chinese state media agency Xinhua, published Saturday morning.

Lavrov claimed that NATO was interfering with a political settlement in Ukraine and that the West intended to fight until “the last Ukrainian,” according to an NBC News translation.

He also claimed the Ukraine conflict “contributes to the process of freeing the world from the neo-colonial oppression of the West.”

—Matt Clinch

‘We will not give up’: UN chief tells Ukrainians

The United Nations will not give up, but will “redouble its efforts to save lives and reduce human suffering,” Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a Twitter post on Friday.

The UN chief said he was “moved by the resilience and bravery of the people of Ukraine. My message to them is simple: We will not give up.”

“In this war, as in all wars, the civilians always pay the highest price,” he said.

Guterres has just returned from the war-torn country, where he visited the Kyiv suburbs of Borodianka, Bucha and Irpin nine weeks after Russia began its illegal and unprovoked war.

“When we see this horrendous site, it makes me feel how important it is [to have] a thorough investigation and accountability,” he said Thursday, when he was in Bucha — where horrific photos of mass graves and executed civilians strewn in the streets sparked global outrage.

“The war is an absurdity in the 21st century. The war is evil,” he said during his visit to Ukraine, where he also met President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Joanna Tan

Russia has been forced to merge ‘depleted and disparate’ forces in Ukraine, UK says

Russia continues to face “considerable challenges” in its war against Ukraine, the U.K. Defence Ministry said.

“It has been forced to merge and redeploy depleted and disparate units from the failed advances in north-east Ukraine. Many of these units are likely suffering from weakened morale,” the ministry said on Twitter.

“Shortcomings in Russian tactical co-ordination remain. A lack of unit-level skills and inconsistent air support have left Russia unable to fully leverage its combat mass, despite localised improvements,” said the latest British intelligence report.

In a bid to fix problems that have constrained its advances, Moscow is trying to concentrate combat power geographically, shorten its supply lines and simplify command and control, the report said.

Joanna Tan

U.S. and Canadian troops are training Ukrainian soldiers in Europe, Pentagon says

U.S. troops in Germany have started training Ukrainian soldiers on the use of heavy weapons to defend their country against Russian attacks, the Pentagon said Friday.

“These efforts build on the initial artillery training that Ukraine’s forces already have received elsewhere and also includes training on radar systems and armored vehicles that have been recently announced as part of security assistance packages,” Press Secretary John F. Kirby said.

This week, President Joe Biden called on Congress to authorize as much as $33 billion in humanitarian and military aid to Kyiv in its fight against Moscow’s attacks.

Canada has given heavy artillery to Ukrainian forces, including M-777 howitzers and anti-armor ammunition, the Canadian government said last week.

Canadian service members are training Ukrainians on the M-777 howitzer in Europe, Kirby added, citing Canadian Defense Minister Anita Anand.

Joanna Tan

Russia says it’s not at war with NATO, blames alliance for war in Ukraine

Russia’s foreign minister says Moscow does not consider itself at war with NATO.

In an interview with Saudi Arabia’s Al-Arabiya TV channel, Sergei Lavrov said: “Unfortunately, NATO, it seems, considers itself to be at war with Russia.”

“NATO and European Union leaders, many of them, in England, in the United States, Poland, France, Germany and of course European Union chief diplomat Josep Borrell, they bluntly, publicly and consistently say, ‘Putin must fail, Russia must be defeated,'” he told the network.

“When you use this terminology,” he said, “I believe you think that you are at war with the person who you want to be defeated.”

Lavrov — who has been sanctioned by the U.S., U.K. and Europe for his role in the war — reportedly said his country’s “special operation” in Ukraine is “a response to what NATO was doing in Ukraine to prepare this country for a very aggressive posture against the Russian Federation.”

He told Al-Arabiya that Ukraine was given arms that can reach Russian territory, and that military bases were being built, including on the Sea of Azov — where the battle for the besieged port city of Mariupol continues today.

Russian forces have largely destroyed the city of Mariupol, though Moscow falsely claims that it doesn’t target civilian areas.

Lavrov claimed many military exercises held on Ukrainian territory “were conducted under NATO auspices, and most of these exercises were designed against the [interests] of the Russian Federation, so the purpose of this operation is to make sure that those plans do not materialize.”

Joanna Tan

Read CNBC’s previous live coverage here:

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/30/russia-ukraine-live-updates.html

Nikole Hannah-Jones accepting a Peabody Award in May 2016.

Mike Coppola/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mike Coppola/Getty Images

Nikole Hannah-Jones accepting a Peabody Award in May 2016.

Mike Coppola/Getty Images

Trustees for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill voted Wednesday afternoon at a closed session to give tenure to star New York Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones, several months after refusing to consider her proposed tenure.

The case inspired a bruising debate over race, journalism and academic freedom. It led both to national headlines and anger and distress among many Black faculty members and students at UNC. Some professors there have publicly said they were reconsidering their willingness to remain at the university over the journalist’s treatment by the university..

“We welcome Nikole Hannah-Jones back to campus,” the UNC’s board chairman, Richard Stevens, said at the close of statements after the three-hour special session of the trustees. “Our university is not a place to cancel people. Our university is better than that. Our nation is better than that.

“We embrace and endorse academic freedom and vigorous debate and constructive disagreement,” Stevens said. He also said the campus was not a place for calling people “woke” or “racist.” The trustees, he said, had to endure terrible insults but could not respond for privacy reasons involving the decision.

The dean of the UNC School of Journalism and Media, Susan King, said in a statement that she was heartened by the outcome.

“It has taken longer than I imagined, but I am deeply appreciative that the board has voted in favor of our school’s recommendation,” she wrote. “I knew that when the board reviewed her tenure dossier and realized the strength of her teaching, service and professional vision they would be moved to grant tenure.”

Protesters had demonstrated at the Carolina Inn on Wednesday afternoon, where the meeting was held, and were confronted inside before its start by campus police. They relented, heading outside, after being informed that Hannah-Jones had asked for a private meeting.

Months earlier, board members asked for more information about her credentials when originally declining to take up her proposed tenure. However, it soon became clear that opposition had focused on her work on “the 1619 Project,” a New York Times initiative she conceived on the legacy of slavery on U.S. society today.

Opposition came from a donor

Some of that opposition came from Walter Hussman, a UNC donor and Arkansas newspaper publisher whose name adorns UNC’s journalism school. Hussman, who is also an alumnus, told NPR he was given pause by criticism of prominent scholars that Hannah-Jones distorted the historical record in arguing that the protection of slavery was one of the primary motivations of the Founding Fathers in seeking independence from the British. (Hannah-Jones has recently tweeted that she will be able to back up that contention in her forthcoming book.)

He spoke to a trustee and administrators about his concerns, while saying it is the university’s choice to make.

Predecessors got tenure

Hannah-Jones was up for a professorship endowed by the Knight Foundation; several predecessors in the professorship were granted tenure while, like Hannah-Jones, also lacking a doctorate. Tenure is the promise of near-certain lifetime employment as a professor, barring misdeeds or dereliction of professional obligations. It is intended to ensure academic freedom for scholars to explore ideas and inquiry independent of public or political pressure.

It is highly unusual for a distinguished university’s trustees to turn down a professor for tenure once it has been backed by the relevant department’s faculty, chairman, the dean, and the provost, or chief academic officer. It is seen as interfering in the academic operation of the campus. Dean King had offered a Hannah-Jones a five-year contract to teach and said she intended to continue to seek the trustees’ approval for tenure.

Hannah-Jones is recipient of MacArthur genius grant

Hannah-Jones has won some of the most prestigious awards in journalism, and more. She won a MacArthur “genius grant” for her reporting on the persistence of segregation in American life. She won a Pulitzer Prize for her essay accompanying “the 1619 Project.”

Hannah-Jones also won a Peabody award for a three-part project for This American Life on racially segregated schools in contemporary America. She also won a national magazine award. She earned a master’s degree from the school itself in 2003. A former reporter for the News and Observer in nearby Raleigh, Hannah-Jones was also a reporter for the Portland Oregonian and the investigative outlet ProPublica.

Earlier this month, Hannah-Jones announced she would not accept the offer and would consider suing the university if it failed to give her tenure.

Hussman argued against her credentials by saying she was helping to erode trust in the press by ignoring important journalistic principles of objectivity – the idea that reporters should not take sides.

“I worry that we’re moving away from those time-tested principles of journalism that we had in the 20th century that were so effective at engendering tremendous trust in the media,” Hussman told NPR. He reiterated, however, his pledge of $25 million to the journalism school was not contingent on UNC’s vote on Hannah-Jones’s tenure, and that it was the university’s decision to make.

In a separate interview with NPR, Hannah-Jones said the promise of objectivity is a subterfuge.

“Most mainstream newspapers reflect power,” she said. “They don’t actually reflect the experiences of large segments of these populations, and that’s why many of these populations don’t trust them. So when I hear that, I think he’s speaking to a different audience.”

King has argued that Hannah-Jones’ intensive interests in reporting on race and society spoke to the moment and would enhance student experience. “She is a journalist’s journalist, a teacher’s teacher and a woman of substance with a voice of consequence,” King said Wednesday. “Hannah-Jones will make our school better with her presence. She will deepen the University’s commitment to intellectual integrity and to access for all.”

At 6:36p.m., about a half-hour after the announcement, Hannah-Jones posted a photo of herself on Twitter holding what appeared to be a celebratory glass of whiskey or bourbon. It had been mostly consumed.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/06/30/1011880598/after-contentious-debate-unc-grants-tenure-to-nikole-hannah-jones

President Donald Trump is now blaming Democrats for the deaths of two migrant children who died in federal custody earlier this month.

In his first public comment on the two tragedies Saturday, Trump tied the deaths to the political impasse over funding for the federal government, saying in a series of tweets that Democrats are to blame for refusing his $5-billion pet project to build new walls along the southern border.

The two young children died in Border Patrol custody over the span of just a few weeks. The latest was an eight-year-old from Guatemala who died on Christmas Eve. Medical examiners say the boy, Felipe Gomez Alonzo, tested positive for influenza. Weeks earlier, seven-year-old Jakelin Caal Maquin, died of dehydration after being detained in New Mexico with her father.

Trump’s comments come as Department of Homeland Security Sec. Kirstjen Nielsen finishes up a two-day tour of the border to inspect the conditions at processing and detention facilities for migrants in both El Paso, Texas and Yuma, Arizona.

Already Border Patrol has moved to step up medical screenings for children since the two deaths.

And amid the growing scrutiny, CBP has also shifted its policy of holding families until Immigration and Customs Enforcement takes over custody, as Vox’s Dara Lind reports. The new plan allows agents at the border to release families directly if they’ve been held for more than a few days, which could leave hundreds of families dropped around El Paso and around the Rio Grande Valley.

Deaths along the border have been a problem for a long time

The tragedy of the two children’s deaths only amplifies what has been true along the border for a long time: The journeys that families take are often extremely dangerous, and deaths along the border are not at all uncommon.

By official counts, more than 7,000 migrants have died trying to cross the southwest border since 1998, but it’s likely those statistics are dramatically lower than the reality.

And for years, advocates have complained of the conditions at Border Patrol facilities, where they say migrants are forced into excessively cold holding cells. In the last year alone, six adults have died in Border Patrol custody, the Washington Post report.

But as Lind notes, the two children’s deaths are the latest signal that the immigration system isn’t designed to deal with families crossing into the US:

That goes double for Customs and Border Protection, which oversees Border Patrol as well as ports of entry. CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan told the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month that “the infrastructure is not compatible with the reality” of who is getting apprehended — essentially admitting that his agency was ill-equipped to take care of the people currently entering the US.

Administration officials, as well as the president’s allies, have meanwhile tried to spin the sting of deaths as fairly a rare occurrence. DHS counters that before the two migrant deaths this month, no child has died in Border Patrol custody in nearly a decade. On Fox News Friday, Rep. Peter King (R-NY) went as far as praising ICE for its treatment of immigrants.

”These are the only two children that have died, certainly in recent memory,” he said. “Considering what does happen in housing projects … I think ICE has an excellent record.”

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2018/12/29/18160522/trump-migrant-children-deaths-border-wall-impasse

The special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election has been a uniquely stupid chapter in news media history.

Newsrooms got some of it right. They also got a lot wrong.

One of the worst aspects of the press’ two-year-long exercise in speculation and rumormongering was social media, particularly Twitter, which provided reporters and political commentators with public platforms to spout off half-cocked for every new allegation and detail regarding the investigation. It’s almost as if these people have never heard the phrase “wait and see.”

And now that the investigation has concluded, we can truly appreciate the absurdity of some of these by-the-minute takes from the people who pretended to understand what was happening.

Washington Post columnist Max Boot, for example, went out on a limb on March 28 when he asked (with a straight face, I presume) how Attorney General William Barr and his team of legal professionals could have possibly read and understood the 400-plus-page Mueller report in less than 48 hours, as the Justice Department claimed.

Funnily enough, the following tweet also comes from Boot, who apparently was able to do all by his lonesome self what he could not comprehend from the Justice Department.

“Having read the Mueller report, I can see why Trump was so eager to discredit the investigators – and why Barr felt compelled to spin in advance. And it’s not because the report proves ‘No Collusion – No Obstruction!’ It proves the very opposite,” he claimed less than 12 hours after the report was released to the public.

Call me a cynic, but my guess here is that Boot’s real position is the opposite of whatever benefits the Trump administration.

Speaking of “whatever it is, I’m against it,” let us also consider freelance journalist and New York Times contributor Jared Yates Sexton, who once wrote a sort of winding paean to Mueller in 2017.

“Important to remember: Robert Mueller is an independent special prosecutor tasked with investigating possible collusion. He is not a partisan tasked with destroying Trump. That’s what conservatives want people to believe,” he wrote. “Do not fall into the trap of talking about this in the terms conservatives want you to. This is as much a PR battle as a legal one.”

“The battle Republicans want here is to define it as a partisan witch hunt. It’s not, at all. But words and tone matter,” Yates concluded. “If Mueller didn’t find evidence, he’d walk away. His job isn’t to invent or distort. This seems obvious, but is massively important.”

On April 18, just hours after the report’s release, Sexton then tweeted:

As it turns out, “wait and see” is a good rule to live by precisely because it saves you from publicly repudiating yourself. It saves you from having the general public realize that even you don’t pay attention to what you say. It also saves you from looking like a partisan hack.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-russian-collusion-story-is-a-reminder-of-why-media-should-wait-and-see


<!–

–>

var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ’61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127′,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127’,
width: 202, height: 137, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

1. GM deja Venezuela luego de que le confiscaron una planta

La automotríz, General Motors cesó sus operaciones en Venezuela y despidió a 2,678 empleados luego de que el gobierno le confiscó una planta dentro del país.
El día de ayer la fabrica fue inesperadamente tomada por las autoridades venezolanas, que impidieron que siguiera operando con normalidad, aseguró Julia Bastos, portavoz de GM en Brasil, en un correo electrónico este jueves.
Otros activos de la compañía, como vehículos, fueron ilegalmente retirados de las instalaciones

2. El 2018, determinante para el futuro de México, dice Lagarde

El años que viene será el decisivo para México con dos eventos determinantes para su futuro, a los que estará atento del Fondo Monetario Internacional: la posible renegociación del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte y las elecciones, comentó la directora gerente del organismo, Christine Lagarde.
Lo que más le interesa en estos momentos al organismo sobre México es la discusión de si se renegociará el TLCAN, cómo se renegociará y cómo le afectará, porque realmente es un asunto crítico para el país.
Al participar en uno de los seminarios previos a las Reuniones de Primavera del FMI y el Banco Mundial, la funcionaria dijo que México se tiene que analizar un poco aparte de los demás países de América Latina, porque está en medio de las dos regiones.

3. La máquina viral de BuzzFeed abre oficina de noticias en México

BuzzFeed anunció su nueva unidad de noticias en México bajo la dirección de Rafael Cabrera, uno de los periodistas que revelaron la existencia de la llamada Casa Blanca de la primera dama Angélica Rivera.
La unidad comenzó operaciones a un año de las elecciones presidenciales de 2018, que este medio digital de origen estadounidense espera cubrir con rigor y sin presiones comerciales. BuzzFeed es más conocido por sus noticias virales y sus contenidos de listas numeradas, pero también es el medio que tuvo una entrevista exclusiva con Barack Obama en 2015 y que entre sus reporteros cuenta con ganadores de premios Pulitzer.

4. Recursos a los estados, con el mayor crecimiento

Las participaciones federales registraron recursos por 136,434.3 millones de pesos durante los dos primeros meses del 2017, lo que representó un crecimiento anual real de 19.4%, de acuerdo con datos de la Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público.
En los últimos siete años, esta es la variación más elevada considerando sólo el primer bimestre; además, este aumento rompió la tendencia de dos caídas consecutivas previas. Por monto, fue el mayor nivel observado.
De 13 fondos que componen las participaciones federales, los que mostraron mayores incrementos anuales reales fueron: Municipal (23.3%), 0.136% de la Recaudación Federal Participable (23.3%), General (23.2%), IEPS (23.2%) e Incentivos Económicos (20.4 por ciento).

5. Hermanos de leche

Un cartón de Perujo

@davee_son

javier.cisneros@eleconmista.mx



var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
$(“#tecmon”).attr(“style”, “width:516px !important;height:194px;overflow:hidden;float:right;margin-bottom:-10px”);
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ‘bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
width: 516, height: 185, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/04/20/5-noticias-dia-20-abirl