Most Viewed Videos

Search and Rescue teams look for possible survivors in the partially collapsed 12-story Champlain Towers South condo building on June 29, in Surfside, Florida. Chandan Khanna/AFP/Getty Images

Rescue teams are entering their seventh day searching the rubble of a collapsed building in Surfside, Florida – still holding out hope they will find the 149 people unaccounted for.

The condo building, Champlain Towers South, partially collapsed in the middle of the night Thursday as many residents slept. Currently, 125 people have been accounted for and 12 have been confirmed dead.

US and international teams are looking for bedrooms buried under 13 to16 feet of concrete, Col. Golan Vach, commander of the Israeli National Rescue Unit said.

“There is still hope,” Vach told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “Until one week, I have a solid hope that we will find someone. After one week, it’s minor.”

Alarcon said he has no idea how long the rescue and recovery efforts will go on, especially seeing as the round-the-clock work has barely scratched the surface of removing the debris. But he said the crews were motivated by understanding the perspective of the families.

“What would I do? How hard are we going to work to save our family members if something like this were to happen?” he told CNN’s Anderson Cooper. “I just want (the families) to know that we’re doing everything we can.”

And many in the community are looking for ways they can help those impacted as well.

Surfside Mayor Charles Burkett said that over $1.9 million has been raised to help those affected as of Tuesday, and some of those donations made to SupportSurfside.org have already been distributed to at least a dozen families in need and a handful of nonprofits.

The building’s tennis center has been transformed. Now, it functions as a respite for the first responders, and the walls are adorned with flowers and photos memorializing those who are unaccounted for and the 12 who have died.

Laura Hernandez, a babysitter, used to spend hours on that court with Graciela Cattarossi while her daughter, Stella, played with the children Henandez babysat, she told CNN affiliate WSVN. Both, along with Graciela’s parents and sister, have been reported missing.

“In September I’m going to go back with the kids, but Stella and Grace are not going to be there. It makes my heart break,” Hernandez told the station.

Those who survived the collapse have told harrowing stories of their escapes.

Iliana Monteagudo, 64, woke up in the middle of the night Thursday to a strange sound. Then, she saw a crack snaking down her wall.

Barefoot, she ran from her sixth floor unit down the stairs, hearing thunderous noises and climbing over several walls as she raced toward safety, according to CNN affiliate WPLG.

“I start going down, fast, and I hear crack, crack, crack,” she said. “I start to scream, ‘Come on God, I want to see my son, I want to see my grandson. Don’t let me die in this condition.'”

Once outside she called her son to say she was OK, but that the building behind her had collapsed.

“Three seconds separate me, the life to the death. Three seconds,” she told the station.

Sara Nir’s daughter had gone to take a shower and her son was keeping busy when Nir heard what sounded like construction noises around 1:10 a.m. She went to talk to the security guard about the noise in the night but was interrupted by a big boom and the garage collapsing.

She ran back to grab her family, she told CNN, and together they escaped. Two loud booming noises later and all they could see were white clouds from the dust.

Esther Gorfinkel, 88, was carried out of the building by neighbors as she headed slowly down the staircase.

When she told Albert Aguero, a man who carried her, that she lived a good 88 years and didn’t need to be rescued, he told her “No, you’re going to make it to your 89th birthday,” Aguero told CNN affiliate WPLG.

“I saw the sky. I knew I will be safe,” Gorfinkel said.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/miami-florida-building-collapse-06-30-21/h_195b145db7732da9d736d280b90a0ec9

Se viven días agitados en la redacción de la Revista Noticias después de que el newsmagazine publicara la nómina completa de agentes de la nueva Agencia Federal de Inteligencia (AFI), el organismo que debe reemplazar a la Secretaría de Inteligencia tras la llamada “guerra de espías”.

Es que incluso antes de salir a la calle, la Editorial Perfil ya recibía intimaciones legales para retirar el número de circulación, alegando un delito que podría enviar a la cárcel de 1 a 6 años a sus responsables.

El jefe de redacción Edi Zunino seguirá firme en su decisión de continuar informando sobre el listado de aspirantes. “Parece relevante poner en conocimiento público de qué forma se está llevando a la práctica la reforma de la ley de inteligiencia”, explicó el periodista, ante la cámara de Perfil.com.

Para Zunino, “hay algo más que la decisión periodística de Noticias, que es la falta de experiencia y currículum de estos integrantes, se arma una agencia de inteligencia en base a la coordinación y subordinación”. El periodista justificó la decisión de publicar la lista porque “se está convirtiendo a la SIDE en una unidad básica, es un legado con el que se busca condicionar al próximo Gobierno”.

El jefe de la AFI, Oscar Parrilli, argumentó que la revista violó los artículos 16 y 17 de la ley de Inteligencia (número 25.520) que prevee que quienes accedan a este tipo de información deban “guardar el más estricto secreto y confidencialidad”. 

“Estamos convencidos de que publicamos una lista de aspirantes, puede haber sucedido que entre que se consiguió esa lista y lo chequeamos estos hayan sido nombrados”, replicó Zunino.

Rodis Recalt, el periodista que trabajó con esta información, anticipó que desde la AFI ya se impulsan nuevas medidas restrictivas para que Noticias no pueda seguir publicando al respecto. “El día que salió a la calle ya llegó una notificación del secretario de Inteligencia, por ahora la única reacción fue esa, pero nos cuentan fuentes que va a haber otras”.

Lejos de intimidarse ante las notificaciones, el conductor y el redactor de la revista afirmaron que seguirán investigando y dando a conocer cómo se conforma esta nueva central de inteligencia. “Uno de los temas que estamos trabajando para esta semana es cómo llegó esta gente a formar parte de la nómina, y también nos preguntamos cómo es en otras partes del mundo”, anticipó Recalt.

Zunino concluyó con un mensaje claro: “Para nosotros cubrir esta interna de Inteligencia fue cubrir el caso Nisman antes de que muera Nisman, vamos a seguir informando aunque tengamos que ponernos a disposición de la Justicia para dar las explicaciones que hay que dar. Mientras siga siendo relevante y habiendo novedades, Noticias va a seguir publicando”.

Vea el video.

 

Source Article from http://www.perfil.com/politica/NOTICIAS-redobla-la-apuesta-tras-la-intimacion-de-la-exSIDE-Vamos-a-seguir-investigando-y-publicando-20150318-0043.html

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/09/22/search-brian-laundrie-after-gabby-petito-autopsy-suggests-homicide/5810621001/

  • High earners could be excluded from qualifying for student-loan relief, The Washington Post reported.
  • “There’s different proposals floating around about how to structure this,” a source told the paper.
  • Relief for loans that were taken out for medicine and law degrees could also reportedly be excluded.

The White House is weighing up the possibility of using income caps to exclude high earners in its eligibility criteria for student-loan relief.

The Washington Post reported the news on Saturday.

Officials are thinking about ways to write off student loans as President Biden indicated that he is considering waiving the debt, Congress lawmakers told various news outlets on Wednesday.

Top Biden aides are looking at capping the relief to people earning less than $125,000 to $150,000, or $250,000 to $300,000 for couples that file joint taxes, people familiar with the matter told The Washington Post. But they said that no final decision has been made on the plans. 

“There’s different proposals floating around the administration about how to structure this,” one person told the Washington Post.

They added that administration and Congressional staff have centered their discussion on “how to best meet the president’s desire to ensure the most economically vulnerable people with student debt benefit from any action.”

The US administration is discussing the amount that will be cut from student-loan debt but this could be at least $10,000 for eligible individuals, the people briefed on the matter told The Washington Post.

The people added that the White House is also considering excluding relief for loans that were taken out for professional degrees like medicine and law, and could limit the aid to undergraduate loans.

Biden has taken a number of actions since taking office to help Americans who have mounting student loan debts totalling $1.7 trillion. Biden said this week that he would make a decision on student-loan relief in the coming weeks.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/white-house-caps-exclude-high-earners-student-loan-relief-2022-4

With airports jammed with angry passengers, Republican senators blaming each other behind closed doors for the government shutdown, and President Trump’s poll numbers tanking, the writing was on the wall. Feeling pressure from his fellow Republicans to reopen the government, Trump announced Friday afternoon that a deal was reached for federal employees to come back to work as negotiations on border security are given a little more time.

A week ago, the White House was firm on its demand: Parts of the government will remain shuttered until Democratic lawmakers write a $5.7 billion check for a border wall. Trump’s capitulation (and make no mistake, it was a capitulation) is a complete reversal of the White House position and a blowout win for Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in her first month back on the job.

Trump, however, remained defiant. At the same time he asked lawmakers to work in unison for the benefit of the nation, he threatened to use the nuclear option if Congress can’t come up with a solution. “I have a very powerful alternative, but I did not want to use it at this time,” Trump said in the White House Rose Garden. “Hopefully, it will be unnecessary.”

That “very powerful alternative” Trump is referring to is a declaration of national emergency, a proclamation that would provide him with a way to get his border wall money without having to go through the normal legislative process. Ordinarily, the executive branch is constitutionally barred from spending any taxpayer money on any program unless Congress explicitly authorizes and appropriates the funds. Outside of declaring war or authorizing the use of military force, the ability to appropriate funds, or not, is the legislative branch’s most coveted power.

Lawmakers from both political parties protect the power of the purse with every fiber of their being because it’s one of the few tactics Congress can employ to pressure the president. Trump’s declaring of a national emergency would rip that power away. If lawyers in the executive branch can argue that there is indeed a dire national emergency along the southwestern border with Mexico, billions of dollars in the military construction budget will be made available for the border structure Trump so desperately wants. Trump could task the Army Corps of Engineers to start building right away.

Democrats, who are as strongly opposed to a border wall as Trump is enamored by it, would not be powerless bystanders if the president tried to do an end-run around Congress. They could technically prohibit any money from being used for construction of a border barrier through legislation, although GOP opposition would likely kill it. They could file a lawsuit against Trump, arguing that his emergency declaration is not, in fact, an emergency, but rather an instigation of an artificial crisis in order to justify an unjustifiable project.

A lawsuit would work itself through the court system and wind up in the Supreme Court, where the case could prove to be one of the most important trials of executive power since the fight over military commissions in the George W. Bush era. The border wall could become a proxy war between the executive and legislative branches, a classic battle over constitutional power that the judiciary would have to arbitrate. If Trump loses that fight, the precedent it would set would impact the flexibility of presidents in the future to tap into their emergency powers.

Trump may decide that a national emergency is too big of a step. The House Freedom Caucus, Trump’s most reliable support base on Capitol Hill, has already questioned whether an emergency proclamation is a smart idea. Lawmakers such as Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows are concerned that a declaration now could provide a future Democratic president with the power to do something similar on progressive priorities like climate change. The White House may gamble on another government shutdown, perhaps believing that the public would blame Democrats for being too obstructionist this time around.

Either way, the three-week government reopening shouldn’t be celebrated as a major breakthrough. The end of the longest shutdown in history may turn out to be the intermission to the meatier second act.

Daniel DePetris (@DanDePetris) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential blog. His opinions are his own.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/trumps-border-wall-drama-isnt-over-this-is-just-intermission

California will continue to require masks in school settings, state health officials announced Friday, even though federal health authorities released new guidelines saying vaccinated students and teachers no longer need to wear masks inside campus buildings.

“Masking is a simple and effective intervention that does not interfere with offering full in-person instruction,” said California Health and Human Services Agency Secretary Mark Ghaly. “At the outset of the new year, students should be able to walk into school without worrying about whether they will feel different or singled out for being vaccinated or unvaccinated — treating all kids the same will support a calm and supportive school environment.”

The recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which also said schools should try and keep desks three feet apart, are not a mandate. The CDC guidance said prevention strategies, including indoor masking, should be utilized when it’s not possible to maintain a distance of at least three feet in the classroom.

Ghaly said that not all school facilities in the state can accommodate physical distancing and “we will align with the CDC by implementing multiple layers of mitigation strategies, including continued masking and robust testing capacity.” The state’s directive would also “ensure that all kids are treated the same,” the California Department of Public Health said.

With the highly contagious Delta variant of the coronavirus continuing to spread statewide, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health previously recommended that all residents wear masks in public indoor spaces — regardless of whether they’ve been vaccinated for COVID-19.

Here’s what parents and educators need to know:

Can parents demand the right to have their children attend schools without masks?
Not in most situations in California. There are some children with disabilities who cannot manage masks or who cannot wear masks safely. These parents already have the right to seek an accommodation that includes not wearing a mask.

What is the situation in the Los Angeles Unified School District?
All students, teachers and staff have been required to wear masks on campus even if they are vaccinated. This policy has been in place since schools began to reopen in April. The only exceptions are for students or others who have special health or physical reasons and are unable to wear a mask.

Will California children have to be vaccinated to attend school in person?
There is currently no vaccine authorized for emergency use in children under the age of 12, and it is unclear how soon that will change. Even after the Food and Drug Administration authorizes one or more COVID-19 vaccines for younger children, it could take several more months — or even years — for the vaccines to receive full approval in this age group. Once immunizations receive full federal approval, they could become mandatory for nearly all students.

Do students have to remain three or six feet apart?
Rules vary from district to district in California.

The CDC said Friday that schools should continue to space students — and their desks — three feet apart in classrooms and distancing is not required among fully vaccinated students or staff. In LAUSD, the nation’s second-largest school district, desks are three feet apart and are expected to stay that way in the fall.

The CDC does not deem any separation as needed among vaccinated children. Practically speaking, it could prove difficult to have different rules and procedures for different students. At middle schools, for example, some students will be eligible for shots and some won’t be. But even at high schools, not every student will be vaccinated.

Do masks have to be worn outdoors by unvaccinated people at schools?
Schools generally don’t require masks at recess or in most other outdoor situations. However, unvaccinated people are advised to wear masks if they are in a crowd for an extended period of time, like in the stands at a football game.

Are other school safety measures still needed?
Ventilation and hand-washing continue to be important. Students and staff also should stay home when they are sick.

And testing for infection remains an important way to prevent outbreaks. But the CDC said Friday people who are fully vaccinated do not need to participate in such screening.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-07-09/masks-wont-necessarily-come-off-students-in-l-a-schools-despite-cdc-guidelines

Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban reacted on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday to Joe Biden’s criticism of President Trump’s response to the violence that has erupted following the death of George Floyd while in police custody, saying that the presumptive Democratic nominee “took a page out of the Trump playbook.”

Biden on Tuesday called the protests sparked by George Floyd’s death “a wake-up call for our nation” and vowed to reverse the nation’s “systemic racism with long-overdue concrete changes.”

In a 20-minute speech that was carried live by all three major national cable news networks, the former vice president slammed President Trump as being “more interested in serving the passions of his base than the needs of the people in his care” and charged that the president “is part of the problem and accelerates it.”

Host Sandra Smith asked Cuban if “this a time for finger-pointing.”

WHAT POWERS DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE TO USE MILITARY TO QUELL DOMESTIC UNREST?

“Does that enhance progress and get us out of that or do we need calls for unity?” she went on to ask.

In response, Cuban noted that Biden “called for unity as well.”

He then went on to explain why he thinks Biden “took a page out of the Trump playbook” for a portion of his speech on Tuesday.

“It’s not like the president isn’t one to cast blame on whoever he can,” Cuban said.

“But I think, more importantly, he was trying to demonstrate a contrast in his approach to dealing with circumstances like this versus the president.”

Cuban explained that he thinks Biden tried to show empathy, depth and substance, which he said are all challenges for President Trump.

“So the way I perceived it wasn’t so much as pointing fingers as much as just showing here’s the difference in what I can present versus what our current president is able to present,” Cuban said.

Protests were sparked by the May 25 death of Floyd, a Minneapolis man who died in police custody after an officer kneeled on his neck for more than eight minutes in a moment caught on cellphone video. The officer, Derek Chauvin, was fired from the force and has been charged with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the case.

Crowds across the nation have seized on the racially charged incident to demand justice, but the protests have devolved into riots in many cities, culminating in days of carnage.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

On Monday Trump said that he is taking “immediate action” to mobilize “all available federal resources” to stop riots and looting across the country, threatening to deploy the military if states don’t send in the National Guard to protests.

Fox News’ Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/mark-cuban-showing-empathy-depth-is-a-challenge-for-trump

Image copyright
UK Parliament

MPs will be called to Parliament for a special Saturday sitting in a decisive day for the future of Brexit.

Parliament will meet on 19 October after a crunch EU summit – seen as the last chance for the UK and EU to agree a deal ahead of 31 October deadline.

If a deal is agreed, Boris Johnson will ask MPs to approve it – but if not, a range of options could be presented.

The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg says these could include leaving without a deal, and halting Brexit altogether.

MPs will have to agree a business motion in the Commons for the sitting to take place.

Assuming they do, the additional day would coincide with an anti-Brexit march run by the People’s Vote campaign, which could see thousands of protesters heading to Westminster.

Letter row

The House of Commons has only sat on four Saturdays since 1939, including on 2 September that year, due to the outbreak of World War Two.

The last time there was a Saturday sitting was 3 April 1982, due to the invasion of the Falkland Islands.

The prime minister has said he is determined the UK will leave the EU on 31 October, despite legislation, known as the Benn Act, which requires him to write to Brussels requesting a further delay if a deal is not signed off by Parliament by 19 October – or unless MPs agree to a no-deal Brexit.

Scottish judges said on Wednesday they would not rule on a legal challenge from campaigners seeking to force the PM to send the letter – or to allow an official to send it on his behalf if he refused. They said they would delay the decision until the political debate had “played out”.

No 10 has insisted Mr Johnson will comply with the law, but Laura Kuenssberg says there are still conversations going on in Downing Street about writing a second letter, making the case that a delay is unnecessary.

Media captionConfused by Brexit jargon? Reality Check unpacks the basics

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said his MPs would “do everything we can in Parliament, including legislating if necessary, to ensure [Mr Johnson] makes that application”.

“The idea that the prime minister will defy the law yet again is something that needs to be borne in mind,” he added, appearing to reference the unlawful suspension of Parliament last month.

But former Conservative MP Dominic Grieve, who now sits as an independent after rebelling over Brexit, said he was a “bit mystified” at the need for a one-off Saturday sitting.

“I realise we are in the middle of a political crisis, but it is not a political crisis which makes me think we could not be sitting on the day before or on the following Monday,” he told BBC Radio 4’s World at One. “The government simply has not explained itself.”

‘Very intense’

Talks are ongoing between the UK and EU after Mr Johnson submitted new proposals for a Brexit deal, centred on replacing the Irish backstop – the policy negotiated between Theresa May and the EU to prevent a hard border returning to the island of Ireland.

However, the EU has said there would have to be “fundamental changes” to the ideas put forward in order for them to be acceptable.

For example, Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Leo Varadkar told the Dail (Parliament) on Wednesday the UK’s proposal to take Northern Ireland out of the EU customs union was a “grave difficulty” for his government.

Mr Varadkar and Mr Johnson are expected to meet for further talks later this week, but after the two leaders spoke on the phone for 45 minutes on Tuesday night, the Irish PM told broadcaster RTE he believed it would be “very difficult” to reach an agreement before the end of the month.

The UK’s chief negotiator, David Frost, will meet European Commission officials later – but sources on both sides told BBC Brussels reporter Adam Fleming that technical talks had effectively reached the limit of what they could achieve.

However, Home Secretary Priti Patel said the government had been putting in “very intense” work in recent weeks to get a deal, so “nothing is over”.

While getting an agreement was still their preference, they were “absolutely clear” that the UK would leave the EU on 31 October “come what may”, she added.

Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay and the EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier will also have a lunch meeting on Thursday to discuss the state of play.

Media captionPriti Patel on Brexit: “Nothing is over yet”

As the clock ticks down towards the summit, the political tension has been rising.

A row broke out on Tuesday after a No 10 source said a call between Mr Johnson and the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, had made a deal “essentially impossible”, claiming she made clear a deal based on his proposals was “overwhelmingly unlikely”.

Mrs Merkel’s office said it would not comment on “private” conversations.

But the President of the European Council Donald Tusk sent a public tweet to Mr Johnson, accusing him of playing a “stupid blame game” – a criticism echoed by a number of opposition parties in the UK.

Media captionIrish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar says he wants a deal “but not at any cost”

Meanwhile, the UK has been told it will still be liable to pay into the EU budget until the end of next year, even if it leaves without a deal this month.

The budget commissioner, Gunther Oettinger, said the UK was fully signed up for the whole of 2020 – the last year’s of the bloc’s current financial framework.

“If the British are not prepared to pay, we are sure we will get the money at a later stage but not immediately,” he said.

This special sitting will be a huge day.

That is because it will be the moment when Boris Johnson either returns to chants of “hail the conquering hero” – if he manages to get this elusive Brexit deal – or, more likely, returns with no-deal and has to set out his next steps.

And we are hearing that No 10 may seek to seize the initiative by putting down a series of motions for MPs to vote on – in other words asking them do they want to leave with no deal, do they want to revoke Article 50, etc.

But at the same time that Boris Johnson wants to use that moment to try and grasp the initiative, it is clear the rebel alliance of opposition MPs also wants to seize the day.

They want to ensure Boris Johnson sits down, gets out the Basildon Bond and writes that letter to the European Commission asking for a further delay.

So both sides are now poised to try and gain control of that Saturday to map out the next steps, assuming – and I think it is a fairly widespread assumption in Westminster now – that there is not going to be a deal.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49984367

El consejo de administración del Banco Sabadell resolverá hoy abandonar Barcelona y trasladar su sede a Alicante, adelantándose a lo que pueda suceder con la posible independencia de Cataluña, informó hoy La Vanguardia.

Sabadell, el quinto banco más importante de España, se une así a otras empresas con sede en Cataluña, que han empezado a cambiar de sede social ante la hipótesis de una secesión de esa región y con la intención de proteger a sus clientes y accionistas.

Fuentes del Banco Sabadell aseguraron hoy a Efe que el cambio de domicilio social garantizará que la entidad siga estando bajo el paraguas de supervisión del Banco Central Europeo, además de que el pago de impuestos de la sociedad se llevará a cabo en la ciudad que albergue la nueva sede del banco.

El pasado martes, dos días después de la consulta ilegal, el tercer banco español, CaixaBank, también con sede en Cataluña, remitió una nota interna a sus empleados en la que les comunicaba que la defensa de los intereses de clientes y empleados “guiará las decisiones futuras que, en caso de ser necesario, hayan de tomarse”.

En estos días otras empresas han optado por cambiar la sede social y, así, la operadora de telecomunicaciones Eurona Wireless ha acordado trasladar su sede de Barcelona a Madrid, lo mismo que la biotecnológica Oryzon Genomics.

Para los bancos, permanecer en la zona euro haría posible seguir operando con normalidad y garantizar los intereses de sus accionistas, clientes y empleados dentro de cualquier escenario.

El Gobierno español y la Comisión Europea han reiterado públicamente que si una región se separa de un país miembro inmediatamente quedará fuera de la Unión Europea.

Desplome de acciones.

Fuertes pérdidas de Caxiabank y Banco Sabadell en el Ibex 35 tras el referéndum. Foto: Efe.

Tanto CaixaBank como Sabadell sufrieron una fuerte caída en sus acciones luego del referéndum del 1° de octubre, llegando el segundo a un desplome de un 12,7%.

Según señala La Vanguardia citando fuentes próximas a la entidad financiera, el cambio de sede se debe a la necesidad de “estar en igualdad de competitividad con el resto de bancos españoles”.

Hoy, tras conocerse la noticia, las acciones del Sabadell fueron las que más subieron en el Ibex 35, alcanzando un 3% de crecimiento.

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/negocios/noticias/banco-sabadell-dejara-barcelona-independencia.html

Allen’s comments come ahead of Tuesday’s crucial runoff elections, which will determine the balance of power in the U.S. Senate. Loeffler is running against Democrat Raphael Warnock, while Perdue’s opponent is Democrat Jon Ossoff. Trump campaigned for Loeffler and Perdue earlier this month, and he is set to hold another rally in the state Monday.

Republicans need to win only one of the races to maintain a majority in the 100-seat Senate; the GOP currently holds a 50-48 advantage.

If both Democrats are victorious in Georgia, that would tip the scale in their party’s favor because Vice President-elect Kamala Harris would be the tie-breaking vote. It also would mean Democrats control both chambers of Congress, plus the White House after President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated Jan. 20. Biden defeated Trump in the Nov. 3 election, helped in part by his victory in Georgia. Biden was the first Democrat to win the state since 1992.

“Keeping a Republican majority in the Senate has been a priority for the President from the beginning,” Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh said in a statement Thursday to CNBC. “He will be rallying voters to support Senators Perdue and Loeffler and warning that their opponents are leftist extremists who support higher taxes, the job-crushing Green New Deal, and amnesty for 11 million illegal aliens.”

Allen, who co-founded Politico before going on to launch Axios in January 2017, said Republicans had initially felt confident that Loeffler and Perdue would defeat their Democratic challengers. “Georgia, despite the president-elect winning there, is still pretty red, so Republicans said, ‘In the end, this could be fine.’ They’re no longer sure it’s fine, and a lot of that has to do with the president,” Allen said.

Trump has refused to concede the election to Biden and falsely claimed he lost the race to due massive voter fraud. He also has attacked numerous elected Republicans in Georgia, including Gov. Brian Kemp, for their handling of the election.

Trump also has been pushing Congress to increase stimulus checks to Americans to $2,000, holding up a $900 billion coronavirus relief package that contained $600 direct payments for days before ultimately signing it. He has continued his push for $2,000 checks, a proposal supported by Democrats that is not popular among Republicans in the Senate.

Ossoff and Warnock quickly seized on Trump’s demand last week and used it to bash their opponents. Loeffler and Perdue, however, have since backed Trump’s proposal for $2,000 checks.

“Republicans look at it and they say, like everyday President Trump is saying something that either puts those candidates on the spot or makes some of those … voters who were maybe queasy about Trump anyway but are Republicans in their bones, like everyday he gives them a reason either not to come out or to decide to go the other way,'” Allen said.

CNBC reached out to the campaigns for Loeffler and Perdue, as well as the White House, for comment on Allen’s remarks.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/31/georgia-senate-races-some-republicans-think-trump-is-trying-to-sabotage-gop-mike-allen-says.html

On Wednesday, Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will be sworn in alongside President-elect Joe Biden at the inauguration.

Surrounding the 2020 election, some of Harris’ family members, like her niece Meena and sister Maya, have been incredibly active and vocal in the vice president–elect’s run.

Here’s a quick rundown of the Harris family tree:

Sister

Maya Harris

Harris’ 53-year-old younger sister is no stranger to politics. During Harris’ presidential run, her sister was the campaign chairwoman. She also served as an adviser to former first lady and Senator Hilary Clinton during her 2016 presidential run, according to The Washington Post. Previously, Maya Harris was the executive director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California and a vice president at the Ford Foundation, whose mission is “to reduce poverty and injustice, strengthen democratic values, promote international cooperation, and advance human achievement,” according to its website.

Maya Harris was one of the family members that the vice president–elect thanked in her acceptance speech in November, along with her husband and stepchildren.

Vice President–elect Kamala Harris, her husband Douglas Emhoff and her sister Maya Harris prior to her delivering a campaign speech at the Des Moines Register Political Soapbox at the Iowa State Fair on August 10, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa.
Alex Wong/Getty

Niece

Meena Harris

Harris’ niece has been particularly outspoken during her aunt’s vice presidential campaign and leading up to her inauguration, whether she was celebrating a rainy rally or coming to Sasha Obama’s defense. Meena Harris is also a lawyer and the CEO of the Phenomenal Woman Action Campaign, which “brings awareness to social and cultural causes” according to its website, by creating and supporting content from various organizations including the Essie Justice Group and Black Futures Lab.

Harris has also authored two children’s books Ambitious Girl and Kamala and Maya’s Big Idea, inspired by her mother and aunt.

Stepchildren

Harris has two stepchildren with her husband, lawyer Doug Emhoff. Both Cole and Ella Emhoff were from Emhoff’s first marriage to producer Kerstin Emhoff (née Mackin). Both the Emhoff children refer to Harris as “Momala.” The siblings were recently interviewed by The New York Times to discuss their family dynamic. Ella described the parenting style between the three as positive. “They have good communication between the three of them. They are really a unit, like a three-person parenting squad. It’s really cool,” she said.

Cole Emhoff

The elder Emhoff sibling is a graduate of Colorado College. He appears to have followed in his mother’s footsteps and pursued a career in the entertainment industry. According to his LinkedIn, he’s an executive assistant for the production company Plan B, which has recently produced the Jon Stewart–directed Irresistible.

Ella Emhoff

The younger Emhoff is a student at Parsons in Brooklyn, New York. She regularly posts different art and knitting projects on Instagram. In the New York Times interview, she said that she hoped her father would take up knitting as part of his new role as second-gentleman.

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-family-sister-niece-children-maya-meena-emhoff-cole-ella-1562747

Image copyright
Reuters.AFP

Image caption

Trump y Clinton llegaban como favoritos al Supermartes y los resultados confirmaron la tendencia a su favor.

Los resultados de las primarias que se celebraron este martes en una docena de estados de Estados Unidos, en lo que se conoce como Supermartes, dieron como claros vencedores a la precandidata presidencial demócrata Hillary Clinton y al republicano Donald Trump.

La ex secretaria de Estado se apuntó la victoria en siete estados, igual que el polémico millonario.

Todavía se ha de conocer quién es el vencedor del caucus republicano celebrado en Alaska.

Mira la tabla de resultados del supermartes de republicanos y demócratas

Los resultados del Supermartes confirman la tendencia vista en las primarias efectuadas en las últimas semanas en los estados de Iowa, New Hampshire, Carolina del Sur y Nevada, en las que Clinton y Trump comenzaron a sacar ventaja a sus rivales.

En el bando demócrata, este martes al senador de Vermont Bernie Sanders le fue mejor de lo esperado, logrando la victoria en cuatro estados, mientras que en el republicano, Ted Cruz debió conformarse con declararse vencedor en dos estados y Marco Rubio en uno.

Los candidatos republicanos Ben Carson y John Kasich no lograron imponerse en ninguno de los territorios en juego.

El Supermartes es la jornada más importante del calendario estadounidense de primarias.

En esta fecha, demócratas y republicanos midieron fuerzas en 11 estados cada uno de manera simultánea.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

La elección presidencial estadounidense se realizará el 8 de noviembre de 2016.

Por el momento, tanto Clinton como Trump superan cómodamente a sus rivales en el número de delegados obtenidos en el proceso de primarias que se inició el pasado 1 de febrero.

Estos delegados serán los encargados de votar a favor de los precandidatos presidenciales que ganaron las primarias o caucus de sus respectivos estados en las convenciones demócrata y republicana que se celebrarán el próximo mes de julio.

Demócratas

En el Supermartes Clinton se impuso en las primarias de Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Texas y Virginia.

Mientras, Bernie Sanders triunfó en Colorado, Minnesota, Oklahoma y Vermont.

La ex secretaria de Estado celebró los resultados en Miami, Florida, junto a sus seguidores.

Sin mencionarlo, Clinton volvió a aludir a Donald Trump, al que criticó por su “retórica divisoria” y por “dar la espalda a los trabajadores y a la clase media”.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Hillary Clinton celebró los resultados del Supermartes en Miami.

La carrera demócrata por lograr la nominación a la candidatura presidencial continuará en el estado de Luisiana, donde las primarias se celebrarán el 5 de marzo.

Republicanos

En el caso de las primarias republicanas, los resultados señalan que el millonario Donald Trump ganó en Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Vermont y Virginia.

Desde Florida, Trump no tuvo reparos en afirmar que “amplió al Partido Republicano” con la promesa de atraer votos demócratas e independientes.

“Vamos a ser un partido mucho más grande. Vamos a ser más inclusivos y unidos”, aseguró Trump.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

“Vamos a ser un partido mucho más grande. Vamos a ser más inclusivos y unidos”, aseguró Trump.

Uno de los competidores del magnate, el cubanoestadounidense Ted Cruz, logró imponerse en las primarias de Oklahoma y Texas.

En un encendido discurso después de conocer su victoria en esos dos estados, Cruz aseguró que es el único candidato que puede frenar a Donald Trump.

Marco Rubio, mientras tanto, logró ganar las primarias republicanas en Minnesota, en la que es su primera victoria de este ciclo electoral.

Desde Miami, Rubio se dirigió a sus electores que le esperaban con gritos de “Marco, Marco”.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Marco Rubio logró ganar las primarias republicanas en Minnesota.

El próximo 15 de marzo vota Florida, estado del que es senador y en el que tiene puestas sus esperanzas.

“No hay ningún lugar en EE.UU. que entienda el sueño americano mejor que esta comunidad y este gran estado de Florida”, dijo acompañado de su esposa y sus hijos.

Igual que los demócratas, los rivales republicanos volverán a verse las caras el próximo 5 de marzo en las primarias de Luisiana.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Demócratas y republicanos celebraron primarias simultáneas en 11 estados este martes.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/03/160301_supermartes_resultados_primarias_estados_unidos_democratas_republicanos_bm

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/experts-say-china-isn-t-too-worried-about-trump-s-n1002581