Most Viewed Videos

Image copyright
UK Parliament

MPs will be called to Parliament for a special Saturday sitting in a decisive day for the future of Brexit.

Parliament will meet on 19 October after a crunch EU summit – seen as the last chance for the UK and EU to agree a deal ahead of 31 October deadline.

If a deal is agreed, Boris Johnson will ask MPs to approve it – but if not, a range of options could be presented.

The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg says these could include leaving without a deal, and halting Brexit altogether.

MPs will have to agree a business motion in the Commons for the sitting to take place.

Assuming they do, the additional day would coincide with an anti-Brexit march run by the People’s Vote campaign, which could see thousands of protesters heading to Westminster.

Letter row

The House of Commons has only sat on four Saturdays since 1939, including on 2 September that year, due to the outbreak of World War Two.

The last time there was a Saturday sitting was 3 April 1982, due to the invasion of the Falkland Islands.

The prime minister has said he is determined the UK will leave the EU on 31 October, despite legislation, known as the Benn Act, which requires him to write to Brussels requesting a further delay if a deal is not signed off by Parliament by 19 October – or unless MPs agree to a no-deal Brexit.

Scottish judges said on Wednesday they would not rule on a legal challenge from campaigners seeking to force the PM to send the letter – or to allow an official to send it on his behalf if he refused. They said they would delay the decision until the political debate had “played out”.

No 10 has insisted Mr Johnson will comply with the law, but Laura Kuenssberg says there are still conversations going on in Downing Street about writing a second letter, making the case that a delay is unnecessary.

Media captionConfused by Brexit jargon? Reality Check unpacks the basics

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said his MPs would “do everything we can in Parliament, including legislating if necessary, to ensure [Mr Johnson] makes that application”.

“The idea that the prime minister will defy the law yet again is something that needs to be borne in mind,” he added, appearing to reference the unlawful suspension of Parliament last month.

But former Conservative MP Dominic Grieve, who now sits as an independent after rebelling over Brexit, said he was a “bit mystified” at the need for a one-off Saturday sitting.

“I realise we are in the middle of a political crisis, but it is not a political crisis which makes me think we could not be sitting on the day before or on the following Monday,” he told BBC Radio 4’s World at One. “The government simply has not explained itself.”

‘Very intense’

Talks are ongoing between the UK and EU after Mr Johnson submitted new proposals for a Brexit deal, centred on replacing the Irish backstop – the policy negotiated between Theresa May and the EU to prevent a hard border returning to the island of Ireland.

However, the EU has said there would have to be “fundamental changes” to the ideas put forward in order for them to be acceptable.

For example, Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Leo Varadkar told the Dail (Parliament) on Wednesday the UK’s proposal to take Northern Ireland out of the EU customs union was a “grave difficulty” for his government.

Mr Varadkar and Mr Johnson are expected to meet for further talks later this week, but after the two leaders spoke on the phone for 45 minutes on Tuesday night, the Irish PM told broadcaster RTE he believed it would be “very difficult” to reach an agreement before the end of the month.

The UK’s chief negotiator, David Frost, will meet European Commission officials later – but sources on both sides told BBC Brussels reporter Adam Fleming that technical talks had effectively reached the limit of what they could achieve.

However, Home Secretary Priti Patel said the government had been putting in “very intense” work in recent weeks to get a deal, so “nothing is over”.

While getting an agreement was still their preference, they were “absolutely clear” that the UK would leave the EU on 31 October “come what may”, she added.

Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay and the EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier will also have a lunch meeting on Thursday to discuss the state of play.

Media captionPriti Patel on Brexit: “Nothing is over yet”

As the clock ticks down towards the summit, the political tension has been rising.

A row broke out on Tuesday after a No 10 source said a call between Mr Johnson and the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, had made a deal “essentially impossible”, claiming she made clear a deal based on his proposals was “overwhelmingly unlikely”.

Mrs Merkel’s office said it would not comment on “private” conversations.

But the President of the European Council Donald Tusk sent a public tweet to Mr Johnson, accusing him of playing a “stupid blame game” – a criticism echoed by a number of opposition parties in the UK.

Media captionIrish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar says he wants a deal “but not at any cost”

Meanwhile, the UK has been told it will still be liable to pay into the EU budget until the end of next year, even if it leaves without a deal this month.

The budget commissioner, Gunther Oettinger, said the UK was fully signed up for the whole of 2020 – the last year’s of the bloc’s current financial framework.

“If the British are not prepared to pay, we are sure we will get the money at a later stage but not immediately,” he said.

This special sitting will be a huge day.

That is because it will be the moment when Boris Johnson either returns to chants of “hail the conquering hero” – if he manages to get this elusive Brexit deal – or, more likely, returns with no-deal and has to set out his next steps.

And we are hearing that No 10 may seek to seize the initiative by putting down a series of motions for MPs to vote on – in other words asking them do they want to leave with no deal, do they want to revoke Article 50, etc.

But at the same time that Boris Johnson wants to use that moment to try and grasp the initiative, it is clear the rebel alliance of opposition MPs also wants to seize the day.

They want to ensure Boris Johnson sits down, gets out the Basildon Bond and writes that letter to the European Commission asking for a further delay.

So both sides are now poised to try and gain control of that Saturday to map out the next steps, assuming – and I think it is a fairly widespread assumption in Westminster now – that there is not going to be a deal.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49984367

An Israeli police official who oversaw the security arrangements for the massive religious celebration where 45 people were killed in a stampede on Friday said he took responsibility for the disaster, according to a report.

“I bear overall responsibility, for better or worse, and am ready for any investigation,” Shimon Lavi, commander of the Northern District, told reporters hours after the tragedy, the Times of Israel reported.

Eyewitnesses accused police of blocking a key exit route at the bottom of a narrow passageway, which had for years been seen as a dangerous potential bottleneck, but Lavi said the exact cause of the tragedy is under investigation.

Early indications were that the fatal crushing occurred when large numbers of people, mostly ultra-Orthodox men, moved through the slanting walkway on the exit route from the Mount Meron site during the annual Lag Ba’omer festivities.

Commander Shimon Lavi reportedly said that he bears “overall responsibility” for the tragedy.
Wikimedia

People began to trip and fall on each other, creating a catastrophic domino effect.

Police for a period blocked stairs at the bottom of the passageway, according to the Times of Israel, which cited a Channel 12 report.

Mourners gather around the body of Rabbi Eliezer Goldberg, who died during Lag Ba’omer celebrations.
AP/Ariel Schalit

There is an ongoing “complicated effort to gather evidence to reach the truth,” Lavi said, adding that cops saved lives during the stampede, pushing through the crowds to rescue people.

The Israel Times reported that police officers temporarily blocked stairs at the bottom of the passageway during the stampede.
AP/Sebastian Scheiner

Public health chief Sharon Alroy-Preis, who had warned earlier this week that a massive gathering at the site could drive an outbreak of COVID-19, told Army Radio that the tragedy could have been averted if police had enforced the restrictions on the number of people allowed to attend.

Mourners gather for the funeral of Rabbi Eliezer Goldberg, who died during Lag Ba’omer celebrations at Mt. Meron in Israel.
AP/Ariel Schalit

“It was not possible to reach an agreement on who enforces the regulations at Mount Meron,” she said. “I remind you that the number of people allowed to gather outside is restricted to 100 — it is the responsibility of the police to enforce the laws of the State of Israel.”

Israeli security officials and rescuers carry an ultra-Orthodox Jew who was injured during the festival of Lag Ba’omer at Mt. Meron in northern Israel.
AP

Meanwhile, President Biden said he spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to offer his condolences, and said the US stood ready to offer assistance.

In a statement, he said the US also was working to confirm reports that Americans may have died or been injured in the stampede.

With Post wires

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/04/30/israeli-police-official-accepts-blame-for-deadly-stampede-report/

China’s rapidly graying population has started to impose increasing pressures on the state. In Monday’s announcement, the party said it would increase funding to expand services for the country’s retirees.

The number of young workers that has powered the world’s factory floor is also declining. A three-child policy would help “maintain our country’s advantages in human resource endowments,” the Politburo said.

In 2020, the number of people age 60 and above in China stood at 264 million, accounting for about 18.7 percent of the population. That figure is set to grow to more than 300 million people, or about one-fifth of the population, by 2025, according to the government.

The party’s announcement on Monday is likely to revive longstanding complaints about the government’s invasive control over women’s bodies in China. On China’s popular social media platform, Weibo, users were quick to post remarks criticizing the move as ineffective.

“Don’t they know that most young people are already tired enough just trying to feed themselves?” wrote one user, pointing to a common lament about the rising costs of living.

The party, in describing the decision on Monday, acknowledged the need for broader changes that would make it easier for couples to have more children. It also pledged to improve maternity leave and “protect the legitimate rights and interests of women in employment.”

For decades, China’s family planning restrictions empowered the authorities to impose punishing fines on most couples who had more than one child and compel hundreds of millions of Chinese women to have abortions or undergo sterilization operations. Civil servants were fired for violating birth restrictions.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/world/asia/china-three-child-policy.html

Image copyright
Reuters.AFP

Image caption

Trump y Clinton llegaban como favoritos al Supermartes y los resultados confirmaron la tendencia a su favor.

Los resultados de las primarias que se celebraron este martes en una docena de estados de Estados Unidos, en lo que se conoce como Supermartes, dieron como claros vencedores a la precandidata presidencial demócrata Hillary Clinton y al republicano Donald Trump.

La ex secretaria de Estado se apuntó la victoria en siete estados, igual que el polémico millonario.

Todavía se ha de conocer quién es el vencedor del caucus republicano celebrado en Alaska.

Mira la tabla de resultados del supermartes de republicanos y demócratas

Los resultados del Supermartes confirman la tendencia vista en las primarias efectuadas en las últimas semanas en los estados de Iowa, New Hampshire, Carolina del Sur y Nevada, en las que Clinton y Trump comenzaron a sacar ventaja a sus rivales.

En el bando demócrata, este martes al senador de Vermont Bernie Sanders le fue mejor de lo esperado, logrando la victoria en cuatro estados, mientras que en el republicano, Ted Cruz debió conformarse con declararse vencedor en dos estados y Marco Rubio en uno.

Los candidatos republicanos Ben Carson y John Kasich no lograron imponerse en ninguno de los territorios en juego.

El Supermartes es la jornada más importante del calendario estadounidense de primarias.

En esta fecha, demócratas y republicanos midieron fuerzas en 11 estados cada uno de manera simultánea.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

La elección presidencial estadounidense se realizará el 8 de noviembre de 2016.

Por el momento, tanto Clinton como Trump superan cómodamente a sus rivales en el número de delegados obtenidos en el proceso de primarias que se inició el pasado 1 de febrero.

Estos delegados serán los encargados de votar a favor de los precandidatos presidenciales que ganaron las primarias o caucus de sus respectivos estados en las convenciones demócrata y republicana que se celebrarán el próximo mes de julio.

Demócratas

En el Supermartes Clinton se impuso en las primarias de Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Texas y Virginia.

Mientras, Bernie Sanders triunfó en Colorado, Minnesota, Oklahoma y Vermont.

La ex secretaria de Estado celebró los resultados en Miami, Florida, junto a sus seguidores.

Sin mencionarlo, Clinton volvió a aludir a Donald Trump, al que criticó por su “retórica divisoria” y por “dar la espalda a los trabajadores y a la clase media”.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Hillary Clinton celebró los resultados del Supermartes en Miami.

La carrera demócrata por lograr la nominación a la candidatura presidencial continuará en el estado de Luisiana, donde las primarias se celebrarán el 5 de marzo.

Republicanos

En el caso de las primarias republicanas, los resultados señalan que el millonario Donald Trump ganó en Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Vermont y Virginia.

Desde Florida, Trump no tuvo reparos en afirmar que “amplió al Partido Republicano” con la promesa de atraer votos demócratas e independientes.

“Vamos a ser un partido mucho más grande. Vamos a ser más inclusivos y unidos”, aseguró Trump.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

“Vamos a ser un partido mucho más grande. Vamos a ser más inclusivos y unidos”, aseguró Trump.

Uno de los competidores del magnate, el cubanoestadounidense Ted Cruz, logró imponerse en las primarias de Oklahoma y Texas.

En un encendido discurso después de conocer su victoria en esos dos estados, Cruz aseguró que es el único candidato que puede frenar a Donald Trump.

Marco Rubio, mientras tanto, logró ganar las primarias republicanas en Minnesota, en la que es su primera victoria de este ciclo electoral.

Desde Miami, Rubio se dirigió a sus electores que le esperaban con gritos de “Marco, Marco”.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Marco Rubio logró ganar las primarias republicanas en Minnesota.

El próximo 15 de marzo vota Florida, estado del que es senador y en el que tiene puestas sus esperanzas.

“No hay ningún lugar en EE.UU. que entienda el sueño americano mejor que esta comunidad y este gran estado de Florida”, dijo acompañado de su esposa y sus hijos.

Igual que los demócratas, los rivales republicanos volverán a verse las caras el próximo 5 de marzo en las primarias de Luisiana.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Demócratas y republicanos celebraron primarias simultáneas en 11 estados este martes.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/03/160301_supermartes_resultados_primarias_estados_unidos_democratas_republicanos_bm

By entering the 2020 Democratic nomination battle, it means that Joe Biden now has 19 rivals gunning for him, but the massive size of the field could play to his benefit.

In general, the more crowded a field is, the more difficult it is for candidates to break out and get the attention of the media and of voters. But as a former vice president with essentially universal name recognition, Biden is guaranteed to receive tons of media attention for what he says and does in a way that his rivals will not. That will make it more challenging for other candidates to gain ground, and as long as he remains on top of polls, it will only reinforce the media’s focus on him.

We saw a similar scenario play out in the 2016 Republican race. As a widely known celebrity with a penchant for going off-script and making wild comments, Donald Trump was able to absolutely dominate coverage in a Republican field with 17 candidates. That made it extremely difficult for other candidates to get their message across or gain any sort of momentum. Whether people liked or hated what Trump was saying, whatever Trump was saying was always the issue that was being debated. This frustrated his rivals, who lamented that the media treated the race as if there were no other candidate. This essentially locked in place a status quo in which Trump dominated the polls.

[Related: Biden voted to give Robert E. Lee his US citizenship]

Instead of attacking Trump, rivals attacked each other, assuming that once the race were isolated into him and an anti-Trump candidate, the anti-Trump candidate would finally be able to consolidate support. Of course, it didn’t work out that way.

The situations are not exactly the same for Democrats in 2020, as they never are in politics, but there are some parallels. Biden has been leading in polls and is theoretically vulnerable, but now he’s in the race, and for better or worse, he’s going to be taking a lot of attention away from the other candidates. There is also a tremendous amount of competition to embrace radical policy ideas to appeal to the resurgent Left, while Biden faces less competition for traditional liberal voters who consider themselves more moderate, both ideologically and in their temperament toward Republicans.

There are plenty of other things that cut against Biden (his age, past policy stances putting him at odds with the modern party, propensity for gaffes, etc.), and they may prove more influential, but the size of the field should be one factor that works in his favor.

[Also read: McCain family to support Biden in 2020 race in bid to defeat Trump]

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/how-the-big-2020-democratic-presidential-field-benefits-joe-biden

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/experts-say-china-isn-t-too-worried-about-trump-s-n1002581

With some Democrats calling to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement, congressional negotiators want to cap the number of the agency’s detention beds.

Scott Olson/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Scott Olson/Getty Images

With some Democrats calling to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement, congressional negotiators want to cap the number of the agency’s detention beds.

Scott Olson/Getty Images

As the clock ticks toward a Friday deadline to avert another partial government shutdown, a new stumbling block has emerged in talks between congressional Democrats and the White House: Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention beds.

The Trump administration said last month that it wanted $4.2 billion to support 52,000 detention beds. “Given that in recent months, the number of people attempting to cross the border illegally has risen to 2,000 per day, providing additional resources for detention and transportation is essential,” the White House said.

But Democrats are seeking to cap the number of detention beds. In a statement Sunday, Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., asserted that “A cap on ICE detention beds will force the Trump administration to prioritize deportation for criminals and people who pose real security threats, not law-abiding immigrants who are contributing to our country.”

Roybal-Allard chairs the House Appropriations subcommittee on homeland security and is a member of the House-Senate conference committee trying to reach agreement on spending levels.

Democrats want to limit to 16,500 the number of beds used in the interior of the country, where ICE places people it arrests who have overstayed their visas or committed misdemeanor crimes. Roybal-Allard charges the Trump administration with:

“pursuing an out-of-control deportation policy focused on removing immigrants with no criminal records, many of whom have deep roots in their communities. This approach is cruel and wrong. A cap on detention beds associated with interior enforcement will rein in the Trump administration’s deportation agenda.”

Democrats say a cap of 16,500 would restore immigration enforcement to levels in place at the end of the Obama administration. They further wish to limit the number of ICE detention beds to 35,520 overall, according to documents leaked to the Washington Post.

In a Sunday interview on Fox Business, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. said of the Democratic position, “not only is it enough they want to abolish ICE. They want to abolish the bed spaces available to the country to house violent offenders so they can be held and deported.” Graham added, “I promise you this. Donald Trump is not going to sign any bill that reduces the number of bed spaces available to hold violent offenders who come across our border. He can’t do that. He won’t do that, and you can take that to the bank.”

President Trump tweeted Monday that “The Democrats do not want us to detain, or send back, criminal aliens! This is a brand new demand. Crazy!

But Democrats say they want nothing of the sort. Roybal-Allard said the cap will ensure the Trump administration “targets violent felons and other people who pose security risks for deportation, instead of pursuing reckless mass deportation policies that actually make us less safe.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/02/11/693460861/ice-detention-beds-new-stumbling-block-in-efforts-to-prevent-another-shutdown

Metsul pronosticó un ingreso de aire polar a Uruguay para el comienzo de esta semana.

Tras cuatro días con máximas de hasta 30 grados en el estado de Río Grande del Sur brasileño, una “poderosa masa de aire polar” ingresará a este territorio que provocará para hoy “una caída muy fuerte de la temperatura” en ese país y la región.

Además pronostica una posibilidad de nieve en el sur brasileño, con una “pequeña” chance que se perciba en los puntos por encima de los 400 o 500 metros de altura en Uruguay.

En Santiago de Chile, el sábado se registró la más grande nevada en la ciudad desde 1971. En Bahía Blanca, ciudad al sur de la provincia de Buenos Aires en Argentina, también cayó nieve.

Inumet.

Mientras tanto, el Instituto Nacional de Meteorología (Inumet) pronosticó para hoy una disminución de nubosidad, con “bajas sensaciones térmicas” para la mañana, la tarde y la noche. La temperatura mínima prevista para hoy es de 4º y la máxima de 9º. El tiempo estará “algo nuboso”, con algunas precipitaciones aisladas. Se advierten de vientos desde el suroeste de entre 30 a 50 kilómetros por hora.

Para el feriado del martes, se prevén mínimas de 3º y máximas de 11. Se aguardan heladas agrometeorológicas para la noche.

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/metsul-pronostica-aire-polar-uruguay.html

February 26 at 11:44 AM

The U.S. military blocked Internet access to an infamous Russian entity seeking to sow discord among Americans during the 2018 midterms, several U.S. officials said, a warning that the Kremlin’s operations against the United States are not cost-free.

The strike on the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg, a company underwritten by an oligarch close to President Vladi­mir Putin, was part of the first offensive cyber campaign against Russia designed to thwart attempts to interfere with a U.S. election, the officials said.

“They basically took the IRA offline,” according to one individual familiar with the matter who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss classified information. “They shut ‘em down.”

The operation marked the first muscle-flexing by U.S. Cyber Command, with intelligence from the National Security Agency, under new authorities it was granted by President Trump and Congress last year to bolster offensive capabilities.

Whether the impact of the St. Petersburg action will be long-lasting remains to be seen. Russia’s tactics are evolving, and some analysts were skeptical of the deterrent value on either the Russian troll factory or on Putin, who, according to U.S. intelligence officials, ordered an “influence” campaign in 2016 to undermine faith in U.S. democracy. U.S. officials have also assessed that the Internet Research Agency works on behalf of the Kremlin.

“Such an operation would be more of a pinprick that is more annoying than deterring in the long run,” said Thomas Rid, a strategic studies professor at Johns Hopkins University, who was not briefed on the details.

But some U.S. officials argued that “grand strategic deterrence” is not always the goal. “Part of our objective is to throw a little curve ball, inject a little friction, sow confusion,” said one defense official. “There’s value in that. We showed what’s in the realm of the possible. It’s not the old way of doing business anymore.”

The action has been hailed as a success by Pentagon officials, and some U.S. senators credited CyberCom with averting Russian interference in the midterms.

“The fact that the 2018 election process moved forward without successful Russian intervention was not a coincidence,” said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), who did not discuss the specific details of the operation targeting the St. Petersburg group. Without CyberCom’s efforts, there “would have been some very serious cyber incursions.”

Cyber Command and the NSA declined to comment.

The disruption to the Internet Research Agency’s networks took place as Americans went to the polls and a day or so afterward — as the votes were tallied, to prevent the Russians from mounting a disinformation campaign that casts doubt on the results, according to officials.

The blockage was so frustrating to the trolls that they complained to their system administrators about the disruption, the officials said.

The Internet Research Agency as early as 2014 and continuing through the 2016 presidential election sought to undermine the U.S. political system, according to the Justice Department. Posing as Americans and operating social media pages and groups, Russian trolls sought to exacerbate tensions over issues such as race, sexual identity and guns.

The agency, according to federal prosecutors, is financed by Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a tycoon from St. Petersburg and an ally of Putin. Prigozhin, the Internet Research Agency and a company Prigozhin runs called Concord Management and Consulting, were among 16 Russian individuals and companies that a grand jury indicted a year ago as part of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

In a response to questions from The Washington Post, Prigozhin said in a statement on the Russian version of Facebook, “I cannot comment on the work of the Internet Research Agency in any way because I have no relation to it.” Concord Management declined to comment, citing the ongoing litigation in the United States.

Another element of the Cyber Command campaign, first reported by the New York Times, involved “direct messaging” that targeted the trolls and as well as hackers who work for the Russian military intelligence agency, the GRU. Using emails, pop-ups, text or direct messages, U.S. operatives beginning last October let the Russians know that their real names and online handles were known and they should not interfere in other nations’ affairs, defense officials said.

Some Internet Research Agency officials were so perturbed by the messaging that they launched an internal investigation to root out what they thought were insiders leaking personnel information, according to two individuals.

The operation was part of a broader government effort to safeguard the 2018 elections, involving the departments of Homeland Security, State and Justice, as well as the FBI. It was led by Gen. Paul Nakasone, who in July formed the Russia Small Group, made up of 75 to 80 personnel from CyberCom and NSA, which are part of the Defense Department.

When Nakasone took up the helm at the NSA and CyberCom in May, the White House and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told him his priority needed to be the defense of the midterm elections, officials said. No one wanted a repeat of the 2016 campaign, when the GRU hacked Democratic Party computers and released troves of emails and the Internet Research Agency mounted its social media campaign to exploit social divisions.

In August, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats said Russia was continuing “a pervasive messaging campaign” to try to weaken and divide the United States, though officials also concluded it was not as aggressive as the 2016 operation by Russia.

Two new U.S. authorities facilitated the move against the Internet Research Agency. A presidential order last August gave CyberCom greater latitude to undertake offensive operations below the level of armed conflict — actions that don’t result in death, significant damage or destruction. And a provision in this year’s National Defense Authorization Act also cleared the way for clandestine cyber operations that fall below that same threshold, categorizing them as “traditional military activity.”

“The calculus for us here was that you’re just pushing back in the same way that the adversary has for years,” a second defense official said. “It’s not escalatory. In fact, we’re finally in the game.”

But other officials are more circumspect.

“Causing consternation or throwing sand in the gears may raise the cost of engaging in nefarious activities, but it is not going to cause a nation state to just drop their election interference or their malign influence in general,” said a third official. “It’s not going to convince the decision-maker at the top.”

The operation also was the first real test of CyberCom’s new strategy of “persistent engagement” issued in April, which involved continually confronting the adversary and information sharing with partners. CyberCom in fall 2018 sent troops to Monte­negro, Macedonia and Ukraine to help shore up their network defenses, and the Americans were able to obtain unfamiliar malware samples that private security researchers traced to the GRU, according to officials

The Cyber Command campaign also was part of what Nakasone has described in an interview with Joint Force Quarterly as “acting outside our borders, being outside our networks, to ensure that we understand what our adversaries are doing.”

Joseph Marks contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-cyber-command-operation-disrupted-internet-access-of-russian-troll-factory-on-day-of-2018-midterms/2019/02/26/1827fc9e-36d6-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html

¿Sientes que te informaste después de echarle un vistazo a Facebook o sientes que no sabes cómo perdiste 10 minutos de tu vida sin enterarte de algo nuevo?

Facebook anunció este jueves 11 de agosto que hará un cambio leve a su fórmula con el fin de que los artículos que te parezcan más informativos surjan al principio de tu sección de noticias.

Lo que eso significa precisamente está poco claro y varía de persona a persona. A través de varias encuestas constantes, Facebook se ha enterado de que la gente piensa que las historias son “informativas” si se relacionan con temas que les interesen e incluyen noticias sobre el mundo en el que viven. No se refiere a la calidad ni a la veracidad de las historias, sino únicamente a la percepción que tienen las personas de ellas.

A través de una combinación de calificaciones de los usuarios en su Programa de Calidad en los Canales (un grupo de prueba compuesto de usuarios que califican las publicaciones en su sección de noticias) y de los comentarios, los “Me gusta” y el historial de lecturas de los usuarios, Facebook decidirá qué tan informativa te parece una historia.

¿Tiendes a leer historias sobre puercoespines y las noticias más recientes sobre las elecciones? Es probable que pronto veas más artículos y publicaciones sobre estos temas en las páginas que sigues o en las de tus amigos.

El canal de noticias es cada vez más complicado, está en constante cambio y nunca es tan suculento como esperas. Facebook hace cambios constantemente en un intento permanente por conservar la atención de la gente para que visite la página más a menudo y que comparta más materiales. Además, ya es costumbre que anuncie estos cambios, incluso los más pequeños.

A principios de agosto, Facebook anunció que planea combatir los “titulares anzuelo”. En junio señaló que daría prioridad a las publicaciones de tus amigos y familiares.

Source Article from http://expansion.mx/tecnologia/2016/08/12/facebook-hace-nuevos-ajustes-a-su-seccion-de-noticias-para-ser-mas-informativo

On Sunday, Naftali Bennett, head of the small, hard-line nationalist Yamina party, said he would work with Lapid to form a broad unity government and “save the country from a tailspin and return Israel to its course.” Lapid has already secured the support of two smaller liberal parties and a secular ultranationalist faction.

Bennett and Lapid have until Wednesday to hammer out a deal in which the pair split the premiership — with Bennett serving the first two years and Lapid the following two.

No political party has ever won an outright majority in Israel’s 120-seat parliament, the Knesset, forcing smaller factions to band together to form a coalition with more than 61 seats.

If Lapid and his allies — which range from hard-line nationalists to liberal Zionists and a small Islamist party — can overcome their differences and seal a deal, it would spell the end of Netanyahu’s rule, for the time being.

Netanyahu is Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, having held office since 2009, as well as a brief stint in the late 1990s. Despite his Likud party being the largest faction in the Knesset, he has become a divisive figure. Israel has held four parliamentary elections in the past two years, all seen as a referendum on his fitness to rule.

The long-serving prime minister has held onto power despite being indicted on charges of fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in 2019. Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing and has refused to step down from office while on trial.

After Bennett announced his intention to join forces with Lapid, Netanyahu lashed out in a nationally televised speech, saying that such a government “is a danger to the security of Israel, and is also a danger to the future of the state.”

Lapid responded to Netanyahu’s remarks on Monday, saying they were “reckless and dangerous, that of a man who has lost the brakes.”

“If you want to know why we’re determined to [bring] a change of government in Israel, go listen to that speech by Netanyahu,” Lapid said, referring to Netanyahu’s claim that a government without him would be “dangerous” and growing calls to violence by some against the prime minister’s political opponents and others.

Lapid pointed to the security details assigned to the prime minister’s political rivals, reporters and state prosecutors in Netanyahu’s corruption trial.

On Sunday, the Knesset Guard approved assigning a personal bodyguard to senior Yamina party politician Ayelet Shaked amid increasing threats of physical violence. Protesters outside Shaked’s home held signs that read “Leftist traitors.” Bennett received a personal security detachment earlier this month.

Gideon Saar, a former member of Netanyahu’s Likud party who split away ahead of the March elections, said his New Hope was “doing everything in our power” to reach a compromise and form a government, but that such an outcome remained uncertain.

Saar railed against the “incitement” against politicians seeking to assemble a coalition without Netanyahu, saying the prime minister “and his people are engaging in wild de-legitimization of a government that has yet to arise.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/31/israel-netanyahu-coalition-lapid-bennett-491452

President Donald Trump’s often-touted “border wall” has recently been referred to as “beautiful steel slats” by the president, a “beaded curtain” by California Rep. Nancy Pelosi, “semantics” by White House adviser Kellyanne Conway, and “not a wall” by outgoing White House chief of staff John Kelly. Finally, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Sunday that the wall was nothing more than a “metaphor” for border security.

Source Article from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-wall-reduced-metaphor-lindsey-graham_us_5c295336e4b05c88b7018acf

Ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, who authored the unverified dossier charging collusion between Russia and Donald Trump, still believes former Trump attorney Michael Cohen held secret meetings in Prague despite the Justice Department not substantiating the claim.

The dossier alleged Cohen had “secret meeting/s with Kremlin officials in August 2016” in Prague. However, Cohen testified before the House Oversight Committee in 2019 that he had never been to Prague and the Justice Department was unable to confirm Steele’s claim after a lengthy investigation.

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos sat down with Steele for a special, “Out of the Shadows: The Man behind the Steele Dossier,” and asked him about Cohen directly. 

“One big claim the dossier, the FBI, according to the Inspector General’s report … is not true, is the claim that Michael Cohen had a meeting with Russians in Prague,” Stephanopoulos said. “Do you accept that finding that it didn’t happen?” 

COHEN, IN BOOK THAT SLAMS TRUMP’S CHARACTER, SAYS STEELE DOSSIER, ‘COLLUSION’ NARRATIVES ARE NOT TRUE

Steele, who insisted the dossier is largely accurate throughout the interview, doesn’t buy Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz’s findings that Steele’s reporting couldn’t be corroborated. 

“No, I don’t,” Steele said. 

Cohen has since turned on Trump, sharing information about the former president with prosecutors. Cohen called Trump “a cheat, a liar, a fraud, a bully, a racist, a predator, a con man” and “amoral” in a book. 

But he still maintained the tale of his traveling to Prague in a Russian collusion-related plot was bogus. Cohen served prison time after pleading guilty to campaign finance violations and bank fraud, but was released to home confinement last year. 

Michael Cohen, former attorney to President Donald Trump, has long denied claims he meeting with Russians in Prague. (AP Photo/Kevin Hagen, File)

SOURCE OF STEELE DOSSIER WAS INVESTIGATED BY FBI FOR RUSSIAN CONTACTS, BARR SAYS

“Michael Cohen has completely turned on Donald Trump. He’s accused him of all kinds of things,” Stephanopoulos said. “It defies logic that if he did this, he wouldn’t say so now.” 

Steele didn’t agree. 

“It’s self-incriminating to a very great degree,” Steele said. 

Stephanopoulos asked what Cohen would be incriminating himself in, to which the dossier author responded, “Treason, presumably.”

Stephanopoulos shot back, “Since he’s gone to prison, since he’s turned on President Trump, he’s told every single story. Why wouldn’t he admit to this?”

“Because I think it’s so incriminating and demeaning and I think the other reason is he might be scared of the consequences,” Steele said.

(ABC News)

Stephanopoulos asked Steele if not believing the FBI, in this case, hurts his credibility.

“I am prepared to accept that not everything in the dossier is 100 percent accurate, I have yet to be convinced that that is one of them,” Steele said. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The questions surrounding Cohen’s alleged travel to Prague come from the dossier, which was published in January 2017 by BuzzFeed News, detailing salacious and unfounded allegations against Trump. Horowitz ripped the FBI in his report for heavily relying on the dossier to obtain surveillance warrants on Trump campaign official Carter Page.

In August 2017, Cohen denied the allegations made in the dossier, calling them “totally false.” Cohen’s attorney said Cohen “never traveled to Prague, Czech Republic, as evidenced by his passport” and “did not participate in meetings with Kremlin officials in Prague in August 2016.”

Former British spy Christopher Steele’s unverified dossier was a major element in warrant applications the FBI filled out to spy on Trump associate Carter Page.

When the dossier was first published, Cohen tweeted on Jan. 10, 2017: “I have never been to Prague in my life. #fakenews.”

Steele compiled information for the controversial file on behalf of Fusion GPS, which was hired to conduct opposition research funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign through law firm Perkins Coie.

Fox News’ Brooke Singman and Tyler Olson contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/christopher-steele-michael-cohen-colluded-prague

As protesters and armed anarchists seized control last month of a swath of Seattle’s downtown that includes a police station, dubbing it Capitol Hill Organized Protest, the local and mainstream media largely echoed elected leaders by insisting it was a peaceful protest – until people started getting killed.

The spin by the Seattle Times and national outlets that covered it belied the violent and dangerous origin of the area that began on June 8, when Seattle police abandoned their own station and allowed self-described anarchists to create a “police-free” zone. On Wednesday, police went back in and finished clearing out the area, after multiple shootings, an alleged rape and at least two murders.

“CHOP violently seized six blocks of downtown Seattle, guarded the area they stole with semi-automatic rifles and appointed a leader who called himself a warlord and the media spun it as a fun time with ‘free snacks,’” Washington Times columnist Tim Young told Fox News.

LATEST SEATTLE CHOP SHOOTING KILLS 16-YEAR-OLD BOY, CRITICALLY WOUNDS 14-YEAR-OLD BOY

“That’s as insane as saying Boko Haram was just trying to start a dating service when they kidnapped nearly 300 women in Nigeria a few years ago,” Young added. “And those liberal outlets probably still can’t figure out why people call them fake news.”

Since it was established, there have been at least four shootings, two of which left a 19-year-old and a 16-year-old dead in separate incidents. Seattle police made more than a dozen arrests after Mayor Jenny Durkan declared the gathering an unlawful assembly – a far cry from how it was originally portrayed by the media and by Durkan herself.

The mayor responded to criticism of her leadership by President Trump by tweeting that he should not be “so afraid of democracy.”

“The CHOP has become lawless and brutal,” Police Chief Carmen Best said Wednesday in a written statement. “Four shootings – two fatal – robberies, assaults, violence and countless property crimes have occurred in this several block area.”

The Seattle Times was perhaps the most egregious when it came to celebrating the cop-free area. The paper boasted about free snacks and pleasant smells inside the zone, called CHAZ at the time, on June 10.

SEATTLE’S CHOP HAS SEEN SHOOTINGS, VANDALISM, OTHER CRIMES AS OFFICIALS VOW TO DISMANTLE IT

“Free snacks at the No-Cop Co-op. Free gas masks from some guy’s sedan. Free speech at the speaker’s circle, where anyone could say their piece. A free documentary movie – Ava DuVernay’s “13th” – showing after dark,” Seattle Times reporter Evan Bush wrote. “Perhaps most important to demonstrators, the neighborhood core was free of uniformed police.”

Bush described the area as “Seattle’s quirky, lefty Capitol Hill,” noting that organizers “envisioned education initiatives, programs to address homelessness and building a community movement where unarmed police are designed to de-escalate.”

The Seattle Times even reported on the delightful odor the “calm and peaceful crowd” were providing residents.

“The streets smelled like the Fourth of July, as people seared hot dogs on curbside grills,” Bush wrote.

The following day, the Seattle Times focused on poets and artists performing inside the area, noting that despite the “festival-like atmosphere” gatherers are often reminded they’re protesting, not partying.

By June 13, Seattle Times business reporter Paul Roberts praised the “community garden” and ways the demonstrators could “advance the goals” of the city’s “newest tourist attraction.”

“Dozens of people with rakes and wheelbarrows spread topsoil and chicken manure in newly planted gardens,” Roberts wrote. “Others gathered in small groups to discuss plans for no-till farming and fundraising for medical supplies.”

“It’s obvious to media consumers that journalists put protesters above property. It remains to be seen how they would greet an occupation of the Seattle Times. It probably depends on which political agenda you’re pushing,” NewsBusters executive editor Tim Graham told Fox News.

“It’s also obvious that to cover something when you can glorify it as a ‘street festival’ and then stop covering it when people die, underlines why people dislike the fakery of liberal ‘news’ reporting,” Graham added, pointing to three recent NewsBusters studies as evidence.

While the Seattle Times celebrated CHOP on a local level, other mainstream news outlets raised eyebrows on a larger stage.

FOX NEWS CHANNEL FINISHES QUARTER WITH RECORD-SETTING VIEWERSHIP

NewsBusters reported on June 22 that CBS’ “Evening News” and “NBC Nightly News” both skipped coverage of a deadly shooting inside CHOP. Another study, conducted on June 23, indicated that evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC all ignored another shooting in the area.

“The networks had been actively trying to protect the encampment’s radicals from criticism. First, they turned a blind eye altogether, and when they had no choice but to cover the ‘Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone,’ as it was called at the time, they downplayed the craziness and provided cover,” Media Research Center news analyst Nicholas Fondacaro wrote after studying coverage of CHOP on ABC, NBC and CBS’ newscasts.

“When the shooting and killing started, they tried to cover it up. They refused to report on the black teen who was shot and killed in the zone last Saturday. And there was no mention of the Sunday or Tuesday shooting at any point during the week,” Fondacaro wrote. ”It was those shootings that were the impetus for the businesses and residents to band together and sue the city for not protecting their rights and property.”

University of North Carolina professor Lois A. Boynton is a fellow in the University’s Parr Center for Ethics. She feels coverage of CHOP “points to some of the basic challenges journalists, all media outlets, face when reporting on contentious and polarizing issues.”

CUOMO BROTHERS’ JOKEY CNN INTERVIEW IGNORING NURSING HOME CONTROVERSY SPARKS OUTRAGE

Boynton explained that biases can come from many things, including story angle, what gets emphasized and what doesn’t, who reporters select as sources and a reporter’s choice of words.

“Reporters, editors and producers need to be cognizant of how readers and viewers are interpreting their stories and what impact that may have on the community’s well-being and news outlet’s professional reputation,” Boynton told Fox News.

When Durkan announced last week that officials would end the police-free zone – CNN and MSNBC didn’t feel it was particularly newsworthy.

News broke during the 7 p.m. ET hour on Monday that Seattle’s mayor said the violence was distracting from changes sought by thousands of protesters seeking to address racial inequity and police brutality – but CNN’s 7 p.m. program, “Erin Burnett Outfront” did not mention the news as it unfolded.

CNN continued to ignore the news during its primetime programming, as there was no coverage on back-to-back editions of “Anderson Cooper 360” from 8-10 p.m. ET or during Don Lemon’s “CNN Tonight,” which aired from 10-midnight ET.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

MSNBC completely ignored CHOP altogether from 7-midnight ET on the day of Durkan’s announcement as “MSNBC Live,” “All in with Chris Hayes,” The Rachel Maddow Show,” “The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell and “The 11th Hour with Brian Williams” all declined to report the news of Seattle’s CHOP possibly drawing to a close.

“Most mainstream media outlets have bent over backward to portray the civil unrest as peaceful actions supporting the general aims of justice. That narrative gets largely disrupted if those news organizations now focus on the chaos in places like Seattle,” DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News at the time.

The mainstream media narrative has extended to other stories, like St. Louis. CNN’s Chris Cuomo was accused of siding with the “mob” on Tuesday night during a contentious interview with Mark McCloskey, the man who went viral for brandishing a gun alongside his wife as the couple protected their home from protesters.

An attorney for McCloskey insisted the couple only retrieved their weapons after they observed multiple people in the crowd who were armed.

Fox News’ Stephen Sorace and Michael Ruiz contributed to this report.  

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/seattle-chop-violence-media-insisted-peaceful

Es por eso que intenta que sus jugadores intercambien ideas y formen opinión, especialmente en temas como el racismo. Cuando los jugadores como LaMarcus Aldridge, Pau Gasol, “Manu” Ginobili, Kawhi Leonard o Tony Parker, entre otros, llegaron al campamento de entrenamiento, les dieron a cada uno una copia de “Between the World and Me”, un libro de Ta-Nehisi Coates sobre la vida de la raza negra en Estados Unidos, y otra del film “The Birth of a Nation”, que trata sobre la rebelión de los esclavos en 1831.

Source Article from http://www.infobae.com/america/deportes/2016/10/09/tests-de-noticias-y-cultura-general-la-clave-secreta-de-los-san-antonio-spurs-de-gregg-popovich/

“There is an extremely high level of COVID in your community,” Secretary of Health and Human Services Marylou Sudders said, addressing people in those places. She urged them to “respect the virus” and take steps such as wearing masks, staying 6 feet apart, washing their hands, and staying home from work if they are ill.

Citing average daily cases per 100,000 residents as a metric many states use to measure community health, Baker said the 33 communities, which had more than 4 cases per 100,000 residents “require specific strategies to attack COVID there, and to work with them to stop the spread.”

Advertisement



Baker said he and Lieutenant Governor Karyn Polito had reached out to leaders in the high- and moderate-risk communities in the past couple of days “because we want to partner with them in whatever way makes the most sense to help them deal with the spread in their communities.”

He said the state’s “key strategy” was to work with local government. “Every community is different,” he said, but the state could help with “additional testing, tracing, and isolation resources. And we’re also implementing stepped-up enforcement measures, and we’ll also work with these communities on messaging and other communication strategies as we and they see fit.”

“The good news here should not get lost,” Baker said. “Three hundred eighteen communities here in Massachusetts are at or below national benchmarks with respect to containing COVID-19 in their communities.”

But he also warned, “I want to be clear on one point. Regardless of where your community sits, COVID is not going away. Your actions, no matter where you live or where you work, will determine in many respects how this virus spreads.”

Advertisement



“We’re asking everyone to recognize that this virus continues to affect, injure, and kill people every single day,” he said.

The state released a color-coded map of all the cities and towns in the state showing them in red, yellow, green, and white, depending on their current level of coronavirus.

Baker said red indicated a community had more than 8 average daily cases per 100,000, yellow was 4 to 8 per 100,000, green was less than 4 per 100,000, and white indicated less than 5 total cases had been reported in the most recent 14 days.

Chelsea, Everett, Lynn, and Revere were the only communities marked in red on the map, which officials said would be updated weekly. Boston, Worcester, and Springfield were among the communities in yellow.

Baker noted that he had announced on Friday the creation of a multi-agency enforcement and intervention team and said its mission of ramping up enforcement and coordinating local intervention efforts “would make the most sense” in the moderate- and high-risk communities.

“The virus doesn’t care about boundaries. It certainly takes every opening any of us give it. We’re making progress and have made progress in our fight, but we have seen the effects of too many people letting your guard down,” he said.

Baker also suggested the numbers argued for letting children return to schools, something some parents in less-affected towns have advocated.

Advertisement



“We would certainly hope that, based on this data, if you’re in a green or white community, I can’t imagine a good reason not to go back, whether it’s full-time or in some sort of a hybrid, because for all intents and purposes, you meet all the benchmarks that are being used across the country, across New England, to make decisions about whether it’s safe to go back to school,” he said.

Both Baker and Sudders emphasized the importance of wearing face coverings, especially for those in higher-risk communities.

”Masks work,” Sudders said. “Wear a face covering at all times when outside of your home.”

Sudders even urged people to consider wearing a mask inside their homes “if an older individual or someone with a compromised medical condition is part of your immediate household, and safe distancing cannot be maintained and other members of your household are going to work [or] participating in recreational activities outside the home.”

Sudders also noted that Baker’s new gathering order, which went into effect Tuesday, now requires face coverings at private events where more than 10 people from different households will be mixing.

Baker underscored that point, noting: “If you’re putting a bunch of people in your house or backyard and they’re not the immediate people you have in your house every day that you live with, people need to wear face coverings, and they need to respect the fact we have a lot of asymptomatic transmission going on.”

Advertisement



Baker’s office didn’t immediately release a list, but a Globe review of the map indicated that, in addition to the four high-risk communities, the 29 moderate risk communities were: Northampton, Holyoke, Chicopee, Springfield, Longmeadow, Granby, Belchertown, Charlton, Auburn, Worcester, Marlborough, Framingham, Maynard, Wrentham, Taunton, Fall River, Brockton, Randolph, Quincy,Hull, Boston, Winthrop, Malden, Saugus, Peabody, Salem, Middleton, Lawrence, and Georgetown.

In other news from Baker’s news conference, the Republican governor expressed concern about the controversial executive order by Republican President Donald Trump to extend unemployment benefits to people in need during the pandemic.

Baker said his biggest concern was that the federal share of the benefits would come from money from Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster relief funds.

“You can make an argument, a credible one, that FEMA money would be an appropriate resource. It’s an emergency and all the rest,” he said. But he said the problem was that states were already expecting to apply for the FEMA funds as reimbursement for costs that they incurred in March, April, May, and June during the early days of the pandemic.

The unemployment funding “needs to be done through a separate appropriation, not by taking money from FEMA,” he said.

The coronavirus surged through the state this spring but is now at much lower levels. The state has recorded 8,741 confirmed and probable deaths from coronavirus as of Monday. One model says the death toll will likely climb over 10,000 by Dec. 1.

The state is in Phase 3 of a phased reopening process, but recent upticks in coronavirus metrics have sparked concerns among state officials and public health experts.

Advertisement



Peter Bailey-Wells of the Globe staff contributed to this report.


Martin finucane can be reached at martin.finucane@globe.com Jaclyn Reiss can be reached at jaclyn.reiss@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter: @JaclynReiss

Source Article from https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/08/11/nation/baker-says-33-communities-moderate-or-high-risk-coronavirus/

La noche, que comenzó siendo una fiesta netamente carnavalera y popular, terminó con un enfrentamiento entre un grupo de personas y un grupo de choque de la Policía local.

Los 23 detenidos fueron recuperando la libertad, a lo largo de la jornada de este domingo, por disposición judicial.

El hecho tuvo su punto central en los alrededores de la Plaza Treinta y Tres Orientales, lugar de la culminación de una multitudinaria y colorida fiestas, que había comenzado en la Plaza Artigas, lugar de partida de este desfile.

Ya en esa Plaza comenzaron los primeros incidentes entre personas que estaban alcoholizadas y drogadas, quienes intentaban enfrentarse a la Policía, cuando los agentes intentaban poner orden.

Mas tarde y ya avanzada la madrugada cuando la última comparsa culminó su actuación y la fiesta inaugural concluía comenzaron las primeras corridas y apedreos contra los uniformados.

Éstos, al no poder calmar a los inadaptados, recurrió al uso de la fuerza para proceder a la detención de las 23 personas que ayer declararon en el juzgado y quedaron libres. Entre los detenidos hubieron dos mujeres y siete adolescentes.

En este procedimiento resultaron heridos dos policías, uno de ellos en el rostro producto del impacto de un trozo de hormigón y otro en una pierna con similar objeto.

Según informaron a El País, fuentes policiales, en la próximas horas los efectivos heridos realizarán una denuncia penal a causa de este ataque.

Esta situación no es nueva en los desfiles del departamento salteño.

Los mismos cobran más intensidad cuando aumenta el uso de drogas y alcohol en el lugar y bandas de adolescentes y jóvenes se enfrentan, provocando la intervención de la Policía, punto culmine de este tipo de enfrentamientos.

Seguridad para las llamadas

En Montevideo, se ultiman los preparativos para el tradicional desfile de llamadas, que se realizará el próximo jueves 5 y viernes 6 de febrero, por los barrios Sur y Palermo. La Intendencia de Montevideo y Jefatura de Policía anunciaron ya previo al desfile inaugural un importante operativo que tendrá casi 600 funcionarios policiales y municipales, monitoreando la zona donde se realizará el desfile, durante dos jornadas.

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/policias-heridos-detenidos-carnaval-salto.html