Most Viewed Videos

At least seven Minneapolis police officers have resigned amid the protests over police brutality and racial inequality, and more than half a dozen are in the process of leaving, department officials told the Minneapolis Star Tribune

Minneapolis Police Department (MDP) insiders told the newspaper that officers are feeling misunderstood and stuck in the middle of a state probe, protests, city leaders and the media after the death of an unarmed black man, George Floyd, in Minneapolis police custody sparked nationwide protests. 

City spokesman Casper Hill confirmed to the newspaper that seven officers had left the department without providing demographic information. Police insiders said several officers in exit interviews pointed to a lack of support from police leadership and city officials as the demonstrations intensified. 

The newspaper also reported that another seven officers are in the process of filing separation paperwork and that several others had to be convinced to stay. The departures include patrol officers and detectives. 

The resignations come as the department is facing a state human rights investigation and calls for defunding and disbandment after former officer Derek Chauvin knelt on Floyd’s neck for almost nine minutes before Floyd died. Chauvin and three other officers present were fired from the department.

Henry Halvorson, deputy police chief, signaled in an email to supervisors obtained by the Star Tribune earlier this month that officers were walking off the job without filing paperwork. 

Police spokesman John Elder told the newspaper that the resignations would not affect the department’s ability to provide public safety services.

“There’s nothing that leads us to believe that at this point the numbers are so great that it’s going to be problematic,” Elder said. “People seek to leave employment for a myriad reasons — the MPD is no exception.”

There are 850 officers in the MPD, almost 40 less than the number authorized for 2020. A class of 29 recruits will graduate and start policing in the summer, Elder said.

But the department also faces potential layoffs due to the coronavirus, at least 75 officers being eligible to leave with retirement benefits as of Memorial Day and a 25-year low in applicants, according to the Star Tribune.

The departures reflect what happened in 2015 following protests over Jamar Clark’s killing by police. At the time, officers said they felt “they were left to deal with the occupation on their own,” according to a federal report. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/502655-7-minneapolis-police-officers-resign-amid-george-floyd-protests

Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Friday publicly sparred over the sweeping multitrillion-dollar social spending bill that’s been dividing Democrats.

Manchin — a moderate Democrat pushing back on the bill’s $3.5 trillion price tag — slammed Sanders for writing an op-ed in a West Virginia newspaper claiming the legislation would benefit working families in the state.

“This isn’t the first time an out-of-state has tried to tell West Virginians what is best for them despite having no relationship to our state,” Manchin said in a statement.

“Millions of jobs are open, supply chains are strained and unavoidable inflation taxes are draining workers’ hard-earned wages as the price of gasoline and groceries continues to climb,” the West Virginia lawmaker continued.

“Senator Sanders’ answer is to throw more money on an already overheated economy while 52 other Senators have grave concerns about this approach.”

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders has pushed for more spending.
AP

Manchin is one of two Democratic senators, along with Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who have vowed not to support the reconciliation bill at its current top line — a stance that has drawn open criticism from other members of Congress.

Progressives have repeatedly taken aim at the centrists, with Sanders, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, recently tweeting: “2 senators cannot be allowed to defeat what 48 senators and 210 House members want.” 

The Vermont lawmaker took the fight to Manchin’s home state Friday with his essay in The Charleston Gazette-Mail calling on “every Democrat” to get on board with the massive legislation.

“Poll after poll shows overwhelming support for this legislation. Yet, the political problem we face is that in a 50-50 Senate we need every Democratic senator to vote ‘yes,’ We now have only 48. Two Democratic senators remain in opposition, including Sen. Joe Manchin,” Sanders wrote.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema and Sen. Joe Manchin have been the moderates in the Democratic party.
Los Angeles Times / Polaris

He added that Congress had a “historic opportunity to support the working families of West Virginia, Vermont and the entire country and create policy which works for all, not just the few.”

But the progressive firebrand’s push did not sit well with Manchin, who has called on Congress to “hit the pause button” on the bill and argued for a topline number closer to $1.5 trillion. 

“To be clear, again, Congress should proceed with caution on any additional spending and I will not vote for a reckless expansion of government programs,” Manchin said in his statement.

Sinema and Manchin have pushed for less spending than the progressive wing wants.
AP

“No op-ed from a self-declared Independent socialist is going to change that.” 

Moderates, including Sinema, have called for a $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill that passed the Senate earlier this year to head to the House before the larger package is brought to the floor.

But progressives managed to get House Democratic leadership to abandon plans to bring the bill to the floor late last month, with far-left lawmakers vowing to withhold their support for the measure until the reconciliation bill is addressed. 

Top Democrats are looking to act on both bills before the end of the month. 

President Biden publicly acknowledged on Friday that the final spending bill will be less than $3.5 trillion. 

“To be honest with you, we’re probably not going to get $3.5 trillion this year. We’re going to get something less than that. But I’m going to negotiate, I’m going to get it done,” he said in Hartford, Conn.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/10/15/joe-manchin-and-bernie-sanders-spar-over-bidens-3-5-trillion-bill/

President TrumpDonald John TrumpIran foreign minister warns killing of general is ‘extremely dangerous and foolish escalation’ Congress reacts to U.S. assassination of Iranian general Trump tweets American flag amid reports of strike against Iranian general MORE will spend Friday evening in Miami rallying a group of evangelical supporters, just weeks after a leading evangelical magazine issued a bruising editorial calling for his impeachment and removal from office. 

The piece by Christianity Today’s now-outgoing Editor-in-Chief Mark Galli stoked divisions among evangelical supporters for Trump, who have overlooked some of Trump’s personal foibles while focusing on some of his policies and his judicial picks.

It sparked fierce condemnation from Franklin Graham, the son of the publication’s founder Billy Graham, and caused a number of evangelicals to flock together and publicly express support for the president.

The Trump campaign announced the “Evangelicals for Trump” coalition one day after the editorial declaring that Trump had “abused his authority for personal gain and betrayed his constitutional oath.”

Friday’s speech, which is expected to resemble one of Trump’s rallies, represents a rare public address for Trump as he completes a two-week holiday stint at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, and underscores the importance of evangelical voters to the Trump coalition. 

“Evangelicals were key in 2016 and will be very important again in 2020. They will be overwhelming in their support for the president and they will help immensely,” Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh said in an interview. 

Murtaugh said Friday’s event was in the works prior to the Christianity Today editorial, and he rejected the idea that it reflected a wider feeling among evangelicals.

Social conservatives have largely hailed the rapid pace of Senate confirmations of conservative Trump judicial nominees. They have also been pleased with his support for pro-life policies and religious freedom and his Israel policies.

While the Christianity Today editorial pointed to some discomfort with Trump, there’s little evidence to suggest evangelicals are having serious doubts about the president.

“The fact of the matter is, the vast majority of white evangelicals are Republicans and Republicans are going to support the nominee,” said Dan Cox, a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), who called the group a “critical” element of Trump’s base. “There are very few that are winnable for a Democratic nominee.” 

Eighty-one percent of white evangelicals voted for Trump and Vice President Pence in the 2016 presidential contest, while Democrat Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonIs Joe Biden simply running his campaign like Hillary Clinton? Clinton becomes first female chancellor of Queen’s University in Belfast Pelosi faces decision on articles of impeachment MORE captured 16 percent. 

Over 70 percent of white evangelicals approved of the job that Trump was doing as president as of mid-July, according to an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll taken at the time. 

Some of Trump’s own behavior and rhetoric has at times led to questions about whether his support among more religious voters could waver.

Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct by more than a dozen women, and his former personal attorney has been jailed on charges related to payments to adult-film star Stormy Daniels that were allegedly made to cover up an affair.

On policy, Trump’s administration has cut back on the number of refugees admitted into the U.S. In October, Trump abruptly pulled forces out of Syria in a move that endangered Christians and other religious minorities in the region.

The Christianity Today editorial, which marked a rare venture into politics for the publication, listed Trump’s actions in business and with women and his “mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders” on Twitter as evidence the president has “dumbed down the idea of morality.” It directly appealed to evangelical supporters of Trump, telling them: “Consider how your justification of Mr. Trump influences your witness to your Lord and Savior.”

Democrats argue that evangelical supporters of Trump are coming up with excuses to ignore Trump’s behavior, and presidential candidate Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegSanders slams Biden: He brings ‘a lot of baggage’ into the race Gabbard raises .4 million in fourth fundraising quarter Insurgents win in 2020 fundraising race MORE has made the issue a focus of his campaign.

“He continues to push the outer envelope of accessible discourse and the evangelical leaders as well as Republican leaders struggle to keep up with him,” said Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist and onetime communications director for former Sen. Harry ReidHarry Mason ReidLeft presses 2020 Democrats to retake the courts from Trump Lobbying World Nevada journalist: Harry Reid will play ‘significant role’ in Democratic primary MORE (D-Nev.). “They continue to find new ways to justify their support.”

At the same time, neither Democratic nor Republican strategists see the Christianity Today editorial as signaling a shift in support for Trump among white evangelicals.  

“I don’t see much of a chance of bringing evangelical voters into the Democratic fold,” Manley said, asserting that Republicans have played on fears of a “changing America” among these voters with respect to social policies, immigration and other issues. 

Cox, the AEI research fellow, said Trump is less popular with younger white evangelicals than their older counterparts, which he attributed in part to a lack of fear over racial and demographic changes. But Cox predicted that lack of enthusiasm won’t have a meaningful impact in the 2020 election.

“I think by and large we’re not going to see much change between now and the election,” Cox said. “This group is going to rally around and support him at least as much as they did in 2016.” 

The “Evangelicals for Trump” gathering is one of several targeted events the president’s reelection campaign has orchestrated in recent weeks as it seeks to drum up support among key voting blocs.

The campaign previously held a “Black Voices for Trump” event in Atlanta in an effort to boost enthusiasm among African American voters. Pence attended the launch of “Latinos for Trump” in June, and several female campaign surrogates hosted a “Women for Trump” gathering in Florida last August.

But even as Trump aims to expand his support heading into 2020 among voting blocs that largely voted for Democrats in 2016 and 2018, he can ill afford to lose any of the voters who propelled him to the White House three years ago. 

As a result, strategists believe the president will consistently return to his base supporters, white evangelicals among them.

“This is not going to be the last event we see where he’s strengthening his political connections with evangelical voters,” said Alex Conant, a GOP strategist who worked on Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioIran foreign minister warns killing of general is ‘extremely dangerous and foolish escalation’ Congress reacts to U.S. assassination of Iranian general Trump tweets American flag amid reports of strike against Iranian general MORE’s (R-Fla.) 2016 presidential campaign. 

“It’s just absolutely critical not only that he maintains their support, but that he gets them to turn out.”

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/476587-trump-to-rally-evangelicals-after-critical-christianity-today

But prosecutors, citing what they called Mr. Epstein’s “yearslong scheme to sexually abuse underage girls” and his fortune of at least $500 million, have argued that Mr. Epstein would pose a danger to the community and might flee the country if granted bond.

The government had also said Mr. Epstein might try to obstruct justice if he were given bail. Prosecutors said that last year he wired $350,000 to two people who were potential witnesses against him at a trial.

Mr. Epstein’s lawyers said on Monday that the payment could have been “an act of generosity” to Mr. Epstein’s associates, and that government lawyers were unable to prove otherwise.

Mr. Epstein, 66, who faces up to 45 years in prison if convicted on the charges, has been held since his July 6 arrest in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Lower Manhattan, a highly secure jail that has housed accused terrorists, mobsters and, recently, the Mexican drug lord El Chapo.

In 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty to two state charges in Florida as part of a secret deal with federal prosecutors to satisfy a potential indictment on similar charges. He ended up serving a 13-month sentence in a local jail and avoided federal prosecution.

That deal was brokered by R. Alexander Acosta, a former United States attorney in Miami who resigned last week as President Trump’s Labor Secretary after public outrage over the Epstein agreement reached a fever pitch.

On Monday, defense lawyers for Mr. Epstein listed four additional Justice Department officials — two of whom now hold high-level government positions — who approved Mr. Epstein’s deal at the time.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/15/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-news.html

SAN GABRIEL, Calif. – A fire early Saturday destroyed the rooftop and most of the interior of a Catholic church in California that was undergoing renovation to mark its upcoming 250th anniversary celebration.

Fire alarms at the San Gabriel Mission rang around 4 a.m. When firefighters arrived, they saw smoke rising from the wooden rooftop in one corner of the historic structure, San Gabriel Fire Capt. Paul Negrete said.

Firefighters entered the church and tried to beat back the flames, but they had to retreat when roofing and other structural materials began to fall, Negrete said.

“We were trying to fight it from the inside. We weren’t able to because it became unsafe,” he said.

After evacuating the church, the crew was joined by up to 50 firefighters who tried to douse water on the 50-foot-high structure from ladder trucks, he said.

More:Notre Dame forecourt opens to public for first time since devastating fire

“The roof is completely gone,” the captain said. “The fire traversed the wood rapidly. The interior is pretty much destroyed up into the altar area.”

The cause of the fire was under investigation, Negrete said. He said the recent toppling of monuments to Junipero Serra, the founder of the California mission system who has long been a symbol of oppression among Indigenous activists, will be a factor in the investigation.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/07/11/san-gabriel-mission-fire-destroys-much-249-year-old-church/5422677002/

BLAINE, Wash. — In his decades of beekeeping, Ted McFall had never seen anything like it.

As he pulled his truck up to check on a group of hives near Custer, Wash., in November, he could spot from the window a mess of bee carcasses on the ground. As he looked closer, he saw a pile of dead members of the colony in front of a hive and more carnage inside — thousands and thousands of bees with their heads torn from their bodies and no sign of a culprit.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/02/us/asian-giant-hornet-washington.html

A day after it was revealed that special counsel Robert Mueller issued a letter to Attorney General William Barr regarding his summary of Mueller’s investigation, CNN Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin says it shows that Mueller believes Barr swayed the summary in President Trump’s favor.

The letter, which has since been made public, said that Barr’s two-page summary of the investigation “did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions.”

A Justice Department spokeswoman later told The Washington Post that Mueller and Barr also spoke over the phone regarding the summary, which was a “cordial and professional conversation” that “emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading.”

Toobin, however, believes the language used in Mueller’s letter illustrates something much different and illustrates Mueller’s frustration with Barr’s “deliberate distortion.”

MSNBC’S CHRIS MATTHEWS SLAMS BARR’S ‘SKULLDUGGERY,’ CLAIMS HE LIED ABOUT MUELLER REPORT’S FINDINGS

“That is a scathing, outraged letter,” Toobin said, just before Barr took the stand to answer questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding his summary. “Accusing the attorney general of completely distorting and lying to the public about what Mueller spent two years on.”

CNN Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin calls Mueller’s letter to AG Barr “scathing, outraged” and says it was not a “polite letter among old friends.”
(CNN)

The letter went on to discuss the “public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation” as a result of Barr’s summary, which Mueller said threatened to “undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigation.”

Toobin argued that Mueller’s language did not appear to be a “polite letter among old friends.”

AG WILLIAM BARR TESTIFIES BEFORE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OVER MUELLER REPORT HANDLING — LIVE BLOG 

“That is an accusation of political interference in Mueller’s work,” he said. “That is not a routine letter in any sense of the word… let’s be clear about what Mueller is saying, that the fix was in and he is saying that Barr deliberately distorted his conclusions for the political gain of the president. That’s what that letter says in plain English,” he continued.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The letter has renewed calls from Democrats for Barr to resign. Barr has defended his summary of the Mueller report during his hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday and will do the same on Thursday with the House Judiciary Committee, provided it is not postponed or canceled due to an ongoing debate about whether the staff committee’s attorneys will pose questions to Barr.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cnn-jeffrey-toobin-mueller-barr-letter

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

The protesters included relatives of inmates who have not heard from them in days

Friends and relatives of inmates stuck in cells without power or heat at a prison in New York have held a protest against their detention conditions.

Protesters outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, a federal facility in Brooklyn, chanted: “Where is the heat”?

Many inmates have not been able to contact the outside world for days, following a partial power failure.

Members of Congress who visited the prison on Saturday described the situation there as a “nightmare”.

How bad are the conditions?

“It is like living in a closet without lights,” said Representative Nydia Velázquez, a Democrat whose district includes the prison.

She said temperatures in some cells were as low as 49 F (9.5C).

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

The Metropolitan Detention Center houses more than 1,600 inmates

Jerrold Nadler, another US House member for New York, condemned the authorities’ “total lack of urgency and concern”.

He told the crowd outside the prison – which houses more than 1,600 inmates – that power was unlikely to be restored until Monday.

The protesters carried signs reading “Shut it down”, “Torture at the MDC”, “United in outrage” and “Turn up the heat”.

One tweeted that the prisoners were banging windows as the demonstrators were gathering outside.

What are authorities saying?

Officials say the failure was the result of a fire that destroyed an electrical panel. The fire melted a switch designed to turn on a back-up generator.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons said officials were “working to restore power as expeditiously as possible”, adding: “Inmates have hot water for showers and hot water in the sinks in the cell. Essential personal hygiene items and medical services continue to be provided.”

The bureau also said that the building had emergency lighting.

In a tweet late on Saturday, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio condemned the federal authorities and said the city was providing blankets for the prisoners.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47107326

The Republican chairman of a Senate committee asked the Trump administration to fully declassify an email that President Barack Obama’s national security adviser sent to herself about Michael Flynn shortly before she left office, according to a report.

Sen. Ron Johnson is seeking the email sent by Susan Rice about a Jan. 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting in which Obama and other top administration officials discussed the case against Flynn, who went on to become Trump’s national security adviser.

“I understand your office is currently reviewing a January 20, 2017, email from former national security advisor Susan Rice,” Johnson wrote in the letter to Attorney General William Barr that was viewed by Politico.

“In that email, Ambassador Rice summarized an Oval Office meeting with President Obama and other administration officials that occurred on January 5, 2017. A majority of Ambassador Rice’s email was declassified but a portion of the email remains classified,” wrote Johnson, chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

Johnson, of Wisconsin, said that as more information about the meeting becomes declassified, “it is essential that Congress and the American people understand what occurred” and noted that declassifying Rice’s email “will assist these efforts.”

In a portion of Rice’s email that had been declassified, she said Obama, after a briefing on Russian interference in the 2016 election, had a follow-up conversation with Rice, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and former Vice President Joe Biden.

“President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book,’” Rice wrote. “The president stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”

Rice noted that there might be information related to Russia that should be held from the incoming Trump administration, writing, “we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”

Trump has accused Biden and Obama of trying to sabotage his administration through the Russia investigation.

The president has pointed to documents that show Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, was among Obama White House officials who asked for Flynn to be unmasked after his conversations with a Russian ambassador were picked up by the intelligence community.

“This was all Obama. This was all Biden,” Trump told Fox Business. “These people were corrupt. The whole thing was corrupt. And we caught them. We caught them.”

Rice and other Obama officials have denied they did anything wrong and said “unmasking” is routine.

Michael Flynn and Susan Rice in 2017Mark Wilson/Getty Images

The Justice Department has moved to drop the case against Flynn, who was one of the first prosecutions carried out by then-special counsel Robert Mueller, saying the new information released raises questions about the FBI’s interview with Flynn.

It said the interview was “untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn” and was “conducted without any legitimate investigation.”

Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

But he changed his plea in January, got a new legal team, and accused the FBI of trying to set him up.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/sen-ron-johnson-wants-rices-email-on-flynn-to-be-declassified/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/09/tech/facebook-chris-hughes-break-up/index.html

Submit your calendar items and notices to…
mlopez@lasvegasoptic.com
_______________
• First Born program provides services to families in San Miguel and Mora counties. It is a free and confidential home visiting program. To learn more about the program, or to schedule an informational visit, call 454-1343.

• Fourth Judicial District Court Appointed Special Advocates needs volunteers. The local CASA program is taking applications for volunteers. Call 454-0223 or visit the office.

• Interested in fostering or adopting a New Mexico child? Call CYFD at 1-800-432-2075 for more information.

• The “Sí Se Puede” group of Narcotics Anonymous meets at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday nights at 310 Mills Ave. Everyone is welcome. For more information, call the NA helpline: 800-925-4186 or Frances at 575-815-8544.

Source Article from http://www.lasvegasoptic.com/content/noticias-june-4-2017

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Boris Johnson and David Cameron campaigned together ahead of the 2015 general election

Boris Johnson did not believe in Brexit during the referendum campaign and backed Leave “because it would help his political career”, says David Cameron.

In an extract from his memoir published in the Sunday Times, the former PM also refers to cabinet minister Michael Gove as “a foam-flecked Faragist”.

The pair were “ambassadors for the expert-trashing, truth-twisting age of populism”, Mr Cameron writes.

And he also accuses Mr Gove of being disloyal to himself and Mr Johnson.

Of his former colleague, Mr Cameron writes: “One quality shone through: disloyalty. Disloyalty to me – and, later, disloyalty to Boris.”

The latest revelations come after another extract published on Saturday accused the pair of behaving “appallingly” during the 2016 referendum campaign.

Mr Cameron called the poll after promising it in the Conservative Party’s election manifesto.

He campaigned for Remain, but lost the vote by 52% to 48%, and resigned as prime minister shortly after.

Mr Cameron writes that when deciding whether to back Leave or Remain in the campaign, Mr Johnson was concerned what the “best outcome” would be for him.

“Whichever senior Tory politician took the lead on the Brexit side – so loaded with images of patriotism, independence and romance – would become the darling of the party,” he says.

“He [Mr Johnson] didn’t want to risk allowing someone else with a high profile – Michael Gove in particular – to win that crown.”

The former Tory leader adds: “The conclusion I am left with is that he [Boris Johnson] risked an outcome he didn’t believe in because it would help his political career.”

He also says during the Leave campaign Mr Johnson, who has repeatedly said the UK must exit the EU on 31 October, privately raised the possibility of holding another referendum after fresh negotiations with the EU.

He criticises Mr Johnson’s use of the Vote Leave campaign bus emblazoned by the much-criticised claim that leaving would mean £350m a week extra for the NHS.

“Boris rode the bus round the country, he left the truth at home,” writes the former prime minister.

Image copyright
Carl Court

Image caption

Leave-supporting politicians and footballer Sol Campbell with a Vote Leave poster in 2016

And of Mr Gove – a cabinet minister both now and then – he said: “I couldn’t believe what I was seeing.

“Gove, the liberal-minded, carefully-considered Conservative intellectual, had become a foam-flecked Faragist warning that the entire Turkish population was about to come to Britain.”

During the run-up to the EU referendum, Mr Gove claimed Turkey and four other countries could join the EU by 2020, increasing the UK’s population by up to 5.23 million by 2030.

However, it was the behaviour of his then employment minister and current Home Secretary Priti Patel that “shocked” him the most, he says.

“She used every announcement, interview and speech to hammer the government on immigration, even though she was part of that government,” he writes.

“I was stuck though: unable to fire her, because that would make her a Brexit martyr.”

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Mr Cameron said the behaviour of Priti Patel, his former education minister, shocked him the most

The prime minister, Mr Gove and Ms Patel are yet to respond to the criticisms of them contained in Mr Cameron’s book.

In an interview with the Times published on Saturday, Mr Cameron said he was “hugely depressed” about the 2016 referendum result and he knew “some people will never forgive me”.

But he defended his decision to call the poll, arguing the issue of the EU “needed to be addressed”.

Image copyright
Red Sky Shepherds Huts via PA Media

Image caption

The former PM famously wrote his memoirs in a shed – which allegedly cost £25,000

The prime minister is due to meet European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker in Luxembourg this week as negotiations aimed at securing a deal continue.

In an interview with the Mail on Sunday, Mr Johnson said he was still hopeful a new deal with the EU could be reached in time for the crucial EU summit on 17 October.

It would take a lot of work, he said, adding: “I think that we will get there.”

He said there was a “real sign of movement” in Berlin, Paris and “most interestingly” in Dublin.

However, if he cannot negotiate a deal, the UK would break out of its “manacles” like cartoon character The Incredible Hulk on Halloween, he said.

“Hulk always escaped, no matter how tightly bound in he seemed to be – and that is the case for this country,” he said. “We will come out on 31 October and we will get it done.”

In the interview, Mr Johnson also repeated his opposition to an election pact with Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party, saying the Conservative party was a “great” and “old” party that did not form electoral pacts with other parties.

Earlier this month, Mr Johnson expelled 21 MPs from the party after they rebelled against him in a bid to prevent a no-deal Brexit.

Asked if any would be allowed to stand as a Conservative at the next election, he did not rule it out but urged people not to underestimate the gravity of what they had done.

“They were effectively handing the initiative to our opponents,” he said. “I just want people to understand why it was necessary to be so strict.”

David Cameron as PM

Image copyright
Getty Images

Mr Cameron became the Conservative Party leader in 2005. Five years later he was voted into Downing Street as the UK’s youngest prime minister in almost 200 years – aged 43.

His six-year tenure – firstly in coalition with the Liberal Democrats and latterly with a majority government – was dominated by his desire to reduce the deficit, and the introduction of austerity measures with his Chancellor George Osborne.

But when he pledged in his party’s 2015 manifesto to hold a referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU, the focus shifted.

Mr Cameron backed Remain during the 2016 campaign and, on the morning of the result after discovering he had lost, he announced he would be stepping down, saying: “I do not think it would be right for me to try to be the captain that steers our country to its next destination.”

The former PM had remained silent until this weekend about both of his successors at the helm of the Tory Party – Theresa May and Boris Johnson.

But his allegedly fractious relationship with Mr Johnson has been well documented since their days together at Oxford University – most notably as members of the infamous Bullingdon Club.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49705213

Trump responded as he typically does: with a Twitter thread.

“Few people know where they’ll be in two years from now, but I do, in the Great State of Alaska (which I love) campaigning against Senator Lisa Murkowski,” Trump wrote, noting that Murkowski voted against the GOP efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act and opposed Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court.

“Get any candidate ready, good or bad, I don’t care, I’m endorsing. If you have a pulse, I’m with you!” the president concluded.

Trump’s response highlights the main reason the vast majority of Senate Republicans refuse to outwardly condemn his actions and statements, fearful that a presidential tweet could cost them in November.

But if history is any indication, unseating Murkowski could prove difficult. Murkowski, known for her independent streak, won the general election in 2010 as a write-in candidate after losing in the Republican primary to a conservative challenger — an extremely rare feat. Murkowski was appointed to the Senate in 2002 and was first elected to a full six-year term in 2004.

Trump’s posture this week has presented several challenges to Senate Republicans as they seek to distance themselves from his recent actions without provoking a response from him. After protesters were cleared from outside the White House so that Trump could participate in a photo-op on Monday night, several GOP senators came out against the move. They also openly criticized his tone and rhetoric in recent days as protests have engulfed the nation.

But Murkowski was the only Republican senator to fully endorse Mattis’ comments, which focused largely on Trump’s threat to deploy the military to American towns and cities to quell unruly protesters.

The GOP is still largely behind the president, an important barometer for an election year. But Murkowski suggested that the party’s calculus could change.

“I felt like perhaps we are getting to a point where we can be more honest with the concerns that we might hold internally — and have the courage of our own convictions to speak up,” she said. “And so, I’m working as one individual to form the right words, knowing that these words really matter. So I appreciate General Mattis’ comments.”

Murkowski also noted that while she did not support Trump in 2016, she wants to maintain a relationship with the Trump White House to deliver resources for her state.

“I work hard to try to make sure that I’m able to represent my state well, that I’m able to work with any administration and any president,” Murkowski said. “He is our duly elected president. I will continue to work with him. I will continue to work with this administration. But I think right now, as we are all struggling to find ways to express the words that need to be expressed appropriately, questions about who I’m going to vote for, not going to vote for, I think are distracting at the moment.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/04/trump-murkowski-campaign-mattis-302308

A forecast from NOAA’s High Resolution Rapid Refresh model showed two lines of thunderstorms moving through the Mid-Atlantic starting Sunday afternoon. (Courtesy TropicalTidbits.com)

Winter might be coming to your screens tonight, but for the weather forecast, it’s anything but. The D.C. region will likely see one of this year’s first rounds of strong thunderstorms in the overnight hours on Sunday, with a chance for damaging winds and torrential rainfall.

A large storm system, part of which brought severe weather to millions across the South and Gulf Coast on Saturday, will move east across the Ohio River Valley. Storms are likely moving into the evening, with two rounds of potentially severe weather beginning late this afternoon.



What to expect:

In a nutshell: Severe weather threat late Sunday afternoon through midnight Monday, with the main threat being heavy rain and damaging wind gusts. Large hail, flash flooding and even an isolated tornado are also possible in the strongest storm cells. Stay tuned to the latest forecast.

“The severe storms will bring heavy blinding rain, strong damaging winds and there is a possibility for hail and even weak isolated tornadoes,” NBC Washington meteorologist Clay Anderson said.

The National Weather Service’s Storm Prediction Center placed most of the Northeastern U.S. under what it categorizes as a “slight” risk for severe thunderstorms on Sunday. While the setup isn’t in place for a widespread outbreak in the D.C. area, weather service forecasters said the atmosphere will destabilize enough through the daylight hours that any storms that do form will pack a significant wind threat.

“After 2 p.m., the environment will be a bit primed for a pop-up thunderstorm that could quickly intensify, so while many of us will have a dry Sunday, let’s prepare for a rogue storm,” NBC Washington meteorologist Somara Theodore said. “The real threat lies after sunset, and confidence is high that as a front drives through our region, it will translate to a line of heavy rain with some embedded thunderstorms.”

Starting late Sunday afternoon, forecasters said thunderstorms will organize into two lines ahead of a cold front approaching from the west. The first will bring heavy rain into the region around sunset.

“The best chance for severe thunderstorms will be near and west of the Blue Ridge Mountains with the first round, since convection will arriving around peak heating across these areas and moving into the metro areas after sunset,” the weather service’s D.C. office said in its Sunday forecast discussion.

A second round of potentially severe storms will follow close behind, expected to arrive overnight. Up to a half of an inch of rain is expected, posing a flood risk for areas vulnerable to heavy downpours.

“A strong cold front is expected to move through the area during this time,” the weather service said. “The main threat will be damaging winds with the line, but an isolated tornado and isolated instances of flooding cannot be ruled out as well.”


2 dead as severe storms ravage South

Powerful storms that killed at least two people continued to move across the South on Sunday after spawning suspected tornadoes that left several people injured and multiple homes and businesses damaged or without power.

In East Texas, the Angelina County Sheriff’s Office said an 8-year-old and a 3-year-old died when strong winds toppled a tree onto the back of their family’s car in Lufkin while it was in motion. Capt. Alton Lenderman said the parents, who were in the front seats, were not injured.

Mississippi State University’s 21,000 students huddled in basements and hallways as a tornado came near the school’s campus in Starkville. University spokesman Sid Salter said some debris, possibly carried by the tornado, was found on campus, but no injuries were reported and no buildings were damaged.

The large storm system also knocked out power to thousands and caused some flash flooding. The weather service said the system is expected to shift to the Ohio Valley and the Southeast on Sunday. More than 140,000 customers remained without power in Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas late Saturday.


Forecast:

Sunday’s storm system will have mostly cleared the area by dawn on Monday, bringing with it cooler air. Monday will be breezy with a slight chance of lingering showers in the morning.

Sunday: Cloudy, with drizzle and scattered fog. Showers and thunderstorms likely after 3 p.m. Highs in the upper 70s.

Sunday night: Showers and thunderstorms. Some storms may produce strong winds and heavy downpours. Lows in the upper 50s to low 60s.

Monday: Scattered showers before 9 a.m., then gradually clearing. Partly sunny and breezy, with highs in the low 60s.

Tuesday: Sunny. Highs in the upper 60s to low 70s.

Wednesday: Warming. Party sunny, with highs in the upper 70s.


Current conditions:

WTOP’s Reem Nadeem and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Like WTOP on Facebook and follow @WTOP on Twitter to engage in conversation about this article and others.

© 2019 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Source Article from https://wtop.com/weather-news/2019/04/strong-winds-heavy-rain-possible-in-dc-area-sunday-night/

WASHINGTON – As he left for a daylong trip to Texas and Ohio on Wednesday to meet with the victims of back-to-back shootings, President Donald Trump dismissed criticism that his own campaign trail rhetoric has contributed to the violence.

“My critics are political people,” Trump told reporters at the White House. 

His critics, he said, are seeking “political gain.”

The shootings in El Paso and Dayton, in which at least 31 people were killed, have once again thrust Trump into the increasingly familiar role of consoling communities reeling from the brutality of the killings while navigating the tricky politics of gun control.

This time, however, at least some residents of the affected communities may not welcome Trump so warmly. Some critics argue that Trump’s rhetorical broadsides on migrants in particular created an atmosphere of hate that presaged the attacks. 

Air Force One touched down in Dayton shortly before 11 a.m. ET. 

The president said lawmakers are working toward a deal on legislation to increase background checks for gun purchases. Some lawmakers are discussing the possibility of red-flag provisions. Background checks would be a higher hurdle. 

Red flag laws allow law enforcement, family members and others to petition a judge to confiscate guns from individuals who may cause harm to themselves or others. 

“I’m looking to do background checks,” Trump said, adding that there is a “great appetite” for background checks. 

When the president lands in El Paso in the afternoon, after visiting Dayton in the morning, he will be confronted by a front-page editorial in the El Paso Times lauding the city’s response and questioning the way his administration characterizes the community.

“Mr. President, in your February State of the Union address, you claimed that El Paso was ‘one of our nation’s most dangerous cities’ before a border wall was built,” editor Tim Archuleta wrote. “Mr. President, that is not El Paso.”

The El Paso Times is part of the USA TODAY Network. 

CLOSE

President Donald Trump said our nation must condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy following two mass shootings in Dayton and El Paso.
USA TODAY

The El Paso gunman wrote a “manifesto” expressing concern about an “invasion” by Hispanics, echoing language often used by Trump to describe migrants

Trump expressed grievances in pre-trip tweets, criticizing Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke around midnight on Tuesday after the former congressman said the president should stay away from El Paso.

USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll: Who’s to blame for mass shootings?

Trump also urged the news media to focus on reports that the shooter in Dayton allegedly used a Twitter account to express support for Democrats like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. While it’s true that other mass shooters have supported Democrats, Trump did not address the fact that his own rhetoric is unusual among national politicians in the intensity he brings to his attacks on immigrants.   

Several El Paso officials urged Trump not to visit the area.   

“Don’t come here President Trump, you are not welcome,” wrote Cassandra Hernandez, a city council member representing the neighborhood where the shooting occurred.

Mass shootings in the US: After El Paso and Dayton, 112 killed in mass shootings over 216 days

Mayor Dee Margo, the Republican mayor of El Paso, said he will meet with Trump.

In Ohio, Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, told SiriusXM on Tuesday said he would not join Trump on the Dayton visit. “I don’t have any interest because of what he’s done on this – total unwillingness to address the issue of guns, his racist rhetoric.”

Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley said she planned to tell him that his proposals on gun control as outlined in remarks Monday are inadequate.

“His comments weren’t very helpful to the issue around guns,” Whaley told reporters. 

Trump has at times struggled to fulfill the role of consoler-in-chief increasingly demanded of modern presidents. The president was greeted by hundreds of protesters singing softly in Hebrew or holding signs as he visited the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh last year, days after a gunman killed 11 worshipers. 

Months earlier, after the president spent an hour meeting with people who lost family members and the survivors of a shooting at a Texas high school, one of the mothers who lost a child described Trump’s presence in the private gathering as polarizing.

“It was like talking to a toddler,” she said.

Trump remained mostly out of sight Tuesday, even on Twitter. White House aides said the president spent the day meeting with staff and preparing for Wednesday’s travel.  

“This is a very, very serious moment in our country’s history,” Trump spokesman Hogan Gidley told reporters. “This president recognizes the gravity of this moment.” 

Americans overwhelmingly blame the mental health system, racism and white nationalism and loose gun laws for a series of mass shootings that have shaken communities across the country, according to a USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll this week.

Nearly three of four Democrats said some of the responsibility should be held by the president, who has been criticized for racist tweets and provocative rhetoric aimed at Latinos, Muslims, blacks and others. That compared with just 23% of Republicans.

White House officials declined to say where within El Paso and Dayton the president is traveling, citing security concerns. The president is expected to visit Dayton first. 

Critics questioned Trump’s sincerity in dealing with mass shootings, noting he backed away from an initial tweet calling for “strong” background checks for gun purchases. During subsequent remarks at the White House on Monday, Trump called on the nation to condemn “racism, bigotry and white supremacy.”

What’s next: Trump vows action but offers few specifics after shootings 

Democrats, including those who are making gun control an issue in the 2020 election, said Trump’s words after the shooting don’t erase his previous statement.   

“This president, who helped create the hatred that made Saturday’s tragedy possible, should not come to El Paso,” tweeted O’Rourke, who once represented the city in Congress.

“We do not need more division,” he said. “We need to heal. He has no place here.”

 Contributing: The Arizona Republic

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/07/trump-visits-dayton-el-paso-grief-mass-shootings/1920474001/

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Chiitas en el Medio Oriente y en Pakistán han expresado su rechazo a la ejecución.

El líder supremo de Irán, el ayatolá Alí Jamenei, le advirtió a Arabia Saudita que enfrentará “la venganza divina” por la ejecución del clérigo chiita Nimr al Nimr, ocurrida el sábado.

El ayatolá describió al religioso como un “mártir” pacífico.

Nimr fue una de las 47 personas ejecutadas tras haber sido halladas culpables por las autoridades sauditas de ofensas relacionadas con el terrorismo.

Sin embargo, Alí Jamenei dijo que el clérigo había sido ejecutado por su oposición a los gobernantes sunitas de Arabia Saudita.

Este erudito oprimido ni invitó a nadie a un movimiento armado ni estaba involucrado en conspiraciones encubiertas“, dijo el líder iraní en un mensaje a través de Twitter.

De acuerdo con Jamenei, el único acto cometido por Al Nimr fue su “crítica abierta”.

Y añadió: “La sangre injustamente derramada del mártir oprimido #SheikhNimr afectará rápidamente y la venganza divina se apoderará de los políticos saudíes“.

El sábado, manifestantes irrumpieron en la embajada saudita en Teherán, capital de Irán, y le prendieron fuego al edificio, antes de ser dispersados por la policía.

BBC Mundo investigó quién era el clérigo cuya muerte ha avivado las tensiones en Medio Oriente.

Contra las monarquías sunitas

El clérigo Nimr al Nimr fue un destacado y elocuente líder religioso que salió de la minoría chiita de ese país.

Fue arrestado en 2012, el año en que se desataron varias protestas en la Provincia Oriental, que es rica en petróleo y la más grande del país, como parte de las movilizaciones de la Primavera Árabe.

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

La ejecución de Nimr al Nimr desató protestas no sólo en Irán sino en otros países de la región. En esta imagen, se observan a manifestantes en Irán quemando la foto del rey saudita.

Durante su arresto, después de una persecución en automóvil en el distrito de Qatif, le dispararon cuatro veces en la pierna.

Tres personas murieron en las manifestaciones que se desencadenaron por su detención en los días posteriores.

Nimr al Nimr, quien tenía más de 50 años, había expresado abiertamente su apoyo a las protestas contra el gobierno en la provincia, donde la mayoría chiita ha denunciado por años que son discriminados por las autoridades.

Expertos aseguran que el religioso contaba con una amplia base de seguidores muy jóvenes en Arabia Saudita y Bahréin.

Fue un crítico agudo de las monarquías sunitas de ambos países.

Con ayuda de los sauditas, Bahréin controló y terminó con las movilizaciones populares de su población mayoritariamente chiita en 2011.

“El rugido de la palabra”

En los últimos 10 años, el clérigo fue arrestado varias veces.

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Cuarenta personas han sido arrestadas tras la protesta en la embajada saudita en Irán.

Supuestamente había sido golpeado por la policía secreta en una ocasión en que estaba en custodia.

Su sentencia de muerte fue confirmada en octubre de 2014. Su familia informó que había sido hallado culpable, entre otros cargos, de buscar “intromisión extranjera” en el reino.

Al Nimr nunca negó los cargos políticos en su contra pero sus seguidores insisten en que abogó por la celebración de manifestaciones pacíficas y pedía que se evitara la violencia contra el gobierno.

En 2011, el religioso le dijo a la BBC que apoyaba “el rugido de la palabra contra las autoridades y no la armas”.

“El arma de la palabra es más fuerte que las balas porque las autoridades se beneficiarán de una batalla de armas”, aseguró.

“Crucifixión”

Cuando Al Nimr, quien tenía el rango de ayatolá, fue a juicio en marzo de 2013, los fiscales pidieron su ejecución por medio de la “crucifixión”, un castigo que en Arabia Saudita implica decapitación. Posteriormente, se exhibe públicamente el cuerpo.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Mujeres salieron a manifestar el sábado en el distrito de Qatif, de Arabia Saudita, contra la ejecución de Nimr.

Grupos en defensa de los derechos humanos expresaron su preocupación ante la posibilidad de que no recibiera un juicio justo.

Dichas organizaciones también denunciaron que a Nimr no se le había permitido tener acceso a tratamientos médicos adecuados tras las heridas de bala que sufrió durante su arresto en julio de 2012, algo que las autoridades negaron.

Mientras se encontraba en custodia en 2012, su esposa, Muna Jabir al Shariyavi, murió en un hospital de Nueva York, lo cual, de acuerdo con el periódico británico The Guardian, le generó apoyo popular.

Llamados de libertad

Se desconoce con precisión si nació en 1959 o en 1960.

Pero se sabe que creció en un pueblo del distrito de Qatif, en la Provincia Oriental de Arabia Saudita, y estudió por muchos años en Irán y Siria.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Nimr había sido arrestado en 2012 y condenado a muerte en 2014.

Regresó a Arabia Saudita en 1994 y sus llamados por libertades religiosas atrajeron de inmediato la atención de los servicios de seguridad sauditas.

El clérigo fue detenido brevemente en dos ocasiones antes de 2012: en 2004 y en 2006, reportó el canal de noticias Al Jazeera.

Para esa época, Nimr al Nimr se estaba convirtiendo en una figura de relevancia nacional.

En 2008, se reunió con funcionarios de Estados Unidos –según reveló Wikileaks- en un intento por distanciarse de posiciones antiestadounidense y proiraníes.

Amnistía internacional criticó el arresto de Nimr por ser parte de lo que la organización calificó como una campaña de las autoridades sauditas para aplastar toda disidencia en el país.

Su ejecución ha sido ampliamente condenada por grupos de derechos humanos y comunidades chiitas en todo el mundo.

La directora de la unidad del Medio Oriente de la organización Human Rights Watch, Sarah Leah, dijo que Nimr al Nimr había sido condenado en un juicio “injusto” y que su ejecución “solo le suma a la discordia y al malestar sectario existente”.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/01/160103_iran_arabia_saudita_clerigo_ejecucion_nimr_al_nimr_mr

Rep. Steve King, shown here during a news conference in August 2019, faced criticism for his comments on abortion, including when he questioned whether there would be “any population of the world left” if not for births due to rape and incest.

Charlie Neibergall/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Charlie Neibergall/AP

Rep. Steve King, shown here during a news conference in August 2019, faced criticism for his comments on abortion, including when he questioned whether there would be “any population of the world left” if not for births due to rape and incest.

Charlie Neibergall/AP

After years of incendiary comments on race and other issues that lost him the support of many Republican Party leaders, conservative Iowa Rep. Steve King has lost his bid for reelection to a primary challenge by GOP state Sen. Randy Feenstra, The Associated Press projects.

“I am truly humbled by the outpouring of support over the past 17 months that made tonight possible and I thank Congressman King for his decades of public service,” Feenstra said in a statement. “As we turn to the general election, I will remain focused on my plans to deliver results for the families, farmers and communities of Iowa. But first, we must make sure this seat doesn’t land in the hands of Nancy Pelosi and her liberal allies in Congress. Tomorrow, we get back to work.”

First elected in 2002, King faced the toughest primary campaign of his career in Iowa’s 4th Congressional District, trailing in the polls with a limited cash supply and minimal advertising. He faced an onslaught of challengers feeding off of his vulnerability due to inflammatory rhetoric.

His primary opponents focused on an argument that King is unable to effectively represent the interests of his constituents since being stripped of House committee assignments last year, rather than focusing on his history of controversial statements.

Loading…

“The 4th District needs a seat at the table, an effective conservative voice,” stressed Feenstra in a May debate hosted by WHO-TV.

Feenstra represented the most likely threat to King’s reelection, raising $925,849 this cycle, compared to King’s $330,000, according to the Center For Responsive Politics.

Also challenging King were former Irwin Mayor Bret Richards, former state representative and Woodbury County supervisor Jeremy Taylor and real estate developer Steve Reeder. All had similar platforms: opposing abortion rights, securing the southern U.S. border and supporting gun owners’ views of the Second Amendment.

The writing may have been on the wall for King, who President Trump once dubbed “the world’s most conservative human being.” In his last general election, he scraped by with a margin of just 3% of the vote in his bright red district against Democrat J.D. Scholten, a paralegal and former minor league baseball pitcher.

Scholten’s progress at nearly flipping the northwest district, which is home to Sioux City and Ames, prompted this crowded Republican primary with challengers painting King, 71, as ineffective and offering themselves up as a viable conservative alternative without the reputation of being a toxic thorn in the GOP’s side.

Scholten is returning for a second swing at the seat this year and ended up without any competition in the Democratic primary.

Not only did Feenstra raise more than King in the first quarter, he also garnered the high-profile endorsements of former Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, the National Right to Life Committee and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The latter released an ad criticizing King for inaction.

“When we’ve needed him most, Steve King has let us down. He got kicked off the agriculture committee, hurting our farmers, and hasn’t written a single farming bill that passed Congress,” the ad proclaimed.

Many top Iowa Republicans have abandoned King this cycle, seeing it as an unnecessary risk to maintaining control of the district, with King’s controversial record considered a distraction to the conservative cause and a possible threat to the reelection Sen. Joni Ernst.

Last year, King wondered out loud to The New York Times why “white nationalist” and “white supremacist” are considered offensive terms. King was widely rebuked by party leadership and stripped from key committee assignments, including his place on the House Agriculture Committee, a panel of particular importance to his home state. King did support a House resolution condemning his comments that was passed nearly unanimously in 2019.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely wades into actions by House Republicans, released a statement at the time calling King’s statements “unworthy of his elected position.”

“If he doesn’t understand why ‘white supremacy’ is offensive, he should find another line of work,” McConnell wrote.

King issued a public statement shortly after the interview was published, defending himself by saying he wasn’t an advocate for white nationalism but rather supports “western civilization’s values.”

It hardly marked the first time his explosive comments made the news.

In 2008, he said terrorists would “be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they did on September 11” if Barack Obama were elected president.

He’s also made incendiary comments on multiculturalism, immigration and abortion, falsely expressing skepticism that a woman could get pregnant as a result of rape or incest.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/06/03/865823546/iowa-rep-steve-king-ousted-in-gop-primary-ap-projects