Top Rated Videos

So where, finally, are the Republicans? Are they starting to connect the dots between Trump’s disastrous, impulsive foreign policy moves, his budgetary antics and his unhinged personality? Are they, perhaps, worried for their country?

Source Article from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/opinion-donald-trump-government-shutdown_us_5c205647e4b0407e907c89a7

The Biden administration is not mandating COVID-19 vaccines for White House staff, press secretary Jen Psaki said Friday. 

During the White House press briefing Thursday, Psaki suggested that every White House official had been offered a COVID-19 vaccine, but clarified Friday that the White House was not requiring officials to be vaccinated. 

PSAKI CONFIRMS MORE BREAKTHROUGH COVID-19 CASES IN WHITE HOUSE THAT WERE NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED

“No, we have not mandated it,” Psaki responded, after being asked whether the administration was mandating White House staff receive a coronavirus vaccine. 

Psaki did not provide a specific number of how many White House officials have been vaccinated against the novel coronavirus, but said that they are able to track the number of individuals on the president’s staff because “they are vaccinated here in the White House medical unit.” 

As for those who have not been vaccinated, Psaki maintained the public health guidance remains the same for White House officials as for other Americans. 

“Any individual who has chosen not to be vaccinated, same as in the press corp, the public health guidance is to wear a mask,” Psaki said. “That is the public health guidance for employees as well.” 

WHITE HOUSE SAYS ‘UNVACCINATED PEOPLE SHOULD BE MORE FEARFUL’ THAN VACCINATED OF COVID DELTA VARIANT

Psaki’s comments come after the news that a vaccinated White House official, as well as a vaccinated aide for House Speaker Pelosi, tested positive for COVID-19 after attending the same event. 

Earlier this week, Psaki said “there have been” other breakthrough positive COVID cases among White House staffers, and maintained the administration’s commitment to disclose positive COVID-19 tests among “commissioned officers.” 

“According to an agreement we made during the transition, we committed we would release information proactively,” Psaki said, adding that they “continue to abide by that commitment.”

Meanwhile, Psaki said that the Centers from Disease Control and Prevention are tracking breakthrough cases throughout the country. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-mandating-covid-vaccines-for-white-house

“They would call me and I just wouldn’t go, because I just didn’t want him to lose his job,” she said.

Without her testimony, the judge declined to issue a final order.

“All I want is for him to get better so that my children can have their dad,” Ms. Carro said of her husband, from whom she is separated. The husband did not respond to a call seeking comment.

Once a final order is issued, though, judges are reluctant to reverse themselves.

In 2019, a judge red-flagged a college student who showed signs of mania after he lost his grandmother and broke up with a girlfriend, was involved in a road rage incident and purchased an AK-47 he called his “baby.” A friend said he was worried that he was on “a downward spiral.”

When the order still had almost three months to go, Mr. Schechter and Mr. Tilem, the man’s lawyers, moved to end it, arguing that his distress was temporary, that he had been cleared by three medical experts and that he underwent therapy.

“He was sad, and people are happy sometimes and sad other times,” wrote Mr. Schechter, “but to take away rights from people is not something the court should do lightly.”

The judge was unmoved; the order ran its course.

The student has “done extremely well since this has been over,” Mr. Tilem said.

Susan C. Beachy contributed research. Jonah E. Bromwich contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/05/nyregion/red-flag-law-shootings-new-york.html

The yearly rainfall ranges from 80 to 400 inches (200 to 1,000cm).

Most of this rain, which can get very heavy, runs through the Amazon’s rainy season roughly from mid-December to mid-May.

But the Amazon is a massive forest, meaning its climate varies depending on what area.

It rains far less in central Amazonia than in the Peruvian Amazon or at the eastern Amazon of Brazil.

READ MORE

Amazon rainforest fire: Rainfall in the Amazon? Latest rainfall maps – FORECAST

Amazon fires latest: Just 40 firefighters tackling raging blaze – INSIGHT

Amazon fires latest news: Thick smoke pours over Peru as fires rage on – PICTURES

Source Article from https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1169284/amazon-rainforest-fire-weather-is-it-raining-amazon-rainforest-brazil-rain-radar

These companies have “brought a sense of crisis to US elites, which shows that China’s top companies have the ability to move to the forefront of the world in technology,” the Global Times said.

“When similar things happen time and again, the US will take steps closer to its decline. The US is a pioneer in global internet and has created Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. But in recent years, the US’ internet structure has been rigid,” it added.

U.S. moves against Chinese technology companies are happening as tensions between world’s two largest economies continue to rise. Some commentators have dubbed their relationship as the “new Cold War.”

Technology has been a key part of the dispute between the two nations, and TikTok is the latest to be dragged into the fight.

The social media app is perhaps one of the few Chinese companies to have found success in the American market. With Chinese technology firms expanding globally, one analyst recently told CNBC that the TikTok saga is part of Washington’s strategy to push back against the competition. 

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/tiktok-microsoft-deal-state-media-says-china-could-retaliate.html

Just a few days before President Joe Biden marks his first 100 days in office, a trio of new polls from NBC, CBS, and the Washington Post and ABC show that Americans give Biden high marks for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic, while his overall job approval rating remains positive.

But Biden also faces criticism from respondents over his handling of an influx of migrants arriving at the US’s southern border, and Sunday’s NBC News poll underscores the apparent durability of Republican voter fraud lies.

In all three polls, better than 60 percent of adults approved of Biden’s coronavirus response, and a comfortable majority were enthusiastic about his recent infrastructure proposal, which calls for $2 trillion in spending on everything from roads and bridges to green energy and high-speed broadband.

Americans were also much happier with Biden’s first 100 days than with former President Donald Trump’s early tenure in 2017. While Trump’s approval rating sat in the low 40s shortly after taking office, according to all three polls, over half of respondents approve of the job Biden has done in the first 100 days.

Young people are particularly upbeat. According to a Harvard Institute of Politics poll released Friday, 56 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 said they were “hopeful about the future of America,” compared to just 31 percent in 2017.

In particular, the IOP poll found, young people of color feel far more positively about America now than in 2017.

Biden’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic appears to have played a significant role in these positive numbers. Prior to taking office, Biden promised to administer 100 million vaccine doses within his first 100 days. He’s made good on that promise and then some: On Wednesday, his administration announced that 200 million vaccine doses have been administered in the US.

Biden will mark his 100th day in office this Thursday, one day after he is set to give his first joint address to Congress.

Biden also signed an overwhelmingly popular $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package into law last month, which included $1,400 checks for most Americans, and he has overseen falling Covid-19 case numbers and an economy that is beginning to bounce back.

In the NBC poll, a plurality of Americans — about 30 percent — said the coronavirus was the top issue facing the country, followed by “uniting the country” at 25 percent.

However, other issues are already shaping up to be a challenge for the Biden administration. According to all three polls, a majority of Americans disapprove of Biden’s early handling of immigration issues and the southern border.

The administration is currently confronting a substantial influx of unaccompanied children at the southern border, in some cases overwhelming Customs and Border Protection facilities.

However, as Vox’s Nicole Narea reported last month, the situation at the border isn’t exactly new — there have been surges of migrants at the border before, and “the current situation is not an aberration, but a recurring problem.”

The “big lie” isn’t going away

Though recent polls by and large paint a positive picture of Biden’s first 100 days in office, there’s at least one persistent burr. According to Sunday’s CBS/YouGov poll, just 68 percent of Americans believe that Biden was elected legitimately — and only a quarter of Trump voters say that.

Those numbers are almost identical to what a number of major polls found in January 2021, shortly before Biden took office. Then, according to a CNN-SSRS poll, 65 percent of Americans believed Biden’s win was legitimate, and 75 percent of Republicans either suspected that Biden did not win legitimately, or believed there was “solid evidence” he did not.

There is no such evidence — election officials of both parties, at both the state and federal levels, say the 2020 election was actually the most secure in history — but relatively static beliefs about Biden’s legitimacy suggest that the GOP’s “big lie,” an all-consuming voter fraud mythology with no basis in fact, isn’t going anywhere any time soon.

In fact, lawmakers in 47 states have introduced a staggering number of restrictive new voting bills to address a nonexistent “election integrity” problem, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, including a Georgia bill that has already been signed into law.

This mythology does translate into loyalty among Trump’s diehard base, according to NBC’s most recent poll. As of this month, 32 percent of Americans hold a somewhat or very positive view of the former president. But that represents a dip from January, when his favorability stood at about 40 percent. Meanwhile, Biden’s favorability has increased to 50 percent since taking office, up from 44 percent in January.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2021/4/25/22402355/biden-joe-coronavirus-first-100-polls-trump


<!–

–>

var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ’61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127′,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127’,
width: 202, height: 137, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

En las noticias más leídas del día de hoy, El Economista realizó un ejercicio en dónde se consideraron 10,132 plazas de los ramos administrativos del gobierno federal por los cuales se destinarían del erario público 14,166 millones de pesos, pero con las reducciones de 10%, sería un gasto por 12,749 millones de pesos. En temas internacionales, el presiente electo del país vecino, Donald Trump, no quita el dedo del renglón de generar ataques contra México y sigue con el discurso de que nuestro país pagará por el muro en la frontera.

1. Reducción de salarios dejaría $1,400 millones

Generar una reducción salarial del 10% a los altos mandos del gobierno federal, entre ellos, secretarios de Estado, subsecretarios, directores generales y directores adjuntos, podría significar un ahorro para los contribuyentes por 1,417 millones de pesos.

En un ejercicio realizado por El Economista, se consideraron 10,132 plazas de los ramos administrativos del gobierno federal por los cuales se destinarían del erario público 14,166 millones de pesos, pero con las reducciones de 10%, sería un gasto por 12,749 millones de pesos.

Como ejemplo a estas reducciones, tenemos la Oficina de la presidencia de la República, en la que se consideraron 116 plazas de altos mandos, donde el gobierno podría ahorrar 27 millones 172,589 pesos, de acuerdo con información del analítico de plazas y remuneraciones del Presupuesto de Egresos de la Federación.

2. México, la tercera obsesión de Donald Trump

El presiente electo de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump preparó su conferencia de prensa como si se tratara de una batalla más rumbo a la Casa Blanca. Es su estilo cuando se presenta ante el escrutinio de la prensa. Pero la sesión detuvo un contexto diferente al acostumbrado. Un documento filtrado a la CNN y transmitido la noche del martes sobre las que parecen ser sus obsesiones de vida, el sexo y los negocios, lo desestabilizó emocionalmente.

Trump estaba enojado. Lo suficiente como para utilizar mayúsculas en sus mensajes tuiteros horas antes de que iniciar la conferencia. Si quieres saber qué fue lo que comento en su Twitter, entra a la nota completa.

3. Los aumentos a las gasolinas y el error de 3%

Enrique Campos Suárez, escribió en su columna la gran depresión sobre el tema del aumento a las gasolinas.

Piensa que el principal error de la liberación de los precios de las gasolinas, que se aplica de facto con los precios máximos determinados por la Secretaría de Hacienda, llega justo a la par del arribo de Donald Trump a la Presidencia de Estados Unidos, justo cuando México enfrenta las peores presiones en décadas a la cotización del peso frente al dólar.

La reforma energética marcaba el 2018 como el año de la liberación de los precios y lo que decidió el gobierno federal, con el concurso del Congreso de la Unión, fue adelantar la apertura para este año. De hecho, en estricto sentido la apertura inicia en marzo próximo. Si quieres saber más sobre la opinión de Campos, entra en la nota completa.

4. Minimice el gasolinazo deduciendo sus gastos

Luego del más reciente gasolinazo en donde se vio un incremento de casi 20% en los precios de la gasolina, muchas personas están comenzando a buscar soluciones para verse menos afectadas. Hay quienes han optado por ajustar su presupuesto y otros prefieren dejar de utilizar tanto su automóvil. Una medida que también se debe contemplar es la deducción de este pasivo.

Actualmente quienes pueden deducir los gastos por combustibles son: todas las personas morales, las personas físicas con actividades empresariales o profesionales, los contribuyentes que están dados de alta ante el Régimen de Incorporación Fiscal y las Sociedades con Acciones Simplificadas. Pero si quieres saber más detallado estos pasos, entra a la nota completa.

5. 5 datos sobre la frontera México-EU y la migración

Al parecer el discurso de Donald Trump no cambiará. Uno de sus ejes de campaña fue la inmigración ilegal hacia Estados Unidos y desde que se anunció su victoria electoral, no ha desaprovechado alguna oportunidad para reiterar que no quitará el dedo del renglón.

En dicha campaña, Trump acusó a los mexicanos de ser “violadores” y “narcotraficantes” y dijo que deportará a millones de inmigrantes indocumentados en Estados Unidos, muchos de ellos mexicanos.
El presidente electo dijo en su primera conferencia de prensa que apenas asuma la presidencia de Estados Unidos comenzará a construir un muro en la frontera con México que ayudará, según él, a frenar la inmigración ilegal. Si quieres saber más datos sobre este tema y el discurso de Trump, entra a la nota completa.

Twitter: @davee_son

javier.cisneros@eleconomista.mx



var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
$(“#tecmon”).attr(“style”, “width:516px !important;height:194px;overflow:hidden;float:right;margin-bottom:-10px”);
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ‘bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
width: 516, height: 185, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/01/12/5-noticias-dia-12-enero

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/04/politics/romney-gop-cheney-kinzinger-censure-vote/index.html

Reports from U.S. intelligence officers of Russian interference in the 2020 presidential race felt like “Groundhog Day,” former Senior Adviser to Hillary Clinton Philippe Reines said Saturday.

Appearing on “America’s News HQ Weekend” with host Gillian Turner, Reines said that he was not surprised.

“If you remember, our intelligence community at the end of 2016, when they announced it at the beginning of 2017, [it] wasn’t just that the Russians were making an attempt to hurt Hillary, but they were also making an attempt to help Donald Trump,” he told Turner.

KAYLEIGH MCENANY: DEMS HAVE ‘NOTHING TO OFFER’ IN 2020 EXCEPT RUSSIA

Reines told Turner that the “pro-chaos” Russians saw that what they did in 2016 “worked so well,” and took notes.

“Forget whether it successfully helped Donald Trump or hurt Hillary Clinton. The fact that three or four years later we’re still talking about it, and they did that on the cheap — they didn’t spend all that much money to really screw around with us,” Reines said.

The Washington Post first reported Friday that U.S. intelligence officials have determined Moscow is attempting to interfere in the race on behalf of both the president and front-runner Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Later Friday night, President Trump took to Twitter and slammed the media, singling out MSNBC — which he called “MSDNC” — and CNN for grouping Sanders and others as “Russian Sympathizers.”

“MSDNC (Comcast Slime), @CNN  and others of the Fake Media, have now added Crazy Bernie to the list of Russian Sympathizers, along with @TulsiGabbard & Jill Stein (of the Green Party), both agents of Russia, they say,” Trump wrote. “But now they report President Putin wants Bernie (or me) to win.”

On Saturday morning he warned Democrats in the “Great State of Nevada” — which he predicted he would win come November — to be “careful of Russia, Russia, Russia.”

“According to Corrupt politician Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, they are pushing for Crazy Bernie Sanders to win. Vote!” Trump tweeted.

“I don’t care, frankly, who [Russian President Vladimir] Putin wants to be president,” Sanders said in a statement following the article’s release Friday. “My message to Putin is clear: stay out of American elections, and as president I will make sure that you do.”

Ahead of a rally Friday in California, Sanders was questioned by reporters about the news, saying in a video posted on Twitter by a CNN reporter that he was briefed on the Russian interference attempts “about a month ago.”

When questioned as to why the news of the briefing is only coming out now, Sanders replied: “I’ll let you guess,” adding that it was “one day before the Nevada caucus.”

“What surprises me is that Bernie has known for a month and decided not to share it,” Reines said Saturday. “That [is something] I find odd and somewhat irresponsible for a couple of reasons.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“Bernie should have told either his competitors or the DNC or someone to…’be on the lookout,'” he continued. “And, the real problem is — if you remember — the last two weeks we’ve been talking about Bernie’s online supporters and whether they have been too aggressive. Those two things are connected and that’s problematic.”

“We’re hanging on by a thread,” Reines said. “We don’t need a foreign adversary who is like tipping us over to make this.”

“And again, it would be great if everyone set aside the intent of the Russians and just looked at it the way you said it: They are trying to meddle in our elections and we should all be terribly concerned about that and we should be fighting that,” he added.

Fox News’ Alex Pappas, Andrew Craft, Joseph A. Wulfsohn and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/fmr-hillary-clinton-adviser-russian-meddling-2020-election-groundhog-day

Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders have agreed to a proposal to extend through June protections against evictions for California tenants financially harmed by the COVID-19 pandemic, an effort that would head off what some warn could be a housing crisis in the state, officials said Monday.

The proposal ironed out with Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon (D-Lakewood) and Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins (D-San Diego) and introduced in legislation made public Monday would also create a rent subsidy program using up to $2.6 billion in federal rental relief dollars.

The deal, confirmed by the governor, would help renters who have collectively fallen behind by hundreds of millions of dollars as the pandemic’s shutdown of the economy has put many out of work. Current state protections against eviction expire Jan. 31. But some tenant advocates said the proposal does not go far enough.

State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) said Monday he would like to see more, but added that immediate action is needed this week on the proposal supported by the governor.

“While the proposal doesn’t go as far as I would like … we must pass this proposal by end of week to avoid mass evictions,” Wiener said.

Atkins and Rendon had signaled earlier this month that they supported extending the eviction moratorium.

“COVID-19 continues to devastate communities across our state and too many Californians remain one paycheck away from losing their apartments or homes. These families need protection and relief now,” Newsom, Rendon and Atkins said in a joint statement Monday, adding that the proposal is “protecting tenants and small landlords from losing their housing as the nation continues to confront the pandemic.”

The state leaders said the use of federal funds for rent subsidies “will help tenants stay afloat during and after this pandemic.”

Under existing law and the governor’s new proposal, tenants could not be evicted as long as they pay 25% of their rent. The budget-related bill would extend eviction protections and allow tenants to meet the 25% payment requirement by paying that amount monthly or providing a lump payment by June 30. Tenants were already required to pay 25% of rent in recent months under the current eviction protection law.

The current law converts the other rent to debt that landlords can seek in the courts, but cannot be used as the basis for eviction.

The new rent subsidy will pay landlords 80% of the total amount of rent in arrears incurred between April 2020 and March 2021 as long as landlords agree to forgive the remaining 20% and not pursue evictions.

“It’s one thing to get protections and another to be able to pay your rent when it is due,” Newsom said at a news conference Monday. “We also address the issue of small landlords that also have to pay mortgages.”

He said the financial incentive for landlords to waive 20% of the back rent is an important part of the strategy.

“We are going to leverage that $2.6 billion focusing on low-income renters,” he said.

If the landlord doesn’t agree to forgive unpaid rent, the program would pay 25% of rent in arrears. The legislation identifies $1.5 billion of the $2.6 billion allocated to California for rent relief, and says the rest of the money, which goes to local jurisdictions, may also be used.

Christina Livingston, executive director of the tenant advocacy group Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, said the proposal is flawed and state leaders must do more.

“This plan leaves tenants to the ‘luck of the draw,’” Livingston said. “If a tenant has a landlord who wants them to stay, they will get this federal rent assistance. If the tenant is unlucky enough to have a corporate landlord who wants to flip the building, or a racist landlord who doesn’t like them, they won’t receive the relief.”

The governor and legislative leaders said additional effort is needed to make sure low-income tenants are protected from homelessness.

“We have more work to do, together, to tackle the structural housing cost crisis in California,” the leaders said.

Those eligible for the rental assistance must qualify as low-income residents based on a formula involving area median income, have financial hardships such as unemployment and demonstrate a “risk of homelessness or housing instability,” according to the legislation.

The legislation would require landlords to notify tenants who owe back rent that the rental assistance program is available and block property owners from evicting people if they have not given that notice.

The $2.6 billion for the program was recently approved by Congress during the Trump administration, and the money is divided between state and local jurisdictions.

The proposal will be pursued in a budget trailer bill, which does not require the lengthy process and two-thirds majority vote that regular legislation undergoes to take effect immediately. A simple majority vote would pass the bill.

Millions of Californians have lost jobs or income since the COVID-19 pandemic began nearly a year ago as state health officials urged residents to stay home and businesses to scale back indoor operations to mitigate the spread of the virus.

The current state law approved last summer protected tenants from evictions through Jan. 31 if they are suffering financial hardship because of the pandemic and are paying at least 25% of their monthly rent.

“While the bill doesn’t contain everything we asked for, the important provision here is the payment of dollars for rent that is owed,” said Debra Carlton, executive vice president of the California Apartment Assn., which is neutral on the bill. “Without this money, many landlords are at risk of losing their rental units.”

President Biden signed an executive order last week extending through March federal protections for tenants facing financial hardships, but tenant activists say state action is still urgently needed because the federal protections are weaker.

Under the federal policy, tenants must pay all back rent owed at the end of the federal moratorium in March in order to avoid immediate eviction, said Jennifer Kwart, a spokeswoman for Assemblyman David Chiu (D-San Francisco).

“California’s policy only requires tenants to pay 25% of back rent by the end of the moratorium to avoid eviction,” she said, adding that an extension of state law is needed “because it’s unlikely tenants will be able to pay all back rent to avoid eviction.”

Chiu introduced a bill recently that would have extended protections against evictions by 11 months through the rest of this year, but landlords had pressed for a shorter extension in hopes vaccines would allow the economy to recover quickly. Chiu supported the compromise Monday, saying “this deal is necessary but far from perfect.”

About 90,000 California households are behind on their rent by a total of $400 million, according to an estimate last week by the independent Legislative Analyst’s Office, although other estimates have been higher. The office estimated the average unpaid rent of those households is $4,500.

In a sign of the urgency of the issue, California court officials estimate that landlords will file 240,000 new eviction cases over the next year, double what is normally seen in the state.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-01-25/california-eviction-protections-to-be-extended-june-covid-19

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Kate del Castillo podría declarar en el consulado mexicano en Los Ángeles, aseguró la fiscal general de México.

La actriz mexicana Kate del Castillo fue citada a declarar ante la fiscalía mexicana por sus supuestos vínculos con el líder del cartel de Sinaloa, Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán.

Así lo anunció este lunes la encargada de la Procuraduría General de la República, Arely Gómez.

Del Castillo, de 43 años, intercedió para que el actor estadounidense Sean Penn entreviste al capo, se reunió con “El Chapo” y mantuvo conversaciones a través de mensajes de texto con el narcotraficante.

Guzmán, de 57 años, fue capturado por las autoridades mexicanas el 8 de enero, seis meses después de que se fugara de la cárcel más segura de México, la misma en la que ahora se encuentra recluido bajo medidas especiales de seguridad.

De acuerdo a mensajes interceptados divulgados este lunes, la actriz celebró el escape del capo del penal de El Altiplano a través de un túnel que conectaba con su celda.

En calidad de testigo

Gómez aseguró en una entrevista con el diario El Universal que como la actriz se encuentra en Estados Unidos podría declarar en el consulado mexicano de Los Ángeles.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

En los primeros días de octubre, la actriz y Sean Penn viajaron a las montañas donde estaba “El Chapo”, en la región conocida como Triángulo Dorado.

En tanto, un funcionario de la PGR aseguró a la agencia de noticias Reuters que el citatorio es para que la actriz declare la próxima semana.

En los últimos días, a través de distintos medios de comunicación se conocieron las conversaciones entre Del Castillo y Guzmán interceptadas por las agencias de seguridad mexicanas.

A través del teléfono móvil de uno de los abogados del capo, Andrés Granados, “El Chapo” y la actriz comenzaron a incrementrar el intercambio de mensajes el año pasado, aunque el vínculo se remonta a 2012.

En uno de los intercambios, del 25 de septiembre, Guzmán invita a del Castillo a visitarlo en las montañas de Sinaloa.

“Yo te tendré súper todo para que no vayas a tener ningún detalle, que me sentiría muy mal. Ten fe en que estarás a gusto. Te cuidaré más que a mis ojos”, aseguró el capo.

A lo que la actriz respondió: “Me mueve demasiado que me digas que me cuidas, jamás nadie me ha cuidado, ¡gracias!”.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Guzmán, de 57 años, fue capturado el 8 de enero, seis meses después de que se fugara de la cárcel más segura de México.

En los primeros días de octubre, la actriz y Sean Penn viajaron a las montañas donde estaba “El Chapo”, en la región conocida como Triángulo Dorado, en un encuentro que luego fue reflejado en la revista estadounidense Rolling Stone.

De acuerdo al actor estadounidense, la reunión fue propiciada por Del Castillo a quien, según el gobierno mexicano, Guzmán había pedido que se encargue de organizar la realización de una película sobre su vida.

Guzmán fue capturado en Los Mochis, una ciudad de su estado natal, Sinaloa.

Luego las autoridades aseguraron que una de las claves para dar con el narcotraficante había sido seguir las conversaciones de la actriz mexicana.

Festejos por “El Chapo”

Del Castillo, según mensajes de celular interceptados por las agencias de seguridad y publicados este lunes por El Universal, celebró la fuga de Guzmán el 11 de julio.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Kate del Castillo festejó la fuga de Guzmán en julio pasado, de acuerdo a mensajes interceptados.

El 12 de julio, el abogado le pregunta a la actriz si está enterada de la noticia y le dice que él está “festejando”, a lo que del Castillo responde “yo más”.

En un intercambio entre el abogado y la actriz, Granados le sugiere que invite a Guzmán a que invierta en la marca de tequila que ella promociona. “Sería divino”, respondió la intérprete.

Del Castillo prometió la semana pasada contar su versión de los hechos y el sábado usó su cuenta en la red social Instagram para rechazar que estuviera estresada por lo acontecido.

Escribió en inglés “Do you really think I’m stressed?” (¿De veras creen que estoy estresada?) y acompañó el texto con una imagen de un ratón mirando a la cámara con la leyenda “¿Por qué me preguntas si estoy un poco estresado?”.

Penn, por su parte, aseguró al canal estadounidense CBS, que se arrepentía de cómo había sido percibida su entrevista con el narcotraficante.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/01/160118_mexico_chapo_guzman_citan_kate_del_castillo_jp

Samantha Josephson, 21, a student at the University of South Carolina, had last been seen by friends early Friday, and her body was found hours later by two hunters, Columbia Police Chief William H. Holbrook told reporters.

Source Article from https://www.nbc-2.com/story/40225819/slain-college-student-may-have-mistaken-suspects-car-for-uber

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/26/politics/jessica-rosenworcel-nomination-fcc/index.html

WASHINGTON — Veteran New York Rep. Carolyn Maloney was elected Wednesday lead the powerful House Oversight and Reform Committee, the first woman to hold the job in the panel’s 92-year history.

Maloney defeated Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly by a 133-86 vote in a secret ballot among the full Democratic caucus. She succeeds the late Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, who died last month.

As Oversight chief, Maloney, 73, will play a key role in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.

The committee has a broad portfolio, including oversight of the Trump administration’s handling of the census and immigration matters, as well as investigations into Trump’s business dealings and security clearances granted to White House officials.

Oversight is among the committees handling the impeachment inquiry, although the most visible one is the House Intelligence Committee, whose chairman is Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

Maloney, who lost out to Cummings as the committee’s top Democrat nearly a decade ago, is the panel’s longest-serving Democrat, having joined the committee in 1993 following her first election to Congress.

She has led the committee on an acting basis since Cummings’ Oct. 17 death and won endorsements from the next two longest-serving Democrats, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia’s delegate, and Rep. William Lacy Clay of Missouri. She also was endorsed by South Carolina Rep. Jim Clyburn, the third-ranking Democrat and an influential member of the Congressional Black Caucus. Norton and Clay also are black caucus members.

Maloney is in her 14th term representing a district that includes much of Manhattan, including Trump Tower. She is best known for her years of advocacy for victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and famously wore a New York firefighter’s jacket at the Capitol and even at the Met Gala until she could secure permanent authorization for a victims’ fund. A measure making the 9/11 fund permanent was a rare example of a bipartisan bill signed into law earlier this year.

Maloney has promised to continue the robust oversight agenda begun by Cummings after Democrats assumed the majority this year. In a letter to colleagues, she touted her work helping to remove the citizenship question from the 2020 census, promote the Equal Rights Amendment and to introduce bills to guarantee paid family leave for federal employees.

Connolly, 69, congratulated Maloney on her election, noting in a statement that Oversight “has a consequential responsibility in the next year to bring transparency and accountability to the Trump administration for the American people.’’ He said Maloney has his full support.

Maloney also serves on the House Financial Services Committee, reflecting the importance of the financial industry in her district. She agreed to give up her role leading a subcommittee on investor protection and capital markets if elected to head Oversight.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/carolyn-maloney-chosen-first-woman-lead-house-oversight-panel-n1087671

But the latest numbers suggest the tailored approach is no longer enough.

The government’s scientific advisory panel, known as SAGE, estimated earlier this month that there are between 43,000 and 75,000 new infections a day in England, a rate that is above the worst-case scenarios calculated only weeks before that.

Hospital admissions are also running ahead of the worst-case scenario, the panel said, raising the specter that within weeks, the National Health Service will not be able to cope with the influx of patients. That could drive Britain’s virus-related death toll beyond the 85,000 that scientists estimated could be reached this winter.

On Friday, Britain reported 24,405 new infections and admitted 1,489 patients to the hospital with symptoms of Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus. Nearly 1,000 patients are in intensive care units, while 274 people died.

Britain’s total death toll from the virus is 58,925, one of the highest in Europe.

Politics has colored the debate over how to curb the virus. The leader of the opposition Labour Party, Keir Starmer, called on Mr. Johnson two weeks ago to impose a two-week lockdown that scientists said would act as a “circuit breaker” on the chain of transmissions. He cited a report from SAGE that warned Britain faced a “very large epidemic with catastrophic consequences.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/31/world/great-britain-coronavirus-lockdown.html