Most Viewed Videos

Un sismo de 5,4 grados de magnitud y otro de 5.0 sacudieron este domingo Bogotá y otras zonas de Colombia, sin que se reportaran de inmediato víctimas ni daños materiales.

El movimiento telúrico también se sintió en Bogotá, en el Eje Cafetero, Huila, Tolima y Meta. Las autoridades no reportan daños en los departamentos donde se sintió el temblor de aproximadamente 30 segundos, informan medios locales.

 

Source Article from http://www.telesurtv.net/news/Fuerte-sismo-de-5.4-sacude-centro-y-sur-de-Colombia-20161030-0039.html

“Lo único que quiero es que la Justicia actúe y que los dejen bien presos”, dijo el hombre en referencia al reconocimiento del cuerpo, que junto a la madre de Melina, de nombre Ana María, hicieron esta madrugada en la morgue judicial de Lomas de Zamora. “Yo quería encontrarla con vida, no era una llamita (de esperanza), ya me estaba incendiando con las ganas de encontrarla con vida, sin embargo la tengo que ir a reconocer así”, lamentó el padre.

Al salir del reconocimiento, la madre de la joven sufrió una descompensación, por lo que recibió atención médica. “En homicidios así, siempre hay muchas más personas metidas en el tema. No son tres, cinco gatos locos, hay alguien más metido”, estimó el hombre respecto a que entendía que hay más personas involucradas en la muerte de su hija y que aún no fueron apresadas.

También opinó sobre la joven que atestiguó en la causa y que dijo haber visto cómo asesinaron a Melina: “Lo que creo de esta chicha, si pasó eso, es como que apareció muy tarde, se acordó tarde”.

Source Article from http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/ultimas/20-256033-2014-09-24.html

An already tense hearing involving former Trump fixer Michael Cohen got heated when a Democratic congresswoman and a Republican congressman traded accusations of racism.

The flareup started when Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., was questioning Cohen and took a swipe at Rep. Mark Meadows for bringing Lynne Patton, a black woman who’s friends with the Trump family and works for the federal government, to the hearing as a “prop.” Meadows had presented Patton to the hearing to push back against Cohen’s claims that the president is a racist.

“Just because someone has a person of color, a black person, working for them does not mean they aren’t racist, and it is insensitive that some would even say — the fact that someone would actually use a prop, a black woman, in this chamber, in this committee, is alone racist in itself,” the freshman Democrat said.

An angry Meadows demanded Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland, strike her comments from the record. “I’m sure she didn’t intend to do this, but if anyone knows my record as it relates, it should be you, Mr. Chairman,” he said to Cummings.

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C, center, Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga., right, and other conservative Republicans discuss their goal of obstructing the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare, as part of a strategy to pass legislation to fund the government, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 19, 2013. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Representative Mark Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, listens as comments made by Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat from Michigan, not pictured, are reviewed a House Oversight Comittee hearing with Michael Cohen, former personal lawyer to U.S. President Donald Trump, not pictured, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2019. Cohen brought documents to Wednesday’s congressional hearing to back up his case that his former boss is a ‘con man’ and ‘a cheat.’ Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Republican House Oversight Committee and Government Reform Committee members, from left, Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., listen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, July 7, 2016, as FBI Director James Comey, right, testifies before the committee’s hearing to explain his agency’s recommendation to not prosecute Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her private email setup during her time as secretary of state. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., left, chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, and Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., right, walk to a meeting of House Republicans as work in Congress resumes following the August recess, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 6, 2017. Meadows is opposed to suggestions by GOP leaders to connect the urgent Harvey aid bill to increasing the U.S. debt limit. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., objects to House Oversight and Reform Committee Chair Elijah Cummings, D-Md., efforts to subpoena Trump administration officials over family separations at the southern border, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2019. The committee voted to subpoena Trump administration officials over family separations at the southern border, the first issued in the new Congress as Democrats have promised to hold the administration aggressively to count. The decision by the Oversight Committee will compel the heads of Justice, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services to deliver documents. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)




Asked to clarify her remarks, Tlaib said, “I’m just saying that’s what I believe to have happened and as a person of color in this committee that’s how I felt at that moment, and I wanted to express that. But I am not calling the gentleman, Mr. Meadows, a racist for doing so. I’m saying in itself it is a racist act.”

The North Carolina Republican and close Trump ally denied he’d used Patton as a prop — and said that accusation was racist.

“To indicate that I asked someone who is a personal friend of the Trump family, who has worked for him, who knows this particular individual, that she’s coming in to be a prop — it’s racist to suggest that I ask her to come in here for that reason,” he said. “She loves this family. She came in because she felt like the president of the United States was getting falsely accused.”

He said he took the accusation especially personally because “my nieces and nephews are people of color. Not many people know that. You know that, Mr. Chairman.”

Cummings responded that he could “see and feel” Meadows’ pain, and referred to him as “one of my best friends” before giving Tlaib another opportunity to clarify her remarks.

She maintained it wasn’t her intention to call Meadows a racist and said, “I do apologize if that’s what it sounded like.”

“As everybody knows in this chamber I’m pretty direct so if I wanted to say that I would have, but that’s not what I said,” she said.

In this Nov. 6, 2008 file photo, Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat, is photographed outside the Michigan Capitol in Lansing, Mich. The Michigan primary victory of Tlaib, who is expected to become the first Muslim woman and Palestinian-American to serve in the U.S. Congress, is rippling across the Middle East. In the West Bank village where Tlaib’s mother was born, residents are greeting the news with a mixture of pride and hope that she will take on a U.S. administration widely seen as hostile to the Palestinian cause.

(AP Photo/Al Goldis, File)

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., left, and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., right, laugh as they wait for other freshman Congressmen to deliver a letter calling to an end to the government shutdown to deliver to the office of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2019. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)




Patton, now an official at the U.S. Department of Housing and Development, made her unusual cameo appearance earlier in the hearing.

“I asked Lynne to come today,” Meadows told Cohen as she stood behind the congressman.

“You made some very demeaning comments about the president Ms. Patton doesn’t agree with. She says as a daughter of a man born in Birmingham, Alabama, there’s no way she would work for an individual who’s a racist. How do you reconcile that? “

Cohen responded, “Ask Ms. Patton how many people who are black are executives at the Trump Organization. The answer is zero.”

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/02/27/lawmakers-racial-dispute-mars-cohen-hearing/23680048/

A century ago this week, the wealthiest U.S. Black community was burned to the ground.

At the turn of the 20th century, the Greenwood District of Tulsa, Oklahoma, became one of the first communities in the country thriving with Black entrepreneurial businesses. The prosperous town, founded by many descendants of slaves, earned a reputation as the Black Wall Street of America and became a harbor for African Americans in a highly segregated city under Jim Crow laws.

On May 31, 1921, a white mob turned Greenwood upside down in one of the worst racial massacres in U.S. history. In the matter of hours, 35 square blocks of the vibrant Black community were turned into smoldering ashes. Countless Black people were killed — estimates ranged from 55 to more than 300 — and 1,000 homes and businesses were looted and set on fire.

Yet for the longest time, the massacre received scant mentions in newspapers, textbooks and civil and governmental conversations. It wasn’t until 2000 that the slaughter was included in the Oklahoma public schools’ curriculum, and it did not enter American history textbooks until recent years. The 1921 Tulsa Race Riot Commission was formed to investigate in 1997 and officially released a report in 2001.

“The massacre was actively covered up in the white community in Tulsa for nearly a half century,” said Scott Ellsworth, a professor of Afro American and African studies at the University of Michigan and author of “The Ground Breaking” about the Tulsa massacre.

“When I started my research in the 1970s, I discovered that official National Guard reports and other documents were all missing,” Ellsworth said. “Tulsa’s two daily white newspapers, they went out of their way for decades not to mention the massacre. Researchers who would try to do work on this as late as the early 1970s had their lives threatened and had their career threatened.”

In the week following the massacre, Tulsa’s chief of police ordered his officers to go to all the photography studios in Tulsa and confiscate all the pictures taken of the carnage, Ellsworth said.

These photos, which were later discovered and became the materials the Oklahoma Commission used to study the massacre, eventually landed in the lap of Michelle Place at Tulsa Historical Society & Museum in 2001.

“It took me about four days to get through the box because the photographs were so horrific. I had never seen those kinds of pictures before,” Place said. “I didn’t know anything about the riot before I came to work here. I never heard of it. Since I’ve been here, I’ve been at my desk to guard them to the very best of my ability.”

The Tulsa museum was founded in the late 1990s, but visitors couldn’t find a trace of the race massacre until 2012 when Place became executive director, determined to tell all of Tulsa’s stories. A digital collection of the photographs was eventually made available for viewing online.

“There’s still a significant number of people in our community who don’t want to look at it, who don’t want to talk about it,” Place said.

‘The silence is layered’

Not only did Tulsa city officials cover up the bloodbath, but they also deliberately shifted the narrative of the massacre by calling it a “riot” and blaming the Black community for what went down, according to Alicia Odewale, an archaeologist at University of Tulsa.

The massacre also wasn’t discussed publicly in the African American community either for a long time. First out of fear — if it happened once, it can happen again.

“You are seeing the perpetrators walking freely on the streets,” Odewale said. “You are in the Jim Crow South, and there are racial terrors happening across the country at this time. They are protecting themselves for a reason.”

Moreover, this became such a traumatic event for survivors, and much like Holocaust survivors and World War II veterans, many of them didn’t want to burden their children and grandchildren with these horrible memories.

Ellsworth said he knows of descendants of massacre survivors who didn’t find out about it until they were in their 40s and 50s.

“The silence is layered just as the trauma is layered,” Odewale said. “The historical trauma is real and that trauma lingers especially because there’s no justice, no accountability and no reparation or monetary compensation.”

What triggered the massacre?

On May 31, 1921, Dick Rowland, a 19-year old Black shoeshiner, tripped and fell in an elevator and his hand accidentally caught the shoulder of Sarah Page, a white 17-year-old operator. Page screamed and Rowland was seen running away.

Police were summoned but Page refused to press charges. However, by that afternoon, there was already talks of lynching Rowland on the streets of white Tulsa. The tension then escalated after the white newspaper Tulsa Tribune ran a front-page story entitled “Nab Negro for Attacking Girl In Elevator,” which accused Rowland of stalking, assault and rape.

In the Tribune, there was also a now-lost editorial entitled “To Lynch Tonight,” according to Ellsworth. When the Works Progress Administration went to microfilm the old issues of the Tribune in the 1930s, the op-ed had already been torn out of the newspaper, Ellsworth said.

Many believe the newspaper coverage undoubtedly played a part in sparking the massacre.

The aftermath

For Black Tulsans, the massacre resulted in a decline in home ownership, occupational status and educational attainment, according to a recent study through the 1940s led by Harvard University’s Alex Albright.

Today, there are only a few Black businesses on the single remaining block in the Greenwood district once hailed as the Black Wall Street.

This month, three survivors of the 1921 massacre — ages 100, 106 and 107 — appeared before a congressional committee, and a Georgia congressman introduced a bill that would make it easier for them to seek reparations.

Meanwhile, historians and archaeologists continued to unearth what was lost for decades. In October, a mass grave in an Oklahoma cemetery was discovered that could be the remains of at least a dozen identified and unidentified African American massacre victims.

“We are able to look for signs of survival and signs of lives. And really look for those remnants of built Greenwood and not just about how they died,” Odewale said. “Greenwood never left.”

— CNBC’s Yun Li is also co-author of “Eunice Hunton Carter: A Lifelong Fight for Social Justice.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/31/black-wall-street-was-shattered-100-years-ago-how-tulsa-race-massacre-was-covered-up.html

An independent audit conducted for the county also found he had used public funds to buy body armor, weapons, ammunition and a drone. He also purchased a $90,000 server room to benefit a cryptocurrency company he created. Those servers overloaded a circuit breaker inside a county building, sparking a fire that caused $6,700 in damages that weren’t covered by insurance, the audit said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/31/joel-greenberg-matt-gaetz-investigations/

In a devastating blow to British Prime Minister Theresa May, the British Parliament rejected a bill Tuesday that lists the terms of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union — more than two years after the country’s historic 2016 referendum that resulted in the decision to depart the E.U.

The House of Commons voted 432 -202 against the deal, said to be the largest defeat in House of Commons history and catastrophic for May.

May had urged Parliament to vote in favor of her Brexit deal, which she struck with the E.U. in November.  But ahead of the vote, signs were not pointing in favor of May, who has faced criticism from members of her own party for her handling of Britain’s departure from the E.U. and in December survived a vote of confidence in the leadership of her party.

THERESA MAY FACES CATASTROPHIC DEFEAT IN MAJOR BREXIT VOTE AS ALLIES WARN: ‘WINTER IS COMING’

A thumbs-down vote on the divorce deal throws British politics further into turmoil, just 10 weeks before Britain is due to leave the E.U. on March 29. It’s also possible the country could leave the bloc without a deal, which economists have warned could have devastating effects on the British economy.

The deal faced deep opposition from both sides of Britain’s divide over Europe. Pro-Brexit lawmakers say the deal will leave Britain bound indefinitely to E.U. rules, while pro-E.U. politicians favor an even closer economic relationship with the bloc.

Here’s what you need to know about Brexit and the departure agreement.

First, what is Brexit?

Brexit — or “British Exit” — refers to the U.K.’s choice to leave the E.U., which is an “economic and political partnership” that currently consists of 28 countries in Europe, according to the BBC.

A list of countries that are part of the E.U. can be found here.

What has happened since the U.K. voted to leave the E.U.?

May and other U.K. leaders have worked with the E.U. to negotiate and agree on the terms of the country’s exit from the E.U., which will occur on March 29 whether or not there is a deal, the BBC reported.

Negotiations between the two sides have led to a 585-page withdrawal agreement. The agreement, in part, details the terms of the U.K.’s departure from the E.U.

Namely, this includes how much money the U.K. is required to pay the E.U., (estimated £39 billion or more than $49 billion), what will happen to the E.U citizens living in the U.K. and vice versa, and how to prevent a physical border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland “when it becomes the frontier between the U.K. and the E.U.,” the BBC reported. This has also been referred to as the “backstop plan.”

The E.U. says that there can be no deal without the backstop to guarantee an open border along the U.K.’s only land frontier with an E.U. member state. But pro-Brexit supporters say this part of the agreement will bind the U.K. to many E.U. laws, CNBC reported.

What happens now that Parliament voted “no” on Jan. 15?

Now that Parliament has voted “no” on the deal, May has until Monday of next week to come back to Parliament with Plan B.

If the deal is rejected by a narrow margin, the government could try again, re-submitting the agreement to Parliament after tweaking it or winning some soothing words from the E.U. to assuage lawmakers’ concerns.

But while E.U. leaders have offered “clarifications” to the deal, they insist the 585-page withdrawal agreement cannot be reopened.

Other options include possibly delaying Britain’s exit or holding a second referendum, which has been driven largely by supporters of the losing “remain” side last time around. But May and her government have firmly opposed this option.

Additionally, there is the possibility that the main opposition Labour Party could call a no-confidence vote in the government if the deal is defeated. The vote would be an attempt to trigger a general election.

The party has not disclosed the timing of such a motion, which could come as early as Tuesday night. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn told colleagues on Monday that a no-confidence vote was “coming soon.”

What’s the so-called “transition period” and why is it important?

The transition period is a period of time between March 29 and Dec. 21, 2020 that will allow businesses to adjust to the new rules between the U.K. and E.U after Brexit formally begins.

But the transition period will only occur if a deal is met between the E.U. and U.K.

BRITISH MP DELAYS GIVING BIRTH BY TWO DAYS TO VOTE AGAINST BREXIT DEAL

Economists warn that an abrupt break from the E.U. could batter the British economy and bring chaotic scenes at borders, ports and airports.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

The British government has already reportedly started to plan for this potential outcome.

Fox News’ Adam Shaw and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-votes-on-theresa-may-brexit-deal-what-to-know

Antonio Fernández, Subdirector de Diseño de Producto y Estándares de Servicio de Aeroméxico comentó: “En Aeroméxico, siempre estamos en busca de novedades para que nuestros pasajeros tengan la mejor experiencia de viaje, y para eso, no hay nada como la televisión en vivo. Nuestros clientes ahora podrán estar al día en los eventos mundiales, además de ver competir a sus atletas y equipos favoritos en tiempo real a 35,000 pies de altura”.

Aeroméxico comenzará a ofrecer este nuevo servicio de transmisión en vivo durante el mes de agosto en cuatro de sus nueve aviones Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, la aeronave más moderna en el mundo, que opera a Tijuana en México y hacia destinos internacionales tales como Buenos Aires, Londres, Los Ángeles, Madrid, Nueva York, París, Shanghái, Santiago de Chile y Tokio.

David Bruner Vice Presidente de Servicios de Comunicación Global de Panasonic Avionics Corporation dijo: “La televisión en vivo se ha vuelto muy importante, tanto para las aerolíneas como para sus pasajeros. Las noticas y los deportes nunca se detienen, y seguimos mejorando nuestro servicio de eXTV, para brindar una experiencia única a los pasajeros de todo el mundo. Es un honor y orgullo apoyar a Aeroméxico con la inclusión de esta nuevo servicio a bordo de su flota de Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner que vuela internacionalmente”.

Acerca de Grupo Aeroméxico

Grupo Aeroméxico, S.A.B. de C.V., es una sociedad controladora, cuyas subsidiarias se dedican a la aviación comercial en México y a la promoción de programas de lealtad de pasajeros. Aeroméxico, la aerolínea más grande de México, opera más de 600 vuelos diarios y su principal centro de operaciones está localizado en la Terminal 2 del Aeropuerto Internacional de la Ciudad de México. Su red de destinos alcanza más de 80 ciudades en tres continentes: 45 en México, 16 en Estados Unidos, 15 en Latinoamérica, cuatro en Europa, tres en Canadá, y dos en Asia.

La flota actual del Grupo suma cerca de 130 aviones Boeing 787, 777, 737, así como Embraer 190, 175, 170 y 145 de última generación. En 2012, anunció el plan de inversión más importante en la historia de la aviación en México, la compra de 100 aviones Boeing conformados por 90 equipos B737 MAX y 10 equipos B787-9 Dreamliner.

Como socio fundador de SkyTeam, Aeroméxico ofrece más de 1,000 destinos en 177 países, a través de las 20 aerolíneas socias, por medio del cual los pasajeros pueden obtener diferentes beneficios y disfrutar de 672 salas VIP alrededor del mundo. Al mismo tiempo que, gracias a los códigos compartidos que tiene con Delta Air Lines, Alaska Airlines, Avianca, Copa Airlines y Westjet, Aeroméxico ofrece una amplia conectividad dentro de países como Estados Unidos, Brasil, Canadá, Chile, Colombia y Perú. www.aeromexico.com y www.skyteam.com

Acerca de Panasonic Avionics Corporation

Panasonic Avionics Corporation es el distribuidor líder en el mundo de entretenimiento y sistemas de comunicación para aeronaves. Las soluciones de la empresa, las mejores en su clase sustentadas en servicios profesionales de mantenimiento, se integran completamente a la cabina para que sus clientes obtengan la mejor experiencia de viaje con una gran variedad de opciones de entretenimiento, dando como resultado sistemas y soluciones de comunicación con una calidad superior, además de un tiempo de salida al mercado reducido a un menor costo.

Fundada en 1979 en los Estados Unidos, Panasonic Avionics Corporation, es la subsidiaria principal de Panasonic Corporation de Norte América. Con sede en Lake Forest, California, la empresa cuenta con más de 4,400 empleados y tiene presencia en 80 oficinas en distintos continentes. Ha entregado más de 8,000 sistemas de entretenimiento a bordo, y 1,000 soluciones de conectividad para aeronaves entre las principales aerolíneas del mundo. Para más información, visite www.panasonic.aero

Logo – http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20130315/MX77534LOGO

SOURCE Aeromexico

Related Links

http://www.aeromexico.com

Source Article from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aeromexico-anuncia-transmision-en-vivo-de-deportes-y-noticias-en-su-flota-internacional-de-boeing-787-8-590460531.html

  • The US Omicron wave could peak sharply in January, then bottom out in March, new models suggest.
  • Omicron could represent the swiftest outbreak in the US to date, lasting no more than three months.
  • But hospitalizations and deaths are still expected to rise as the variant becomes more widespread.

Almost as quickly as the Omicron variant has torn through the US, some scientists are predicting it will decline. New models suggest that the US’s Omicron outbreak may peak in January and last no more than three months.

That would make this latest wave much steeper and swifter than its predecessors.

“When you have something that goes up this quickly, often you see it come right back down,” Dr. Anthony Fauci told “Good Morning Americaon Tuesday. “Because what will happen is that almost everyone is either going to get infected, particularly the unvaccinated, or be vaccinated.”

A recent report from the University of Texas estimated that Omicron cases could peak between January 18 and February 3, depending on how well the variant transmits or evades immunity relative to Delta. At the height of the winter surge, COVID-19 cases could reach between 230,000 and 550,000 a day, the model suggests.

The US has been recently reporting about 170,000 daily COVID-19 cases on average, as shown in the chart below from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Daily COVID-19 cases could also bottom out in March, the report said, even as Omicron remained prevalent. Another model from the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) projects that coronavirus infections may peak at more than 2.8 million cases a day around January 27, then drop to fewer than 700,000 daily infections by April.

That trajectory wouldn’t be surprising, scientists say: A highly transmissible virus tends to burn quickly through a population until it runs out of people to infect — and Omicron could be the most transmissible coronavirus variant to date.

“As the transmission moves from an outbreak setting to a household setting, where you’re really starting to talk about infecting one or two people at a time, then you see that growth slow down,” David Dowdy, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Insider. 

“Anytime you see these new outbreaks popping up, they start off with a bang,” he added. “It doesn’t mean that they’re going to stay that way forever.”

Omicron already seems to have passed its peak in South Africa, which first reported it to the World Health Organization, roughly one month after scientists first spotted it there. Daily COVID-19 cases in South Africa have fallen 24% on average over the past week after reaching a record high of nearly 38,000 cases on December 12.

But widespread Omicron cases could still bring a punishing surge of hospitalizations in the US.

“Even in my own hospitals that I work at, we’re already starting to see more and more cases of COVID,” Dr. Vivek Cherian, a Chicago internal-medicine physician, told Insider

Both hospitalizations and asymptomatic infections could rise

People wait in line as city workers hand out take-home COVID-19 tests in lower Manhattan on December 23.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images


Daily coronavirus infections in the US could reach a record high by January, the IHME model suggests. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that vaccinated people will get sicker: Early data indicates that Omicron causes less severe illness than Delta does, perhaps because more people have some degree of immunity against the coronavirus already, either from vaccines or natural infection.

On the whole, hospitalizations and deaths are likely to rise the more Omicron spreads.

Omicron cases are doubling every two to three days in the US, and a recent report from Imperial College London suggested the variant increased the risk of reinfection by more than fivefold compared with Delta.

Within two to three months, more than 60% of all Americans could be infected with Omicron, the IHME model indicates. According to the model, more than 90% of those Omicron cases will likely be asymptomatic, but deaths could still increase considerably in January.

IHME predicted that COVID-19 deaths would peak around February 4 at more than 2,000 a day. The University of Texas’ model suggests hospitalizations may climb to roughly 10,000 to 30,000 a day, while deaths could reach between 1,500 and 3,900 a day.

“Under all scenarios, we expect that Omicron will quickly overtake Delta as the dominant variant and has the potential to cause the most severe COVID-19 healthcare surges to date,” the University of Texas researchers wrote.

Staffing shortages at hospitals, combined with a large share of unvaccinated people, could make it particularly difficult to treat patients. More than 38% of Americans are either unvaccinated or have received just one dose.

“Hospital capacity is already strained in many states,” Faheem Younus, the chief of infectious diseases at the University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health, recently told Insider. “We fear a repeat of early 2020, when surgeries were canceled and non-COVID care was impacted due to hospitals being overloaded with COVID.”

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/omicron-cases-peak-january-end-march-models-2021-12

Israeli settlers celebrate the Jewish Purim holiday at al-Shuhada street in the divided West Bank town of Hebron, on March 21.

Hazem Bader/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Hazem Bader/AFP/Getty Images

Israeli settlers celebrate the Jewish Purim holiday at al-Shuhada street in the divided West Bank town of Hebron, on March 21.

Hazem Bader/AFP/Getty Images

When it came down to a final issue for Israeli voters to ponder before Tuesday’s election, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made an extraordinary campaign pledge: If re-elected, he said on Saturday, he would annex Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Such a move would represent a dramatic, far-right policy change for Israel, staking a permanent claim over lands Palestinians demand for their own state.

Even if it is an election tactic to energize his nationalist base, Netanyahu’s annexation pledge is a fitting final chord to a decade of his administration, which began with a reluctant embrace of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and ended with the chances of such an outcome dwindling to a new low point.

Since Netanyahu returned to office in 2009, the Jewish settler movement has grown in size and influence. That evolution was apparent last month in the West Bank city of Hebron.

In one of the West Bank’s tensest cities — where several hundred Israeli settlers live in guarded enclaves among some 200,000 Palestinians — Israelis dressed up in costume and paraded down the main street. It was the Jewish carnival holiday of Purim, but the settlers were celebrating more than just the religious festivities.

In January, they had successfully lobbied Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to expel an international observer group, tasked with patrolling Hebron and making Palestinians in the city feel safe after an Israeli settler killed 29 Palestinian worshippers there on Purim in 1994.

Chicago native and Hebron settler Yisrael Zeev is in costume as a pipe-smoking farmer and driving a float in the Purim holiday parade. A red swath from the uniform of an international observer from the recently expelled Temporary International Presence in Hebron flutters on a pole.

Daniel Estrin/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Estrin/NPR

Chicago native and Hebron settler Yisrael Zeev is in costume as a pipe-smoking farmer and driving a float in the Purim holiday parade. A red swath from the uniform of an international observer from the recently expelled Temporary International Presence in Hebron flutters on a pole.

Daniel Estrin/NPR

“We will not allow the continuation of an international force that acts against us,” Netanyahu said in a statement about the Temporary International Presence in Hebron.

Settlers accused the organization of causing friction and undermining Israeli rule in the city. But member countries of the group criticized the closure of the mission, saying the observers “promoted conflict resolution between Israelis and Palestinians” and helped prevent violence.

It was Netanyahu, during his first term in office in 1996, who had allowed for the founding of the unarmed civilian group.

“Apparently they were very temporary, and we are the permanent Israeli presence in Hevron,” said Yisrael Zeev, an Israeli settler in the city, calling the city by its Hebrew name.

Zeev drove a float in the parade dressed as an American farmer, with a swath of an observer’s uniform flapping from a pole like the flag of a vanquished enemy. Some settlers, including a candidate for national elections, dressed in costume as the expelled international observers.

Israeli settlers celebrate the Jewish Purim holiday at al-Shuhada street in the divided West Bank town of Hebron.

Daniel Estrin/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Estrin/NPR

Israeli settlers celebrate the Jewish Purim holiday at al-Shuhada street in the divided West Bank town of Hebron.

Daniel Estrin/NPR

“Everything’s going in the right direction,” Zeev said.

Israel captured the West Bank in 1967, and has occupied it ever since. Both Israelis and Palestinians have historical ties there.

In 2009, a few months after entering office, Netanyahu gave a speech that has become famous: For the first time, he publicly called for the creation of Palestinian state. He was facing pressure from then-President Obama, who advocated for a Palestinian state alongside Israel: a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

But it didn’t stop Netanyahu from enlarging Jewish settlements in the occupied land. Apart from a 10-month settlement construction freeze at Obama’s request, Netanyahu’s government has continued to build homes for Israelis in the West Bank, leaving the map of what could be left for a Palestinian state looking like Swiss cheese.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is depicted in a poster in Hebron, calling on him to restore Jewish settlements in the northern West Bank that were uprooted by a former prime minister in 2005.

Daniel Estrin/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Estrin/NPR

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is depicted in a poster in Hebron, calling on him to restore Jewish settlements in the northern West Bank that were uprooted by a former prime minister in 2005.

Daniel Estrin/NPR

About three-quarters of the construction has taken place in settlements deep in the West Bank “that Israel will probably need to evict in the framework of a two-state agreement,” said Hagit Ofran of Peace Now, a settlement watchdog group that examines aerial photos to count each settlement unit built. The homes range from spacious U.S. suburb-style homes to multifamily structures to trailers set up on a hill.

“Every year they build at least 2,000 units, which means thousands of new settlers every year in the West Bank,” Ofran said. “If we want to have peace, specifically where Netanyahu is building is in places that will be harder to compromise.”

The phenomenon of completely new settlements, which Israel previously stopped, was renewed during Netanyahu’s tenure. Settlers built a few dozen small outposts without government permission but with Israel largely turning a blind eye, Ofran said.

By the time Netanyahu ran for re-election in 2015, he vocally opposed a Palestinian state. Recently, according to Peace Now figures, Israel has advanced more plans for settlement construction, with little opposition from President Trump.

“The evolution isn’t just that [Netanyahu has] gone more to the right. It’s that the entire country has gone more to the right, because the Palestinians have killed a lot of their support in Israel,” said Israeli political analyst Reuven Hazan.

Most of the Israeli public doesn’t believe a peace deal is possible now, he said, with instability in the Middle East and a fractured Palestinian leadership divided between the militant Hamas in Gaza and a weakened Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

“The prospects of a peace partner or a viable peace process is not something that you can sell to the man or woman on the street, nor can you win an election on today,” Hazan said.

Mufid Sharabati, a Palestinian, on his roof in Hebron.

Daniel Estrin/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Estrin/NPR

Mufid Sharabati, a Palestinian, on his roof in Hebron.

Daniel Estrin/NPR

In the runup to Tuesday’s elections, two dozen senior government ministers and lawmakers released video statements endorsing a policy once considered fringe. Instead of negotiating with Palestinians about the West Bank, they’re calling for Israel to unilaterally annex parts of it.

Netanyahu resisted that move for years. But last month, following Trump’s backing of Israel’s annexation of land it captured from Syria in 1967, Netanyahu argued Israel has the right to keep land it seized in war.

In a TV interview on Saturday, just days before the elections, he pledged to “impose Israeli sovereignty” over Jewish settlements if re-elected, including isolated ones deep in the West Bank. In a weekend meeting with settler leaders, Netanyahu said he would do so “immediately” after the vote, said settler leader Yossi Dagan. The U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem declined comment.

Palestinians see the chances of having their own state slipping away.

In Hebron, Palestinian resident Mufid Sharabati stands on his roof and counts the abandoned homes — about 10 that he can see. He says about 60 Palestinian families left the neighborhood in the last five years because life among Israeli settlers and soldiers has become too difficult.

There have been reports of settler harassment of Palestinians, as well as a recent wave of Palestinian stabbings against soldiers in the city. Sharabati says he must show Israeli soldiers his assigned number, 711, written in Sharpie on his ID cover, to enter the enclave he lives in alongside Israeli settlers. He is part of a civil society campaign called “Dismantle the Ghetto.”

Israelis dressed up in costume as Palestinian Muslim women, for the Jewish Purim holiday, in Hebron.

Daniel Estrin/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Estrin/NPR

Israelis dressed up in costume as Palestinian Muslim women, for the Jewish Purim holiday, in Hebron.

Daniel Estrin/NPR

Jewish settlers in Hebron say it is important they live in the city because of its biblical history — as the traditional site of the tomb of Abraham and other ancestors — and because it was home to an old Jewish community that ended when Arabs killed some 69 Hebron Jews in 1929.

Israelis often view Hebron as an extreme example of Israeli-Palestinian friction — the only place in the West Bank where Israeli settlers live under military guard in the heart of a city among Palestinians.

“There is nothing extreme about Hebron,” said Yehuda Shaul of Breaking the Silence, a left-wing Israeli veterans group shunned by Netanyahu’s government for its work collecting unflattering soldier testimonies about their service in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. “Restrictions of movement do you have only in Hebron? All over the West Bank. Settler violence in Hebron? You have all over the West Bank. Military presence only in Hebron? All over the West Bank.”

The Palestinian-only part of Hebron is accessible from the settler area through a military checkpoint. Palestinian politics professor Assad Aweiwei stands on the Palestinian side. He’s not allowed to cross through.

“This is apartheid politics,” he said. “We must change the condition. We must be equal in this land. We can live together.”

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas failed to deliver on his promise of an independent Palestinian state, and a growing number of Palestinians — including Aweiwei — advocate one shared state with Israelis. Aweiwei says Palestinians would likely become the majority, like apartheid South Africa became a black-majority democracy.

In the last decade under Netanyahu, Israel has approved more settlement housing in Hebron, and invested in tourism, archaeology and educational tours to normalize the tense city for average Israelis who tend to avoid it.

Daniel Estrin/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Estrin/NPR

In the last decade under Netanyahu, Israel has approved more settlement housing in Hebron, and invested in tourism, archaeology and educational tours to normalize the tense city for average Israelis who tend to avoid it.

Daniel Estrin/NPR

That would put an end to Israel as a Jewish state.

In the last decade under Netanyahu, Israel has approved more settlement housing in Hebron, and invested in tourism, archaeology and educational tours to normalize the tense city for average Israelis who tend to avoid it — Israelis like Ophir Solonikov.

In late March, he visited Hebron for the first time on his 50 birthday and on the Purim holiday. He’s not a Netanyahu voter, not a settler, and not religious. But he sees the West Bank city — where Jewish and Muslim traditions say Abraham is buried — as a part of Israel.

Solonikov thinks Israel should pay Palestinians to leave — a policy promoted by a far-right libertarian candidate he supports, Moshe Feiglin, who is shaping up to be an influential kingmaker in the close election race.

“I dunno,” Solonikov said as holiday music blared, “if you do it in good will, it’s a good idea.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/08/709989737/after-a-decade-of-netanyahu-hopes-fade-for-a-palestinian-state

A man visiting Hawaii’s Kīlauea volcano this week was left “seriously injured” after falling from a cliff into the volcano’s caldera, officials said Wednesday.

Responders from the Hawai‘i County Fire Department and Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park rangers were ultimately able to rescue the unidentified individual, who witnesses said had “lost his footing and fell from a 300 foot cliff at Kīlauea caldera” around 6:30 p.m., according to a news release from Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.

“The man had just climbed over a permanent metal railing at the Steaming Bluff overlook to get closer to the cliff edge,” park officials said.

GRAND CANYON VISITOR, 70, DIES IN FALL FROM EDGE, AUTHORITIES SAY

A search for the fallen man ensued and resulted in his rescue more than two hours later, according to the news release. He was found “on a narrow ledge about 70 feet down from the cliff edge,” officials said. He was airlifted to receive medical treatment.

The man was airlifted to Hilo Medical Center for treatment, the news release said.
(Getty/File)

Officials issued a stern warning about the hazards of bypassing safety barriers, saying the results could be fatal.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“Visitors should never cross safety barriers, especially around dangerous and destabilized cliff edges,” Chief Ranger John Broward said. “Crossing safety barriers and entering closed areas can result in serious injuries and death.”

The United States Geological Survey defines a caldera on their website as “a large basin-shaped volcanic depression” that is “commonly formed when magma is withdrawn or erupted from a shallow underground magma reservoir.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/man-falls-from-cliff-into-kilauea-volcanos-caldera-officials-say

Beto Ortiz informó que el próximo domingo, su programa ‘La Noticia Rebelde’ llegará a su fin, y explicó los motivos por los que el dominical será sacado del aire en 2016.

PUEDES LEER: ¿Por qué Karen Schwarz dejó “Espectáculos”?

A través de su columna en Perú 21, el periodista dijo que los auspiciadores del programa jugaron en contra de la continuidad del espacio televisivo que se emitía por la señal de Latina.

“Pasó que, aunque el ráting era bueno, los auspiciadores se morían de miedo de apostar porque no terminaban de entender nuestro exquisito sentido del humor. Y los políticos se morían de miedo de venir y que, de abajo de la mesa, les saliera una estriptisera en tetas o algo así”, escribió.

Ortiz aseguró que su programa “fue divertido mientras duró”. “Cuando uno está metido dentro de esta cajita maravillosa, no puede hacer los programas que quiere, sino los programas que puede, o sea los programas que los jefes, ustedes y los anunciantes quieren. Y ya sabemos cuáles son esos programas que los jefes, ustedes y los anunciantes quieren”, sostuvo.

Beto Ortiz no brindó detalles acerca de su futuro televisivo para el próximo año.

Cabe recordar que ‘La Noticia Rebelde’ estuvo al aire desde el 14 de junio de 2015.

Source Article from http://larepublica.pe/espectaculos/729183-beto-ortiz-anuncia-que-la-noticia-rebelde-no-va-mas


El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, acusó hoy a los medios de comunicación de “fabricar” muchas de las noticias que publican sobre la Casa Blanca e “inventar” las fuentes anónimas en las que se basan.

En una retahíla de tuits, Trump pareció reaccionar a las recientes noticias con fuentes anónimas que han relacionado a su yerno, Jared Kushner, con la investigación sobre la injerencia de Rusia en las últimas elecciones estadounidenses, y han asegurado que el mandatario se plantea grandes cambios en la Casa Blanca.

“Es mi opinión que muchas de las filtraciones que salen desde dentro de la Casa Blanca son mentiras fabricadas, inventadas por los medios de comunicación falsos”, escribió Trump en su cuenta de Twitter, con la etiqueta “#FakeNews”.

“Cuando vean las palabras ‘según fuentes’ en los medios de comunicación falsos, y no mencionen nombres… es muy posible que esas fuentes no existan sino que sean inventadas por escritores de noticias falsas. ¡Las noticias falsas son el enemigo!”, añadió en otros dos tuits.

Desde que llegó al poder en enero pasado, Trump se ha mostrado frustrado por las filtraciones a la prensa que provienen de la Casa Blanca o de las agencias de inteligencia estadounidenses, y en febrero aseguró que había encargado una investigación de esos actos “criminales” y que los responsables pagarían “un gran precio”.

El mandatario, que acaba de regresar de una gira internacional en la que limitó su presencia en Twitter, podría estar irritado por las revelaciones acerca de Kushner, sobre el que el diario The Washington Post publicó el viernes un artículo citando “funcionarios estadounidenses que han tenido acceso a informes de inteligencia”.

Tanto el Wall Street Journal este viernes como el Washington Post hoy informan, además, de que Trump se plantea hacer grandes cambios en la Casa Blanca, incluida la posibilidad de despedir o reducir el papel del portavoz del mandatario, Sean Spicer.

Esos cambios incluyen también, según las fuentes anónimas citadas por los periódicos, la creación de una “sala de guerra” para responder al constante murmullo mediático sobre la trama rusa y encauzar el mensaje oficial al respecto, e incluso la posibilidad de que un equipo de abogados revise los tuits de Trump.

Trump considera “un éxito” su gira por Europa

En sus mensajes de hoy, el mandatario se refirió también a su gira de nueve días al extranjero, de la que dijo que “fue un gran éxito para Estados Unidos”, y aseguró que su “trabajo duro” en el viaje producirá “grandes resultados”.

Además, volvió a destacar la “gran victoria” en el estado de Montana del candidato republicano Greg Gianforte, acusado de agredir a un periodista y quien este jueves se hizo con un escaño en la Cámara de Representantes en una elección especial.

“¿Se ha dado alguien cuenta de que la carrera por el escaño de Montana fue algo muy importante para los demócratas y los medios de comunicación falsos hasta que el republicano ganó? Su victoria se cubrió muy mal”, opinó Trump, quien no se ha pronunciado aún sobre el escándalo que ha generado la agresión de Gianforte a un periodista

TAMBIÉN PUEDES LEER

Por oposición de Trump, termina cumbre del G7 sin acuerdo sobre cambio climático

LO MÁS VISTO EN PUBLIMETRO TV








Source Article from https://www.publimetro.com.mx/mx/noticias/2017/05/28/trump-acusa-medios-comunicacion-fabricar-noticias-e-inventar-fuentes.html

Former N.J. Gov. Chris Christie, a friend of Donald Trump and former transition adviser for the Trump campaign, talks about the president’s prospects for coming out ahead of the next three week government funding deadline on ABC’s ‘This Week.’

CHRISTIE: I believe it is. I believe that, you know, he nor the people around him developed an endgame to that. If you are going to close the government, then you have got to have an endgame on how you get out when the moment is ready to get out with a way that is face saving for you and for the other people.


And as far as I could tell there was no plan on how to do that. And that’s an impulsive decision on his part, but also the people around him. And how does he get out now, he hits the reset button. He is the president of the United States. So, OK, now you have got three weeks to hit the reset button. Now come up with a plan that thank you is sellable and winnable for the country and for you politically.


I could tell you, everybody counts Donald Trump out as always being wrong. He has a great ability to be able to recover from things because he is strong and I say in the book, he is fearless. I mean, he’s fearless in a way that I have seen few people in politics be fearless. And so those are all good points, but when you act on impulse and you don’t have a plan sometimes, as I think what happened with the shutdown, it doesn’t end well.

Source Article from https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/01/27/chris_christie_trump_sometimes_acts_on_impulse_doesnt_have_a_plan.html

Revelations that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s still-confidential report may contain damaging information about President Trump ignited a fresh round of political fighting on Thursday, ushering in a new phase of the nearly two-year-old battle over the Russia probe.

Members of Mueller’s team have told associates they are frustrated with the limited information that Attorney General William P. Barr has provided about their investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether Trump sought to obstruct justice, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

While Barr concluded the special counsel’s evidence was not sufficient to prove that the president obstructed justice, some of Mueller’s investigators have said their findings on obstruction were alarming and significant, one person with knowledge of their thinking said.

Some on the special counsel’s team were also frustrated that summaries they had prepared for different sections of the report — with the view that they could be made public fairly quickly — were not released by Barr, two people familiar with the matter said. 

The developments put additional pressure on Barr to publicly release Mueller’s 400-page report in its entirety and prompted objections from Trump and his allies that Democrats are attempting to politicize what the president believes has been a 22-month “witch hunt.”

Barr has pledged as much transparency as the law and Justice Department policies allow, but House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) cited “troubling press reports” in a Thursday letter calling for Barr to “immediately release to the public any ‘summaries’ contained in the report that may have been prepared by the Special Counsel.” Nadler also asked Barr to turn over to the committee “all communications” between the Justice Department and Mueller’s office related to the report.

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the Nadler letter.

Trump, meanwhile, took to social media to press his attacks on the Mueller report, part of a shift in tone from his earlier praise for portions of the probe’s findings that he viewed as favorable to him.

“According to polling, few people seem to care about the Russian Collusion Hoax, but some Democrats are fighting hard to keep the Witch Hunt alive,” he tweeted. “They should focus on legislation or, even better, an investigation of how the ridiculous Collusion Delusion got started — so illegal!”

The political debate over the minimal information released so far about Mueller’s lengthy report seems to have led to cracks in the special counsel’s disciplined and tight-lipped team. The displeasure among some who worked on the closely held inquiry has begun to surface in the days since Barr released a four-page letter to Congress on March 24 describing what he said were the principal conclusions of Mueller’s report. 

In his letter, Barr said the special counsel did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. And he said that Mueller did not reach a conclusion “one way or the other” as to whether Trump’s conduct in office constituted obstruction of justice.

“It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” said one person, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the subject’s sensitivity.

Trump immediately seized on Barr’s letter to declare on Twitter, “No Collusion, No Obstruction, Complete and Total EXONERATION.”

 Though Trump’s assertion was incorrect — Mueller pointedly did not reach any conclusion on obstruction, for example — he and his allies began wielding Barr’s summary as a political cudgel to dismiss not just Mueller’s work but any future investigations into the president’s conduct. 

However, the news that Mueller’s full report could contain unflattering revelations about the president and his behavior has created a potential political problem for the White House and Trump’s reelection campaign.

After initially calling for the full report to be released, Trump seemed to temper his enthusiasm this week, writing on Twitter that “there is no amount of testimony or document production that can satisfy Jerry Nadler or Shifty Adam Schiff” — a reference to Nadler and Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Referring to the Democrats more generally, he also tweeted, “NOTHING WILL EVER SATISFY THEM!”

Against this backdrop, grumbles from Mueller’s team have broken into public view. Some members of his office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to three people familiar with their reactions.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according to one U.S. official briefed on the matter.

Two officials familiar with the matter added that the summaries the Mueller team had prepared were intended to be ready for public consumption in a timely manner, because the redactions could have been done fairly quickly.

Justice Department officials disputed that characterization, saying the summaries contained sensitive information that will probably require redaction.

Justice spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement Thursday that every page of Mueller’s confidential report was marked with a notation that it may contain confidential grand jury material, adding that it “therefore could not be publicly released.”

“Given the extraordinary public interest in the matter, the Attorney General decided to release the report’s bottom-line findings and his conclusions immediately — without attempting to summarize the report — with the understanding that the report itself would be released after the redaction process,” she said. “ . . . He does not believe the report should be released in ‘serial or piecemeal fashion.’ The Department continues to work with the Special Counsel on appropriate redactions to the report so that it can be released to the Congress and the public.”

A spokesman for the special counsel declined to comment. 

While the White House has publicly given Barr wide leeway to handle the Mueller report as he sees fit, congressional Democrats have been increasingly critical of his role, questioning whether he is trying to protect the president through his public letters and statements while he continues to review and redact portions of the Mueller report. 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday revived her demand that Barr release Mueller’s report and tied it in spirit to a Democratic request to the Treasury Department for six years of Trump’s tax returns.

“Show us the Mueller report. Show us the tax returns,” Pelosi said at a news conference, appearing to momentarily address the president. “We’re not walking away because you said ‘no’ the first time around.”

With each passing day the report remains secret, the pressure on Barr increases, driven in part by congressional demands for transparency and by anonymous officials’ characterizations of the attorney general’s work.

Part of the difficulty for Barr, according to several current and former law enforcement officials, is that he is trying to follow Justice regulations that were written in the wake of Kenneth Starr’s investigation of President Bill Clinton, with an eye toward limiting the amount of information that can be made public.

Some senior Justice officials are also wary of repeating what they view as mistakes made in 2016 by then-FBI Director James B. Comey when he discussed details of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Because those senior officials contend Comey said too much about people who were not charged with crimes, they are now arguing internally for Barr to be more circumspect in public statements and releases of information.

People familiar with the discussions said there is frustration in the special counsel’s office with Barr’s limited characterization of their work; others say there is frustration in the Justice Department with Mueller’s decision not to reach a conclusion about whether the president tried to obstruct justice. In both camps, there is frustration that the special counsel regulations seem to make these differing viewpoints more difficult to resolve.

Trump attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani said the frustrations on Mueller’s team were coming from “disgruntled” staffers. 

“They are a bunch of sneaky, unethical leakers,” he told Fox News host Laura Ingraham Wednesday night. “And they are rabid Democrats who hate the president of United States.”

Giuliani added, “I am absolutely confident that the report will bear out the conclusions. The conclusions: no obstruction, no Russian collusion of any kind. It will bear that out.”

During nearly two years of work, Mueller’s team — which included 19 lawyers and roughly 40 FBI agents, analysts and other professional staff — worked in near silence, speaking only rarely through public documents filed in court. The fact that some have been confiding in recent days to associates is a sign of the level of their distress. 

Some members of Mueller’s team appear caught off guard by how thoroughly the president has used Barr’s letter to claim total victory, as the limited information about their work has been weaponized in the country’s highly polarized political environment, according to people familiar with their responses.

Their frustrations come as polls show many Americans have already drawn conclusions about the special counsel findings — even though only a handful of words from the report have so far been released.

Rosalind S. Helderman, Rachael Bade and Mike DeBonis contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/potentially-damaging-information-in-mueller-report-ushers-in-new-political-fight/2019/04/04/10ea64f0-56f0-11e9-9136-f8e636f1f6df_story.html

Jen Psaki, Joe Biden’s White House press secretary, said on Sunday she had tested positive for Covid-19.

Psaki, 42, did not travel with Biden to Rome, for the G20 summit, from where the president was due to travel on to Glasgow for the Cop26 climate talks.

In a statement, Psaki said she stayed in the US “due to a family emergency, which was members of my household testing positive for Covid-19. Since then, I have quarantined and tested negative via PCR for Covid on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday. However, today I tested positive for Covid.

“While I have not had close contact in person with the president or senior members of the White House staff since Wednesday and tested negative for four days after that last contact, I am disclosing today’s positive test out of an abundance of transparency.”

News of a positive test for such a close aide to the president came a little over a year after an outbreak at the White House reached the then president, Donald Trump, who was forced to spend time in hospital.

Psaki said she last saw Biden, 78, on Tuesday, “when we sat outside more than 6ft apart and wore masks”.

She also said that “thanks to the vaccine I have only experienced mild symptoms, which has enabled me to continue working from home.

“I will plan to return to work in person at the conclusion of the 10-day quarantine following a negative rapid test, which is an additional White House requirement beyond [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] guidance, taken out an abundance of caution.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/31/jen-psaki-white-house-press-secretary-joe-biden-tests-positive-covid

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/03/biden-covid-19-relief-bill-heads-senate-3-600-child-tax-credit/6875120002/

(CNN)President Joe Biden on Thursday announced a number of new steps his administration will take to try to get more Americans vaccinated and slow the spread of coronavirus, including requiring that all federal employees must attest to being vaccinated against Covid-19 or face strict protocols.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/29/politics/joe-biden-vaccination-requirement-announcement/index.html