The Coming Subpoena Fights Between Trump and Congress, Explained – The New York Times

Thanks! Share it with your friends!

Close

That power “includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling the Congress to remedy them,” justices have written. “It comprehends probes into departments of the federal government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste.”

This oversight role, courts have said, includes the power to issue subpoenas compelling people and organizations to turn over documents or testify, even if they do not want to comply.

They can vote to hold someone who defies a subpoena in contempt of Congress. First, the committee that issued the subpoena would vote to recommend that step, and then the full House of Representatives would vote on whether to do so. Just one chamber can do this, so it does not matter that Republicans control the Senate.

On paper, defying a congressional subpoena for testimony or documents is a misdemeanor crime, punishable by one to 12 months in jail. But in practice, this law is generally toothless in disputes between Congress and the executive branch. Invoking prosecutorial discretion, the Justice Department can decline to charge an official who defies a subpoena at the president’s direction.

In theory, yes, but this is outdated. Historically, Congress has exercised “inherent contempt” authority to fine recalcitrant witnesses or detain them until the end of its session. But Congress has not tried to use that authority since 1935.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/us/politics/subpoenas-trump-congress.html

Comments

Write a comment