The latest sanctions follow a string of attacks last summer in the Persian Gulf on oil tankers, the takedown of an unmanned U.S. surveillance drone and strikes in Saudi Arabia on the world’s largest crude oil processing plant.

At the White House on Friday, Mnuchin pushed back on concerns that the existing sanctions on Tehran were ineffective.

“The economic sanctions are working,” Mnuchin said. “If we didn’t have these sanctions in place, literally Iran would have tens of billions of dollars. They would be using that for terrorist activities throughout the region.”

“There is no question that by cutting off the economics to the regime we are having an impact,” he added.

In a statement later, Trump repeated his assertion that “Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.”

“The United States will continue to counter the Iranian regime’s destructive and destabilizing behavior,” he said in a statement. “These punishing economic sanctions will remain until the Iranian regime changes its behavior. The United States is ready to embrace peace with all who seek it.”

Last month, State Department officials said the pressure on Iran “will intensify in 2020, as the U.S. seeks to rein in Tehran’s pursuit of nuclear infrastructure and regional aggression.”

“There will be more sanctions to come, and Iran’s economic problems and challenges are going to compound in 2020,” a senior State Department official said on a Dec. 30 call with reporters.

“They are already deep into a recession, and we are also seeing Iran come under greater diplomatic isolation.”

Another senior State Department official added that the Trump administration has sanctioned approximately 1,000 individuals and entities with links to Iran’s malign activities.

“What we are doing is denying the regime the revenue that it needs to run an expansionist foreign policy, and by that policy, Iran has less money to spend today than it did almost three years ago when we came into office,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

In December, Pompeo announced another round of fresh sanctions, this time targeting Iran’s largest shipping company and biggest airline, saying the companies were aiding the regime’s alleged proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

“As long as its malign behaviors continue, so will our campaign of maximum pressure,” Pompeo said during a Dec. 11 news conference.

The 2015 nuclear deal lifted sanctions that crippled Iran’s economy and cut its oil exports roughly in half. In exchange for sanctions relief, Iran accepted limits on its nuclear program and allowed international inspectors into its facilities.

In 2018, Trump unilaterally withdrew from the agreement and reintroduced sanctions on Tehran that had been previously lifted in accordance with the nuclear deal. In response, Iran stopped complying last May with some commitments in the 2015 nuclear deal.

On Sunday, Iran announced it would not abide by any limits established in the nuclear deal on the number of uranium enrichment centrifuges.

That means Iran would have no limit on its enrichment capacity, the level to which uranium could be processed to create a nuclear bomb. Iranian state-run broadcast said Tehran’s steps could be reversed if Washington lifted its sanctions.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/10/us-will-slap-new-sanctions-on-iran-following-strikes-on-us-targets.html

Here’s what you need to know to understand what this moment means in U.S.-Iran relations.

What happened: President Trump ordered a drone strike near the Baghdad airport, killing Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, Iran’s most powerful military commander and leader of its special-operations forces abroad.

Who was Soleimani: As the leader of the Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, Soleimani was key in supporting and coordinating with Iran’s allies across the region, especially in Iraq. Soleimani’s influence was imprinted on various Shiite militias that fought U.S. troops.

How we got here: Tensions had been escalating between Iran and the United States since Trump pulled out of an Obama-era nuclear deal, and they spiked shortly before the airstrike. The strikes that killed Soleimani were carried out after the death of a U.S. contractor in a rocket attack against a military base in Kirkuk, Iraq, that the United States blamed on Kataib Hezbollah, an Iran-backed militia.

What happens next: Iran responded to Soleimani’s death by launching missile strikes at two bases hosting U.S. forces in Iraq. No casualties were reported. In an address to the nation, Trump announced that new sanctions will be imposed on Tehran.

Ask a question: What do you want to know about the strike and its aftermath? Submit a question to Post reporters.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/on-the-day-us-forces-killed-soleimani-they-launched-another-secret-operation-targeting-a-senior-iranian-official-in-yemen/2020/01/10/60f86dbc-3245-11ea-898f-eb846b7e9feb_story.html

Boeing went to lengths to downplay the computerized flight-control system that turned out to be deadly in the 737 Max jetliner, a new batch of internal communications show.

Repeatedly, Boeing tried to dissuade airlines from requiring training for pilots in advanced flight simulators before they flew the new jet, a move that would have vastly added to the manufacturer’s costs. 

Some of the message exchanges between Boeing employees allude to deceiving regulators or others. One employee talked about “jedi mind tricks” – a “Star Wars” reference – that would hopefully work on regulators.

In the end, the plane launched without a requirement for simulator training, with disastrous effects. Two crashes – one off Indonesia and the other outside Addis Ababa in Ethiopia – killed 346 people and grounded the 737 Max.

The chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, which received and reviewed the documents as part of a probe into the crashes that killed 346, called the emails “incredibly damning.” 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/01/09/boeing-737-max-plane-crash-faa-emails-jedi-mind-tricks/4428720002/

Boeing’s internal emails don’t paint a pretty picture of its corporate culture.

A new round of emails Boeing shared with the US Federal Aviation Administration in December, and gave to Congress on Thursday, showed its pilots regarded inquiries from airlines and air safety officials with disdain. The internal exchanges show the employees focused on getting Boeing’s commercial and regulatory partners to drop requests for simulator training on the new 737 Max, which ultimately was involved in two deadly crashes that killed nearly 350 people. (The Verge has published a full set of the emails and messages.)

In 2017, shortly after Malaysia’s Malindo Air became the first airline to start flying the 737 Max, a sister airline in the Jakarta-based Lion Air group requested a flight simulator to train pilots on the newly acquired plane, to the irritation of a Boeing technical pilot. Technical pilots are Boeing employees that work with airlines and regulators on training, among other things.

“Now frigging [airline name redacted] may need a sim to fly the Max, and maybe because of their own stupidity,” the pilot wrote in an instant message (pdf, p. 33). “I’m scrambling to figure out how to unscrew this now! idiots.” The pilots’ names were redacted.

In October 2018, Lion Air, part of the group, became the first airline to crash while flying the Max, killing 189 people, but it is not known if the Boeing pilots were discussing that airline or another in the group.

The Seattle Times reported the airline’s request for simulator training might have come in relation to the airline flying to India, as the exchange linked the request to India’s regulator, the Directorate General for Civil Aviation. Not sure if this is Lion’s fault or DGCA’s yet,” the pilot said.

In another exchange, the Boeing pilot told a colleague he had advised the airline to send the Indian regulator an email from him with a list of all airlines using the Max just based on computer training “to make them feel stupid about trying to require any additional training requirements.” Because the plane was certified as a variation on an earlier 737 model, limited training was required for pilots trained on the older planes, a key component of Boeing’s marketing of the Max.

Simulator training for pilots at airlines is expensive, but it could have helped familiarize them with a new feature, the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, or MCAS. Instead, pilots weren’t made aware of or trained on the new flight control system, which was added to make the plane perform like earlier models in the 737 series. It was capable of pushing the plane’s nose sharply down during early minutes of the flight, and it activated on it two fatal flights, which included an Ethiopian Airlines crash in March, which led to the 737 Max’s global grounding.

An internal email from the 737’s chief technical pilot said (pdf, p. 27 of 48) Boeing would go “face to face” with any regulator that tried to make simulator training a requirement for the Max: “Boeing will not allow that to happen.”

Earlier this week Boeing said it would recommend simulator training for pilots when the 737 Max is again certified to fly. On announcing the latest release of emails, which come after an earlier batch of damning communications made public in December, the plane maker, said “these communications do not reflect the company we are and need to be, and they are completely unacceptable.”

Some employees also expressed scathing opinions about the Max development team, and Boeing management culture more generally. One email described the Max as “designed by clowns, who are in turn supervised by monkeys,” an apparent reference to the FAA. Another wrote in 2018, “Would you put your family on a MAX simulator trained aircraft? I wouldn’t.”

The exchanges reflect a safety culture that appears to have deteriorated sharply in the wake of Boeing’s 1997 acquisition of aircraft manufacturer McDonnell Douglas. The purchase removed a competitor, but also changed Boeing in fundamental ways that contributed to the 737 Max crash, by shifting its priorities from design and engineering to costs. Those concerned about the company’s approach to safety appeared to feel ignored.

A line in one of the released emails now stands out as darkly prescient: “I don’t know how to fix these things. It’s systemic. It’s culture… Sometimes you have to let things fail big so that everyone can identify a problem.”

Source Article from https://qz.com/1782894/boeing-quashed-stupid-requests-for-737-max-simulator-training/

Mr. Sanders has rebounded thanks to a supporter base more devoted than any other candidate’s, their loyalty stoked by his consistent messages on health care and climate change plus, for some, an unwavering sense he was denied his shot in 2016 by the Democratic establishment.

He has capitalized on the moment to expand his base and turn it into a small-donor army, which raised $96 million in 2019, including $1.8 million that comes in monthly from 200,000 people who have signed up to make recurring donations. The campaign had 300,000 new donors in the last quarter as part of a $34.5 million haul. Better yet, it says, 99.9% of his donors haven’t hit the federal contribution limit, meaning they might be tapped for more.

Mr. Sanders campaigning in Boone, Iowa, on SundayPhoto: Patrick Semansky/Associated Press

This success has come while Sen. Warren, his leading rival for the most liberal voters, has taken heat from other candidates over details of her health-care proposal and faded in the polls. Mr. Sanders has largely avoided such scrutiny, for now, allowing him to build support as she has sagged in national and early-state polling.

Sean Lewis, a nonprofit consultant who is vice chair of the Democratic organization for Salem, N.H., told the Warren campaign this past summer he was backing Ms. Warren. But after what he called a few weeks of soul-searching, Mr. Lewis, 37, said he came to the conclusion “I should be backing the candidate who is pushing for wholesale change, and…has been pushing for that kind of change since even the earliest days of his political career.”

With less than a month until the Iowa caucuses that kick off the nomination season, Mr. Sanders’s team is emphasizing his long-term support for a Medicare-for-All system by centering campaign events on individual voters’ health-care stories.

The team is urging its many young supporters to reach out to their friends and parents, and it’s banking on winning votes from groups that often don’t vote in high numbers, such as young people and minorities.

The campaign also is counting on the Democratic field remaining fractured, which would mean that none of his more moderate rivals, such as former Vice President Biden or former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg, consolidates support. Unlike Mr. Biden, Mr. Sanders has never polled above 30% among Democrats nationally in this election cycle, though he has consistently been in the top tier.

The leaders in Iowa and New Hampshire are separated by only a few percentage points—margins that could change quickly. Though letters from doctors released recently said the 78-year-old Mr. Sanders was healthy and able to take on the duties of the presidency, he still faces questions about his age and health, largely from older voters, many of whom have never warmed to his candidacy.

He also faces the continuing worry from critics that as the nominee, Mr. Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, might turn off independent or Republican voters who otherwise could be persuaded to vote Democrat.

“I hope that the Democratic Party nominates a moderate,” said Bill Engler, a 79-year-old retiree from Anthem, Ariz. “I’m a realist, so I want the Democratic Party to nominate someone that can’t just [win] a primary but win the general election.”

The Sanders campaign points to polling that shows the senator beating President Trump in battleground states as an example of his electability.

Mr. Sanders’s heart attack came at a time, the first of October, when he was struggling to gain momentum against Ms. Warren and Mr. Biden.

Sanders supporters gathered on the Venice Beach boardwalk in California in late December.Photo: Brian Cahn/Zuma Press

Following news of the heart attack, “I guess I was a little bit worried,” said Katelin Penner, a student at Wesleyan University in Connecticut.

“But not really,” she added, because as soon as she saw that Mr. Sanders was using his health problem as a chance to push for Medicare-for-All, she figured he would be fine.

Mr. Sanders soon gave his supporters something to celebrate when, during his recovery, three influential progressive lawmakers decided to endorse him. When he returned to the trail in mid-October with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, he drew the largest crowd of his campaign. Framed by the Queensboro Bridge in New York City, he announced he was “more than ready to assume the office of president of the United States.”

Shortly after his return to campaigning came Ms. Warren’s dip in polling. Early on, the Massachusetts senator had said she was “with Bernie” in his call to eliminate private health insurance and replace it with a government-run program.

In a rally not long after his heart attack, Mr. Sanders was joined by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in New York on Oct. 19.Photo: peter foley/EPA/Shutterstock

Mr. Sanders has said he would introduce legislation to do that in his first week in office. He hasn’t specified how he would pay for it, just saying taxes would go up—and not excepting middle-class taxes. Mr. Sanders also says there would be no premiums or co-pays, so the overall cost of health care would go down.

Ms. Warren, by contrast, has said she would pay for Medicare-for-All without raising middle-class taxes. In addition, she said that instead of starting it right away she would transition to it. First there would be an interim plan—looking similar to Mr. Biden’s and Mr. Buttigieg’s proposals—before she would push a Medicare-for-All bill during her third year in office.

That stance has dogged the Massachusetts senator on the campaign trail. At an event in Manchester, Iowa, a woman told Ms. Warren she agreed with the candidate’s support of Medicare-for-All but was worried that the transition idea would mean higher costs.

“We need to get votes and we need to give people some experiences with it,” Ms. Warren responded.

Mr. Sanders held a large campaign rally in Long Island City, Queens, in October. Photo: Natalie Keyssar for The Wall Street Journal

Ms. Warren’s campaign didn’t reply to a question on how her health plan might have influenced Mr. Sanders’s support. Some of her allies said she didn’t lose support because of the health-care contrast with Mr. Sanders. Instead, they said, the problem arose because she was forced to defend his Medicare-for-All plan before she had worked out the details of her own.

“Let’s be clear: Warren took the most incoming fire when she was defending Bernie’s bill, which even he admits leaves many details unanswered,” said Adam Green, who runs a liberal group backing Ms. Warren.

Aides to rival campaigns acknowledged in December that they had given him a pass on the Medicare-for-All issue and other policies, saying they believed he was unlikely to build a coalition large enough to win the nomination, and his core supporters would never leave him anyway.

“Because of the lack of hits he’s taken, whether from rivals or the media, his negatives have not grown swiftly in recent months in the way you’ve seen from Warren or even Biden,” said Ian Sams, who was an aide in Sen. Kamala Harris’s former campaign.

Mr. Sanders has begun emphasizing personal stories about health care. In the past few months—at Mr. Sanders’s request, aides say—smaller campaign events now almost always include time for people to share their stories, particularly about health care’s high costs. Mr. Sanders repeats some of the more dramatic stories at later events, and his campaign sometimes shares the videos on Facebook and
Twitter.

A mother and son shared a story about diabetes and insulin issues as Mr. Sanders listened during a campaign event in Windsor, Ontario, near Detroit, in July.Photo: Erin Kirkland/Bloomberg News

Sanders aides plan to use a series of recent crises around the world to emphasize his policy consistency. The Vermont senator has long bemoaned U.S. involvement in the Middle East. He has jabbed at former Vice President Biden for voting to authorize the Iraq invasion while a senator in 2002, and pointed out that Mr. Sanders, then a House member, opposed it.

Share Your Thoughts

What do you think the chances are that Sanders will be the Democratic nominee? Join the conversation below.

He has stepped up those arguments since President Trump ordered the airstrike that killed Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani. The evening that news broke, Mr. Sanders and aides huddled in a Cedar Rapids, Iowa, hotel, crafting a statement they released just before midnight Eastern time.

By the next morning, they had decided that the candidate, who was on a bus tour through Iowa, needed to address in person what he called an “assassination.” Mr. Sanders spent the morning writing his speech, working on his remarks until he arrived at the event site, the National Motorcycle Museum in Anamosa, Iowa.

Mr. Sanders greeted people at the National Motorcycle Museum in Anamosa, Iowa, on Jan. 3.Photo: Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Liz Vells, 75, a retiree from Iowa City, said she backed Hillary Clinton in the Iowa caucuses four years ago, even though she liked Mr. Sanders, because she thought Mrs. Clinton more electable. Wearing a “Hindsight is 2020” T-shirt, Ms. Vells said she is fully behind Mr. Sanders this time, a decision she made well before the recent U.S.-Iran confrontation. “He knew that the war in Iraq was a mistake in the early 2000s,” she said.

Mr. Biden has also seized on the lethal airstrike, highlighting his long foreign-policy record and noting that President Obama chose him to serve as the administration’s point person on Iraq. The former vice president’s advisers said the confrontation with Iran has raised the stakes for the primary, adding they would happily put Mr. Biden’s foreign-affairs record up against any other candidate’s.

Some other recent global developments, notably a series of natural disasters in the U.S. and abroad, also can draw voters to Mr. Sanders, his team says.

Images of deadly wildfires in Australia have given candidate Mr. Sanders an opportunity to promote his climate plan. “I think his ideas have caught on,” said Emily Hosmer-Dillard, 33, a Brooklyn, N.Y., resident volunteering for Mr. Sanders in Iowa. She called recent natural disasters “a wake-up call to a lot of people.”.

Mr. Sanders waved at a beachside rally at Windward Plaza in Venice, Calif., in December. Photo: Ringo Chiu/Zuma Press

Write to Eliza Collins at eliza.collins@wsj.com.

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/how-sanders-stumbled-then-steadied-his-presidential-campaign-11578676518

President TrumpDonald John TrumpProfessor fired for Facebook post suggesting Iran should tweet out list of American cultural sites to threaten NY judge denies Trump request to dismiss lawsuit by E. Jean Carroll Rep. Omar: ‘War trauma never leaves you’ MORE said in an interview airing Friday that Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani was plotting attacks against four embassies before the U.S. carried out last week’s airstrike that killed the top commander.

“I can reveal that I believe it would have been four embassies,” Trump told Laura IngrahamLaura Anne IngrahamJudd Gregg: Trump is a conservative in name only House GOP wants Senate Republicans to do more on impeachment Vindman’s lawyer requests Fox News retract guest’s allegation about espionage MORE during an interview on Fox News that will air in full Friday night. The president also said Soleimani was targeting the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, repeating a claim he made on Thursday.

“Don’t the American people have a right to know what specifically was targeted without revealing methods and sources?” Ingraham asked Trump.
 
“Well, I don’t think so. But we will tell you that probably it was going to be the Embassy in Baghdad,” Trump replied.

Trump’s comments went beyond what senior administration officials have said about the alleged attacks plotted by Soleimani, which they have described as posing an imminent threat to American lives without going into further detail in a purported effort to protect intelligence sources and methods.

Earlier Friday, Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoOvernight Defense: House passes measure to limit Trump on Iran | Pelosi vows vote to end 2002 war authorization | Officials believe Iran accidentally shot down passenger plane House passes measure seeking to limit Trump on Iran Understanding and responding to China’s brutal Xinjiang campaign MORE said at a White House press briefing that the Iranian general had been plotting a “large-scale” attack that threatened American facilities, including U.S. embassies and military bases, in the Middle East.

Under questioning from reporters, Pompeo said that the Trump administration didn’t know precisely when or where the attack would occur, but insisted it was imminent.

“We had specific information on an imminent threat and the threat stream included attacks on U.S. embassies. Period, full stop,” Pompeo said.

The administration has come under scrutiny from Democrats over the lack of information provided to justify the airstrike that killed Soleimani.

Officials have pointed both to Soleimani’s destructive actions — he is said to be responsible for hundreds of American deaths in the region over the years — while also referencing plans for future attacks that could result in U.S. casualties in describing last Thursday’s strike as a defensive measure.

Congressional Democrats and two GOP senators have complained that classified briefings on the strike provided by top administration officials were insufficient.

On Thursday, Trump told reporters at the White House that Soleimani was “looking to blow up” the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, later pointing to the violent Iran-backed protests against the embassy before he authorized the drone strike.

During a campaign rally in Ohio on Thursday evening, Trump suggested Soleimani was looking at targeting U.S. embassies but didn’t provide a number of the facilities under threat.

“Soleimani was actively planning new attacks and he was looking very seriously at our embassies and not just the Embassy in Baghdad,” Trump said at the rally in Toledo. “We stopped him and we stopped him quickly and we stopped him cold.”

Brett Samuels contributed.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/477740-trump-says-four-embassies-targeted-before-soleimani-strike

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said Friday that she’s been working with “a fairly small group” of Republican senators to make sure witnesses can be called in President Donald Trump’s impending Senate impeachment trial.

“We should be completely open to calling witnesses,” Collins told reporters in Bangor, Maine, the Bangor Daily News reported. She declined to say who or how many GOP lawmakers she’s been working with, but said she was “hopeful that we can reach an agreement on how to proceed with the trial that will allow the opportunity for both the House and the president’s counsel if they choose to do so.”

Collins echoed those comments in a statement to NBC News and said, “It is important that both sides be treated fairly.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has said he plans to follow the model that was used in President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial. In that case, the two sides made opening arguments and took questions from senators before there was a motion to either dismiss the case or hear from witnesses. In the Clinton case, the motion to dismiss failed, and senators wound up taking videotaped depositions of three witnesses, portions of which were played at the trial.

McConnell has said he’s working in “total coordination” with the White House on the trial, leading Democrats to charge that the majority leader plans to hold “sham” proceedings. Numerous Republican senators have said they don’t see a need for witnesses to testify, despite former national security adviser John Bolton’s recent offer to do so if subpoenaed.

Collins, a moderate Republican who is up for re-election this year, has criticized McConnell for his comments about working with the White House, and previously said she’s “open” to calling witnesses. Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, has said he’d “love to hear” what Bolton has to say. Bolton’s lawyer has said he has pertinent information about the White House’s dealings with Ukraine that has not been disclosed publicly.

One person who doesn’t want to hear from Bolton is the president who fired him (although Bolton maintains he resigned). In an interview with Fox News on Friday, Trump said he’d likely invoke executive privilege to limit his testimony.

“I think you have to, for the sake of the office,” the commander-in-chief said, maintaining it was important for “future, I’m talking about future, many future presidents.”

In her statement, Collins suggested she was fine with McConnell’s call to follow the Clinton model, as long as it allows for witnesses. “I have had many discussions with some of my Republican colleagues on how we can adhere as closely as practical to the precedent for conducting the impeachment trial of President Clinton, which included as a third stage the decision on whether to call witnesses,” she said.

Other moderate Republicans have sidestepped questions about potential witnesses, but just a handful peeling away could be the deciding factor. Republicans would need 51 votes to dismiss the case, and Democrats would need 51 votes to call witnesses. Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/sen-susan-collins-working-fairly-small-group-republicans-ensure-impeachment-n1113741

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/10/politics/nancy-pelosi-impeachment-vote-friday/index.html

Media captionFootage appears to show missile strike on Ukrainian plane in Iran

Evidence suggests an Iranian missile brought down a Ukrainian passenger plane that crashed near Tehran, possibly in error, Western leaders say.

Canada and the UK called for a full and thorough investigation into the crash, which killed all 176 people on board.

Iran’s civil aviation chief, however, said he was “certain” that the plane was not hit by a missile.

The crash came just hours after Iran carried out missile strikes on two airbases housing US forces in Iraq.

Image copyright
AFP/Getty Images

Image caption

Iran is known to have Russian-made Tor missile defence systems

US media have speculated that the timing of the crash suggests the plane may have been mistaken for a US warplane as Iran prepared for possible US retaliation for the strikes.

Victims included 82 Iranians, 63 Canadians and 11 Ukrainians as well as nationals from Sweden, the UK, Afghanistan and Germany.

CBS News quoted US intelligence sources as saying a satellite detected infrared “blips” of two missile launches, followed by another blip of an explosion.

Meanwhile, Newsweek quoted a Pentagon and senior US intelligence officials, as well as an Iraqi intelligence official, as saying they believed Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752 was hit by a Russian-made Tor missile.

Video obtained by the New York Times appeared to show a missile streaking across the night sky over Tehran and then exploding on contact with a plane. About 10 seconds later a loud explosion is heard on the ground. The plane, ablaze, continues to fly.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

An investigation is continuing into what caused the crash

US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he had “suspicions” about what happened to the plane.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called on Western countries to share their information about the crash.

Who will investigate?

Amid tensions heightened by the US killing of top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani on 3 January, Iran initially said it would not hand over the recovered black box flight recorders to Boeing, the plane’s manufacturer, or to the US.

However, an Iranian official later told Reuters the US had been formally invited to take part in the investigation, and the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed it had assigned an investigator.

Boeing said it would support the NTSB in the inquiry, and the Transportation Safety Board of Canada said it had also been invited to the accident site by Tehran.

Media captionMobile phone footage appears to show the plane in the moments before it came down

Under global aviation rules Iran has the right to lead the investigation, but manufacturers are typically involved.

Iranian TV pictures later in the day showed the crash site being bulldozed.

What’s been said about the possible missile strike?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he had received intelligence from multiple sources indicating that the plane was shot down by an Iranian surface-to-air missile, adding that it was possible that this was unintentional.

“This reinforces the need for a thorough investigation,” he said. “Canadians have questions and they deserve answers.”

But he said it was too early to apportion blame or draw any conclusions, and refused to go into detail about the evidence.

The Canadians on the flight were expecting to fly on to Toronto from Kyiv.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson echoed Mr Trudeau’s words and said Britain was working closely with Canada and other international partners affected by the crash.

Speaking in Canada, UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said British nationals were advised not to travel to Iran, “given the body of information that UIA Flight 752 was shot down by an Iranian surface-to-air missile, and the heightened tensions”.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Ukraine’s president met the relatives of crew members on Thursday

Newsweek quoted sources as saying that Iran’s anti-aircraft systems were probably active following its attacks on the US airbases.

Two Pentagon officials had assessed that the incident was accidental, Newsweek added.

Media captionAsked about the cause of the plane crash, President Trump said: “I have my suspicions”

Earlier on Thursday, Oleksiy Danylov, the secretary of Ukraine’s security and defence council, said in a Facebook post (in Ukrainian) that a Tor missile strike was one of four possible causes being considered: The others are:

  • A mid-air collision with a drone or other flying object
  • Engine destruction/explosion due to technical reasons
  • An explosion inside the plane as a result of a terror attack

Mr Danylov said Ukrainian investigators, who are already in Iran, would include experts who worked on the investigation into the 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 in eastern Ukraine.

What does Iran say?

At a news conference on Friday, Iran’s Civil Aviation Organisation (CAOI) chief Ali Abedzadeh repeated his view that a missile was not the cause of the crash.

“The thing that is clear to us and that we can say with certainty is that this plane was not hit by a missile,” he told reporters.

“As I said last night, this plane for more than one and a half minutes was on fire and was in the air and the location shows that the pilot was attempting to return.”

On Friday, government spokesman Ali Rabiei described the reports of a missile strike as “psychological warfare”.

‘This would be an extraordinary error’

A pattern of disturbing indications is emerging suggesting that Flight PS752 may well have been shot down by mistake by Iran’s own air defences.

While it is not unprecedented for air defence systems in conflict zones to shoot down airliners, this would be an extraordinary error.

The aircraft had only just taken off from an international airport; it was a scheduled flight; and it should easily have been recognisable.

However, precisely what the operators of the Russian-supplied, Soviet-era Tor – or SA-15/Gauntlet system as it is known by Nato – would have seen is unclear.

All this is hugely embarrassing for the Iranian authorities and is only going to complicate the politics involved in getting to the bottom of this tragedy.

What do we know?

Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752 to Kyiv had 167 passengers and nine Ukrainian crew on board.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

A team from Iran’s Red Crescent searched the debris for victims

There was good visibility when the plane went down near Iran’s capital, according to the Flightradar24 aviation website. Officials from the airline said the crew were experienced.

Iran’s head of emergency operations said 147 of the victims were Iranian. That would suggest that 65 of the foreign nationals had dual nationalities. The Ukrainian airline gave a helpline number for further information about passengers: +38-044-581-50-19.


Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51055219

The Trump administration announced new sanctions on Iran Friday targeting the country’s metals sector and several of its government leaders following Tehran’s missile attacks on Iraqi bases housing U.S. troops earlier this week. 

Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoOvernight Defense: House passes measure to limit Trump on Iran | Pelosi vows vote to end 2002 war authorization | Officials believe Iran accidentally shot down passenger plane House passes measure seeking to limit Trump on Iran Understanding and responding to China’s brutal Xinjiang campaign MORE and Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinDemocrats call for appointment of permanent IRS watchdog Mnuchin aims to wait until end of 2020 to disclose Secret Service costs for Trump’s travel: report Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers say Facebook deepfake ban falls short | House passes bills to win 5G race | Feds sound alarm on cyberthreat from Iran | Ivanka Trump appearance at tech show sparks backlash MORE held a press conference at the White House to detail the new measures, which President TrumpDonald John TrumpProfessor fired for Facebook post suggesting Iran should tweet out list of American cultural sites to threaten NY judge denies Trump request to dismiss lawsuit by E. Jean Carroll Rep. Omar: ‘War trauma never leaves you’ MORE promised were coming earlier in the week.

The new sanctions target the Iranian aluminum, copper, iron and steel industries. The U.S. is also sanctioning eight senior Iranian officials who were allegedly involved in Tuesday’s missile attacks against U.S. forces in Iraq. 

“We are announcing additional sanctions on the Iranian regime as a result of the attack on U.S. and allied troops,” Mnuchin said. “Today’s sanctions are part of our commitment to stop the Iranian regime’s global terrorist activities.”

The sanctions target the largest manufacturers of steel, aluminum, copper and iron in Iran, which combine to produce billions of dollars in annual revenue, the officials said. The U.S. will also sanction 17 Iranian metals producers and mining companies with Friday’s measure.

In addition to the sanctions, Trump will sign an executive order that targets revenue sources the Iranian government relies on to fund its nuclear program and its proxy networks. The order gives additional leeway to Pompeo and Mnuchin to impose additional sanctions on other sectors of the Iranian economy, such as its mining and textiles industries.

The announcement came days after the U.S. and Iran appeared to ease back from the prospect of a military conflict following an exchange of strikes from each side. 

Trump approved a strike last week that killed top Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani in Baghdad after an Iranian-backed group was blamed for attacks that killed a U.S. contractor. U.S. officials have remained tight-lipped about the intelligence that led to the Soleimani strike, but have insisted the general posed an urgent threat to Americans.

In response to Soleimani’s death, Iran fired several missiles at two bases in Iraq that house U.S. forces and allied personnel. There were no casualties reported in the strikes, and Trump said the bases sustained limited damage.

Trump said in a Wednesday address to the nation that Iran appeared to be standing down and that he hoped for a peaceful resolution with Tehran. But in the meantime, he pledged to impose “punishing sanctions” over the missile strikes until Iran “changes its behavior.”

The Trump administration has levied numerous sanctions on Tehran as part of its “maximum pressure campaign” against Iran that kicked off in earnest with the 2018 withdrawal from the Obama-era nuclear deal. Previous measures have targeted Iran’s supreme leader, its foreign minister and the country’s oil and metal industries in an effort to hamper the economy.

Mnuchin and Pompeo were adamant on Friday that the sanctions have been effective, even after the latest exchange of military strikes and even as Iran continues to exert influence in the Middle East.

“I think we have 100 percent confidence and we are consistent in our view that the economic sanctions are working,” Mnuchin said. “That if we didn’t have these sanctions in place, literally Iran would have tens of billions of dollars. They would be using that for terrorist activities throughout the region and to enable them to do more bad things.”

Pompeo argued that the sanctions have cut off revenue streams, putting Iran in dire financial straits that have forced it to reconsider whether to back proxy groups or invest in nuclear ambitions.

“This country has never been in the place they’ve been today,” he said. “They’ve got real challenges in figuring out how to make difficult decisions.” 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/477688-trump-administration-announces-new-sanctions-on-iran

Here’s what you need to know to understand what this moment means in U.S.-Iran relations.

What happened: President Trump ordered a drone strike near the Baghdad airport, killing Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, Iran’s most powerful military commander and leader of its special-operations forces abroad.

Who was Soleimani: As the leader of the Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, Soleimani was key in supporting and coordinating with Iran’s allies across the region, especially in Iraq. Soleimani’s influence was imprinted on various Shiite militias that fought U.S. troops.

How we got here: Tensions had been escalating between Iran and the United States since Trump pulled out of an Obama-era nuclear deal, and they spiked shortly before the airstrike. The strikes that killed Soleimani were carried out after the death of a U.S. contractor in a rocket attack against a military base in Kirkuk, Iraq, that the United States blamed on Kataib Hezbollah, an Iran-backed militia.

What happens next: Iran responded to Soleimani’s death by launching missile strikes at two bases hosting U.S. forces in Iraq. No casualties were reported. In an address to the nation, Trump announced that new sanctions will be imposed on Tehran.

Ask a question: What do you want to know about the strike and its aftermath? Submit a question to Post reporters.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/on-the-day-us-forces-killed-soleimani-they-launched-another-secret-operation-targeting-a-senior-iranian-official-in-yemen/2020/01/10/60f86dbc-3245-11ea-898f-eb846b7e9feb_story.html

“Mr. President, if you’re listening, I want you to hear me, please: You have harnessed fear for political purposes, and only love can cast that out,” she declared from the debate stage in June. “I’m going to harness love for political purposes. I will meet you on that field, and sir, love will win.”

Ms. Williamson was averaging less than 1 percent in polls and had not qualified for a debate since July. Earlier this month, she laid off her entire staff — a development first reported by New Hampshire’s WMUR television station and confirmed by Ms. Williamson’s campaign manager, Patricia Ewing, who was among those laid off.

At that July debate, she gave forceful responses to two questions about race — describing reparations not as “financial assistance” but rather “payment of a debt that is owed,” and saying the water crisis in Flint, Mich., would never have happened in a wealthy, majority-white suburb — and got a brief surge of public attention. But her poll numbers did not budge, and the spotlight also brought renewed scrutiny of her views on science and medicine.

Earlier in the year, she had called vaccine mandates “Orwellian,” then backtracked under fire. She also criticized the widespread use of antidepressants, linking them without evidence to celebrity suicides and asserting that doctors recklessly prescribe them to suppress ordinary emotions.

In an interview with The New York Times over the summer, she said she had been wrong to call clinical depression a “scam,” but stood by other remarks that mental health experts warned could increase the stigma surrounding mental illness and discourage people from seeking medical help.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/us/politics/marianne-williamson-drops-out.html

A New South Wales Rural Fire Service large air tanker drops fire retardant on the Morton Fire burning in bushland close to homes at Penrose, south of Sydney, on Friday.

Dan Himbrechts/AAP Image via Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Dan Himbrechts/AAP Image via Reuters

A New South Wales Rural Fire Service large air tanker drops fire retardant on the Morton Fire burning in bushland close to homes at Penrose, south of Sydney, on Friday.

Dan Himbrechts/AAP Image via Reuters

A pair of massive bushfires in southeastern Australia has merged into a “megafire” engulfing some 2,300 square miles — a single blaze more than three times as large as any known fire in California.

The merged fire, which straddles the country’s most populous states of New South Wales and Victoria, measures nearly 1.5 million acres, according to The Sydney Morning Herald. It is just one of some 135 bushfires in Australia’s southeast that have claimed the lives of at least 26 people, killed more than a billion animals and damaged or destroyed nearly 3,000 homes.

Since September, the unprecedented bushfires have swept through an area larger than Massachusetts and New Hampshire combined.

NASA has released an animation showing how smoke from the fires has reached the lower stratosphere and traveled as far away as Chile.

Meanwhile, more than 30,000 people attended a protest in Sydney to denounce the government’s handling of the crisis and to call for action on climate change.

The protesters directed their ire at Prime Minister Scott Morrison, whose coalition government’s policies have rejected a link between Australia’s unprecedented drought and fires crisis and climate change.

However, the prime minister said this week that his government would launch an inquiry to examine whether there was any connection between the fires and climate change. Asked whether he expected the current fire crisis to become commonplace in Australia because of climate change, he replied: “The links and implications here have been acknowledged.”

Morrison, who has also found himself on the defensive for taking a Hawaiian vacation with his family while the fires raged, also said Friday he had ordered the military to be on standby to help firefighters.

“I’ve given them very clear instructions that they are to stand ready to move and support immediately,” he said. “In the event that they are needed in the wake of what we hope we will not see today, but we must prepare for today.”

Authorities in Australia on Friday urged a quarter of a million people in Victoria to leave their homes amid erratic winds and soaring temperatures, even as there was welcome rain in some parts affected by the fires.

Helicopters dropped supplies to towns at risk of being cut off and C-130 tankers unleashed torrents of fire retardant.

Fire crews were preparing for what they believe will be a difficult night as the wind shifts and ramps up to 50 miles per hour. In parts of the fire-affected countryside, temperatures pegged out at 104 degrees Fahrenheit on Friday.

Firefighter Andrew Beville, who was battling the Morton fire on the outskirts of the town of Penrose, near Wingello, told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. that he wasn’t sure what would happen when the blaze reached the town.

“We just want to survive the night,” he said.

Towns south of Sydney, including Eden, Batemans Bay and Norwa were warned by New South Wales Rural Fire Service to be prepared for another onslaught, The Associated Press reports.

A yacht sails past a burning woodchip mill as bushfires hit the town of Eden, New South Wales, Australia, on Friday.

Rick Rycroft/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Rick Rycroft/AP

A yacht sails past a burning woodchip mill as bushfires hit the town of Eden, New South Wales, Australia, on Friday.

Rick Rycroft/AP

In neighboring Victoria, premier Daniel Andrews told reporters he was thankful that there were at present no one unaccounted for and no communities cut off in his state.

“Now, all of those things can change and that is perhaps the most powerful reminder that we have to remain vigilant,” he said. “Please, listen to the warnings and do as you are asked. If you are told to leave a community, and you can leave, then you should leave.”

Veterinarians and volunteers treat koalas at Kangaroo Island Wildlife Park on Kangaroo Island, southwest of Adelaide, Australia, on Friday.

Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Reuters

Veterinarians and volunteers treat koalas at Kangaroo Island Wildlife Park on Kangaroo Island, southwest of Adelaide, Australia, on Friday.

Reuters

The conservation group WWF-Australia estimates that 1.25 billion animals have been killed in the fires and says it fears that some species, such as the glossy black-cockatoo and the knee-high kangaroo, face local extinctions.

Meanwhile, the government says the loss of livestock from the fires will exceed 100,000 animals.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/10/795169417/enormous-mega-fire-in-australia-engulfs-1-5-million-acres

‘):””},t.getDefinedParams=function(e,t){return t.filter(function(t){return e[t]}).reduce(function(t,n){return i(t,function(e,t,n){return t in e?Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:n,enumerable:!0,configurable:!0,writable:!0}):e[t]=n,e}({},n,e[n]))},{})},t.isValidMediaTypes=function(e){var t=[“banner”,”native”,”video”];return!!Object.keys(e).every(function(e){return J()(t,e)})&&(!e.video||!e.video.context||J()([“instream”,”outstream”,”adpod”],e.video.context))},t.getBidderRequest=function(e,t,n){return H()(e,function(e){return 0n[e]?-1:0}};var L=n(3),F=n(115),G=n.n(F),V=n(12),H=n.n(V),K=n(10),J=n.n(K),$=n(116);n.d(t,”deepAccess”,function(){return $.a});var Y=n(117);n.d(t,”deepSetValue”,function(){return Y.a});var Z,X=n(5),Q=”Array”,ee=”String”,te=”Function”,ne=”Number”,re=”Object”,ie=”Boolean”,oe=Object.prototype.toString,ae=Boolean(window.console),ue=Boolean(ae&&window.console.log),ce=Boolean(ae&&window.console.info),se=Boolean(ae&&window.console.warn),de=Boolean(ae&&window.console.error),fe={checkCookieSupport:M,createTrackPixelIframeHtml:k,getWindowSelf:f,getWindowTop:d,getWindowLocation:l,insertUserSyncIframe:O,insertElement:T,isFn:_,triggerPixel:C,logError:v,logWarn:h,logMessage:p,logInfo:g},le={},pe=function(e,t){return t}.bind(null,1,le)()===le?Function.prototype.bind:function(e){var t=this,n=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return function(){return t.apply(e,n.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)))}},ge=(Z=0,function(){return++Z}),he=function(){if(Array.prototype.indexOf)return Array.prototype.indexOf}(),ve=N(“timeToRespond”,function(e,t){return t=e.length?(this._t=void 0,i(1)):i(0,”keys”==t?n:”values”==t?e[n]:[n,e[n]])},”values”),o.Arguments=o.Array,r(“keys”),r(“values”),r(“entries”)},101:function(e,t,n){“use strict”;var r=n(102),i=n(72);e.exports=n(104)(“Set”,function(e){return function(t){return e(this,0>>0,o=0;if(t)n=t;else{for(;o=y.syncsPerBidder?s.logWarn(‘Number of user syncs exceeded for “‘.concat(t,'”‘)):g.canBidderRegisterSync(e,t)?(h[e].push([t,n]),(r=b)[i=t]?r[i]+=1:r[i]=1,void(b=r)):s.logWarn(‘Bidder “‘.concat(t,'” not permitted to register their “‘).concat(e,'” userSync pixels.’)):s.logWarn(“Bidder is required for registering sync”):s.logWarn(‘User sync type “‘.concat(e,'” not supported’));var r,i},g.syncUsers=function(){var e=0Object(y.timestamp)()},R=function(e){return e&&(e.status&&!I()([T.BID_STATUS.RENDERED],e.status)||!e.status)},D=(v=w.a,m={},(b={}).setLatestAuctionForAdUnit=function(e,t){m[e]=t},b.resetPresetTargeting=function(e){if(Object(y.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var t=s(e),n=v.getAdUnits().filter(function(e){return I()(t,e.code)});window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach(function(e){C.forEach(function(t){n.forEach(function(n){n.code!==e.getAdUnitPath()&&n.code!==e.getSlotElementId()||e.setTargeting(t,null)})})})}},b.resetPresetTargetingAST=function(e){s(e).forEach(function(e){var t=window.apntag.getTag(e);if(t&&t.keywords){var n=Object.keys(t.keywords),r={};n.forEach(function(e){I()(C,e.toLowerCase())||(r[e]=t.keywords[e])}),window.apntag.modifyTag(e,{keywords:r})}})},b.getAllTargeting=function(e){var t,n,p,v,m,w,S,x,E,j=1e.getTimeout()+b.b.getConfig(“timeoutBuffer”)&&e.executeCallback(!0)}function a(e,t){var n=e.getBidRequests(),r=A()(n,function(e){return e.bidderCode===t.bidderCode});!function(e,t){var n;if(e.bidderCode&&(0n&&(t=!1)),!t}),t&&e.run(),t}function d(e,t){void 0===e[t]?e[t]=1:e[t]++}var l=this;g=C,s=Date.now();var m=I.makeBidRequests(W,s,K,$,L);E.logInfo(“Bids Requested for Auction with id: “.concat(K),m),m.forEach(function(e){var t;t=e,G=G.concat(t)});var y={};if(m.lengtht.max?e:t},{max:0}),b=0,m=u()(t.buckets,function(t){if(e>v.max*n){var i=t.precision;void 0===i&&(i=s),r=(t.max*n).toFixed(i)}else{if(e=t.length?{value:void 0,done:!0}:(e=r(t,n),this._i+=e.length,{value:e,done:!1})})},62:function(e,t,n){function r(){}var i=n(28),o=n(94),a=n(63),u=n(50)(“IE_PROTO”),c=”prototype”,s=function(){var e,t=n(55)(“iframe”),r=a.length;for(t.style.display=”none”,n(97).appendChild(t),t.src=”javascript:”,(e=t.contentWindow.document).open(),e.write(“

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/iraq-withdrawal-troops-status-of-forces.html

Iranian leaders denied Friday that their country’s missiles shot down a Ukrainian jet that crashed after taking off from Tehran this week after the U.S. and Canadian officials said intelligence showed that the Iranian military gunned down the plane.

All 176 people aboard Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 on a Boeing 737 were killed in the crash early Wednesday, just after Iran fired ballistic missiles on Iraqi bases housing U.S. soldiers in retaliation for the U.S.’ drone strike killing one of its top military leaders, Gen. Qasem Soleimani.

Intelligence indicates that Iran’s military mistakenly fired on the Ukraine flight with a Russian-supplied anti-aircraft missile after its air-defense radar locked onto the passenger plane, a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly said Thursday. 

Among the dead on the flight were 63 Canadians, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday a missile was the cause of the plane crash.

Here’s what we know now.

U.S., Canada says missile hit plane; Iran says ‘no’

Speaking with reporters Friday, Ali Abedzadeh, head of Iran’s national aviation department, denied that any missile hit the passenger plane.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2020/01/10/iran-plane-crash-not-caused-missile-iran-denying-us-canada/4429314002/

A New South Wales Rural Fire Service large air tanker drops fire retardant on the Morton Fire burning in bushland close to homes at Penrose, south of Sydney, on Friday.

Dan Himbrechts/AAP Image via Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Dan Himbrechts/AAP Image via Reuters

A New South Wales Rural Fire Service large air tanker drops fire retardant on the Morton Fire burning in bushland close to homes at Penrose, south of Sydney, on Friday.

Dan Himbrechts/AAP Image via Reuters

A pair of massive bushfires in southeastern Australia has merged into a “megafire” engulfing some 2,300 square miles — a single blaze more than three times as large as any known fire in California.

The merged fire, which straddles the country’s most populous states of New South Wales and Victoria, measures nearly 1.5 million acres, according to The Sydney Morning Herald. It is just one of some 135 bushfires in Australia’s southeast that have claimed the lives of at least 26 people, killed more than a billion animals and damaged or destroyed nearly 3,000 homes.

Since September, the unprecedented bushfires have swept through an area larger than Massachusetts and New Hampshire combined.

NASA has released an animation showing how smoke from the fires has reached the lower stratosphere and traveled as far away as Chile.

Meanwhile, more than 30,000 people attended a protest in Sydney to denounce the government’s handling of the crisis and to call for action on climate change.

The protesters directed their ire at Prime Minister Scott Morrison, whose coalition government’s policies have rejected a link between Australia’s unprecedented drought and fires crisis and climate change.

However, the prime minister said this week that his government would launch an inquiry to examine whether there was any connection between the fires and climate change. Asked whether he expected the current fire crisis to become commonplace in Australia because of climate change, he replied: “The links and implications here have been acknowledged.”

Morrison, who has also found himself on the defensive for taking a Hawaiian vacation with his family while the fires raged, also said Friday he had ordered the military to be on standby to help firefighters.

“I’ve given them very clear instructions that they are to stand ready to move and support immediately,” he said. “In the event that they are needed in the wake of what we hope we will not see today, but we must prepare for today.”

Authorities in Australia on Friday urged a quarter of a million people in Victoria to leave their homes amid erratic winds and soaring temperatures, even as there was welcome rain in some parts affected by the fires.

Helicopters dropped supplies to towns at risk of being cut off and C-130 tankers unleashed torrents of fire retardant.

Fire crews were preparing for what they believe will be a difficult night as the wind shifts and ramps up to 50 miles per hour. In parts of the fire-affected countryside, temperatures pegged out at 104 degrees Fahrenheit on Friday.

Firefighter Andrew Beville, who was battling the Morton fire on the outskirts of the town of Penrose, near Wingello, told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. that he wasn’t sure what would happen when the blaze reached the town.

“We just want to survive the night,” he said.

Towns south of Sydney, including Eden, Batemans Bay and Norwa were warned by New South Wales Rural Fire Service to be prepared for another onslaught, The Associated Press reports.

A yacht sails past a burning woodchip mill as bushfires hit the town of Eden, New South Wales, Australia, on Friday.

Rick Rycroft/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Rick Rycroft/AP

A yacht sails past a burning woodchip mill as bushfires hit the town of Eden, New South Wales, Australia, on Friday.

Rick Rycroft/AP

In neighboring Victoria, premier Daniel Andrews told reporters he was thankful that there were at present no one unaccounted for and no communities cut off in his state.

“Now, all of those things can change and that is perhaps the most powerful reminder that we have to remain vigilant,” he said. “Please, listen to the warnings and do as you are asked. If you are told to leave a community, and you can leave, then you should leave.”

Veterinarians and volunteers treat koalas at Kangaroo Island Wildlife Park on Kangaroo Island, southwest of Adelaide, Australia, on Friday.

Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Reuters

Veterinarians and volunteers treat koalas at Kangaroo Island Wildlife Park on Kangaroo Island, southwest of Adelaide, Australia, on Friday.

Reuters

The conservation group WWF-Australia estimates that 1.25 billion animals have been killed in the fires and says it fears that some species, such as the glossy black-cockatoo and the knee-high kangaroo, face local extinctions.

Meanwhile, the government says the loss of livestock from the fires will exceed 100,000 animals.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/10/795169417/enormous-mega-fire-in-australia-engulfs-1-5-million-acres

BEIRUT—Iraq’s prime minister asked the U.S. to start preparing for the safe withdrawal of American troops from the country, the latest sign of diplomatic fallout from the killing of an Iranian general on Iraqi soil.

Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi made the request on Thursday in a call with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to a readout of the conversation from his office.

President…

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraq-calls-on-u-s-to-prepare-for-troop-withdrawal-11578657109

When Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump seeks to make case for strike on Iranian general in address to Ohio supporters Biden maintains lead in Nevada: poll Steyer qualifies for Iowa debate after surprise surge in Nev.,S.C. polls MORE was asked last week at an Iowa town hall if he was running a better campaign than Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonTrump seeks to make case for strike on Iranian general in address to Ohio supporters DOJ inquiry tied to Clinton, touted by Trump winds down with no tangible results: report The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Pelosi says impeachment articles coming ‘soon’ as pressure builds MORE had in 2016, it highlighted a question on the minds of some Democrats: Is Biden this cycle’s Clinton? 

The question is becoming more significant as Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersTrump seeks to make case for strike on Iranian general in address to Ohio supporters Trump slams Democrats for criticism over strike on Iranian general Biden maintains lead in Nevada: poll MORE (I-Vt.) gains traction. 

Weeks away from the Iowa caucuses, Biden remains the front-runner with Sanders as his most compelling competitor. 

While the much bigger field of candidates and strong campaigns from Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenTrump seeks to make case for strike on Iranian general in address to Ohio supporters Biden maintains lead in Nevada: poll Steyer qualifies for Iowa debate after surprise surge in Nev.,S.C. polls MORE (D-Mass.) and former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegBiden maintains lead in Nevada: poll Steyer qualifies for Iowa debate after surprise surge in Nev.,S.C. polls Biden leads, Steyer pulls in second in South Carolina: poll MORE make the 2020 primary different than the one four years ago, Democrats are also seeing some parallels. And some would just as soon avoid them.

“No one wants deja vu. And the big fear is that it will be just that,” said one Democratic strategist who has worked on recent presidential campaigns but is uncommitted to a candidate in this cycle. 

Biden, like Clinton in 2016, is seen as the safe candidate by a number of strategists, and the most likely to appeal to general election swing voters.

The former vice president “is going to be cast as the third iteration of an institutional-establishment candidate,” said Basil Smikle, a former aide to Clinton who also served as the executive director of the New York State Democratic Party.

Sanders and his supporters then and now argue Democrats would make a mistake by going safe and establishment over the candidate with grassroots energy.

Warren makes some similar arguments as Sanders and is battling for progressive support. Buttigieg and Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharSteyer qualifies for Iowa debate after surprise surge in Nev.,S.C. polls McConnell tells GOP senators to expect impeachment trial next week Poll: Buttigieg, Sanders surge sets up 4-way tie in New Hampshire MORE (D-Minn.) have set themselves up as alternative centrist candidates to Biden. 

“It’s so clear that Biden is our worst foot forward against Trump and he would ironically cede the outsider mantle to a corrupt incumbent president,” said Adam Green, the co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. 

Some Clinton supporters still carry grudges over the 2016 Sanders campaign, arguing he took too long to endorse her candidacy. Worries that 2020 could provide a rerun of that theme are becoming audible.

Democratic strategist Michael Starr Hopkins wrote of the parallels in an opinion piece for The Hill last week. 

“[Biden’s] supporters argue that his experience, combined with his appeal to both Democrats and Republicans, make him the safe choice in a general election,” he wrote. 

“If all this sounds eerily familiar, it should. In many ways, his candidacy is a continuation of the campaign Hillary Clinton ran in 2016.” 

To be sure, there are important differences between Biden and Clinton. 

Clinton, a divisive figure in politics, was dogged throughout her campaign by the controversy surrounding her use of a private email server for official communication while serving as secretary of State. 

Former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyBernie-Hillary echoes seen in Biden-Sanders primary fight Rosenstein on his time in Trump administration: ‘We got all the big issues right’ James Comey describes Trump as ‘shrunken, withered figure’ in new op-ed MORE announced just more than a week before the election that he was looking at new emails from Clinton that were found on a computer used by former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), the subject of a different investigation. Clinton has blamed Comey’s public remarks for killing her campaign. 

Clinton ended up dealing with Russian interference with her campaign, including the theft of emails from the Democratic National Committee that were selectively leaked out.

She also was seeking to break the last glass ceiling in American politics, and it is impossible to know how many voters decided against voting for her because of her gender. 

Democratic strategist Brad Bannon pointed out that while Biden doesn’t have a controversy like Clinton’s emails, he does have to contend with the storyline about his son Hunter Biden’s work for Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas company. 

Trump has pounced on the issue, asking Ukraine to investigate his role on the board of the company as well as Joe Biden’s connection. 

“To counter those attacks, the former vice president needs to be aboveboard about his own personal finances and go on the offensive about the shady financing of the shaky Trump financial empire which includes the president and his children,” Bannon said. “Biden will be able to give as good as he gets when it comes to wayward children.”

Biden and his allies and surrogates say there are clear differences between this year’s race and 2016.

During the town hall, Biden said one of the reasons Clinton lost was because of sexism. He called the attacks against her “unfair” but added “that’s not going to happen with me.” 

A spokesman for Biden dismissed any parallels between the two candidates, refusing to engage on the subject on the record.

“These are my Star Wars rankings: The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi, A New Hope, and Rogue One. Those are all of the movies in the franchise of which I’m aware,” the spokesman, Andrew Bates, wrote in an email.

An ally of Biden’s said the former vice president can still fire up a crowd and is a stronger campaigner than Clinton. 

“He has instincts about connecting with activists that didn’t come naturally to Hillary. She was much more cautious. If there’s a Clinton he’s more often compared to it’s Bill not Hillary,” the ally said.

The Biden supporter also said motivation among Democrats to end Trump’s presidency makes for a different situation.

“Democrats will do anything to get rid of Trump,” the ally said. “In 2018, we saw that in record turnout everywhere. Everything Trump is doing only turbocharges that base for Democrats.”

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/477458-bernie-hillary-echoes-seen-in-biden-sanders-primary-fight

For his part, Mr. Trump has already warned North Korea against “interference,” though he appeared to be referring to missile launches meant to embarrass him.

The president has shown far less concern about Russian interference. He has repeatedly questioned the idea that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election, viewing such talk as a challenge to his legitimacy. In his zeal to find another culprit, Mr. Trump eagerly embraced a Russian-backed conspiracy theory that shifted the blame to Ukraine, and set in motion the events that led to his impeachment.

American officials, however, are nearly unanimous in the conclusion that Russia interfered in 2016, and that it remains the greatest threat in 2020. Unlike other countries, which are seen as eager to influence American policy, Russia appears, above all, to be interested in undermining confidence in America’s democratic institutions, starting with the voting process.

Then and now, officials and experts said, the Russians and others could bank on one constant: America’s partisan divide, which engenders deep cynicism among Democrats and Republicans alike.

“Our adversaries, including Russia, China, Iran and others, are persistent: They focus on our politics and try to take advantage of existing fissures and American sentiment, particularly if it may weaken us,” said Shelby Pierson, who monitors election threats at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

“They’ll try many tactics and can adapt,” she added. “If it doesn’t work out, they try something else.”

In the public imagination, the defining elements of Moscow’s interference in the 2016 election were disinformation and the hacking of Democratic Party emails. But as they look to 2020, many election security officials and experts say the most worrying piece of the Russian meddling was the hacking of state election systems.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/us/politics/russia-hacking-disinformation-election.html