Wildfires ignited by nearly 12,000 lightning strikes over the past three days continue to spread havoc across a heat wave-baked California, with little relief in sight.

“Just a day ago, I announced that we are struggling to address the needs of suppressing some 376 fires in this state,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said at a Friday news conference. “That number has grown to about 560 fires in the state of California.

“Seven-hundred and seventy-one thousand acres has already been burned in the state of California, the equivalent to the size of the state of Rhode Island,” the governor added. “We simply haven’t seen anything like this in many, many years.”

Newsom pointed to two fires that have been blazing in Northern California as ranking among the 10 largest in the state’s recorded history: The so-called LNU Lightning Complex burning in five wine-producing counties north and east of San Francisco covers 219,000 acres and is the 10th largest and 7% contained, while the SCU Lightning Complex is scorching 229,000 acres east of San Jose. It is the state’s seventh-largest recorded wildfire and 10% contained.

Newsom said five people have died in the fires, while Reuters reported that “43 fire fighters and civilians have been injured, and over 500 homes and other structures destroyed.”

“These fires again are stretching our resources, stretching our personnel,” the governor lamented. “We have over 12,000 firefighters now actively working to suppress these larger complex fires.”

Newsom expressed gratitude to fellow governors in states ranging from Texas to Washington who have sent equipment to help battle the blazes.

“We now are engaged formally with mutual aid from 10 different states. We’ve been on the phone with governors all throughout the United States, not just the Western states, trying to reach out as far as the East Coast to see if we can get resources here into the state of California,” he added. “And not one governor has not been responsive.”

Still, Reuters reported that — according to a spokesperson for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, known better as Cal Fire — of the 375 out-of-state fire crews California has requested, only 45 have arrived.
Newsom blamed the manpower shortfall on increasing fire conditions in neighboring Western states.

“It’s a consequence of that heat dome impacting the Western United States,” he said. “And as a consequence of that, our mutual aid that goes outside of the state of California has also been stretched.”

The first-term Democratic governor of the nation’s most populous state said he had just received a call from Sen. Kamala Harris of California, the running mate of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. It was to update Newsom on efforts that she and a bipartisan group of other members of the state’s congressional delegation are making to have the federal government declare a major disaster in California.

“We are here with an open hand, not a closed fist,” Newsom said of such efforts to persuade the Trump administration to come to the aid of his beleaguered state. “Right now we have 40 million Americans that live in the great state of California. There’s not one of them that wears red versus blue at this point — we are here to save lives because everybody deserves to be protected.”

Newsom did not offer hope, however, for any immediate relief from the scourge that’s incinerating the parched Golden State.

“We are not naive, by any stretch, how deadly this moment is,” he said. “While the hots are getting a little less hotter this week, we are looking at weather conditions over the course of the next number of days where you can have some monsoon-type weather conditions that led to some of those dry lightning strikes. That will certainly stretch our resources and challenge us.”

An extraordinarily high number of ballots — more than 550,000 — have been rejected in this year’s presidential primaries, according to a new analysis by NPR.

That’s far more than the 318,728 ballots rejected in the 2016 general election and has raised alarms about what might happen in November when tens of millions of more voters are expected to cast their ballots by mail, many for the first time.

Election experts said first-time absentee voters are much more likely to make the kinds of mistakes that lead to rejected ballots. Studies also show that voters of color and young voters are more likely than others to have their ballots not count.

Most absentee or mail-in ballots are rejected because required signatures are missing or don’t match the one on record, or because the ballot arrives too late.

“If something goes wrong with any of this, that’s a problem writ large, but it’s also going to be one that hits some populations of the United States a bit harder than others, potentially disenfranchises different groups of folks at higher rates,” said Rob Griffin of the Democracy Fund, which is conducting a sweeping survey of the 2020 electorate with researchers at UCLA.

Griffin said, so far, about a quarter of those who voted in person in the last election say they plan to vote by mail this November. The same is true for those who have never voted before and will be casting their first ballots in this year’s election.

The numbers compiled by NPR are almost certainly an underestimate since not all states have made the information on rejected mail-in ballots available.

Battleground states

Even with limited data, the implications are considerable. NPR found that tens of thousands of ballots have been rejected in key battleground states, where the outcome in November — for the presidency, Congress and other elected positions — could be determined by a relatively small number of votes.

For example, President Trump won Wisconsin in 2016 by almost 23,000 votes. More than 23,000 absentee ballots were rejected in the state’s presidential primary in April. More than 37,000 primary ballots were also rejected in June in Pennsylvania, a state Trump won by just over 44,000 votes.

The numbers are also significant because of large partisan differences in how Americans plan to vote this fall. Democrats have expressed more interest than Republicans in voting by mail — 47% to 28% in the Democracy Fund/UCLA survey. Forty-eight percent of those who intend to vote for Joe Biden say they will use mail-in ballots, compared with 23% of Trump supporters.

With so much at stake, the political parties and candidates have made voting options, and the rules that surround them, a central part of their campaigns.

Trump has repeatedly blasted mail-in voting as ripe for widespread fraud despite a lack of evidence. At the same time, Republicans are encouraging their supporters to vote by mail. In fact, Trump and his wife, Melania, did so this week in Florida’s primary.

For their part, Democrats are pushing widespread mail-in voting but are also concerned that many of their voters’ ballots could be rejected if the rules aren’t relaxed. They’re in court in more than half the states fighting to extend mail-in ballot deadlines and to waive witness and notary requirements. They also want voters to be given the opportunity to fix errors before their ballots are rejected.

At the same time, Democrats are calling on election offices to make in-person voting and other options available for those who don’t want to vote by mail. These concerns have grown in recent weeks with news of cuts in the U.S. Postal Service that could impede ballot delivery.

“The parties are making this political calculus right now,” said Daniel Smith, a political scientist at the University of Florida. He said they’re trying to balance concerns about mail-in voting with the possibility that people won’t turn out in person due to the health risks of voting during a pandemic.

Smith added that the rejection numbers are only part of the picture. He said they don’t always take into account mail-in ballots that are initially accepted but then not counted because of other mistakes, such as a voter incorrectly choosing too many candidates or incorrectly circling a candidate’s name instead of filling in the bubble next to it.

Such errors are usually caught at the polling place and can be corrected before voters casts their ballots. Most voting machines will also not allow people to overvote accidentally, or choose too many candidates in a given race.

“Those mistakes are avoided when you vote in person,” Smith said. “You have seven, 10 people who can assist you in terms of making sure that you know about the ovals having to be filled out.” As a result, only about one-hundredth of a percent of in-person ballots are rejected compared with about 1% of mail-in ballots.

Smith found that in Florida’s March primary – where 18,000 ballots were rejected — black and Hispanic voters were more likely to be voting by mail for the first time and, if so, were twice as likely to have their ballots rejected than white voters who were voting by mail for the first time. These differences will likely be exacerbated in the general election when turnout is much greater.

“If you have 1% of maybe up to 6 million votes, you’re talking tens of thousands of votes that potentially are going to be rejected, and they are not rejected evenly across the electorate,” Smith said.

That could not only affect the outcome of the presidential election but other races as well. In 2018 in Florida, Republican Rick Scott beat incumbent Democrat Bill Nelson for the Senate by just over 10,000 votes.

Legal storm clouds

Even though Democratic-leaning voters appear to be most at risk of having their mail-in ballots rejected, Republicans and conservatives have been most vocal about the risks of voting by mail. It’s part of a broader campaign to prevent the expansion of mail-in and absentee voting, which they fear Democrats could use to their advantage.

Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, a conservative advocacy group, noted that mail-in voting in the primaries has not only led to thousands of ballots being rejected but widespread confusion. He cited New York City’s primary, which took six weeks to resolve, in part because many mail-in ballots were rejected for not having a postmark. A federal judge later ordered those ballots to be counted.

Snead predicted that if the margin of victory in November is “smaller than the number of ballots that have been rejected for various reasons, I think that we can anticipate litigation to change the procedures for tallying those votes,” similar to the post-Election Day legal challenges in the 2000 presidential race between George W. Bush and Al Gore.

Democrats and progressive voter groups argue that the answer is not to limit mail-in voting but to eliminate the barriers that lead to rejections in the first place — the focus of their legal challenges of existing rules.

They also said it’s crucial that voters know what to do so their ballots aren’t rejected. Multiple nonprofit groups and campaigns have launched social media and online efforts encouraging voters to request their mail-in ballots early, learn the rules and return their completed ballots as soon as possible — either by mail, at a secure drop box or at their local election office.

At their presidential nominating convention this week, Democratic leaders repeatedly urged supporters to make sure they have a plan to vote, in person or by mail. “We’ve got to request our mail-in ballots right now, tonight, and send them back immediately and follow up to make sure they’re received. And then, make sure our friends and families do the same,” former first lady Michelle Obama said.

Election officials of both parties are also trying to get the word out in an effort to limit ballot rejections. Many states have detailed instructions on their websites on how to get, fill out and return an absentee or mail-in ballot.

This summer, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson filmed a public service announcement where she filled out her own absentee ballot and explained the process step-by-step.

Pennsylvania, one of the states where the extent of rejected mail-in ballots might well determine the outcome of the election, is planning an ad campaign soon, urging people who have applied for absentee ballots to return them immediately, so they don’t risk having them not count because they arrived too late.

Wildfires ignited by nearly 12,000 lightning strikes over the past three days continue to spread havoc across a heat wave-baked California, with little relief in sight.

“Just a day ago, I announced that we are struggling to address the needs of suppressing some 376 fires in this state,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said at a Friday news conference. “That number has grown to about 560 fires in the state of California.

“Seven-hundred and seventy-one thousand acres has already been burned in the state of California, the equivalent to the size of the state of Rhode Island,” the governor added. “We simply haven’t seen anything like this in many, many years.”

Newsom pointed to two fires that have been blazing in Northern California as ranking among the 10 largest in the state’s recorded history: The so-called LNU Lightning Complex burning in five wine-producing counties north and east of San Francisco covers 219,000 acres and is the 10th largest and 7% contained, while the SCU Lightning Complex is scorching 229,000 acres east of San Jose. It is the state’s seventh-largest recorded wildfire and 10% contained.

Newsom said five people have died in the fires, while Reuters reported that “43 fire fighters and civilians have been injured, and over 500 homes and other structures destroyed.”

“These fires again are stretching our resources, stretching our personnel,” the governor lamented. “We have over 12,000 firefighters now actively working to suppress these larger complex fires.”

Newsom expressed gratitude to fellow governors in states ranging from Texas to Washington who have sent equipment to help battle the blazes.

“We now are engaged formally with mutual aid from 10 different states. We’ve been on the phone with governors all throughout the United States, not just the Western states, trying to reach out as far as the East Coast to see if we can get resources here into the state of California,” he added. “And not one governor has not been responsive.”

Still, Reuters reported that — according to a spokesperson for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, known better as Cal Fire — of the 375 out-of-state fire crews California has requested, only 45 have arrived.
Newsom blamed the manpower shortfall on increasing fire conditions in neighboring Western states.

“It’s a consequence of that heat dome impacting the Western United States,” he said. “And as a consequence of that, our mutual aid that goes outside of the state of California has also been stretched.”

The first-term Democratic governor of the nation’s most populous state said he had just received a call from Sen. Kamala Harris of California, the running mate of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. It was to update Newsom on efforts that she and a bipartisan group of other members of the state’s congressional delegation are making to have the federal government declare a major disaster in California.

“We are here with an open hand, not a closed fist,” Newsom said of such efforts to persuade the Trump administration to come to the aid of his beleaguered state. “Right now we have 40 million Americans that live in the great state of California. There’s not one of them that wears red versus blue at this point — we are here to save lives because everybody deserves to be protected.”

Newsom did not offer hope, however, for any immediate relief from the scourge that’s incinerating the parched Golden State.

“We are not naive, by any stretch, how deadly this moment is,” he said. “While the hots are getting a little less hotter this week, we are looking at weather conditions over the course of the next number of days where you can have some monsoon-type weather conditions that led to some of those dry lightning strikes. That will certainly stretch our resources and challenge us.”

Updated at 3:26 p.m. ET

Two of the most prominent figures in the college admissions scheme that the Justice Department uncovered last year are headed to prison.

Lori Loughlin, the actress best known as Aunt Becky on Full House, will serve two months in prison. Her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli, was sentenced on Friday to five months.

“I am truly and profoundly and deeply sorry,” Loughlin said, choking up as she apologized to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel Gorton, Reuters reported.

They pleaded guilty in May to fraud charges related to their efforts to have their daughters admitted to the University of Southern California as rowing recruits despite not practicing the sport.

The U.S. attorney for the District of Massachusetts announced the sentences on Twitter. Both sentences followed the terms of plea agreements between federal prosecutors and attorneys for the defendants.

Giannulli must also serve two years of supervised release following his sentence, complete 250 hours of community service and pay a fine of $250,000. Loughlin must serve two years of supervised release, pay a $150,000 fine and complete 100 hours of community service.

“I deeply regret the harm that my actions have caused my daughters, my wife and others,” Giannulli said in a short statement during the hearing, according to The Associated Press.

“I take full responsibility for my conduct. I am ready to accept the consequences and move forward with the lessons I’ve learned from this experience,” he added.

At the sentencing, Gorton chastised Giannulli for taking part in the admissions scheme.

“You were not stealing bread to feed your family,” Gorton said, according to the AP. “You have no excuse for your crime and that makes it all the more blameworthy.”

The wire service reported that Giannulli was ordered to surrender on Nov. 19.

The couple entered plea agreements with the U.S. attorney’s office in May. For her part, Loughlin pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud.

Her husband pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud.

They were the 23rd and 24th parents to plead guilty in the case, according to federal officials.

Loughlin became the face of the admissions scandal, in part because of her celebrity, and also because unlike other parents accused in the elaborate scheme, she and Giannulli long maintained their innocence.

In April 2019, the couple pleaded not guilty in federal court after being accused of paying a bribe worth $500,000 in exchange for securing their daughters’ admission into USC.

The bribes were paid to William “Rick” Singer, the mastermind of the wide-ranging enterprise, which included creating bogus sports profiles for well-off parents hoping to shirk the traditional admissions process to get their children accepted to prestigious schools.

Singer is awaiting sentencing. He has pleaded guilty to racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of justice — and now faces a prison sentence of more than 50 years. However, Justice Department officials said he is cooperating with the government’s investigation, and they have recommended a prison sentence at the lower end of the sentencing guideline range.

In all, 55 people have been charged in connection with the admissions scheme, which federal officials first announced in March 2019 in Boston.

The Justice Department framed the venture as a multimillion-dollar scheme to cheat college admissions standards.

In addition to creating sham athletic profiles, the scheme included “bribing SAT and ACT exam administrators to allow a test taker … to secretly take college entrance exams in place of students or to correct the students’ answers after they had taken the exam.”

The scam has also swept up a number of collegiate coaches.

Former USC soccer coach Laura Janke pleaded guilty in May 2019 to a racketeering conspiracy charge related to the scandal, including $130,000 in illegal payouts. Like Loughlin and Giannulli, she had previously said she did not take part in the scheme.

As NPR reported, Janke helped create a number of bogus sports profiles, including ones for Loughlin and Giannulli’s daughters, Olivia Jade and Isabella Rose.

Another well-known actress, Felicity Huffman of Desperate Housewives fame, was also convicted in the scheme. She was handed a 14-day prison sentence in September for paying thousands of dollars in exchange for having one of her children’s SAT scores boosted.