White House press secretary Jen Psaki promised to “choose my words more carefully” following a Friday complaint from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which claimed she apparently violated the Hatch Act.

In the complaint, the nonpartisan non-profit U.S. government ethics and accountability watchdog group called on the Office of Special Counsel to investigate Psaki for comments she made from the White House podium Thursday regarding the Virginia gubernatorial campaign.

In response to the complaint, Psaki told Fox News, “While the president has publicly expressed his support for McAuliffe, we’ll leave it to the press and the campaign to provide commentary on the race. I take ethics very seriously and will choose my words more carefully moving forward.”

In the comments CREW took issue with, Psaki responded to a question about the Virginia gubernatorial race by first acknowledging she had “to be a little careful about how much political analysis I do” from the podium. She then went on to say, “Look, I think the president, of course, wants former Governor McAuliffe to be the future governor of Virginia.

“There is alignment on a lot of their agenda, whether it is the need to invest in rebuilding our roads, rails, and bridges, or making it easier for women to rejoin the workforce,” she continued.

She later added, “We’re going to do everything we can to help former Governor McAuliffe, and we believe in the agenda he’s representing.”

CREW said that Psaki’s comments appeared to have violated the Hatch Act, which forbids officials from using their “official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.”

Noting how there was “no question” Psaki made her remarks while speaking in her official capacity, CREW said, “By mixing official government business with support of a candidate for partisan political office in the weeks before the election and engaging in political activity while on duty, Ms. Psaki appears to have used her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election, political activity that is prohibited by law.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

CREW repeatedly issued complaints regarding apparent Hatch Act violations during the Trump administration.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/psaki-promises-to-choose-my-words-more-carefully-following-hatch-act-violation-complaint

“I like kids better than people,” President Biden said Friday after getting a hug from a toddler in Connecticut while nearby protesters bellowed, “F–k Joe Biden.”

“When I talked to all your folks out on the playground, I joked that everybody knows I like kids better than people. Fortunately they like me. That’s why maybe I like them,” Biden said during a speech in Hartford.

Biden, 78, kneeled outside the Capitol Child Development Center and gave one child a hug and spoke to several others.

But the playground cheer was nearly drowned out by immigration reform activists and some supporters of former President Donald Trump.

A similar scene played out on Biden’s recent trip to New Jersey — when protesters there also gave Biden a hostile welcome.

President Biden hugs a child during his visit to the Capitol Child Development Center in Hartford, Connecticut, on October 15, 2021.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

Zolan Kanno-Youngs of the New York Times reported that “protesters standing just outside within ear shot screamed ‘F*ck Joe Biden’ and ‘Ban Title 42.’” Title 42 is a COVID-19 policy that allows the government to swiftly deport people who illegally enter the US.

NPR reporter Scott Detrow relayed in a pool note that “at one point Biden put a twisty blue tube toy on his head. As this happened you could clearly hear Trump supporters across the street yelling ‘traitor’ and ‘f— Joe Biden.’”

Protesters jeered Biden repeatedly in Connecticut: first at Hartfort’s airport, then at the childcare center and finally at the University of Connecticut, where he spoke at an event honoring former Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.).

Noah Robertson of the Christian Science Monitor wrote in a pool report that “[s]ome folks flying Trump flags (‘Trump Won’ ‘F*** Biden’) waved hello outside [Hartfort’s] airport and filmed the motorcade with their phones.”

Later at the playground, Robertson wrote, “Around 50 more Trump supporters, with similarly expressive signage gathered a street away from the center. They chanted ‘F*** Joe Biden. He’s not our president.’ They also shouted ‘traitors’ as a coda while we walked inside.”

At the University of Connecticut, there were more protesters waving Trump campaign flags and holding anti-Biden signs. 

One sign said “What the F— does Joe Biden know about rights?” according to a pool report.

Biden also faced heat from the left while on campus. A couple dozen students held signs with messages such as “Cuba Sends Doctors Biden Sends Bombs” and “Don’t Come to My School Unless It’s to Cancel My Debt.”

Biden made the trip to Connecticut despite no obvious strategic purpose as his legislative agenda stalls in Congress.

President Biden touches a child’s shirt during his visit to the Capitol Child Development Center in Hartford, Connecticut.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

During his remarks at the childcare center, Biden admitted that he’s unlikely to pass his sprawling, $3.5 trillion social spending plan without significant cuts to win the support of Senate centrists.

President Biden claims he prefers children over people because “Fortunately they like me.”
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

He also joked about his own personal wealth. He said he couldn’t afford child care as a 30-year-old senator in 1973, but that he’s doing fine now with his $400,000 presidential salary.

“I’m also listed for 36 years as the poorest man in the Congress. But I make big money now that I’m the president,” Biden said.

Biden had a salary of about $200,000 per year when working as a senator until 2009 and as vice president from 2009 to 2016, but he reaped a financial windfall in the years that followed.

President Biden promotes his “Build Back Better” agenda during his speech at the Capitol Child Development Center in Hartford, Connecticut, on October 15, 2021.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

In 2017 and 2018, Biden and first lady Jill Biden routed $13 million in book and speech income through “S corporations” to reduce their Medicare taxes by up to $500,000 by dubiously lowballing the share of that income produced by their own labor.

Biden earned nearly $1 million from the University of Pennsylvania from 2017 to 2019 for serving as an honorary professor at the Ivy League school. He made just nine known appearances, including a November 2017 event promoting his book “Promise Me, Dad.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/10/15/i-like-kids-better-than-people-biden-says-as-hecklers-shout/

London — British lawmaker Sir David Amess has died after being stabbed multiple times at a meeting with constituents in southern England, police confirmed Friday.

Police said they were called to a stabbing in Essex at around noon, and that they found an injured man and treated him for his wounds, but he did not survive.

They said a 25-year-old man was arrested at the scene on suspicion of a murder, that counter-terrorism detectives were handling the investigation, and that a knife was found. 

“We are not looking for anyone else in connection with the incident and do not believe there is an ongoing threat to the wider public,” police said.  

David Amess in the Prime Ministers Office at 10 Downing Street on October 16,2016 in London, United Kingdom.

Getty Images


Amess, a 69-year-old member of the Conservative party, had been a member of Parliament since 1983. He was married with five children.

He is the second MP to be murdered in five years. In 2016, Labour MP Jo Cox was shot on the street in her constituency and died.

The Jo Cox Foundation, a charity set up in her memory, said it was “horrified” by the stabbing.

“We are thinking of him, his family and loved ones at this distressing time,” the foundation said on Twitter.

U.K. politicians are generally not given police protection when are in their constituencies.

“This is an incident that will send shockwaves across the parliamentary community and the whole country,” House of Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said, according to the Associated Press. “In the coming days we will need to discuss and examine MPs’ security and any measures to be taken. But for now, our thoughts and prayers are with David’s family, friends and colleagues.”

Police officers and ambulance crew attend following the stabbing of UK Conservative MP Sir David Amess as he met with constituents on October 15, 2021 in Leigh-on-Sea, England. 

Getty Images


There was an outpouring of grief on social media from U.K. politicians across the political spectrum.

“David was a man who believed in this country and its future. We have lost a fine public servant,” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said. “Everyone was deeply shocked and heart stricken.”

“Horrific and deeply shocking news,” Keir Starmer, the leader of the opposition Labour party, tweeted. “Thinking of David, his family and his staff.”

“Heartbroken. I could write reams on how Sir David was one of the kindest, most compassionate, well liked colleagues in Parliament. But I can’t. I feel sick. I am lost. Rest in Peace. A little light went out in Parliament today. We will miss you,” Conservative MP Tracey Crouch tweeted.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/david-amess-uk-lawmaker-killed-stabbing-today-2021-10-15/

The former US president Bill Clinton’s health is improving but he will remain in a California hospital for at least another night to receive antibiotics intravenously for a urological infection that spread to his bloodstream, his spokesperson said on Friday.

The 75-year-old Clinton, who served as president from 1993 to 2001, entered the University of California, Irvine, medical center on Tuesday evening after suffering from fatigue. He spoke with Joe Biden on Friday.

Clinton’s spokesperson Angel Ureña said that Clinton’s white blood count has decreased, indicating his health is improving.

“All health indicators are trending in the right direction, including his white blood count which was decreased significantly,” Ureña said on Twitter. “In order to receive further IV antibiotics, he will remain in the hospital overnight.”

Since his admission to the intensive care unit at the hospital, Clinton has received fluids along with antibiotics, his doctors said.

The University of California, Irvine, medical center in Orange, California. Photograph: Apu Gomes/AFP/Getty Images

His wife, a former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, was at the hospital on Thursday and Friday, and the two read books and talked about politics, Ureña told Reuters.

It remained unclear when Clinton would be released.

Biden said Clinton would likely go home soon, though it was not clear whether he would be released on Saturday or later.

“He is getting out shortly. … Whether that’s tomorrow or the next day, I don’t know,” Biden told reporters in Connecticut. “He’s doing fine. He really is.”

On Thursday, Ureña said Clinton was “up and about, joking and charming the hospital staff”.

Clinton has dealt with heart problems in the past, including a 2004 quadruple bypass surgery and a 2010 procedure to open a blocked artery.

The Democrat served two terms in the White House, overseeing strong economic growth while engaging in bruising political battles with congressional Republicans.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/15/bill-clinton-to-remain-in-hospital-as-he-recovers-from-urological-infection

In response to a Justice Department lawsuit over the Texas law, US District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas, last week issued a preliminary injunction halting its enforcement, calling it “flagrantly unconstitutional” and a violation of Roe v. Wade.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58935257

Even as Ms. Pelosi vowed in San Francisco to protect those climate provisions, at least four people in Washington close to the negotiations called the clean electricity program “dead.”

Senator Tina Smith, Democrat of Minnesota, the chief author of the program, said that while dropping it might win Mr. Manchin’s vote on the budget bill, it could cost hers — and those of other environmentally-minded Democrats.

“We must have strong climate action in the Build Back Better budget. I’m open to all approaches, but as I’ve said, I will not support a budget deal that does not get us where we need to go on climate action,” she said. “There are 50 Democratic senators and it’s going to take every one of our votes to get this budget passed.”

Mr. Manchin, who has personal financial ties to the coal industry, had initially intended to write the details of the program as the chairman of the Senate committee on energy and natural resources. Mr. Manchin was considering a clean electricity program that would reward utilities for switching from coal to natural gas, which is less polluting but still emits carbon dioxide and can leak methane, another greenhouse gas. Mr. Manchin’s home state, West Virginia, is one of the nation’s top producers of coal and gas.

But in recent days, Mr. Manchin indicated to the administration that he was now completely opposed to a clean energy program, people familiar with the discussions said.

As a result, White House staffers are scrambling to calculate the impact on emissions from other climate measures in the bill, including tax incentives for renewable energy producers and tax credits for consumers who purchase electric vehicles. Unlike a clean energy program, tax incentives tend to expire after a set period of time, and do not have the market-shifting power of a more durable strategy.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/15/climate/clean-energy-program-manchin.html

White House press secretary Jen Psaki may have violated a law barring executive branch employees from partisan politicking, a government ethics watchdog said Friday.

But the group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, also said that Psaki’s alleged breach of the Hatch Act was nowhere near as egregious as the mountain of similar ethics complaints that piled up during former President Donald Trump’s administration.

CREW alleged in a complaint that Psaki violated the ethics law Thursday during a press briefing when she affirmed President Joe Biden’s support for Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe.

“I have to be a little careful about how much political analysis I do from here,” Psaki said before noting that Biden “of course” wants McAuliffe “to be the future governor of Virginia.”

“We’re going to do everything we can to help” McAuliffe, Psaki said, “and we believe in the agenda he’s representing.”

The complaint, filed to Henry Kerner of the Office of Special Counsel, alleged that Psaki appeared to violate the Hatch Act by “impermissibly mixing official government business with advocacy for former Governor McAuliffe’s election.” Her remarks were made in her official capacity and they were aimed at a preferred outcome in a partisan political election, the complaint said.

The complaint called on Kerner to investigate and take “any appropriate disciplinary action” against Psaki.

“While the President has publicly expressed his support for McAuliffe, we’ll leave it to the press and the campaign to provide commentary on the race,” Psaki told CNBC in an email.

“I take ethics very seriously and will choose my words more carefully moving forward,” she said.

CREW President Noah Bookbinder, who authored the complaint, noted in a press release that Psaki’s conduct “does not come close to rising to the level of the outrageous offenses of the Trump administration,” which “systematically co-opted the government for the president’s reelection.”

The ethics group filed Hatch Act complaints against numerous Trump administration officials, including two press secretaries, Kayleigh McEnany and Sarah Huckabee Sanders, as well as then-communications aides Raj Shah and Hogan Gidley.

CREW said its complaints led to reprimands against at least a dozen Trump administration officials, including former Trump advisors Kellyanne Conway and Peter Navarro, former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley and Trump’s third press secretary, Stephanie Grisham.

The Office of Special Counsel in 2019 issued a scathing report recommending Conway in particular should be fired for her repeated Hatch Act violations. But Trump shrugged off the report, claiming in a Fox News interview that “it looks to me like they’re trying to take away her right of free speech.”

The Trump administration’s abuse of the Hatch Act “does not mean we should be casual about compliance with an important ethics law” under Biden, Bookbinder said. “The Biden administration should not follow the Trump administration down that path.”

“After the ethics disaster of the Trump administration, there is extra pressure on the Biden administration to be above board,” Bookbinder said. “We hope the Biden administration will give renewed attention to staying on the right side of this law.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/15/biden-press-secretary-jen-psaki-may-have-violated-hatch-act-watchdog-says.html

As debate over Democrats’ Build Back Better Act has intensified, the $3.5 trillion social spending bill has remained strikingly popular. That may be both a blessing and a curse for lawmakers because it’s now clear that the bill will need to shrink to pass. And like Congress, Americans don’t all agree on which of its big-ticket items are most important.

But at least one thing seems clear from public polling: People want to pay for the bill by taxing the rich.

A Vox and Data for Progress poll, conducted October 8-12, found that 71 percent of voters support raising taxes on the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans to pay for the bill. Eighty-six percent of Democrats and 50 percent of Republicans backed the idea. Other tax provisions focused on the wealthy that could be included in the bill — such as tax increases on corporations and capital gains — found 65 percent or more support overall.

Sixty-three percent of voters in the poll said they supported the $3.5 trillion overall plan that includes spending on health care, long-term care, child care, and clean-energy jobs.

Ethan Winter/Data for Progress

It’s less clear which priorities voters most want to spend that money on. When asked to choose the most and least important parts of the Build Back Better Act’s many policies, taxing the rich was most frequently cited as a top priority, with 13 percent of respondents choosing the measure. (The poll surveyed 1,224 likely voters and had a sampling margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.)

Expanding Medicare benefits to cover dental, vision, and hearing also showed strong support, with 12 percent of respondents ranking it the highest priority, and another 12 percent picked policies to increase access to long-term care for older adults and people with disabilities. Republicans were especially supportive of the provisions for health care and long-term care for older adults, compared to Democrats, who most frequently cited the tax increases and clean-energy measures as top priorities.

Democrats face tough choices in keeping a promise of “transformative” policies in the Build Back Better Act: Do programs need to be made permanent, increasing their price tag? Should funding child care or prekindergarten win out over expanding Medicare benefits? How fast must the country move to cut fossil fuels and fight climate change?

This is Democrats’ first chance in years at crafting major legislation not directly tied to the pandemic — and given the electoral map’s skew toward Republicans, it could be their last for another decade.

The popularity of the Build Back Better Act may or may not make it easier for lawmakers to get the bill over the finish line. In the Vox/Data for Progress poll, voters were presented with arguments for and against removing a particular provision to reduce costs, such as Medicare benefits expansion or clean-energy policy. Only about a third of voters or fewer supported the cuts. And respondents showed a diversity of opinion on what’s most important in the bill.

That likely reflects the fact that Democrats’ big bill touches on important issues for people at various stages of life, said Ethan Winter, a senior analyst for Data for Progress.

Ethan Winter/Data for Progress

Winter noted that a policy like free prekindergarten would be especially favored by a young parent, while expanding Medicare benefits appeals more to older adults — who make up a larger swath of the electorate. The somewhat stronger support for tax increases on the wealthy and spending on care for older adults suggests those ideas are a core appeal of Democratic politics, for both the party’s base and swing voters.

“People elect Democrats because they will raise taxes on the rich to do modest economic redistribution, and [policies] for seniors are always very popular,” Winter said.

Polls have shown solid majority support for most pieces of the bill as standalone policies. (The child tax credit expansion has seen majority approval but seems to fare worse in polling when voters are explicitly asked about making the expansion permanent.)

The bill’s popularity could shift as Americans learn more about it and are exposed to partisan messaging; an October CBS News poll found that few Americans say they know much about what’s in the bill, and only a third think it will affect them directly, despite many provisions focused on helping middle- and lower-income families.

On climate issues, 63 percent of voters in the Vox/Data for Progress poll expressed support for the clean electricity program that is a key component of the bill’s climate crisis strategy. Fifty-seven percent said tax credits for electric cars in the Build Back Better plan would make them more likely to purchase one.

Democrats’ bill is popular. So why are they shrinking it?

Americans largely like the Build Back Better Act. Most don’t seem fazed by the $3.5 trillion price tag. The strong support for tax increases on the rich — after big tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations under President Donald Trump — suggests skeptical centrist Democrats may have other concerns in backing cuts to the bill.

The precariousness of the bill largely comes down to Democrats’ very thin majorities in the House and Senate. That gives Joe Manchin, a senator from a Trump-voting coal state, the power to dictate demands on climate provisions as well as the overall size of the bill.

It also means another centrist senator, Kyrsten Sinema, is a key figure in the negotiations, even though it’s not totally clear what she wants in the bill — and she left this week for Europe on a fundraising tour. (While Manchin’s approval in his home state of West Virginia has remained fairly steady overall, Sinema’s resistance to the legislation has caused her approval rating to plummet among Democrats and prompt stirrings of a primary challenge in Arizona, a state more evenly split between Republicans and Democrats.)

Manchin, Sinema, and other moderate Democrats have sometimes appeared at odds with each other on how to pay for the bill, making things even more complicated.

At New York magazine, Eric Levitz chalks pushback by some House Democrats up to America’s skewed representation in Congress and the decline of labor as a lobbying force. Plus, perhaps, old-fashioned stubbornness: Many Democrats in Congress came of political age in the era of Bill Clinton, deficit reduction, and welfare reform. “I think that’s why we can’t have ($3.5 trillion worth of) nice things: Labor is weak, Congress is malapportioned, and some old rich Democrats have annoying beliefs,” Levitz wrote.

No matter what happens with the Build Back Better Act, it won’t end debates around what pursuing popular policies really means. Even if the final bill is embraced by the public, it might not lead Democrats to electoral victory, either.

But if Democrats are just looking for legislation that most Americans want, taxing the rich to pay for policies that help families, seniors, and the planet seems like a safe bet.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2021/10/15/22723457/build-back-better-poll-democrats-bill-infrastructure-taxes

Father Jeff Woolnough, parish priest at nearby St Peter’s Catholic Church, told the BBC: “Sir David was a great, great man, a good Catholic and a friend to all.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-58930593

A growing number of Senate Democrats are getting impatient with President BidenJoe BidenMcAuliffe holds slim lead over Youngkin in Fox News poll Biden signs bill to raise debt ceiling On The Money — Progressives play hard ball on Biden budget plan MORE’s kid-glove approach to negotiating with Sens. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinOn The Money — Progressives play hard ball on Biden budget plan Schumer, McConnell headed for another collision over voting rights Overnight Energy & Environment — Presented by ExxonMobil — Climate divides conservative Democrats in reconciliation push MORE (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten SinemaKyrsten SinemaOn The Money — Progressives play hard ball on Biden budget plan Overnight Energy & Environment — Presented by ExxonMobil — Climate divides conservative Democrats in reconciliation push Pelosi on addressing climate through reconciliation package: ‘This is our moment’ MORE (D-Ariz.).

Biden’s approach has involved a lot of facetime and personal attention, but little in the way of public concessions or discernible movement.

After talks on the scale and scope of the Democrats’ $3.5 trillion reconciliation spending bill stalled in September, Democratic senators expressed hope that Biden’s personal involvement would yield a breakthrough.

Yet after several one-on-one meetings between the president, Manchin and Sinema, Democrats don’t seem any closer to agreeing on a framework than a month ago.

This is fueling frustration among senators who see this Congress as a once-in-a-generation opportunity to pass bold reforms as the House and possibly the Senate are in danger of flipping to Republicans in the 2022 midterm election.

“Both of them have left the president hanging,” grumbled one Democratic senator who requested anonymity to vent about the lack of progress since Biden reached out personally to Manchin and Sinema.

Biden met one-on-one with Sinema on the morning of Sept. 15 and then with Manchin later that day. He also held separate meetings with the two senators on Sept. 28.

Little news came out of any of the meetings other than a report that Sinema issued an ultimatum to Biden, warning him she wouldn’t back the reconciliation bill if the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill was delayed or failed in the House.

“If [Biden] had been able to walk away and say, ‘I have a commitment to $2 trillion from both [senators] and now we’re working on the details,’ it would have been like a sense of momentum. ‘The president’s magic of the Oval Office comes in once again.’ But instead it was like, ‘There’s no magic in the Oval Office right now,’” the senator who spoke to The Hill said of the meetings.

Some Democratic senators think Biden’s deference to Manchin and Sinema has only emboldened them to dig in their heels even more.

A second Democratic senator said Sinema crossed the line when she called out Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiCongress is hell-bent on a spooky spending spree  Pelosi on addressing climate through reconciliation package: ‘This is our moment’ House progressives lay out priorities for spending negotiations MORE’s (D-Calif.) decision to delay a vote on the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill as “inexcusable.”

Sinema also ruffled feathers by accusing Democratic leaders of making “conflicting promises that could not all be kept” when they pledged to move the bipartisan infrastructure package and the larger social investment reconciliation bill in tandem.

“It’s one thing to say I’m not satisfied, it’s another thing to criticize,” the second senator said.

The complaints leveled from Democrats in private aren’t new.

Democratic lawmakers vented frustration earlier this year over how long it took the White House to negotiate with moderate Senate Republicans on a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package.

When talks collapsed between Biden and Sen. Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Wellons Moore CapitoThe Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – After high drama, Senate lifts debt limit Here are the 11 GOP senators who helped advance the debt extension Key debt-limit vote sparks major fight among Senate Republicans MORE (R-W.Va.), some Democrats called for their leaders to scrap the two-track strategy of moving a bipartisan hard infrastructure bill separately from a bigger human infrastructure bill that would pass with only Democratic votes under the budget reconciliation process.

Andrew Bates, a White House spokesman, said Biden is working with Manchin and Sinema “in good faith” and implied there has been more progress in the talks than people outside the room know about.

“We do not discuss the president’s private interactions with senators — but he and the senators themselves are the only people in the room when they have one-on-one meetings. We are dealing with everyone in this process in good faith, and they are doing the same with us,” he said.

Steven S. Smith, a professor of political science at Washington University in St. Louis, said Democratic senators need to have more patience.

“It’s a mistake to think about a meeting between a senator and the president as an international summit that merely confirms what’s already been negotiated,” he said. “For those kinds of things, we think if they walk away with nothing it represents a huge failure in diplomacy.”

“I don’t think Biden sees his relationship to Congress that way at all. He was a member of Congress so long and even as vice president so deeply engaged on negotiating on Capitol Hill that even as president he sees it as an ongoing relationship that is going to have its highs and lows, but it doesn’t need to produce anything until it needs to produce something,” he said. 

Smith argues it’s too soon to pass judgement on Biden’s tactics until time has run out for passing legislation. But Democratic senators worry that the longer it takes to pass the reconciliation package, the heavier a lift it becomes. 

Biden’s poll numbers have fallen, which adds to the worries in Democratic circles.

The rising frustration is further fueled by the lack of transparency in talks, which has left Democratic lawmakers in the dark about whether there’s been any progress.

Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenHillicon Valley — Presented by LookingGlass — Congress makes technology policy moves Warren, Jayapal demand answers on reported judicial ethics violations Warren calls for Amazon breakup MORE (D-Mass.), a leading progressive, said on “The View” Wednesday that she “want folks on the other side to put on the table what they don’t want, what they want to cut.”

“Tell me what you want to cut and then we’ll figure out what the dollar [amount] is,” she said.

Manchin signed a memorandum of understanding with Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerSenate to vote next week on Freedom to Vote Act To Win 2022: Go big on reconciliation and invest in Latinx voters McConnell-aligned group targeting Kelly, Cortez Masto and Hassan with M ad campaign MORE (D-N.Y.) in late July laying out $1.5 trillion as his top-line spending limit for a human infrastructure investment package and laying out a list of other demands, but many Democratic senators were completely unaware of his position until the memo was publicly reported on Sept. 30.

Steve Jarding, a Democratic strategist and former Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee aide, said Democratic senators are understandably frustrated.

“I think it’s a failure on the part of the Biden administration. You’re the president of the United States, you’ve got all the leverage in the world,” he said, pointing out that Biden’s agenda is broadly popular.

“We need this stuff,” he said of Biden’s proposals for hard infrastructure and social investment. “America needs it and [Manchin and Sinema] are playing politics with it.

“You have to lay this at the feet of Joe Biden,” he said. “When the president calls somebody into the Oval Office and can’t walk out with a deal, something’s wrong, because everybody has a price.

“What does Joe Manchin want? What would get him to move? What would Sinema need to move off square one? That’s out there, and Biden failed to get it,” he added. “Be Lyndon Johnson, don’t be Martin Van Buren. That’s what presidents do.”  

A Senate Democratic aide said that Democratic senators understand that Manchin and Sinema are wielding their leverage. But the aide said Democratic senators are running out of patience with Biden for giving them so much leash to run.

“This has been the Biden thing so far, his leadership style is to basically ask for nothing. There’s nothing,” the aide said.

The aide said senators understand where Manchin and Sinema are coming from.

“There’s less frustration with them than there is with Biden,” the aide said. “It’s his time to step up.”

Biden asked a group of centrist Democratic senators who met with him at the White House on Sept. 22 to come up with a top-line spending number they could support for the reconciliation bill.

Three weeks later, Democrats don’t appear any closer to an agreement on a top-line spending target.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/576861-bidens-soft-touch-with-manchin-sinema-frustrates-democrats

Joe Biden conceded on Friday that the final version of his sweeping social policy and climate change initiative – often referred to as the $3.5tn reconciliation bill – would not be $3.5tn.

“We’re not going to get $3.5tn. We’ll get less than that,” Biden said, during an event at the Capitol Child Development Center in Hartford, Connecticut.

“But we’re gonna get it, and we’re gonna come back and get the rest.”

The White House and Democratic leaders are racing to trim the bill to win the support of centrist holdouts, senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin, without whom the measure cannot pass. Both have balked at the top-line figure, but infuriated their colleagues by not providing more specifics on what they will and will not support in the bill.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently acknowledged the reality during a press conference earlier this week. “The fact is, that if there are fewer dollars to spend there are choices to be made,” she said.

As Democrats race to chisel the bill down to about $2tn, they must decide whether to keep the sweep of the programs proposed in the legislation – paid family leave, child care, community college, Medicare expansion – with shorter funding periods or narrow the scope and fund fewer programs longer. In his remarks on Friday, Biden offered a glimpse of where the negotiations stood, warning that his proposal for free community college might not make the cut.

“We’re going to get something less than that, but I’m going to negotiate,” Biden said. “But I’m going to get it done with the grace of God and the goodwill of the neighbors and the crick not rising.”


Joe Biden speaks at the Capitol Child Development Center on Friday. Photograph: Evan Vucci/AP

In his speech, which focused on how the bill would make childcare and education more affordable, Biden spoke about his own experience raising two young boys as a single father after the death of his first wife and daughter.

“I could not afford childcare,” he said, recalling his days traveling back and forth between Washington and Delaware, where he lived. “Everybody wonders why I commuted [by train] every day, 265 miles a day, to be back and forth for my children. I could afford the train. It was cheaper.”

At the end of his remarks, Biden said he had been in touch with Bill Clinton, who was hospitalized for an infection and “on the mend”. Knocking on wood, Biden said the former president was “doing well.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2021/oct/15/trump-allies-subpoena-orders-capitol-attack-committee-bannon-biden-us-politics-live

The White House said Friday it would allow international travelers who are fully vaccinated against Covid-19 into the U.S. starting Nov. 8, lifting a ban on visitors from the European Union, UK and other countries.

The White House last month said it planned to lift the travel restrictions, which barred most non-U.S. citizens who had recently been in Europe, Brazil, South Africa and elsewhere, in early November. The rules were first set Trump administration early in the pandemic to slow the spread of Covid-19, and extended by the new Biden administration in the winter. The Biden administration had said visitors would have to be fully vaccinated against Covid to enter.

Inbound travelers, including U.S. citizens, still need proof of a negative Covid test to travel to the United States from abroad.

The measure is a relief for large airlines like Delta, United and American, which have struggled to return to profitability with international travel curbed for more than a year and a half.

We welcome the Biden administration’s science-based approach to begin lifting the restrictions on travel to the U.S. that were put into place at the start of the pandemic,” American’s CEO Doug Parker said in a statement.

American was up 3% in afternoon trading, while United and Delta were each up more than 1%, compared with an 0.6% gain in the S&P 500.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/15/us-to-lift-travel-ban-on-nov-8-allowing-vaccinated-international-visitors-into-the-country.html

The move gives the justices a chance to once again consider a law they declined to block last month, a decision that made Texas the first state to ban abortion early in pregnancy since the landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalized the procedure in 1973.

The state’s ban was briefly blocked by a lower court earlier this month but was reinstated just 48 hours later by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. The law includes no exemptions for victims of rape or incest, and has prompted patients as young as 12 to seek out abortion clinics hours away in neighboring states.

On Thursday night, a panel at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals split 2-1 on keeping Texas’ law in place while litigation continues — the court’s third decision in favor of the ban over the last few months.

The Supreme Court is already preparing to hear a separate case in early December surrounding a Mississippi abortion ban that represents a direct challenge to Roe, but could decide to hear the Biden administration’s challenge on Texas before that date.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/15/biden-justice-department-supreme-court-texas-abortion-516093

Emergency services at the scene near the Belfairs Methodist Church, where Conservative MP Sir David Amess was stabbed several times, in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, England, on Friday. He has since died.

Nick Ansell/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Nick Ansell/AP

Emergency services at the scene near the Belfairs Methodist Church, where Conservative MP Sir David Amess was stabbed several times, in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, England, on Friday. He has since died.

Nick Ansell/AP

LONDON — British Conservative lawmaker David Amess was stabbed to death on Friday during a routine meeting with constituents at a church in eastern England, an attack that united the U.K.’s fractious politicians in shock and sorrow. A 25-year-old man was arrested at the scene.

The Essex Police force said officers were called to reports of a stabbing in the seaside town of Leigh-on-Sea just after noon Friday. It said “a man was arrested and a knife recovered.

“We are not looking for anyone else in connection with the incident and do not believe there is an ongoing threat to the wider public,” police said.

Amess, 69, had been a member of Parliament for Southend West, which includes Leigh-on-Sea, since 1997, but has been a lawmaker since 1983.

Chris McAndrew/UK Parliament via AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Chris McAndrew/UK Parliament via AP

Amess, 69, had been a member of Parliament for Southend West, which includes Leigh-on-Sea, since 1997, but has been a lawmaker since 1983.

Chris McAndrew/UK Parliament via AP

A motive wasn’t given and the suspect wasn’t identified. More than two hours after the attack, the force said the man injured in the stabbing had died. It didn’t release his name. The suspect is being being held on suspicion of murder, police said.

Sky News and others said Amess was attacked during a regular meeting with constituents at Belfairs Methodist Church in a residential area of Leigh-on-Sea, about 40 miles (62 kilometers) east of London.

Aerial footage showed several ambulances and an air ambulance waiting nearby to the church, where paramedics worked to save Amess’ life.

John Lamb, a local councilor, said Amess hadn’t been taken to a hospital more than two hours after the attack and the situation was “extremely serious.” His death was announced soon after.

Amess, 69, had been a member of Parliament for Southend West, which includes Leigh-on-Sea, since 1997, but has been a lawmaker since 1983. He was a well-liked member of Parliament, best known for his ceaseless campaign to have Southend declared a city.

Politicians from across the political spectrum expressed shock and sorrow.
Conservative lawmaker Tracey Crouch tweeted: “Heartbroken. I could write reams on how Sir David was one of the kindest, most compassionate, well liked colleagues in Parliament. But I can’t. I feel sick. I am lost.”

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon of the Scottish National Party tweeted: “Elected representatives from across the political spectrum will be united in sadness and shock today. In a democracy, politicians must be accessible and open to scrutiny, but no-one deserves to have their life taken while working for and representing their constituents.”

Carrie Johnson, wife of Prime Minister Boris Johnson, wrote on Twitter: “Absolutely devastating news about Sir David Amess. He was hugely kind and good. An enormous animal lover and a true gent. This is so completely unjust. Thoughts are with his wife and their children.”

Violence against British politicians is rare, but concerns have grown in recent years about the increasingly bitter polarization in politics. In June 2016 Labour Party lawmaker Jo Cox was fatally stabbed and shot in her northern England constituency. A far-right extremist was convicted of her murder.

Cox’s widower, Brendan Cox, tweeted that “Attacking our elected representatives is an attack on democracy itself. There is no excuse, no justification. It is as cowardly as it gets.”

British lawmakers are protected by armed police when they are inside Parliament, and security there was tightened after an attacker inspired by the Islamic State group fatally stabbed a police officer at the gates in 2017.

But politicians have no such protection in their constituencies. Amess published the times and locations of his open meetings with constituents on his website.
Two other British lawmakers have been attacked this century during their “surgeries,” regular meetings where constituents can present concerns and complaints.

Labour legislator Stephen Timms was stabbed in the stomach and injured in May 2010 by a female student radicalized by online sermons from an al-Qaida-linked preacher.

In 2000, Liberal Democrat lawmaker Nigel Jones and his aide Andrew Pennington were attacked by a man wielding a sword during such a meeting. Pennington was killed and Jones injured in the attack in Cheltenham, England.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/10/15/1046360169/british-lawmaker-david-amess-stabbed-death

Those who were never banned from traveling across the land borders, including commercial drivers and students, will also need to show proof of vaccination when crossing starting in January, giving them some time to adjust to the new rules, officials said. Those crossing land borders will not need to show a coronavirus test.

Foreigners hoping to fly to the United States will need to show proof of vaccination before boarding and a negative coronavirus test within three days of entering.

Unvaccinated Americans traveling from overseas will need to test negative for the coronavirus one day before returning home and show proof that they have bought a test to take after arriving in the United States.

The U.S. Travel Association, an industry group, applauded the moves.

“The date is critically important for planning — for airlines, for travel-supported businesses, and for millions of travelers worldwide who will now advance plans to visit the United States once again,” Roger Dow, the group’s president, said in a statement. “Reopening to international visitors will provide a jolt to the economy and accelerate the return of travel-related jobs that were lost due to travel restrictions.”

A spokeswoman for Airlines for America, another industry group, noted that even before the announcement of the date, airlines had seen an uptick in ticket sales to the United States from abroad.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/15/us/politics/vaccine-mandate-travel-us.html

ORANGE (CBSLA) – Former President Bill Clinton has been hospitalized at the University of California, Irvine Medical Center in Orange earlier this week.

CNN reported Thursday that Clinton is in the ICU with a urinary tract infection that spread to his bloodstream.

READ MORE: Dodgers Beat Giants 2-1 In Playoff Thriller, Advance To NLCS

Angel Ureña, the president’s spokesperson, said the 75-year-old Clinton was brought to UCI Medical Center after becoming fatigued, tweeting, “On Tuesday evening, President Clinton was admitted to UCI Medical Center to receive treatment for a non-COVID-related infection. He is on the mend, in good spirits, and is incredibly thankful to the doctors, nurses, and staff providing him with excellent care.”

Video taken in the early morning hours Friday, showed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton leaving UCI Medical Center escorted by Secret Service agents and local police.

READ MORE: New Climate Models Show Much Of Southern California Underwater

Ureña also tweeted out a statement from the former president’s physicians, Dr. Alpesh Amin and Dr. Lisa Bardack, saying, “President Clinton was taken to UC Irvine Medical Center and diagnosed with an infection. He was admitted to the hospital for close monitoring and administered IV antibiotics and fluids. He remains at the hospital for continuous monitoring. After two days of treatment, his white blood cell count is trending down and he is responding to antibiotics well. The California-based medical team has been in constant communication with the President’s New York-based medical team, including his cardiologist. We hope to have him go home soon.”

 

The former president was reportedly in Southern California for a Clinton Foundation event. On Thursday night, he was supposed to be the moderator for an economic panel discussion called Rebuilding For All, Inclusive By Design.  It is not clear if he was to appear virtually or in person.

MORE NEWS: Fire Crews Prepare Ahead Of Red Flag Warning And High Fire Danger

This is not Clinton’s first real health scare. In 2004, he had a quadruple bypass surgery.

Source Article from https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2021/10/14/bill-clinton-hospitalized-at-uci-medical-center-in-orange-spokesman-says/

But the Justice Department is suing Texas over the law’s unique enforcement mechanism, which the department claims violates the Constitution by allowing the state to essentially prohibit abortion while technically complying with court rulings that forbid such a ban by a state.

The law encourages private parties to bring lawsuits by granting $10,000 to any plaintiff that successfully sues someone accused of performing or aiding in an abortion that violates the statute.

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland called the enforcement mechanism an “unprecedented” effort to bar women from their constitutionally protected right to have an abortion.

The department argued in its lawsuit that the Texas law is invalid under the supremacy clause of the Constitution, which gives federal law precedence over state law, and under the equal protection guarantees of the 14th Amendment.

A federal district judge last week granted the department’s request to halt enforcement of the law while the legal challenge makes its way through the court system, delivering a short-lived win to the Biden administration. But two days later, the appeals panel intervened.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/14/us/politics/texas-abortion-appeals-court.html