Most Viewed Videos

El exministro socialista, Miguel Boyer, ha fallecido a los 75 años en la clínica Ruber Internacional pasadas las doce del mediodía, donde ingresó de urgencia esta misma mañana, según informan a Efe fuentes cercanas a la familia. La causa del fallecimiento ha sido una embolia pulmonar. En febrero de 2012 estuvo ingresado en la Ruber de Juan Bravo como consecuencia de un derrame cerebral del que se recuperó, pero que le obligó a apartarse de las responsabilidades que aún mantenía como consejero de Reyal Urbis y de Red Eléctrica de España.

El ”superministro” que expropió Rumasa

El economista, conocido como “el superministro” en los años en que fue titular de Economía, Hacienda y Comercio en el primer gobierno de Felipe González, será recordado fundamentalmente por haber llevado a cabo la expropiación de Rumasa.  Para la historia quedan las imágenes del presidente de Rumasa, José María Ruiz-Mateos, atacando al grito de “¡qué te pego leche!” a Boyer, a quien persiguió sin descanso disfrazado de Supermán o de presidiario, entre otras cosas.

De su etapa en el Gobierno socialista queda una estricta política monetaria dirigida a controlar la inflación, así como el choque ideológico con el otro “peso pesado” del gabinete, el vicepresidente Alfonso Guerra. Es probable que en aquellos años comenzara su transición política, que tuvo como punto de inflexión su inesperada dimisión del Gobierno en julio de 1985 y acabó cuando dejó las filas socialistas en 1996 para apoyar públicamente el programa económico de quienes hasta entonces habían sido sus adversarios políticos.

En 2002 sería nombrado miembro del patronato de la FAES, la fundación del PP, a propuesta del expresidente del Gobierno José María Aznar, aunque la abandonó en 2011 en otro giro por el que volvió a acercarse al Gobierno de José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Los contrastes también alcanzaron a su vida privada, en la que pasó de la discreción de su matrimonio con la ginecóloga Elena Arnedo, con quien tuvo dos hijos, a su enlace con la reina del “papel cuché” Isabel Preysler, con quien ha estado casado más de 26 años y tuvo una hija.

La pareja formó parte de la denominada “beautiful people”, gentes del mundo financiero y empresarial que prosperaron en los años 80 y 90 durante los gobiernos socialistas, como el exgobernador del Banco de España Mariano Rubio, o el expresidente de Banesto Mario Conde. Por su pertenencia a aquel círculo se vio salpicado por el caso Ibercorp, escándalo financiero que supuso la caída en desgracia de Mariano Rubio, pero del que Boyer salió indemne.

Le duró poco el descanso de la política porque en diciembre de 1982 entró a formar parte del primer gabinete de Felipe González, años en los que se ganó la fama de frío y altivo, y en los que llegó a estar considerado el ministro más poderoso de aquel Gobierno. Sus políticas de ajuste y reformas se encontraron con la oposición del aparato guerrista y de los sindicatos, defensores de una política económica más expansiva frente a las que consideraban medidas liberales de Boyer.

Fueron los años de la reconversión industrial, que generó una elevada destrucción de empleo, y de la expropiación por decreto de uno de los mayores grupos privados del país para proteger al erario público (unos de sus principales acreedores), a sus trabajadores y a los accionistas. La salida de Boyer del Gobierno a petición propia se justificó en el cansancio, pero inevitablemente fue interpretada como la victoria de Alfonso Guerra.

Tras su periodo en el Ejecutivo pasó por el Banco Exterior, Cartera Central, Grucycsa y FCC, hasta que fue nombrado presidente de CLH, cargó que ocupó hasta 2005. En los años posteriores fue designado consejero de Reyal Urbis y de Red Eléctrica de España, consejos en los que causó baja después de sufrir un derrame cerebral en la primavera de 2012.

Source Article from http://www.elconfidencial.com/espana/2014-09-29/muere-el-exministro-miguel-boyer_218217/

The Georgia Board of Education is taking steps to prohibit schools from teaching that the U.S. is fundamentally racist and other controversial ideas associated with critical race theory (CRT).

By an 11-2 vote, the state adopted part of a resolution drafted by conservative think tank Ethics and Public Policy Center, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported. It contains language restricting external, private influences from changing school teaching — an apparent attempt to exclude diversity consultancies or activist nonprofits from administrators’ decision-making.

The resolution also prevents teachers from being forced to teach that an individual’s worth or sense of shame should be dependent on their race or sex.

It reads, in part: “[C]oncepts that impute fault, blame, a tendency to oppress others, or the need to feel guilt or anguish to persons solely because of their race or sex violate the premises of individual rights, equal opportunity, and individual merit underpinning our constitutional republic, and therefore have no place in training for teachers, administrators, or other employees of the public educational system of the State of Georgia.”

WHAT IS CRITICAL RACE THEORY?

Brian Kemp, the state’s Republican governor, reportedly urged the board last month to take steps against CRT, which is often seen as the source of these ideas.

Georgia’s is just the latest attempt to halt so-called “anti-racist” trainings and curricula in their tracks. Some have defended those types of teachings as a way to foster understanding and dismantle purportedly systemic inequities. Others, like Chris Rufo, have described them as a form of neo-racism that unfairly attributes certain concepts or actions to racial groups.

The issue gained steam in national media this year as controversial materials emerged. For example, the Oregon Department of Education was found to promote a teacher training program that argued white supremacy manifested itself in a focus on finding the right answer in math.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Besides individual racial characteristics, American history has also been a subject of these trainings. Schools across the U.S. have started utilizing the “1619 Project,” which teaches, among other things, that the institution of slavery was the nation’s true founding. 

A series of the resolution’s statements seemed to be aimed at disputing those types of ideas. The board, it says, “[b]elieves the United States of America is not a racist country, and that the state of Georgia is not a racist state.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgia-board-of-education-critical-race-theory

A former staffer on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign says he kissed her without her consent outside a rally in Florida in August 2016, The Washington Post reported Monday.

“I immediately felt violated because I wasn’t expecting it or wanting it,” the staffer, Alva Johnson, told the Post. “I can still see his lips coming straight for my face.” 

The allegation is described in a federal lawsuit filed Monday in Florida, in which Johnson is seeking unspecified damages for emotional pain and suffering, according to the Post.

Trump grabbed Johnson’s hand and tried to kiss her on the lips as he exited an RV outside the Tampa rally on Aug. 24, 2016, she alleges in the lawsuit and told the Post in a series of interviews.

RELATED: Donald Trump at the Oscars through the years




Johnson told the Post she turned her head to avoid the unwanted kiss, which landed on the side of her mouth and felt “super-creepy and inappropriate.”

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders dismissed Johnson’s accusation, calling it “absurd on its face.”

“This never happened and is directly contradicted by multiple highly credible eye witness accounts,” Sanders said in a statement.

At least 21 other women have accused Trump of various instances of sexual misconduct between the early 1980s and mid-2000s. He has vehemently denied the allegations.

In the lawsuit, Johnson, who is black, also alleges that Trump’s campaign discriminated against her by paying her less than her white colleagues. Trump’s campaign has denied the accusation.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/02/25/former-donald-trump-campaign-staffer-alleges-he-kissed-her-without-consent-in-2016/23677488/

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/

On March 24, 1973, President Richard Nixon told his Attorney General John Mitchell, “I want you all to stonewall it, let them plead the Fifth Amendment, cover-up or anything else, if it’ll save it–save the plan.” That conversation, revealed in a tape during the height of Watergate, led to Mitchell’s indictment on charges of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury for his role in the cover-up of the Watergate scandal and ultimately the resignation of Nixon.

So it’s fitting that last Sunday, on the 46th anniversary of the Watergate Stonewall tape, that we learned Robert Mueller submitted his report to Attorney General William Barr. A three page letter written by Barr did little to tell the American people what the Mueller Report found. It did, however, give Donald Trump a political advantage by creating the impression that he’d been exonerated when it wasn’t true.

Just like Nixon and Mitchell, Trump and Barr are stonewalling.

‘DADDY WON,’ ALEC BALDWIN’S TRUMP BOASTS IN FIRST ‘SNL’ SINCE END OF MUELLER PROBE

After a week of giving Trump the political advantage – boosted by poor reporting and repeated claims of exoneration – a backlash followed about Barr’s stonewall attempt, not only in his three-page letter but also in his refusal to say when he would release the Mueller Report and in what form. That is why on Friday afternoon Barr resorted to damage control that will only result in more damage.

Barr announced he would make a version of the Mueller Report available by the middle of April, almost a month after Mueller submitted it to him, unredacted and with all the evidence. Specifically, a nearly 400-page report with thousands of pages of evidence that Congress and the public may never see if Barr has his way. That is unacceptable.

Congress’ responsibility is to hold the president accountable. They can’t do their job if the full Mueller Report isn’t provided. Anything less than that is the Trump-Barr Stonewall Report, not the Mueller Report.

Furthermore, Barr has no right to opine about the Mueller Report let alone revise or stonewall it. There is nothing in the regulations that govern the special counsel that permits the attorney general to do anything like it. Nothing. Yet Barr has opined three times to date, apparently now editing the Mueller Report, and taking a month to do it. The only job Barr has is to hand over the full Mueller Report, intact with the evidence, and it should have been done last Sunday.

Congress can’t do its job if the full Mueller Report isn’t provided. Anything less than that is the Trump-Barr Stonewall Report, not the Mueller Report.

Barr states he is going to redact all the grand jury testimony from the Mueller Report. That alone will result in a substantial portion of the report being redacted – and it is unnecessary.  A judge can allow the grand jury material to be made public, just as Leon Jaworski did during Watergate, and Ken Starr followed suit in the Bill Clinton investigation. They sought and received permission from federal judges to release grand jury material. Starr, furthermore, submitted his report and evidence, equally voluminous to the Mueller Report, and it was made public within 48 hours of its completion.

The fact is there is no reason to believe Barr is an honest broker, and every reason to believe he is doing Trump’s bidding. If the Mueller Report exonerated Trump, then it would have been released in its entirety last Sunday, not sometime in mid-April with redactions, omissions, and interpretations by Barr, followed by his promised Congressional testimony in May.

Barr, in fact, has a history of stonewalling and helping presidents avoid the consequences of investigations. The last time Barr served as attorney general, during the Iran-Contra investigation, the late New York Times columnist William Safire referred to him as the “Cover Up General” because he rejected calls to appoint an independent counsel that could have ensnared many members of the Reagan administration, including himself.

Barr finally relented when members of Congress considered impeaching him, and appointed Lawrence Walsh as special counsel, allowing Barr to oversee Walsh even though he was under scrutiny in the investigation. It was also reported that Barr then considered firing Walsh for “misconduct,” believing his investigation cost Bush re-election.

After the 1992 election, Barr then proceeded to help President George H.W. Bush grant pardons to six figures in the Iran-Contra case, including former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger as he was about to go on trial to face charges about lying to Congress. That action undercut the Iran-Contra investigation and Special Counsel Walsh. When the pardons were announced Walsh said, “It demonstrates that powerful people with powerful allies can commit serious crimes in high office, deliberately abusing the public trust without consequences”.

Barr’s record of stonewalling is clear. The fact that Barr was confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate based on his record is stunning. Now, it is clear that his record is the reason Barr was picked as attorney general.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The only way to know if a conspiracy or obstruction of justice has been committed by Trump is to provide the full Mueller Report to Congress and to the public. The American people deserve the truth, the full truth, and nothing but the truth. As we have learned throughout our country’s history, and especially during Watergate, you can’t stonewall the truth. Not even Trump and Barr.

And if they continue to stonewall, then Trump and Barr will face the consequences rendered by the American people and history…just like Nixon and Mitchell.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM MARY ANNE MARSH

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-and-barr-are-stonewalling-on-the-mueller-investigation-just-like-nixon-did-on-watergate

Hay trámites judiciales que van muy lentos. La Justicia suiza está cerca de desbloquear cuentas de Lázaro Báez porque la Argentina jamás le informó sobre el eventual origen delictuoso de ese dinero.

Otros trámites, en cambio, vuelan. El pasado domingo 9 en su programa televisivo Jorge Lanata denunció que la empresa Hotesur, de Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, funciona de manera irregular, adeuda impuestos y no presenta balances ante la Inspección General de Justicia. El lunes 10 la diputada Margarita Stolbizer transformó la denuncia periodística en denuncia judicial, y acusó a la Presidenta de violación de los deberes de funcionario público y abuso de autoridad. El martes 18 el fiscal Carlos Stornelli pidió abrir la investigación del caso. Ayer, jueves 19, el juez Claudio Bonadio ordenó allanar las oficinas de Hotesur, que administra los hoteles de la familia Kirchner en El Calafate. 

Son malas noticias para Cristina. Y puede haber más. Ella lo sabe.

El martes último, el mismo día que Stornelli le pidió a Bonadio iniciar la investigación sobre Hotesur, se conoció un fallo de la Justicia suiza que reveló la existencia de la cuenta secreta de una fundación de Lázaro Báez. Allí entraron 15 millones de dólares durante 2012. La cuenta y cajas de seguridad vinculadas fueron bloqueadas. El periodista Daniel Santoro publicó en exclusiva esa información, anteayer en Clarín.

No son gratas ni gratis para Cristina estas revelaciones acerca de los manejos de Lázaro Báez. El inasible jefe de la AFIP, Ricardo Echegaray, ya afirmó en público que este empresario de prosperidad vertiginosa desde que Néstor Kirchner llegó al poder mantiene “vínculos comerciales” con la Presidenta.

La desgracia de Báez, que parece una novela con final anunciado, puede terminar salpicando feo a Cristina, incluso cuando haya dejado de ser Presidenta. Véase el caso de Carlos Menem: la recordada denuncia por tráfico de armas se empezó a investigar cuando estaba en su momento cumbre, al ser reelecto en 1995. Lo llevó a unos meses de prisión domiciliaria en 2001, casi dos años después de dejar la Casa Rosada. Caprichos de la historia circular: el fiscal de aquella causa era Stornelli.

Tanto incordio quizás haya influido para que la Presidenta tuviera el martes pasado un día de aquellos. La explosión de furia y el trato destemplado que obsequió a quienes estuvieron ese día con ella asombró, incluso, a funcionarios que son parte del sistema kirchnerista desde los lejanos tiempos de la gobernación en Santa Cruz. El dato corrió con tono de alarma en la vieja pingüinera. Demasiada gente lo supo, imposible que la información pudiese quedar por completo tabicada.

Senadores oficialistas también notaron, ese día, visiblemente agitados al jefe de Gabinete, Jorge Capitanich, y al ministro Julio De Vido, cuando llegaron directo desde Olivos para defender y apurar la nueva ley de telecomunicaciones. Se ve que les dieron mucha tarea para el hogar, ironizó un funcionario del Senado que estuvo en esa reunión con los ministros.

La preocupación por ese estado de ebullición temperamental de la Presidenta podría vincularse a algún episodio similar ocurrido semanas atrás, en coincidencia temporal con la fuerte infección intestinal que obligó a su internación en el Sanatorio Otamendi el domingo 2 de este mes. Cristina pasó allí una semana, volvió a Olivos con indicación de reposo por un mínimo de 10 días. Hoy cumple 12 en esa condición y seguiría así hasta el próximo martes. El objetivo de sus médicos era aliviarle el estrés. No se sabe aún si lo han logrado.

Dos allegados a ministros del Gabinete coincidieron ante Clarín en que antes de aquel episodio de fuerte compromiso emocional a fines del mes pasado, la Presidenta habría recibido un informe sobre el progreso de los fondos buitre en su investigación sobre las cuentas de Lázaro Báez en el exterior, las decenas de empresas fantasma que se le atribuyen y la hipotética aparición del nombre de Máximo Kirchner en esos movimientos financieros.

Esos fondos, en particular Elliott Associates, con autorización de la Justicia de los Estados Unidos están rastreando fondos argentinos en el mundo para embargarlos. Reclaman el pago por el juicio que le ganaron al país en Nueva York. Buscan en EE.UU., en Europa y en paraísos fiscales.

Husmear y descubrir fondos presuntamente originados en actos de corrupción, y extorsionar con esos datos al presidente renuente a hacer el pago, fue un mecanismo que les dio excelentes resultados para cobrarle a Dennis Sassou-Ngueso, mandatario de Congo, en 2008 y después de diez años de paciente tarea.

Luego de persuadir a Sassou-Ngueso de la conveniencia de pagar lo que el Congo les debía, los fondos buitre perdieron todo interés en esas cuentas. No es transparencia lo que esos fondos persiguen, todo lo contrario. Pero resulta que acá hay mucha gente decidida a hacer lo necesario para que esos datos obtenidos y esas pesquisas no queden en el olvido.

Los diputados Graciela Ocaña, Manuel Garrido y Margarita Stolbizer están impulsando causas judiciales dentro y fuera del país. Sectores de poder que tienen cuentas pendientes con Cristina y el kirchnerismo podrían sumar recursos y fuentes propias a las investigaciones en curso, accediendo a información muy calificada. 

Y además están los jueces y fiscales que ahora asoman decididos a avanzar sobre los casos de corrupción que antes sectores de la Justicia enviaban rápido al archivo sin comprometerse ni arriesgarse.

No se trata de una valentía recién nacida: esto sucede cuando falta un año para que Cristina deje el poder y el temor a sus operaciones punitivas ha disminuido. 

El contexto también juega. Una porción mayoritaria del Poder Judicial se siente agredida por el kirchnerismo. La llamada “democratización de la Justicia”, frustrada en la Corte Suprema, fue un punto culminante de la ofensiva de la Casa Rosada para poner a los tribunales bajo control político. 

Hoy se buscan resultados parecidos por caminos diferentes. La reforma del Código Procesal Penal apunta a quitarle a los jueces la capacidad de investigar y dejar ese asunto en manos de los fiscales. Pero a la vez pone a los que hoy tienen esa tarea bajo riesgo de congelamiento, al crear una parva de fiscalías especiales, con personal nuevo y recursos propios, que en los tribunales ya definen como la “fuerza de tareas” de la procuradora Alejandra Gils Carbó. Se trata así de levantar una barrera de protección judicial para la retirada kirchnerista.

Todo esto configura una pulseada sorda y violenta en pleno desarrollo.

Bonadio, el juez que ayer allanó la empresa hotelera de Cristina, ya procesó al vicepresidente Amado Boudou por falsear papeles de un automóvil para escabullirlo de la separación de bienes en su divorcio.

Ariel Lijo es el juez que primero procesó a Boudou, por el escándalo de corrupción en el caso Ciccone. También lo investiga por enriquecimiento ilícito.

La jueza María Servini de Cubría ordenó allanar la AFA en agosto y esta semana la sede de 25 clubes, buscando la ruta de más de 5.000 millones de pesos del programa Fútbol para Todos. Parte de ese dinero habría sido desviado. En la causa están imputados Capitanich y sus dos antecesores en la Jefatura de Gabinete: Juan Manuel Abal Medina y Aníbal Fernández.

Estos y otros magistrados federales quizás hayan descubierto cuán coincidentes eran sus preocupaciones y desvelos durante un simpático asado de camaradería realizado algún tiempo atrás.

La Presidenta, como todo líder político, seguro está preocupada por cómo la va a tratar la Historia después que deje el poder. Ahora quizás también se preocupe por cómo la va a tratar la Justicia. 

Source Article from http://www.clarin.com/opinion/malas-noticias-puede_0_1252674840.html

  • By:
    Kelcie Willis, Cox Media Group National Content Desk

    Updated: Apr 11, 2019 – 12:00 PM

“);
}
if ($(imageDivId).length == 0) {
$(“#wrapper”).after(contentText);
}
})(jQuery);


OPELOUSAS, La.

An arrest has been made in connection with three fires at historically black churches in a Louisiana parish, according to U.S. Attorney David C. Joseph.

At a news conference Thursday morning, Louisiana State Fire Marshal H. “Butch” Browning Jr. said 21-year-old Holden Matthews had been arrested. He was booked into the St. Landry Parish Jail and charged with three counts of simple arson on religious buildings. Each charge has a maximum sentence of 15 years. The three fires are related and were intentionally set, Browning said.

Federal authorities are vetting whether hate was a motive of Holden Matthews, who is white. 

KATC reported that Holden Matthews is the son of Roy Matthews, a St. Landry Parish deputy. St. Landry Parish Sheriff Bobby Guidroz told KATC that Roy Matthews father did not turn his son in, despite earlier reports. Guidroz said the father was “shocked and hurt when we told him.”

>> Read more trending news 

“A suspect has been identified in connection with the three church burnings in Opelousas, Louisiana, and is in state custody,” Joseph said in a statement Wednesday. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office, ATF, and FBI are working with state and local law enforcement and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the victims and those St. Landry Parish residents affected by these despicable acts. A special thanks to St. Landry Parish Sheriff Bobby Guidroz, Louisiana State Fire Marshal, H. ‘Butch’ Browning Jr., Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry’s Cybercrime Unit, the Louisiana State Police, and the Florida State Fire Marshal for working seamlessly with federal law enforcement agents in this investigation.”

On March 26, a fire was started at St. Mary Baptist Church in Port Barre, Louisiana. On April 2, there was a fire at Greater Union Baptist Church followed by one at Mount Pleasant Baptist Church on April 4. Each church is more than 100 years old.

In this April 4, 2019 file photo, firefighters and fire investigators respond to a fire at Mt. Pleasant Baptist Church, in Opelousas, La.
Leslie Westbrook/AP

The Associated Press reported that the churches were empty at the time of the fires and there were no injuries. Authorities are working to determine if the fires were intentionally set and motivated by racism or extremism, NBC News reported. In the 1960s, during the height of the civil rights movement, church fires were routinely used to intimidate the black community.

A GoFundMe page has been set up to raise funds for the rebuilding of the three churches. It has a goal of $1.8 million.

Authorities said there was a fourth fire at a predominately white church in another parish, but it doesn’t appear to be connected to the three fires, according to NBC News.

Source Article from https://www.wpxi.com/news/trending-now/son-of-parish-deputy-arrested-in-connection-with-fires-at-3-louisiana-historically-black-churches/939137587

Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies are dragging Donald Trump center stage in their fight against the Republican-led campaign to recall the governor, banking on the overwhelming distaste Californians hold for the former president to sink the effort.

But recall supporters want the spotlight to stay trained on Newsom’s actions in office, including his response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and are trying to send a message to the mercurial former president: Please stay out of our campaign.

“I think the less he’s involved in the recall, the better it will be for the recall,” said Dave Gilliard, a veteran Republican consultant who is working on the campaign and helped place the successful 2003 recall of Democratic Gov. Gray Davis on the ballot. “The recall has to be about Gavin Newsom for it to be a success.”

Trump remains extraordinarily unpopular in California — he captured just 34% of the state’s votes in the November election. And that was two months before radicalized Trump supporters rioted at the U.S. Capitol to stop Congress from certifying the outcome of the presidential election, leading to Trump’s second impeachment in the House of Representatives.

Newsom’s Democratic allies have heralded the recall’s support among far-right Trump supporters, including QAnon conspiracy theorists.

Loyalists to the governor are trying to yoke the Republicans behind the recall effort to Trump’s term in the White House, which saw policies targeting immigrants in the country illegally, led to two impeachments, polarized the nation and ended with a half-million Americans dying of COVID-19.

Gov. Gavin Newsom had refused to comment on recall efforts, saying his focus was on reducing coronavirus spread and ensuring Californians were vaccinated.

In January, Rusty Hicks, chairman of the California Democratic Party, described the campaign to recall Newsom as a “coup,” akin to the violent pro-Trump insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. LGBTQ rights advocates recently criticized the recall campaign as a backdoor power grab “led and funded by anti-LGBTQ+ and pro-Trump extremists.” Rep. Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles) on Monday called it a “Republican plot right out of Trump’s playbook.”

Newsom on Monday for the first time directly attacked the effort to oust him from office, labeling the campaign a “Republican recall” led by Trump supporters.

“Let’s call it what it is: it’s a partisan, Republican recall — backed by the RNC, anti-mask and anti-vax extremists, and pro-Trump forces who want to overturn the last election and have opposed much of what we have done to fight the pandemic,” Newsom said in an email sent by his campaign. “If they are successful, it would mean risking the progress we are making to end the pandemic. We can’t let that happen.”

Kimberly Nalder, a political scientist at Cal State Sacramento, expects the attacks on Trump to be effective in California.

“The strategy of tying the signature gathering and any subsequent candidate to Trump — especially to the extremist groups that were associated with the Jan. 6 attacks — is smart,” Nalder said. “He’s pretty toxic. That association is pretty radioactive.”

But Gilliard thinks that tactic will fall flat.

“I think it’s a high hill for them to climb,” he said. “He’s not on the ballot, so I think it’s going to be stretch.”

If the recall campaign’s results hold steady from last month — when state officials reported that almost 84% of the initial signatures were valid — there would be more than enough signatures for an election that could oust Newsom.

More Coverage

Gilliard and other recall supporters dismissed Newsom’s attempt to cast the recall as a Republican effort to short-circuit the governor’s victory in the 2018 election. He said the campaign has received thousands of signatures from independents and Democrats who believe Newsom’s response to the pandemic was ineffective and heavy-handed. While nearly two-thirds of the recall petition signatures his organization has collected are from Republicans, close to a quarter are from independents, he said.

“It is important for Republicans to not play Gavin Newsom’s game, and that is his attempt to turn the recall effort into something that is about Washington, D.C., and the past instead of a referendum on what type of leadership you want to have here in California,” said Ron Nehring, a former chairman of the California Republican Party who unsuccessfully challenged Newsom in the 2014 race for lieutenant governor.

A poll by UC Berkeley’s Institute of Government Studies released in early February offered some insight into how Californians feel about the political futures of Newsom and Trump. Among those surveyed, 36% said they would vote to recall Newsom, while 45% would vote to keep him in office. A poll released Monday by Nexstar Media Group television stations and Emerson College had similar results. Nearly two-thirds of California voters favored having the Senate convict Trump after his impeachment, which would have barred him from holding public office, while 32% opposed it. The Senate acquitted Trump last month.

GOP political consultant Rob Stutzman, who was Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger’s communications director during the 2003 recall and during his first years in office, expressed doubt that Trump would insert himself into the effort to oust Newsom. Not only did Trump lose to President Biden in November, but during his years in the White House, Republicans lost majorities in both the House and Senate to Democrats.

“I don’t know he’s anxious to put another loss on the board,” Stutzman said. “I think there’s actually a pretty good disincentive for Trump to get involved. He might endorse one of the Republicans but I think it would be a light touch because he’s not going to help anything succeed.”

Supporters of an effort to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom are poised to put the matter on the ballot. Here are the details.

Trump’s absence from the White House and his exile from Twitter, his bullhorn of choice, might be the best news recall supporters could hope for, he said.

“It shouldn’t be lost on people that Newsom’s and other Democratic governors’ popularity began to sink as soon as Trump left office,” Stutzman said. “The comparison frame of Democrats-versus-Trump really benefits Democrats in holding their base together, as well as a majority of independents. So Trump getting involved would be very good news for Newsom.”

The recall effort, which now appears to have gathered enough voter signatures to qualify for the ballot by year’s end, was initially fueled by animosity California’s conservative minority has voiced toward Newsom and his progressive agenda, virulence that is concentrated among the most devoted Trump supporters.

The recall petition itself focuses on longstanding GOP grievances: It blames Newsom for California’s high taxes and homelessness crisis, and criticizes him for protecting immigrants who entered the county illegally and halting death row executions. The petition was filed in late February last year, before the enormity of the coronavirus crisis was known.

Gavin Newsom has faced a backlash against COVID closures and their effects on the economy, fueling a recall effort led by Republican activists.

“It’s full of this sort of classic Trumpian language,” said Dan Newman, the governor’s political strategist, who said the petition contained “anti-California extremist rhetoric that comes from Trump.”

Regardless of whether Trump decides to actively support the recall effort, Newsom’s supporters can be expected to do their best to ensure that the Republican president is tied to it in the minds of voters. This week, Newman accused the Republicans who hope to replace Newsom of “crawling all over each other to be as close to Trump as possible.”

Despite Newsom allies casting a Trump endorsement as something akin to a scarlet “T” in deep-blue California, a narrow path exists for a Trump-backed candidate to emerge victorious. If Newsom is recalled, the candidate on the ballot who receives the most votes wins — no matter how many votes he or she receives.

A ballot with crowded field of candidates could potentially splinter the electorate, especially if some high-profile Democrats decide to jump in. Though it’s a long shot, a Republican who reels in just 34% of the vote — what Trump received in November — could become California’s 41st governor.

That would require a Trump-endorsed candidate to attempt to earn the support of every Californian who voted for the former president, an extremely difficult task if there are several GOP choices on the ballot.

A candidate who can attract both right-leaning and left-leaning moderate voters could have a better chance of cobbling together enough support for a victory — and the vast majority of self-described moderates in California have a sour opinion of Trump, according to the Berkeley poll released in February.

Some of the Republican candidates hoping to replace Newsom have been open about their support for Trump and his policies.

Rancho Santa Fe businessman John Cox, who lost to Newsom in a landslide in the 2018 general election, was endorsed by Trump in that race, giving him a boost with GOP voters in the June primary — he finished second to Newsom and, under the state’s top-two primary rules, advanced to November. Cox applauded Trump’s economic policies during his frequent appearances on Fox News and defended Trump’s actions during the president’s first impeachment trial.

President Trump endorsed Republican John Cox for California governor on Friday, backing that could help Cox consolidate the GOP vote in the June primary and increase his chances to win a spot on the November ballot.

Richard Grenell, a former Trump Cabinet member who alleged voter fraud in the November election alongside other supporters without providing proof, has been a vociferous critic of Newsom and last month hinted at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Florida that he might run to replace him.

“In my three decades in American politics, I have never seen a better case for a recall than there is right now in California,” said Grenell, who served as Trump’s ambassador to Germany and later as the acting director of national intelligence. “And of course, if a public official is still failing to deliver on their promises and you can’t limit their term, or recall them in time, there’s always another option: You can run against them yourself.”

Afterward, Grenell stopped by Trump‘s Mar-a-Lago resort to have dinner with the former president, an occasion he memorialized on Instagram.

Former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer kept Trump at arm’s length while in office, rejecting the former president’s hard-line immigration policy — including opposing construction of a massive wall at the U.S.-Mexico border — and he’s been more supportive of foreign trade and environmental protections.

Still, Faulconer said he voted for Trump in the November election, and he visited him in the White House in 2019, posing for pictures to celebrate the passage of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

Faulconer personifies the peril for Republicans when it comes to embracing Trump, who attracts fierce loyalty from his supporters but is anathema to California’s Democratic voter majority.

When asked by a Newsweek reporter whether he wanted Trump’s endorsement, Faulconer sidestepped the question, drawing a rebuke from the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr. — via Twitter, of course.

“I think it’s safe to say if he won’t say that he wants it that he likely doesn’t deserve it,” Trump Jr. wrote.

Times staff writers John Myers and Seema Mehta contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-03-16/gavin-newsom-recall-election-trump-covid-19-campaigns-republicans-democrats








Habrá referendo el domingo próximo



Mientras sigue el corralito en Grecia, confirman que el gobierno no pagará al FMI










Grecia no realizará un pago de 1.600 millones de euros que vence este martes por créditos del Fondo Monetario Internacional, dijo a Reuters un funcionario del Gobierno en Atenas, poniendo de relieve la profundidad de la crisis financiera que enfrenta el país, que al inicio de la semana vivió su primer día de corralito bancario.

Los ministros han dicho reiteradamente que Grecia no tendría los fondos para pagar al FMI, a menos que se alcance un acuerdo con los acreedores para desbloquear 7.200 millones de euros de congelados durante la negociación de ambas partes por las condiciones que se exigían a Atenas para obtener ayuda.

Las conversaciones se rompieron el fin de semana, generando la imposición de controles de capitales a los bancos griegos.

La directora gerente del FMI, Christine Lagarde, había dicho este mes que Grecia caería en incumplimiento el 1 de julio si no pagaba, pero un portavoz del FMI dijo la semana pasada que la falta de un pago calificaría a Grecia “en atraso”.

El incumplimiento del pago llevaría a Grecia más cerca de una salida de la zona del euro si provoca que el Banco Central Europeo corte la financiación de emergencia de la que dependen los bancos griegos. Sin embargo, se espera que el BCE mantenga la ayuda al menos por esta semana y hay analistas que dicen que Grecia podría incumplir su deuda y seguir en el euro.

Pese al golpe de un incumplimiento de pagos de un país de la zona euro, el destino de Grecia permanecería sin cambios hasta un referendo del 5 de julio sobre los términos de un rescate presentado por los acreedores del país.

Políticos de la zona euro han advertido a los griegos de que un triunfo del “no” al paquete de ayuda sería equivalente a un rechazo de involucrarse con los acreedores que apunta hacia su salida de la zona del euro.

El domingo el Gobierno griego informó de que los bancos permanecerán cerrados durante seis días (este lunes se aclaró que se podrán pagar jubilaciones) y el límite de retirada de efectivo será de sesenta euros, después que el primer ministro, Alexis Tsipras, haya anunciado la aplicación de un control de capitales a partir del lunes.

Según el decreto oficial, publicado tras una reunión maratoniana del consejo de ministros, las entidades bancarias griegas cerrarán hasta el 6 de julio, aunque este periodo podría acortarse o extenderse por decisión del Ministerio de Finanzas.

El primer ministro Alexis Tsipras había anunciado feriado bancario y controles de capitales en Grecia para este lunes, después de que los griegos respondieran a su sorpresivo llamado a un referendo sobre los términos del rescate del país con retiros de depósitos bancarios.

Tsipras culpó a los socios europeos de Grecia y al Banco Central Europeo por forzar a Grecia a tomar estas medidas, pero dijo que eso no detendría el plan de sostener un referendo el próximo domingo.

El rechazo “del pedido del gobierno griego para una breve extensión del programa fue un acto sin precedentes para los estándares europeos, cuestionando el derecho de un pueblo soberano a decidir”, dijo Tsipras en un mensaje televisado a la nación.

“Esta decisión llevó al BCE hoy a limitar la liquidez disponible para los bancos griegos y forzó al banco central griego a recomendar un feriado bancario y restricciones sobre retiros de los bancos”, indicó.

Sin embargo, el Consejo de Estabilidad Financiera griego había recomendado mantener cerrados los cajeros automáticos el lunes y limitar los retiros a 60 euros por día una vez que reabran el martes. 

El límite recomendado se aplicará a los tenedores de tarjetas bancarias griegas.

Los tenedores de tarjetas extranjeras tendrán permitido retirar el límite máximo fijado por sus bancos, dijo la fuente el domingo.

Para que los controles de capitales entren en vigencia, deben ser aprobados por el gabinete griego y luego promulgarse con un decreto presidencial.

“El consejo recomendó un feriado bancario de seis días hábiles hasta el lunes por la noche de la próxima semana. Los cajeros automáticos no operarán mañana, volverán a abrir el martes”, dijeron fuentes griegas.






























Source Article from http://www.ambito.com/noticia.asp?id=796690

Image copyright
afp

Image caption

El ranking se basa en la canasta básica británica, que incluye carne, leche, arroz, pastas, papas, lechuga, tomates y frutas, presentes en la mayoría de los países.

¿Cuánto cuesta una canasta básica de alimentos? ¿Cuánto necesitamos del salario medio para cubrir estos productos esenciales?

La consultora inglesa MoveHub, especializada en cuantificar los gastos de británicos que buscan vivir fuera del Reino Unido, ha elaborado un ranking de países a partir del gasto semanal que una familia de cuatro personas debe realizar para acceder a la canasta básica británica.

El listado se basa en el porcentaje del salario promedio que necesita una familia en cada país para adquirir estos productos.

En todo el mundo, Uganda encabeza la tabla de los 122 países analizados.

Un ugandés tiene que invertir un 275,86 % del salario medio nacional, es decir casi tres veces su valor, para hacerse con esta canasta básica.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Uganda es el país con la canasta básica más cara del mundo, según el ranking.

En cambio, en la mayoría de los países desarrollados el porcentaje se sitúa por debajo del 10%.

En América Latina, los hondureños son los que más tienen que poner de su bolsillo (100,05%), seguidos por Bolivia (62,95%), El Salvador (49,98%) y Republica Dominicana (34,8%).

Alexandra Yanik del equipo investigador de Move Hub explicó a BBC Mundo cómo efectuaron el cálculo.

“Dado que no es posible encontrar una canasta básica universal debido a las diferencias idiosincráticas de las canastas nacionales, identificamos productos que se encuentran en las canastas de todos los países.

La canasta básica británica incluye carne, leche, arroz, pastas, papas, lechuga, tomates y frutas, presentes en la mayoría de los países. Usando este parámetro la mayoría de las naciones de América Latina sale bien parada respecto a Asia y Africa”, señaló Yanik.

En el puesto 50, Panamá es el país de América Latina en el que el salario medio rinde más a la hora de acceder a los productos de la canasta básica (Ver recuadro).

Uruguay, Venezuela, Chile, Argentina, México y Cuba le siguen en ese orden: requieren entre el 10 y el 20% del salario medio.

Canasta básica y pobreza

El acceso a la canasta básica es uno de los criterios primarios para definir la pobreza.

Si bien la medición de MoveHub está construida en base a la canasta básica británica, los resultados de su ranking coinciden a grandes rasgos con la estimación de pobreza de la CEPAL en 2015.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

El Salvador, uno de los países más pobres de América Latina, también figura en el ranking.

En uno y otro Honduras aparece en el último lugar.

Guatemala y Nicaragua no fueron medidos por MoveHub, pero países como Bolivia y El Salvador se encuentran entre los más pobres y también entre los que más cuesta una canasta básica.

Según Darío Rossignolo economista de la Universidad de Buenos Aires y consultor internacional en políticas fiscales, este índice tiene limitaciones, pero puede dar una idea general no ponderada para una comparación.

“Si bien los productos de la canasta británica son parecidos a los de otras canastas, se precisaría una ponderación mayor de una serie de factores. Es decir, un producto puede tener una mayor incidencia en la canasta británica por una cuestión cultural o de estructura monetaria o de valorización de la moneda. Dicho esto, está claro que el factor salarial de la comparación es fundamental”, señaló a BBC Mundo.

Honduras

En el lugar 112 del ranking -entre 122 países- Honduras le sigue a países como Bangladesh, Tanzania, Nepal y Kenia.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

En Honduras, el precio de la canasta básica supera al salario mínimo.

Este país está por encima incluso de los atribulados Territorios Palestinos

Según las encuestas, el desempleo, el alto costo de la vida y los bajos salarios son las principales preocupaciones de los hondureños.

Un sondeo en enero del Equipo de Reflexión, Investigación y Comunicación (ERIC-SJ) de Honduras reveló que para la mayoría de la población la crisis económica es un factor que supera a la violencia para causa de la alta tasa anual de emigración.

En enero de 2015, a un año de la asunción del presidente Juan Orlando Hernández, una encuesta de la misma empresa halló que el “40% de la población señala la crisis económica, incluyendo desempleo y pobreza, como uno de los principales fracasos durante el primer año de gestión”.

El descontento persiste a pesar del relativo éxito del plan antiinflacionario que permitió disminuír el alza de los precios de casi 8% en 2014 a un 3,1% en enero de este año.

Image caption

Los hondureños señalan que la pobreza es uno de los fracasos de su presidente, Juan Orlando Hernández.

“En el caso de Honduras, los datos de nuestra medición indican que el bajo nivel de ingresos convierte a la canasta básica en mucho más cara que en otros países vecinos”, señala Yanik de MoveHub.

Las organizaciones defensoras de los consumidores calculan que para una familia promedio de cinco personas, la canasta básica supera las 13 mil lempiras (unos US$ 615 dolares) mientras que el salario minimo promedio ronda unas 8,400 lempiras (alrededor de US$ 351).

Panamá

En el puesto 50 a nivel mundial Panamá es el país con mayor acceso a la canasta básica y el tercero de toda América, solo superado por Canadá (9,07%) y Estados Unidos (7,04%).

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Pese a que Panamá es el país de América Latina con mayor acceso a la canasta básica, el 25% de su población no tiene servicios sanitarios.

Con un crecimiento promedio anual de más del 7% en los últimos 10 años, Panamá tiene un PIB per capita de US $13.519, uno de los más altos de la región.

En el ranking de MoveHub se necesita el 16,45% del salario medio en Panamá para acceder a la canasta básica familiar.

Pero la realidad es mucho más compleja que la discreta ponderación que pueden ofrecer datos como el PIB per cápita.

Un 25% de la población panameña no tiene servicios sanitarios, un 5% no tiene agua potable, un 11% sufre de desnutrición, un 19% no se alimenta adecuadamente y otro 11% vive en casas con pisos de tierra.

Uruguay

El segundo país regional en la medición, Uruguay, tiene una estructura social menos desequilibrada, pero enfrenta sus propios problemas.

Con un 17,87% del salario promedio para acceder a la canasta básica, Uruguay se sitúa un paso por delante de Japón (17,99%) en el ranking global.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Uruguay es el segundo país con mejor acceso a la canasta básica, pero enfrenta una inflación de 8,5%.

Con apenas diferencias de decimales se encuentran Argelia, Polonia, y Puerto Rico.

Pero esta posición puede deteriorarse si continúan ciertas tendencias presentes en 2015.

En enero del año pasado la inflación estuvo a centímetros del 10% luego de un fuerte aumento de las tarifas públicas.

Este enero, el banco BBVA modificó a la baja las perspectivas de crecimiento (un 1,5%) mientras que situó la inflación en un 8,5%.

Con recesión en sus principales socios, Argentina y Brasil, las perspectivas no son alentadoras.

Es el caso de toda la región que, según la CEPAL, solo crecerá un 0,2% de promedio este año.

En este contexto el consejo de MoveHub es más sentido común que pericia técnica.

“Hay que cortar el consumo de los productos más caros. En muchos países estos suelen ser la carne y los productos lácteos”, señaló Yanik.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/02/160224_america_latina_canasta_basica_cara_ppb




From nearly the moment they roared down the runway and took off in their new Boeing jetliner, pilots of an Ethiopian Airlines flight encountered problems with the plane.

Almost immediately, a device called a stick shaker began vibrating the captain’s control column, warning him that the plane might be about to stall and fall from the sky.

For six minutes, the pilots were bombarded by alarms as they fought to fly the plane, at times pulling back in unison on their control columns in a desperate attempt to keep the huge jet aloft.

Ethiopian authorities issued a preliminary report Thursday on the March 10 crash that killed 157 people. They found that a malfunctioning sensor sent faulty data to the Boeing 737 Max 8’s anti-stall system and triggered a chain of events that ended in a crash so violent it reduced the plane to shards and pieces. The pilots’ struggle, and the tragic ending, mirrored an Oct. 29 crash of a Lion Air Max 8 off the coast of Indonesia, which killed 189 people.

The anti-stall system, called MCAS, automatically lowers the plane’s nose under some circumstances to prevent an aerodynamic stall. Boeing acknowledged that a sensor in the Ethiopian Airlines jet malfunctioned, triggering MCAS when it was not needed. The company repeated that it is working on a software upgrade to fix the problem in its best-selling plane.

‘‘It’s our responsibility to eliminate this risk,’’ CEO Dennis Muilenburg said in a video. ‘‘We own it, and we know how to do it.’’

Jim Hall, a former chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, said the preliminary findings add urgency to re-examine the way that the Federal Aviation Administration uses employees of aircraft manufacturers to conduct safety-related tasks, including tests and inspections — a decades-old policy that raises questions about the agency’s independence and is now under review by the U.S. Justice Department, the Transportation Department’s inspector general and congressional committees.

‘‘It is clear now that the process itself failed to produce a safe aircraft,’’ Hall said. ‘‘The focus now is to see if there were steps that were skipped or tests that were not properly done.’’

The 33-page preliminary report, which is subject to change in the coming months, is based on information from the plane’s flight data and cockpit voice recorders, the so-called black boxes. It includes a minute-by-minute narrative of a gripping and confusing scene in the cockpit.

Just one minute into Flight 302 from Addis Ababa to Nairobi in neighboring Kenya, the captain, Yared Getachew, reported that they were having flight-control problems.

Then the anti-stall system kicked in and pushed the nose of the plane down for nine seconds. Instead of climbing, the plane descended slightly. Audible warnings — ‘‘Don’t Sink’’ — sounded in the cockpit. The pilots fought to turn the nose of the plane up, and briefly they were able to resume climbing.

But the automatic anti-stall system pushed the nose down again, triggering more squawks of ‘‘Don’t Sink’’ from the plane’s ground-proximity warning system.

Following a procedure that Boeing reiterated after the Lion Air crash, the Ethiopian pilots flipped two switches and disconnected the anti-stall system, then tried to regain control. They asked to return to the Addis Ababa airport, but were continuing to struggle getting the plane to gain altitude.

Then they broke with Boeing procedure and returned power to controls including the anti-stall system, perhaps hoping to use power to adjust a tail surface that controls the pitch up or down of a plane, or maybe out of sheer desperation.

One final time, the automated system kicked in, pushing the plane into a nose dive, according to the report.

A half-minute later, the cockpit voice recording ended, the plane crashed, and all 157 people on board were killed. The plane’s impact left a crater 10 meters deep.

The Max is Boeing’s newest version of its workhorse single-aisle jetliner, the 737, which dates to the 1960s. Fewer than 400 Max jets have been sent to airlines around the world, but Boeing has taken orders for 4,600 more.

Boeing delivered this particular plane, tail number ET-AVJ, to Ethiopian Airlines in November. By the day of Flight 302, it had made nearly 400 flights and been in the air for 1,330 hours — still very new by airline standards.

The pilots were young, too, and between them they had a scant 159 hours of flying time on the Max.

The captain, Getachew, was just 29 but had accumulated more than 8,000 hours of flying since completing work at the airline’s training academy in 2010. He had flown more than 1,400 hours on Boeing 737s but just 103 hours on the Max. That may not be surprising, given that Ethiopian Airlines had just five of the planes, including ET-AVJ.

The co-pilot, Ahmed Nur Mohammod Nur, was only 25 and was granted a license to fly the 737 and the Max on Dec. 12 of last year. He had logged just 361 flight hours — not enough to be hired as a pilot at a U.S. airline. Of those hours, 207 were on 737s, including 56 hours on Max jets.

Thursday’s preliminary report found that both pilots performed all the procedures recommended by Boeing on the March 10 flight but still could not control the jet.

While Boeing continues to work on its software update, Max jets remain grounded worldwide. The CEO said the company is taking ‘‘a comprehensive, disciplined approach’’ to fixing the flight-control software.

But some critics, including Hall, the former NTSB chairman, question why the work has taken so long.

‘‘Don’t you think if Boeing knew what the fix was, we would have the fix by now?’’ he said. ‘‘They said after the Lion Air accident there was going to be a fix, yet there was a second accident with no fix. Now, in response to the worldwide reaction, the plane is grounded and there is still not a fix.’’



Source Article from https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/2019/04/05/gone-minutes-ethiopian-airlines-jet-final-journey/Qg9CzEjBRuBEaCRl6ZVCzI/story.html

Well, a short walk certainly ramped up the chatter and speculation, so to speak.

Social media was abuzz about a 25 second video of President Donald Trump descending a ramp after he gave a speech at the West Point Commencement at West Point, New York. He didn’t exactly go down the ramp Gangnam style. Instead, he walked down the ramp fairly carefully. That led to lots of speculation about Trump’s health on social media, because that’s what the Twittersphere, the Facebook-o-sphere, and other social media spheres do.

Trump then responded to this speculation on Twitter, because that’s what Trump does:

This spawned the creation of the hashtag #RampGate. So if you noticed that #RampGate was trending on Twitter this weekend, don’t think, “oh no, what did ramps do now?” Ramps are still cool. The hashtag wasn’t the result of some recent ramp-based policy decision either:

Instead, the hashtag accompanied a number of tweets postulating whether Trump’s ramp walk was a sign of some larger health issue or cognitive decline as this tweet indicated:

By the way, that’s not really Scott Pelley or Trump, and “cognitive incline” is not a real medical term. Some of the tweets also compared Trump’s walk with President Barrack Obama’s ramp romp while he was President:

And raised what Trump had tweeted in 2014:

There was certainly no shortage of opinions. Why go to a doctor then when you can just post a 25-second video of yourself and be diagnosed on Twitter by strangers?

Umm, it’s because you can’t tell much from a video like that. In general, a 25 second video doesn’t tend to reveal a whole lot about a person’s health, unless something very obvious happens. It would be one thing if a video were to show someone getting knocked over by a walrus. Then you could reasonably guess that any immediate subsequent injuries could have been walrus-induced. This would especially true if you noticed something new post-walrus that wasn’t around pre-walrus.

Otherwise, there’s only so much that you can garner by watching a person’s gait from afar. That’s not just afar, but afar on a video. That’s afar, on a video, on the Internet. That’s afar, on a video, on the Internet, while you are in a chair or maybe even on the toilet.

Typically, diagnosing most medical conditions requires actually interviewing the person, knowing the person’s real medical history, completing an appropriate physical exam, and possibly running some tests. By contrast, the video clip offered only a brief view of the President walking down one specific ramp, at one specific time, under one set of specific circumstances without offering much more. So it’s not very fair to come up with any specific diagnoses.

Lots of different things could be going on when someone appears to be moving down a ramp a bit more slowly. Sure, more serious conditions such as strokes, brain hemorrhages, breathing problems, heart disease, movement disorders, or other neurological issues can affect your ability to walk. Sure, cognitive decline could make it more difficult for you to navigate. But nothing in the video really offered compelling support for any of these diagnoses.

In fact, there are lots of much less serious possible explanations for what you saw in the video. Here are just 10 of them:

1. The ramp could have been slippery.

Some on Twitter argued that the ramp was not very long. But length can be a very subjective thing. A person may claim that something is long while others may disagree and argue that the person is exaggerating. In the end, length is not the only thing that matters. There are other factors such as its angle and its slipperiness. (We are still talking about ramps aren’t we?) Plus, what’s not slippery for one person may be slippery for another. Even if the ramp were not made out of slippery material, parts of it could have been a bit slick. For example, what if someone had previously rolled a medicine ball covered in Vaseline down the ramp?

2. His shoes could have been slippery.

Most people probably don’t buy special shoes for ramps. Nonetheless, not all shoes are ideal for all surfaces, especially if your shoes are still new. Also, a variety of things can make shoes much more slippery such as rain water, shoe polish, or baby oil dripping from your body.

3. He could have stepped in dog poop or gum.

Have you ever tried to remove something from your shoes by dragging your feet along the ground? No, it’s not the coolest thing to do to leave a trail of dog poop on a ramp. But it happens.

4. He could have been deep in thought.

Hey, some people are just really thoughtful. Who knows what kind of thoughts may be swirling in your head after you’ve made a big speech such as “boy, I gave such as great speech,” or “they love me, they really love me” or “ disinfectants and injection, injection and disinfectants, hey, how about injecting disinfectants,” or something else. In turn, it’s not uncommon to amble more slowly when you’ve got deep thoughts brewing.

5. He could have had an injury to his lower extremities or some other musculoskeletal issue from an accident, Parkour, or something else.

Certainly an injury or some pain in your feet, legs, knees, or hips can make you walk more gingerly, especially when going down a ramp or stairs.

6. He could have been dehydrated or otherwise feeling lightheaded.

Feeling lightheaded isn’t going to make you very light on your feet. Dehydration, nervousness, or seeing One Direction can all lead to such feelings.

7. He could have had some difficulty seeing.

The glaring sunlight could impair your vision for a bit, maybe even longer, depending on the exposure. That’s why you should avoid staring directly at the sun, even during a solar eclipse. Allergies, dust, or spray tan dripping into your eyes can also impair your sight for a bit.

8. He could have had some gastrointestinal problems.

The words “need to go number two” and “skipping down the ramp” rarely go together. A tummy ache, diarrhea, and gas can all make for a slow and more delicate descent.

9. His clothes could have been too tight or otherwise hampering his movements.

In this case, tight means not loose enough to allow freer movement, as opposed to “that’s tight, bro.” As legendary NFL quarterback Tom Brady showed recently in a golf match, sometimes it’s better to move a little more carefully:

That ended up being a split decision. Speaking of golfing and undergarments, another thing that may hamper movement is the whole wedge issue.

10. He could have been experiencing side effects from medications.

Medications such as those for high blood pressure can cause dizziness, lightheadedness, and other side effects.

This is just a sample of the possibilities. You may agree or disagree with Trump’s statements, actions, and policies. But making judgments about his health from afar is a different story. As I covered previously for Forbes, early in 2019, Sean Patrick Conley, DO, the Physician to the President, did declare that Trump was in “very good health” and “will remain so for the duration of his Presidency, and beyond.” That type of guarantee is traditionally reserved for cookware and backpacks. So who knows what his health may be like now. Nevertheless, the only people who can really tell are his doctors.

After all, it’s very difficult to rule in or out most medical conditions simply based on watching someone without doing a real history and physical. Testing may be necessary too. You certainly can’t tell much from a 25-second video on the Internet, unless, of course, something very obvious like a walrus is involved.

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/06/14/president-trump-walks-down-ramp-at-west-point-here-is-how-people-reacted/

Press Release

Savaget: passion for Arabian tales

 São Paulo – It all starts when the director of Cultural Heritage of the International Society for the Rescue of Imagination (Sirf) goes to Baghdad, in Iraq, to save Ali Baba, Sherazade, Aladdin and other characters from the Thousand and One Nights who may be in danger amidst the war in 2003. The same director then goes to Jordan, where she finds the magic lamp minus the genie, and then sets off to Palestine in an attempt to find him. The incessant conflict with Israel could only be explained by the fact that the genie landed in villainous hands.

These three phases, the director’s journey through Iraq, Jordan and Palestine, and her interaction with the characters of the most famous piece of literature from the East, form the plot of the series of three children’s books that Brazilian author Luciana Savaget wrote. The first is called “Operation Rescue in Baghdad – The Battle of the Invisible” and was published in Brazil in 2003; the second, “Operation Rescue in Jordan – The Secret of the Desert”, was launched in 2007; and the third, “Operation Rescue in Palestine – Heritage Conflict”, is from 2010.

The last two books are the result of the journeys the writer made to promote her first book in Arab lands. Apart from Portuguese, original language of the three books, “Operation Rescue in Baghdad” was also published in Arabic, which turned Savaget into an author well-known by Arab children, particularly in Palestine, as the government of that country purchased 100,000 copies for the libraries in refugee camps.

“I went to Palestine twice, once for the book launch and then again for talks with youngsters who read my books. From the first trip came the book “Operation Rescue in Jordan”, where we find Aladdin’s lamp, but not the genie. Imagine if an enemy finds this powerful genie who fulfils his master’s every desire? It could destroy the world,” says Savaget. “And on the second trip we find the genie hidden in Nablus, in the hands of the dream demolishers and enemies of our powerful Sirf association,” tells Savaget.

The writer puts herself in the role of the director of the International Society for the Rescue of Imagination, and thus transfers to her character her passion for the Arab world. “The idea [for the book] came from my passion for Arab tales and stories, which have amazing magic. These tales and the stories of the Thousand and One Nights are part of my childhood. When I wrote “Operation Rescue in Baghdad”, right at the beginning of the American attacks on the Iraqi capital city, I couldn’t have imagined other books would follow to complete the series,” stated Savaget.

According to the author, one book called out for the next. “And they also physically took me to those wonderful lands, where Sherazade spoke of ‘happily ever after in Baghdad.’” In Palestine, the operation Baghdad book was translated by Tamer Literature. In Brazil, all books were published by publishing house Nova Fronteira. “To have a book published in far and conflicted lands such as Palestine was an honor. Until now I have only had one book edited in Arabic, but who knows in the future, perhaps the other ones will be published too,” says Savaget.

The writer states she will keep on dreaming and that Sirf shall not abandon the Arab world. She feels like writing more about the East. Savaget says she felt first hand, when she visited the Arab country, the Palestine people’s difficulty in being acknowledged as a country. According to her, it is unacceptable that at this day and age there are still wars in that region, where Jesus Christ was born. “I am the Sirf director of Cultural Heritage and I fight for dreams and for peace, not only in books, but also in life,” says Savaget.

Born in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Savaget is a journalist and works for Globo News, a cable TV news channel belonging to network Rede Globo. Savaget translated to Portuguese the book “My Life With Pablo Neruda”, written by the poet’s wife, Matilde Urrutia, and has received many awards for her work in journalism and literature. Her books “Dadá, a Mulher de Corisco” (Dadá, Corisco’s Wife, loosely translated) and “Operation Rescue in Baghdad” are among her prized works. The author was also granted the Vladimir Herzog Amnesty and Human Rights Award, in 2002.

*Translated by Silvia Lindsey

Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21862009/arts/writer-published-three-childrens-books-about-the-arabs/