Most Viewed Videos

CHICAGO — Chicago Public Schools leaders could move classrooms back to remote learning in the city’s least vaccinated neighborhoods if COVID-19 cases continue to surge, the district’s CEO announced Tuesday.

The district will be evaluating cases “school by school, classroom by classroom” starting Jan. 3 when students are slated to return. CPS CEO Pedro Martinez announced the conservative approach as Mayor Lori Lightfoot said the city will require bars, restaurants, gyms and other venues to start checking patrons’ COVID-19 vaccination status that same day.

“You are gonna see us transitioning more classrooms to remote when we see [cases rise]. As a parent, I know how difficult that is for families, but we have to take that conservative approach, especially as cases are rising,” Martinez said.

Martinez called on parents to get their children vaccinated and said the district will start getting 10,000 PCR tests per week in January.

“We have to protect our staff; we have to protect our schools,” he said.

Shutting down every CPS school in the district again is not a viable option, Martinez said. There is no evidence to show the March 2020 shutdowns of schools “has done anything to counter the spread of the virus,” he said.

But there is evidence that the shutdowns had a profound impact on students that “hurt their mental health, we’ve hurt their social and emotional wellbeing and we’ve hurt their academics in ways that we’re still trying to understand today,” Martinez said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Block Club Chicago’s coronavirus coverage is free for all readers.

Subscribe to Block Club Chicago, an independent, 501(c)(3), journalist-run newsroom. Every dime we make funds reporting from Chicago’s neighborhoods.

Click here to support Block Club with a tax-deductible donation. 

Thanks for subscribing to Block Club Chicago, an independent, 501(c)(3), journalist-run newsroom. Every dime we make funds reporting from Chicago’s neighborhoods. Click here to support Block Club with a tax-deductible donation.

Source Article from https://blockclubchicago.org/2021/12/21/cps-prepared-to-switch-to-remote-learning-in-citys-least-vaccinated-areas-if-classroom-cases-spike/

The exact scope of China’s government public opinion monitoring industry is unclear, but there have been some indications about its size in Chinese state media. In 2014, the state-backed newspaper China Daily said more than 2 million people were working as public opinion analysts. In 2018, the People’s Daily, another official organ, said the government’s online opinion analysis industry was worth “tens of billions of yuan,” equivalent to billions of dollars, and was growing at a rate of 50 percent a year.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/china-harvests-masses-of-data-on-western-targets-documents-show/2021/12/31/3981ce9c-538e-11ec-8927-c396fa861a71_story.html

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

Los beneficiarios de DACA son conocidos como “dreamers”, soñadores en inglés.

El fiscal general de Estados Unidos, Jeff Sessions, anunció este martes que el gobierno de Donald Trump va a poner fin a la Acción Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA, por su sigla en inglés), un programa de Barack Obama que protegía de la deportación a miles de indocumentados.

“Estoy aquí para anunciar que el programa DACA, promulgado por la Administración de Obama, va a ser rescindido”, dijo Sessions en una comparecencia leída ante la prensa en Washington.

Sessions justificó la controvertida decisión para “terminar el irrespeto al proceso legislativo del gobierno pasado” y por considerar el decreto “un ejercicio inconstitucional de autoridad por parte del Poder Ejecutivo”.

“Todas las políticas migratorias deberían respetar a los ciudadanos estadounidenses y a los inmigrantes que están aquí de forma legal”, agregó Sessions.

DACA, orden ejecutiva firmada en octubre de 2012 por el presidente Barack Obama, protege de la deportación a más de 750.000 jóvenes indocumentados conocidos como “dreamers” (soñadores).

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

El anuncio del fin de DACA fue recibido con protestas frente a la Casa Blanca.

La orden contempla “diferir” cualquier acción sobre el estatus migratorio por un periodo de dos años, con opción a renovar, a personas que llegaron ilegalmente al país cuando eran niños.

El 78% de los beneficiarios de DACA son de nacionalidad mexicana y California es el estado del país con más inscritos en el programa.

El gobierno de México dijo en un comunicado que miles de jóvenes nacidos en su país son “potencialmente afectados por la decisión”.

“Frente a esta situación el gobierno federal (de México) tiene un imperativo moral de actuar, por la vía diplomática (…) para promover activamente antes los Poderes Ejecutivo y Legislativo de EE.UU. una pronta solución a la incertidumbre jurídica que enfrentan a partir de ahora los jóvenes DACA”.

Además de defensores de los inmigrantes, numerosos destacados líderes empresariales habían instado al presidente Trump a mantener DACA, entre ellos los jefes de Apple, Facebook y Microsoft, al argumentar el impacto negativo que tendría su supresión para la economía.

En un gesto inusual, el expresidente Barack Obama publicó un largo comunicado en redes sociales criticando la decisión del gobierno de Trump.

“Tomar como objetivo a jóvenes luchadores que crecieron aquí está mal, porque no han hecho nada malo”, escribió Obama, quien calificó la medida como cruel.

Obama explicó que la razón por la que emitió la orden ejecutiva que dio lugar al programa DACA en 2012 fue por la inoperancia del Congreso a la hora de legislar en esa materia.

Tomar como objetivo a jóvenes luchadores que crecieron aquí está mal, porque no han hecho nada malo”.

Si bien reconoció que el asunto de la inmigración es controvertido, el expresidente opinó que la decisión de Trump es política y no tiene que ver con la legalidad.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
TWITTER

Image caption

Horas antes del anuncio de Sessions, el presidente de EE.UU., Donald Trump, escribió en Twitter: “Congreso, prepárense para hacer su trabajo -¡DACA!”.

Promesa de campaña

Además de las críticas de Obama, el anuncio de Sessions fue recibido con protestas en la Torre Trump de Nueva York y frente a la Casa Blanca en Washington.

Poner fin a DACA era una de las medidas antiinmigración que había prometido el presidente Trump durante la campaña electoral.

El gobierno había recibido gran presión de sectores conservadores para que cumpla la promesa. De hecho, fiscales generales de nueve estados conservadores, encabezados por Texas, habían amenazado con interponer una demanda si no derogaba el programa.

Ya la semana pasada, la cadena conservadora Fox había anticipado que este martes el gobierno iba a anunciar el fin de DACA.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
EPA

Image caption

Sessions considera DACA inconstitucional.

Otros medios informaron que el plan del presidente Trump era dar seis meses al Congreso para que encontrara una alternativa para los cientos de miles de beneficiarios, pero Sessions no ofreció detalles.

Sí dijo Sessions que el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS, por su sigla en inglés), conducirá “un cambio ordenado” que sirva para “crear un periodo de tiempo para que el Congreso actúe, si así lo deseare”.

Horas antes del anuncio de Sessions, el presidente, Donald Trump, escribió en Twitter: “Congreso, prepárense para hacer su trabajo -¡DACA!”.

No tardó en responder el presidente de la Cámara de Representantes, el también republicano Paul Ryan, quien dijo que espera que el Congreso y el Senado puedan encontrar consenso para dar con una solución permanente para los más de 750.000 jóvenes inmigrantes que perderán los beneficios de DACA.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-41167006

President Trump lashed out at House Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings over his criticisms of the border situation.

“Rep, Elijah Cummings has been a brutal bully, shouting and screaming at the great men & women of Border Patrol about conditions at the Southern Border, when actually his Baltimore district is FAR WORSE and more dangerous. His district is considered the Worst in the USA,” Trump said in a trio of tweets Saturday morning. “As proven last week during a Congressional tour, the Border is clean, efficient & well run, just very crowded. Cumming District is a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess. If he spent more time in Baltimore, maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place.”

He added, “Why is so much money sent to the Elijah Cummings district when it is considered the worst run and most dangerous anywhere in the United States. No human being would want to live there. Where is all this money going? How much is stolen? Investigate this corrupt mess immediately!”

Cummings, who represents the Baltimore-area 7th Congressional District, has been a harsh critic of what he argues is the Trump administration’s poor treatment of migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. The House Oversight Committee chairman shouted down acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan over conditions in migrant camps during a hearing on Thursday.

Last week, Cummings also gained the authority to subpoena top White House aides for their personal email and text messages, including those of Trump’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and son-in law Jared Kushner, as part of an inquiry into whether there have been any violations of federal record-keeping laws.

A watchdog group asked the Maryland attorney general earlier this month to investigate whether Cummings and his wife used a charity for improper self-enrichment.

Trump’s criticism of Cummings’ majority-black district comes after the president engaged in a war of words with a group of four liberal minority women lawmakers who call themselves “the squad,” Democratic Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts, insisting that they “go back” to their home countries, although only Omar was born outside of the United States.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-trashes-elijah-cummings-and-his-rat-and-rodent-infested-maryland-district-over-border-criticism

WASHINGTON – Friday is shaping up to be judgment day for President Donald Trump.

The GOP-controlled Senate could wrap up the impeachment trial for Trump and acquit him, or decide to prolong the proceedings – possibly for weeks – by calling witnesses to testify. That would postpone a final vote on whether to remove him from office.

Thursday ended with the second round of questions being asked but with no certainty to how senators would vote on adding witnesses. 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY, and other GOP leaders have balked at the idea of more witnesses, notably John Bolton. In his forthcoming book, Trump’s former national security adviser writes that the president told him to withhold military aid to Ukraine until Ukraine announced political investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

Defense line:Trump lawyer Dershowitz argues president can’t be impeached for an act he thinks will help his reelection

Democrats, who control 47 of the chamber’s 100 seats, have been trying to convince at least four Republican senators to join them in demanding Bolton and other administration witnesses appear to discuss the president’s conduct regarding Ukraine.

If Democrats fail, the third impeachment of a president in U.S. history will end like the previous two.

The House on Dec. 18 impeached Trump on two articles – abuse of power and obstruction of Congress – after hearings by the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees into whether he tried to leverage the aid to Ukraine in exchange for digging up dirt on the Bidens.

The Senate trial began Jan. 21 with House Democratic lawmakers acting as prosecutors laying out the case against Trump over three days. Trump’s lawyers then began their defense of the president on Saturday and wrapped up Tuesday. As required by Senate rules, both sides – Republican and Democratic senators – were given a chance to pose follow-up questions to the Democratic House managers and Trump’s defense team on Wednesday and Thursday.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/01/31/trump-impeachment-trial-senate-could-acquit-president-friday/2856596001/

WASHINGTON – The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote Thursday on a Democratic resolution mapping out rules for public hearings in the impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump, after weeks of Republicans criticizing the inquiry for holding closed-door meetings in the basement of the Capitol.

Also on Thursday, the trio of committees investigating Trump’s dealings with Ukraine have another private deposition with a National Security Council official. Timothy Morrison, whose departure from the NSC as senior director for Europe and Russia was announced on the eve of his testimony, was described by another witness in the House impeachment inquiry as having a “sinking feeling” after learning the U.S. was withholding military aid for Ukraine while urging an investigation of Trump’s political rival former Vice President Joe Biden.

Morrison’s testimony is expected to begin in the morning. The House is expected to debate the resolution in the morning and vote on it as part of a series beginning about 10:30 a.m.

The vote will be the first of the full House under the formal impeachment inquiry and will put moderate lawmakers from both parties under scrutiny heading into the 2020 election. The resolution formalizes the public phase of the investigation with hearings and evidence-sharing with the president’s counsel, even as Republicans continue to criticize the process as a “sham.”

Mitt Romney: a solitary GOP voice battling Trump for the soul of the Republican Party

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., declared a formal impeachment inquiry Sept. 24 amid reports Trump urged Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rival, Biden, while withholding military aid. Trump has called the inquiry a partisan “witch hunt” and White House counsel Pat Cipollone notified Pelosi Oct. 8 that the administration wouldn’t cooperate for lack of a full House vote.

The resolution charts a public phase of the investigation. Six committees have been investigating Trump for a variety of reasons, including possible abuse of power and obstruction of justice: Financial Services, Foreign Affairs, Intelligence, Judiciary, Oversight and Reform, and Ways and Means.

Provisions in the resolution allow Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Rep. Devin Nunes of California, the panel’s top Republican, to each question witnesses for up to 90 minutes or delegate their time to staffers before rank-and-file lawmakers each ask questions for five minutes. Republicans on the Intelligence and Judiciary committees could subpoena witnesses and documents, and if the chairman objected, Republicans could ask for a committee vote.

The resolution: House resolution outlines public phase of impeachment inquiry, gives GOP subpoena powers

CLOSE

U.S. and Ukraine relations go further back than the now infamous phone call between Trump and Zelensky. We explain their relationship.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Intelligence Committee and other panels would provide reports to the Judiciary Committee, which would draft possible articles of impeachment. At Judiciary hearings, the president’s counsel would be able to participate by receiving evidence and staff reports, questioning witnesses, submitting additional evidence and being invited to offer a concluding presentation.

But if the administration refuses to make witnesses or documents available to the committees, Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler could deny requests from the president’s counsel to call or question witnesses.

“This is a serious moment for our nation,” said Nadler, D-N.Y.  “This committee is committed to executing its part of the House’s ongoing impeachment investigation with the highest fealty to the Constitution.”

The provisions weren’t enough to appease concerns among Republicans, who worried about the lack of additional resources for committees participating in the inquiry and that the Intelligence Committee might not pass along all the confidential evidence it has gathered to the Judiciary Committee.

“The Soviet-style process that Speaker Pelosi and Adam Schiff have been conducting behind closed doors for weeks now has been rotten to the core,” said Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the second-ranking Republican in the House.

The White House denounced the measure in a statement by press secretary Stephanie Grisham, saying the resolution continues the impeachment “scam” without allowing “any due process for the president.”

Testimony from NSC aide

The Intelligence Committee has been taking depositions for weeks about Ukraine and Morrison, who is slated to testify Thursday, was mentioned repeatedly in the House testimony Oct. 22 of Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine. Morrison is leaving the NSC soon after more than a year of service, according to a senior administration official.

Taylor described how NSC and State Department officials learned bit by bit about the back-channel efforts of Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, to pressure Ukraine into investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

Taylor said he asked Morrison during a call Aug. 22 whether U.S. policy toward Ukraine had changed. Morrison replied “it remains to be seen,” but said the “president doesn’t want to provide any assistance at all,” according to Taylor.

“That was extremely troubling to me,” said Taylor, who had warned Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that he would resign if the U.S. didn’t strongly support Ukraine.

The conversation with Morrison was sandwiched between Trump’s July 25 call to  Zelensky, when the president urged an investigation of the Bidens, and the White House release of a summary of the call Sept. 25, when Taylor learned of its details.

‘You cannot make up my life’: Hillary Clinton’s ties to impeachment inquiries against three presidents

Three key House committees – Foreign Affairs, Intelligence, and Oversight and Reform – are investigating how Trump withheld nearly $400 million in military aid during the summer while also urging Zelensky to investigate Biden.

Democrats contend the effort could be an impeachable abuse of power. But House Republicans have accused Democrats of selectively leaking snippets of testimony from the closed-door sessions to make the president look bad. Trump has vigorously defended his authority to urge the investigation of corruption and called the inquiry a partisan “witch hunt.”

Morrison succeeded Fiona Hill, the former NSC senior director for Europe and Russia, who resigned during the summer. She told lawmakers Oct. 14 that National Security Adviser John Bolton said he wasn’t part of “whatever drug deal” that Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney were “cooking up,” according to reports about her testimony.

Bolton reportedly referred to Giuliani as “a hand grenade who’s going to blow everybody up,” according to Hill. Bolton told her to notify NSC lawyer John Eisenberg about a July 10 White House meeting of officials dealing on Ukraine.

Taylor picked up the thread with details about how national-security and diplomatic officials learned about the results of pressuring Ukraine to begin investigations.

On Sept. 1, Zelensky met with Vice President Mike Pence in Warsaw. Sondland also met there with Andriy Yermak, an assistant to Zelensky, according to Taylor.

USA TODAY/Suffolk Poll: Biden’s lead over Warren narrows in a turbulent Democratic field

Morrison described Sondland telling Yermak that the military aid wouldn’t come until Zelensky committed to investigate Burisma, the Ukraine energy company that employed Hunter Biden as a board director, according to Taylor.

“This was the first time I had heard that the security assistance – not just the White House meeting – was conditioned on the investigations,” Taylor said.

Taylor alerted Alexander Danyliuk, Ukraine’s national security adviser, that the military assistance was “all or nothing” because the funding would expire with the end of the U.S. fiscal year Sept. 30.

On Sept. 2, Morrison met with Danyliuk in Warsaw and later told Taylor that the Ukrainian expressed concern about the losing U.S. support.

On Sept. 7, Morrison said he had a “sinking feeling” after a conversation with Sondland, according to Taylor. Trump told Sondland he wasn’t asking for a “quid pro quo,” but insisted that “Zelensky go to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of Biden and 2016 election interference,” Taylor said.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/31/trump-impeachment-inquiry-house-vote-rules-public-hearings/2453705001/

For now, the political fight over Mr. Trump’s national emergency declaration shifts to the courts, where a number of states and organizations have joined lawsuits challenging the legal merits of the order. Xavier Becerra, California’s attorney general, warned in a statement that the 20 states involved in legal action “are ready to fight long and hard to stop his fabricated emergency in its tracks.”

The judicial machinations will most likely prevent the president and Pentagon officials from immediately tapping military funds for border wall construction, and the Defense Department has yet to prepare a final list of what projects could have funding delays. It is unclear when the list will be available.

In the interim, the Pentagon has taken the first steps to begin diverting money from other Defense Department funds toward constructing fencing at the border. On Monday, Patrick M. Shanahan, the acting defense secretary, authorized the transfer of up to $1 billion from military personnel funding toward the construction of 57 miles of border fencing, improving roads and adding lighting in Yuma, Ariz., and El Paso, according to a letter sent to the Department of Homeland Security.

Military officials have said that they do not need congressional approval for such an action. But across Capitol Hill on Tuesday, lawmakers pressed Pentagon officials about the potential effect on military construction and the merits of a wall at the southwestern border.

“To look at the Pentagon as a piggy bank, slush fund, where you can grab money for something when you need it really undermines the credibility of the entire D.O.D. budget,” said Representative Adam Smith of Washington, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

At a hearing on Tuesday, Mr. Smith warned Mr. Shanahan and General Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that Congress would respond to the reallocation of funds without congressional approval by curtailing the privilege of such reallocations in the spending bills for the next fiscal year.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/26/us/politics/national-emergency-vote.html

A second official at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine overheard U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon SondlandGordon SondlandTrump rails against impeachment: ‘They shouldn’t be having public hearings’ Senate Republicans can acquit Trump — but they cannot defend his conduct READ: Top diplomat revises testimony to indicate quid pro quo with Ukraine MORE‘s call with President TrumpDonald John TrumpGOP senators balk at lengthy impeachment trial Warren goes local in race to build 2020 movement 2020 Democrats make play for veterans’ votes MORE about the need for an investigation by Ukraine, The Associated Press reported Thursday, citing an unidentified source. 

Kyiv-based foreign service officer Suriya Jayanti also overheard the call, the wire service reported, citing a person briefed on what Jayanti overheard.

William Taylor, chargé d’affaires to Ukraine, testified Wednesday that someone on his staff overheard a July 26 call between Trump and Sondland during which Trump asked Sondland “about the investigations.”

Sondland replied that “the Ukrainians were ready to move forward,” Taylor testified. 

“Following the call with President Trump, the member of my staff asked Ambassador Sondland what President Trump thought about Ukraine,” Taylor said. “Ambassador Sondland responded that President Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden, which [Trump lawyer Rudy] Giuliani was pressing for.”

The call came a day after Trump spoke with Ukraine’s president on a call from the White House. That call ended up sparking a whistleblower complaint that led to the House impeachment inquiry. 

Taylor offered information about the July 26 call for the first time at Wednesday’s impeachment hearing. He said he had learned of the call after he previously was deposed by House lawmakers behind closed doors.

The staffer, David Holmes, is slated to testify to lawmakers behind closed doors on Friday. 

The alleged call took place one day after Trump’s call with Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which Trump asked him to look into Democratic presidential candidate Joe BidenJoe BidenGOP senators balk at lengthy impeachment trial 2020 Democrats make play for veterans’ votes 2020 Dems put focus on stemming veteran suicides MORE and his son. 

The House launched an impeachment inquiry into Trump in September following revelations about the Trump-Zelensky conversation. 

Jayanti had been slated to testify last month in the inquiry, but the scheduling of her interview was among those shuffled after the death of House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah CummingsElijah Eugene CummingsBrindisi, Lamb recommended for Armed Services, Transportation Committees Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, Elijah Cummings’s widow, will run for his House seat Former NAACP president to run for Cummings’s House seat MORE (D-Md.). 

The AP reported that Jayanti has been in Kyiv since 2018 and helps facilitate coordination between the country’s energy industry and U.S. business interests. She joined the State Department in 2012 and has also served at the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. 

— Updated at 1:09 p.m.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/international/470478-second-person-heard-call-suggesting-trump-cared-more-about

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Pro-Beijing demonstrators are separated from supporters of the Hong Kong protestors in London

Protests over the Hong Kong democracy movement have spread across the globe, with rallies taking place in the UK, France, US, Canada and Australia.

In Vancouver, Toronto and London, demonstrators were confronted by pro-Beijing rallies.

Hundreds also protested in Sydney’s Belmore Park on Sunday.

Some wore facemasks due to fears of alleged Chinese state surveillance of citizens who support Hong Kong from abroad.

On Sunday hundreds of thousands of people took part in pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong despite increasingly severe warnings from the Chinese central government.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Supporters of the Hong Kong protests demonstrated in central London on Saturday

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Pro-Beijing demonstrators confronted them

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

There were also rival demonstrations in Sydney – here, pro-Beijing activists march through the city

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Some clashed with a pro-democracy demonstrator holding a Taiwanese flag

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Supporters of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protesters called for solidarity in the face of “tyranny”

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

In Paris there were heated exchanges between those supporting the Hong Kong protests and those supporting the Beijing government

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

New York’s Chinatown area also saw rival demonstrations

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

In Vancouver, a pro-Hong Kong democracy supporter wore a patch on one eye and a drawing depicting salt poured on the wound – a reference to a demonstrator in Hong Kong who was allegedly wounded in one eye by police firing a projectile

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Pro-Chinese government supporters were also out

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Some demonstrators dressed like protesters in Hong Kong

All photos subject to copyright.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-49388822

The University of Iowa student who died after being found outside on campus in subzero temperatures was “a momma’s boy with a tough exterior,” his dad said.

Gerald Belz, 18, was discovered unconscious Wednesday around 3 a.m. behind an academic hall — when the wind chill was about minus 51 degrees. The first-year pre-med student was rushed to a hospital, where he died.

“I want people to remember him as a compassionate person,” his dad, Michael Belz, told KCRG. “He had many more friends than I was aware of.”

Officials believe the teen died because of arctic temperatures that have been linked to at least nine other deaths as a polar vortex grips the Midwest. Doctors didn’t find any alcohol in his system, his family said, but the precise cause of death is not yet known.

The teen had been Snapchatting with his girlfriend late Tuesday and told her he was going to bed, his dad said, according to the Daily Iowan.

He’d graduated in May from Kennedy High School, where he played football.

The university canceled classes until Thursday amid the frigid weather.

With Post wires

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/01/31/student-who-died-in-polar-vortex-recalled-as-a-mommas-boy-with-a-tough-exterior/

\n”},ko=function(){var a=[],b=document.getElementsByTagName(“base”);if(b)for(var c=0,d=b.length;cw;w++){if(0\x3c/script>’,im(a,c,f,c))}b.I=!0;Wl();a.j||(a.ra[M(e[0])]=window.setTimeout(z(a.sb,a),F.getInstance().get(13)));lk(vo.getInstance(),Hg.Ha)},km=function(a,b,c,d){var e=””;d&&(e=e+’

Source Article from http://noticias.caracoltv.com/colombia/tragedia-en-Manizales-por-deslizamientos-hay-muerte-desaparecidos-y-destruccion

CHICAGO — An Ice Storm Warning (scarlet-shaded area on the headlined map) for freezing rain mixed with sleet and snow is in effect for much of the Chicago area along and west of the Fox River Valley tonight into Tuesday.

At the same time, heavy snow 4 to 8-inches is expected in northern counties bordering Wisconsin, and a Winter Weather Advisory (purple-shaded counties) for primarily freezing rain/snow mix is in effect for the remainder of the Chicago area.

Extremely dangerous conditions for outdoor activities and travel will exist area-wide. The Tuesday morning commute will be slowed by slick roads and snow-covered highways, and movement outdoors made extremely hazardous due to glaze covering a good portion of northeast Illinois into northwest Indiana.

Several schools across the area are closed or opening late due to the hazardous conditions.

Check our up-to-date list of local school closings here.

Metra Electric train service has been suspended until further notice. Metra suggest customers seek alternate transportation at this time.

As of 6 a.m., ComEd is reporting more than 7,000 power outages in Cook County alone. More outages expected.

The center of an intensifying low pressure system will track south of Chicago into Lower Michigan Tuesday, heading into Ontario Canada later Tuesday night. A wintry mix of freezing rain/sleet and snow will lay out to the north of the low-pressure track, covering the Chicago area.

A Wind Advisory is issued for the entire Chicago area later Tuesday/Tuesday night as the storm center pulls away, strengthening west to northwest winds eventually gusting 40 mph or higher will direct much colder air into our area, changing all precipitation to snow showers and potentially causing widespread ice-laden tree damage and subsequent power outages. As you go north, storm total snowfall looks to gradually increase from 1 to 2-inches along the Interstate-80 corridor to the 4 to 8-inches far north.

Source Article from https://wgntv.com/2019/02/11/ice-storm-warning-winter-weather-advisory-for-a-wintry-mix-of-freezing-rain-and-accumulating-snow-in-effect-across-the-chicago-area-tonight-and-tuesday/

Las últimas e intensas 24 horas en Siria han estado marcadas por la liberación de la ciudad de Alepo, el comienzo de la evacuación de los rebeldes que quedaban es esta ciudad, así como la estabilización de la situación en Palmira. Esta es una breve enumeración de las noticias más importantes. 

El Ejército sirio recupera el control de todos los barrios

El Ejército sirio ha logrado expulsar a los rebeldes de todos los barrios de Alepo en el transcurso de su ofensiva, según el representante del Estado Mayor ruso, Víktor Poznijir.

  • Se han liberado 105 manzanas en un territorio total de unos 80 kilómetros cuadrados.
  • Los zapadores rusos han podido desminar más de 300 edificios, de los que 37 son de importancia social.
  • 900 rebeldes armados han sido abatidos y decenas de equipos militares han quedado destruidos.

El presidente sirio Bashar al Assad ha comentado la derrota de los rebeldes armados en la ciudad de Alepo afirmando que “se está haciendo historia“.

Empieza la evacuación de los rebeldes

Paralelamente, desde la mañana de este jueves se lleva a cabo la evacuación de los rebeldes y de sus familias de la parte oriental de Alepo. Se estima que en la ciudad aún quedaban unos 5.000 rebeldes y también 50.000 civiles.

  • El Centro ruso para la Reconciliación en Siria preparó la salida de los rebeldes a instancias del presidente ruso, Vladímir Putin y en colaboración con el Gobierno sirio.
  • Se ha asegurado un corredor de 21 kilómetros, que pasa por el territorio de Alepo controlado por fuerzas leales a Al Assad (6 km.) y por territorio controlado por rebeldes (15 km.).
  • La retirada de los rebeldes y de sus familiares se efectúa con ayuda de 20 autobuses y 10 vehículos de ambulancia.
  • Alrededor de 1.500 de ellos ya han sido amnistiados y puestos en libertad, mientras que los demás están siendo investigados.
  • Más de 9.500 personas, entre ellas 4.500 rebeldes, han sido evacuadas de Alepo, según el Ministerio de Defensa de Rusia.
  • Todos los niños y las mujeres han abandonado los barrios de este de la urbe, controlados por los milicianos.

Este viernes la evacuación, tanto de civiles como de milicianos, ha quedado suspendida por el ataque rebelde contra la salida del barrio Ramusa de Alepo.

Las fuerzas de Siria y Rusia estabilizan la situación en Palmira

El Ejército de Siria, apoyado por la Fuerza Aérea de Rusia, “ha repelido numerosos ataques de combatientes del Estado Islámico” y han logrado estabilizar la situación en Palmira, según lo anunció el general Poznijir.

  • La línea del frente se encuentra en la zona del pueblo de Tiyas, 50 kilómetros al oeste de Palmira.
  • Rusia está ayudando a las fuerzas gubernamentales sirias a organizar una contraofensiva.

Los siguientes pasos en Siria

  • Rusia y Turquía propondrán nuevas negociaciones en “un nuevo escenario” a las partes del conflicto sirio. Según Putin, Moscú trabajará con el Gobierno sirio, mientras que Ankara propondrá a los representantes de la oposición armada la continuación del proceso de las negociaciones de paz en Astaná (Kazajistán).
  • “El siguiente paso es alcanzar un acuerdo sobre el cese del fuego total en toda Siria”, declaró el presidente ruso, que también espera que después de la “exitosa” liberación de Alepo, el Ejército “logre fortificarse en el terreno” y crear un escenario en el que los civiles “puedan volver a una vida normal”.

Source Article from https://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/226218-resumen-siria-alepo-palmira


MEXICO CITY (Reuters) – Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto faced fresh questions on Wednesday about his dealings with a company at the center of a conflict-of-interest scandal, after it emerged that he enjoyed rent-free use of a house belonging to the firm as a campaign office.

Already under pressure over the government’s handling of the presumed massacre of 43 students abducted by corrupt police in southwestern Mexico in September, Pena Nieto is facing his most difficult period since taking office two years ago.

On Nov. 3, the government announced a Chinese-led consortium had won a no bid contract to build a $3.75 billion high-speed rail link in central Mexico.

Three days later, the government abruptly canceled the deal, just before a report by news site Aristegui Noticias showed that a subsidiary of Grupo Higa, a company that formed part of the consortium and had won various previous contracts, owned the luxury house of first lady Angelica Rivera.

Under public pressure, Rivera said she would give up the house. But neither she nor Pena Nieto have addressed the apparent conflict of interest stemming from the government’s business with Grupo Higa.

On Wednesday, Aristegui Noticias published a new story that said Pena Nieto used a different property belonging to another Grupo Higa subsidiary as an office when he was president-elect in 2012.

Eduardo Sanchez, the president’s spokesman, said Pena Nieto unwittingly used the property. Sanchez said it was leased from the Grupo Higa firm by Humberto Castillejos, the president’s legal adviser, who lent it rent-free to Pena Nieto’s team.

“If I invite you to my house, do you come to my house and ask me under whose name it is? Neither does the president,” Sanchez said, denying there were conflicts of interest.

The spokesman also said there were no more properties Pena Nieto or his team had used belonging to Grupo Higa.

“No, there is no other house that was used in a professional capacity,” Sanchez said.

Castillejos could not immediately be reached for comment.

Jorge Luis Lavalle, a senator with the opposition conservative National Action Party, said the public saw a clear conflict of interest in the dealings of Pena Nieto and his government with Grupo Higa.

“It needs to be investigated. All these doubts need to be dispelled fully and clearly,” he said. “We now have another case with no explanation.”

(Additional reporting by Ana Isabel Martinez; Editing by Simon Gardner and Tom Brown)

Source Article from http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/26/us-mexico-president-idUSKCN0JA22220141126

CLOSE

“Send her back” chants erupted at a Trump rally as the president criticized Rep. Ilhan Omar for her “contempt” for the “hard-working Americans.”
Storyful

White House adviser Stephen Miller on Sunday pushed back against those who believe President Donald Trump is a racist or is engaging in racist rhetoric, arguing the liberals use that label to censor their opponents. 

“Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace listed several of Trump’s statements that have been decried as racist, including his recent suggestion that four congresswomen of color “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime-infested places from which they came,” his unsubstantiated claims that former President Barack Obama was not a U.S. citizen, his campaign announcement in which he said Mexicans “are rapists,” his call for a “complete shutdown on Muslims entering the United States,” and his assertion that there were good people on “both sides” of a clash between white nationalists and counterprotesters at the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. 

“Why shouldn’t someone see all of that as racist?” Wallace asked Miller. 

“I think the term ‘racist,’ Chris, has become a label that is too often deployed by the left, Democrats in this country simply to try to silence and punish and suppress people they disagree with, speech that they don’t want to hear,” Miller said.

“The reality is that this president has been a president for all Americans, whether you look at historically low black unemployment rates, historically low Hispanic unemployment rates or if you look at what he’s doing on immigration to protect safety, security, rising wages for all American citizens.” 

‘You have people on both sides of that’: Trump doesn’t apologize to Central Park Five

George Conway: Husband of Kellyanne Conway, calls Trump a racist in op-ed

Wallace said the comments from Trump he cited were not about “protecting the American people” but rather “playing the race card.” 

Miller said Trump “was clear that he disagreed with” the “send her back” refrain that his supporters chanted when the president criticized Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. – a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Somalia – at his rally Wednesday in North Carolina. 

Wallace pointed out that Trump let the refrain continue for 13 seconds and said nothing “that indicated any concern about the chant.” 

“I’ve never called any of his tweets racist, but there’s no question that he is stoking racial divisions,” Wallace said.

Trump’s tweets telling Omar, along with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, D-N.Y., Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., to “go back” to their countries of origin and the “send her back” chant have brought long-simmering accusations that the president is a racist back to a boil. 

When asked Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” if he thought the president is a racist, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said, “I believe he is. Yes, no doubt about it.” 

Cummings, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said he “tried to give him the benefit of the doubt” but “when I think about what he said to these young ladies who are merely trying to bring excellence to government” it takes him back the scars he earned fighting for integration when he was young. 

From ‘Central Park Five’ to ‘the Squad’: A dozen times Donald Trump has stoked racial tensions

Using racial rhetoric to distract: Trump employs familiar tactic in attacks on ‘Squad’

“When the president does these things, it brings up the same feelings that I had over 50 some years ago and it’s very, very painful,” Cummings said. 

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., who is one of 25 Democrats running to unseat Trump in 2020, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that Trump is “worse than a racist.” 

“He is actually using racist tropes and racial language for political gains, trying to use this as a weapon to divide our nation against itself,” Booker said Sunday, comparing Trump to Alabama’s former segregationist Gov. George Wallace. 

“Tragically, the president has decided that racism is good politics,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” 

“I have worked with President Trump for two years and he is not a racist,” Mercedes Schlapp, a senior adviser to Trump’s 2020 campaign told ABC News on Sunday. “He’s a compassionate man whose policies have focused on the minority community.” 

Like Miller, Schlapp cited the low unemployment rate among blacks and Hispanics to dispute the idea that the president is a racist. 

Miller said the “core issue” was that Trump’s supporters at the North Carolina rally “and millions of patriotic Americans all across this country are tired of being beat up, condescended to, looked down upon, talked down to by members of Congress on the left in Washington, D.C., and their allies in many corners of the media.” 

As examples, Miller pointed to an incident where Omar was accused of being dismissive of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, as well as comments she made about al-Qaeda, which fact-checkers have said her taken out of context. He also cited Ocasio-Cortez’s reference to immigration detention facilities as concentration camps

Fact check: Trump’s false claims about Rep. Ilhan Omar

Some experts have suggested Trump’s attacks on the four liberal congresswomen, often referred to as “the Squad,” are part of a political strategy intended to make them and their policies, which are perceived as left of the American mainstream, the face of the Democratic Party. Trump has painted them as women who “hate our country” and chastised them for criticizing the USA. 

“I don’t believe the four Congresswomen are capable of loving our Country,” Trump tweeted Sunday morning. 

“But, during his 2016 campaign, and even as president, Mr. Trump has been as critical of this country as anything ‘the Squad’ has ever said,” Wallace told Miller.

As examples, he cited quotes in which Trump said “nobody respects us” and we “don’t know what we’re doing.” He also pointed to an interview in which Trump defended Russian President Vladimir Putin’s alleged assassinations of his critics, saying, “We’ve got a lot of killers. What, you think our country is so innocent?” 

Miller said the difference was Trump wanted to “strengthen America’s core values” and the “principles of Western Civilization” while the four congresswomen were part of “an ideology that runs down America.” 

Cummings disputed the characterizations of Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Pressley and Tlaib put forth by Trump, Miller and other Republicans.

“They’re on my committee, so I interact with them every day,” he said on “This Week.” 

“These are folks and women who love their country and they work very hard and they want to move us towards that more perfect union that our founding fathers talked about,” Cummings said.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/21/chris-wallace-stephen-miller-trump-racism/1790299001/

Federal authorities also must field a work force that by design reflects the heavily Hispanic communities across the Southwest they are expected to police. Agents sometimes have relatives, friends and neighbors whom they know or suspect are undocumented. In South Texas, one of the most heavily traveled migrant corridors in the country, Border Patrol agents or their spouses have sometimes hired undocumented housekeepers, as do many of their neighbors.

Mr. De La Garza’s deception was unusual for Customs and Border Protection, the largest law enforcement agency in the country, with nearly twice the staff of the F.B.I. Yet it was not unprecedented. There have been at least three other cases of undocumented people working as Customs officers or Border Patrol agents who were prosecuted in federal court in recent years.

One of those cases involved Oscar Antonio Ortiz, a Border Patrol agent in the San Diego area, who first applied for work in the weeks after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Like Mr. De La Garza, Mr. Ortiz was a Mexican citizen with a fraudulent birth certificate who had also served in the Navy. But once he was hired by Border Patrol, Mr. Ortiz got involved, along with another agent, in human smuggling: transporting migrants for money into the United States, sometimes in their Border Patrol vehicles, according to court documents. Mr. Ortiz, who had been assigned to the Border Patrol station in El Cajon, Calif., was sentenced in 2006 to five years in prison.

Mr. Ortiz was later deported and now lives in Mexico. His lawyer, Stephen P. White, said his client had believed, like Mr. De La Garza, that he was born in the United States, based on what his parents told him and the fraudulent birth certificate they had provided him.

Image
A photo of Marco De La Garza submitted as part of a court filing.

“He got security clearances, background checks multiple times and was as surprised as anybody else to find out that he wasn’t a U.S. citizen when he got arrested on the alien smuggling charge,” Mr. White said.

Mr. De La Garza worked at the port of entry in Douglas, Ariz., about 120 miles southeast of Tucson. He lived with his wife and children about 40 miles west of Douglas in the town of Hereford, and appeared to relish his job, filling his home with mugs, clocks and other trinkets bearing Customs or Navy logos.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/28/us/border-patrol-agent-undocumented-immigrant.html

Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegButtigieg surges ahead of Iowa caucuses Overnight Health Care: Cigarette smoking rates at new low | Spread of vaping illness slowing | Dems in Congress push to block Trump abortion rule Ocasio-Cortez jabs ‘plutocratic’ late entrants to 2020 field MORE is surging in the 2020 primary, capitalizing on a Democratic Party wrestling with its political identity. 

In a year when Democrats are struggling to choose between a string of septuagenarian candidates, strategists say the 37-year-old South Bend, Ind., mayor has become an alternative choice, tapping into a desire for a fresh face in Washington. 

Democrats are also battling over how far left to go in the primary, but Buttigieg may be a candidate who appeals to centrists without turning off liberals.

Political observers and strategists say this appeal is one of the main reasons Buttigieg, who is a veteran and also gay, has been surging toward the top of polls. 

“He’s trying to be the Goldilocks ‘just right’ candidate in between everyone,” said Democratic strategist Eddie Vale. 

When Buttigieg announced his candidacy, the chance of him winning the nomination seemed like a long shot. 

Voters didn’t know much about him and couldn’t pronounce his name. He had a staff of four, including an intern. Some news organizations wouldn’t add him to their primary graphics.

Less than a year later, Buttigieg has a staff of 469 people, what pundits call a commanding presence at town halls and a rash of good headlines. 

“I think one of the biggest factors not getting enough attention is they’re doing a really good job campaigning,” said Vale. “They’re doing lots of events [and] interviews.”

It’s “definitely possible” Buttigieg could win the nomination, Vale said, because “his rise is coming from a good foundation, not just a viral moment.”

Buttigieg has emerged as an alternative to Joe BidenJoe BidenButtigieg surges ahead of Iowa caucuses GOP eager for report on alleged FBI surveillance abuse Biden leads among Latino Democrats in Texas, California MORE and most political observers see the Indianan as pulling votes from the former vice president. But he also appears to be winning over supporters from other candidates, including some to his left.

“As far as I can tell, he’s taken a little away from everyone,” said Democratic strategist Michael Trujillo. 

A Monmouth University poll in Iowa released this week found Buttigieg winning 22 percent of likely caucusgoers compared with 19 percent for Biden, 18 percent for Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenButtigieg surges ahead of Iowa caucuses Biden leads among Latino Democrats in Texas, California Following school shooting, Biden speaks out: ‘We have to protect these kids’ MORE (D-Mass.) and 13 percent for Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersButtigieg surges ahead of Iowa caucuses Biden leads among Latino Democrats in Texas, California On The Money: Trump appeals to Supreme Court to keep tax returns from NY prosecutors | Pelosi says deal on new NAFTA ‘imminent’ | Mnuchin downplays shutdown threat | Trump hits Fed after Walmart boasts strong earnings MORE (I-Vt.). 

Buttigieg has gained 14 points since August, the last time Monmouth surveyed caucusgoers. Biden lost 7 points while Warren lost 2 points in the survey and Sanders gained 5 points. 

“There’s no doubt about it — as the primary cycle continues, Mayor Pete’s appeal is only growing,” said Democratic strategist Lynda Tran. “The latest poll certainly puts the wind at his back heading into Iowa.”

Buttigieg’s fundraising has propelled his campaign. He raised more than $19 million in the third quarter, beating some of his competitors and becoming the candidate Hollywood A-listers have most supported with their checkbooks. 

Buttigieg does face some hurdles — particularly his low support among black voters. It is difficult to imagine he will win the nomination unless he can improve his standing with African Americans.

In South Carolina, where Biden performs particularly well because of his strong support among black voters, Buttigieg ranks sixth, according to an average of polls in South Carolina conducted by RealClearPolitics. 

Aware of his weakness with black voters, the Buttigieg campaign made a $2 million ad buy in the state Thursday, hoping to build support. In the first radio ad, Buttigieg highlights his time as a naval intelligence officer in Afghanistan contrasting it with President TrumpDonald John TrumpButtigieg surges ahead of Iowa caucuses Biden leads among Latino Democrats in Texas, California Kavanaugh hailed by conservative gathering in first public speech since confirmation MORE‘s reality television career. 

In the spot, he also pledges “to do something about gun violence, to tackle systemic racism wherever we find it until your race in this country has no bearing on your health, or your wealth, your life expectancy or your relationship with law enforcement.” 

Buttigieg’s age and lack of experience could also weigh him down, Democrats say, particularly in a campaign season where the party’s voters are locked in on finding the candidate who can defeat Trump.

“If Donald Trump wasn’t a factor, he would easily be the front-runner. He’s young, very smart and dynamic,” the Democratic strategist said. 

Some voters might not feel comfortable nominating a candidate who is only 37 years old. 

The youngest president ever elected to the office was John KennedyJohn Neely KennedyMORE, who was 43 when he took the oath of office.

Former President Obama was one of the younger presidents elected in the United States. But he was about a decade older when he took office than Buttigieg is now. 

“I don’t know if I feel comfortable voting for someone younger than me. I think that’s a confusing dilemma for me,” Trujillo said, adding that other voters may feel the same way. 

Trujillo said Buttigieg also hasn’t been scrutinized the way other candidates have so far. 

“He has the appeal because he really hasn’t been under the microscope,” Trujillo added. “Once the bright lights are on you, things get a little bumpier. 

But more than anything, Buttigieg will have to prove his electability against Trump. 

“I like what he stands for a lot, but I have my doubts about whether he can beat him,” one major Democratic donor said. “I don’t see how the mayor of South Bend Indiana ends up winning.” 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/470565-buttigieg-surges-ahead-of-iowa-caucuses

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

El Partido Popular de Mariano Rajoy se perfila ganador de las elecciones de este domingo en España.

El gobernante Partido Popular, PP, ganó este domingo las elecciones generales en España pero quedó lejos de la mayoría absoluta y los votos se repartieron entre vairas formaciones, algo que dificultará la formación del futuro gobierno.

Con el 99% de los votos escrutados, el PP es el partido más votado con 123 diputados y el 28,72% de los votos, seguido del Partido Socialista Obrero Español, PSOE, con 90 escaños y el 22,02%.

Podemos se perfila como tercera fuerza con 69 escaños y el 20,4% y Ciudadanos queda en cuarto lugar con 40 diputados y el 13,93%.

En el caso de Podemos, el total de escaños y porcentaje corresponde a esta formación política y a sus candidaturas en tres comunidades: En Comú Podem en Cataluña (12 escaños y un 3,6% de los votos), Compromís en la Comunidad Valenciana (9 y un 2,7%) y En Marea en Galicia (6 y un 1,5%).

Se trata de unos resultados muy fragmentados que pueden complicar la formación de gobierno.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

La participación ha sido ligeramente superior a la de las elecciones generales de 2011.

Desde los comicios de 1982 los dos grandes partidos (PP y PSOE) siempre habían sumado al menos dos tercios de los votos y un mínimo de 282 de los 350 escaños del Congreso.

Analistas dicen que hay distintos escenarios posibles, como una coalición de centro-derecha entre el Partido Popular y Ciudadanos o un pacto de centro-izquierda entre PSOE, Podemos y otras formaciones.

También se baraja la posibilidad de una gran coalición PP-PSOE, al estilo de Alemania.

Ciudadanos y Podemos presentaron candidatos nacionales por primera vez para desafiar a los dos partidos tradicionalmente más grandes.

“Gracias”

El presidente del gobierno y candidato a la reelección, Mariano Rajoy, habló desde el balcón de la sede del Partido Popular en Madrid para dar las gracias a sus votantes.

Rajoy se mostró dispuesto a formar gobierno y subrayó que el país necesita “un gobierno estable”, reconociendo los esfuerzos que se han hecho en España en los últimos años.

Image copyright
epa

Image caption

Los simpatizantes del Partido Popular se congregaron en las cercanías de la sede del partido para celebrar la victoria.

“El margen de mejora es muy grande pero para ello España necesita un gobierno que tenga apoyo parlamentario”, declaró Rajoy, quien además valoró positivamente el índice de participación en las elecciones.

Dada la pérdida de la mayoría, Rajoy reconoció la necesidad de diálogo para poder seguir adelante.

“España quiere cambiar”

Por su parte, el secretario general y candidato del PSOE, Pedro Sánchez, aseguró en su aparición ante los medios que le corresponde al PP la esponsabilidad de formar gobierno al haber ganado las elecciones generales, pero advirtió que “España quiere izquierda y quiere cambiar”.

Sánchez se dirigió a los militantes socialistas en el interior de la sede de Ferraz tras confirmarse que el PSOE, con 91 escaños, quedó como segunda fuerza por detrás del PP (122).

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

El candidato del PSOE a la presidencia felicitó al Partido Popular por su victoria electoral.

“España quiere izquierda y quiere cambiar, pero también es cierto que los españoles han decidido que la primera fuerza sea el PP”, remarcó el líder del PSOE, que telefoneó a Mariano Rajoy para felicitarle por la victoria.

“Una nueva transición”

El director de campaña de Podemos, Íñigo Errejón, quien ha declarado que se ha terminado “el turnismo político y el bipartidismo” y que se abre una nueva etapa en la historia de España que está “en puertas de una nueva transición”.

Si bien Errejón ha querido mantener en todo momento la prudencia respecto a los datos, ha sido interrumpido por la euforia de sus compañeros que en una sala contigua gritaban “remontada” y “sí se puede”.

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

El líder de Podemos, Pablo Iglesias, se mostró satisfecho con los resultados de su partido en una jornada que tildó de “histórica”.

Poco después compareció ante los medios el líder de Podemos, Pablo Iglesias, quien calificó la jornada como “histórica”.

Iglesias subrayó: “España ha votado un cambio de sistema” y eso tiene una implicación “irrenunciable, imprescindible e inaplazable”, que es la reforma constitucional.

“Basta de rojos y azules”

El líder del emergente Ciudadanos, Albert Rivera, que se estrena en el Congreso español como cuarta fuerza política, considera que su partido ha hecho “historia” y el país empieza “una nueva era política”, caracterizada por la “esperanza e ilusión”.

Ciudadanos consiguió 40 diputados. Según Rivera, las urnas confirman que “hay mas españoles que quieren cambio” y que “se acabó la resignación”.

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

Ciudadanos quedó en cuarto lugar con 40 escaños.

“Basta ya de rojos y azules”, señaló el político catalán en referencia a los colores del PP y el PSOE, y felicitó al resto de formaciones por sus resultados.

Futuras negociaciones

Este domingo también se votó la composición del Senado, donde el PP logró 121 de los 208 escaños en juego, seguido del PSOE, con 50 y Podemos, con 14.

A estos nuevos parlamentarios habrá que sumar los senadores elegidos por las asambleas de las comunidades autónomas que mantienen su puesto.

Las nuevas Cámaras se constituirán el próximo 13 de enero aunque, a la vista de los resultados, todo indica que las negociaciones para la investidura del próximo presidente del gobierno empezarán antes de que acaben las fiestas navideñas.

Preocupaciones del electorado

La economía, los casos de corrupción y la situación de Cataluña fueron temas dominantes durante la campaña.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

El voto de estas elecciones es el más fragmentado de los últimos años.

El gobierno de Mariano Rajoy adoptó durante la legislatura impopulares medidas de austeridad y reformas laborales que el Partido Popular asegura han devuelto el crecimiento a la economía española.

Sin embargo, el índice de desempleo permanece alto en un 21%, el segundo más alto de la Unión Europea después de Grecia, si bien ha bajado desde el 27% del año 2013.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2015/12/151220_elecciones_generales_espana_2015_bd