Most Viewed Videos

\n”},ko=function(){var a=[],b=document.getElementsByTagName(“base”);if(b)for(var c=0,d=b.length;cw;w++){if(0\x3c/script>’,im(a,c,f,c))}b.I=!0;Wl();a.j||(a.ra[M(e[0])]=window.setTimeout(z(a.sb,a),F.getInstance().get(13)));lk(vo.getInstance(),Hg.Ha)},km=function(a,b,c,d){var e=””;d&&(e=e+’

Source Article from http://noticias.caracoltv.com/bogota/encuentran-muerto-al-medico-fabian-herrera-quien-habia-desaparecido-en-bogota

British Prime Minister Theresa May speaks at a news conference at the conclusion of the EU summit in Brussels.

Francisco Seco/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Francisco Seco/AP

British Prime Minister Theresa May speaks at a news conference at the conclusion of the EU summit in Brussels.

Francisco Seco/AP

The European Union has agreed to delay the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU, known as Brexit, until Oct. 31.

The deal, announced early Thursday in Brussels, averts a potential crisis as British leaders had failed to agree on their own plan for pulling out of the multi-state trade arrangement by Friday.

British Prime Minister Theresa May again called on Parliament to approve her Brexit deal.

“I know that there is a huge frustration from many people that I had to request this extension,” May said in a news conference. “The U.K. should have left the EU by now and I sincerely regret the fact that I have not been able to persuade parliament to approve the deal.”

French President Emmanuel Macron called the six-month extension “the best possible compromise” with other EU leaders who were prepared to give the U.K. a year to work out its Brexit plan. Macron favored a shorter deadline fearing potential negative effects of the U.K. staying in the bloc before its exit.

“What is indispensable for us is that nothing can compromise the European project in the following months,” the French president said as quoted by the Washington Post. “We have a European renaissance to implement, and I do not want the issue of Brexit to block us at this point.”

Elections for the European Parliament are scheduled for next month. Macron said the British have to decide whether to participate in the elections with an eye toward soon leaving the EU.

“Please do not waste this time,” said European Council President Donald Tusk, advising the U.K. to finally decide on the details of its planned departure from the EU.

Few observers missed that the Oct. 31 deadline coincides with Halloween.

“They’re not trying to be funny, but I think it’s totally appropriate given that, the way Brexit has gone, said NPR’s Frank Langfitt on All Things Considered. “It has been pretty much a horror story from early on.”

Langfitt said the real reason for the late October deadline is that the European Commission, the group that proposes legislation within the EU, will be seated on Nov. 1.

“So the idea is get the U.K. out before then,” said Langfitt. “There’s a concern that if there is a Brexiteer prime minister who comes in after Prime Minister May, they might try to cause some trouble.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/10/712070225/eu-extends-u-k-s-brexit-deadline-until-oct-31

People stood in parking lots, jostled into front yards and packed into the rafters to witness Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s inaugural appearances here in the first presidential caucus state.

It was part of a trend: In December, the liberal group Progress Iowa doubled the size of its annual meeting from four years ago, with 300 activists eager to participate. In October, Iowa Democrats sold out their 1,500-seat dinner in Des Moines, which featured another potential contender, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.

The Iowa caucuses remain 13 months away, but a pent-up demand for change in the White House is tangible among Democrats eager for the 2020 campaign to start in earnest. The throngs of voters bombarding events in Iowa are testament to something fearful for Republicans: The huge tide of Democratic voters who powered the party’s 2018 gains have not lost interest as attention turns to the 2020 presidential race.

“I’ve never been to a rally, but I wanted to for a long time,” said Dan Elliott, as he waited in the ornate Orpheum Theatre lobby in Sioux City for Warren to speak Saturday morning. “I’m surprised by the energy here. The lines are longer than people expected.”

Iowans cited a slew of reasons for their eagerness to begin the lengthy nomination process to settle on a leader to go up against President Trump. There were the tax cuts that one voter called “a waste of time and money;” the trade war with China depressing demand for exports and hurting farmers; the hostility toward immigrants, a labor pool heavily used on Iowa farms; the rolling back of environmental regulations that impact Iowa’s rivers; a foreign-policy approach changing the country’s status in the world; and the general chaos and lack of civility in the White House.

“It is never too soon to try to get rid of Donald Trump,” said Shannon Kennedy, a 48-year-old Iowan who stood in line to take a selfie in front of a barn-door sized American flag at the Orpheum Theatre. “There is an urgency to get things back on track. Our country is a laughingstock right now.”

It’s not just Warren drawing interest in what amounts to the widest-open caucus competition since 2004.

Booker was greeting by enthusiastic crowds when he made his first trip to Iowa in early October for the Democratic Party gala. His visit included standing-room-only turnout at an event advertised as a discussion on agricultural issues and hosted in the Boone County Democratic offices.

As Sen. Kamala D. Harris (Calif.) gave a speech in Ankeny during her pre-election Iowa tour, she was greeted by a shout: “Run for president!” When she spoke in Iowa City and Des Moines, she filled rooms holding about 500 people.

“They’re paying attention because they don’t think this guy can be reelected,” said Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.), who has already visited all 99 counties in his presidential bid. “And the takeaway I hear from a lot of Democrats is that 2016 wasn’t a good primary. It was about people going into their camps early. This year, it’s the opposite; Democrats are focused on how we beat this guy in 2020, and they come into the primary process with an open mind.”

Helping to channel some of this Democratic enthusiasm are organizations like Siouxland Progressive Women, one of thousands of groups that have cropped up on the left since the 2016 election.

“We’re so ready,” said Susan Leonard, 64, a co-founder of the group. Her 200-member organization campaigned for J.D. Scholten, the Democrat who unsuccessfully challenged Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa). Now they’re turning to 2020.

“We’ve got invitations out to several presidential candidates already,” Leonard said. “It’s a big group, and we want to hear their ideas.”

There are plenty of candidates and potential candidates coming to Iowa to meet with Democratic activists. A day after Warren departs Sunday, Julián Castro, the former Housing and Urban Development secretary and San Antonio mayor, is planning stops in Cedar Rapids and Iowa City. Delaney, who was the first Democrat in the race, will open campaign offices here when he returns to Iowa for events Friday and Saturday.

Tom Steyer, the billionaire who has been campaigning to impeach Trump as he ponders his own presidential bid, is returning soon for an event about education reform. He said in an interview that Trump’s actions in the past few weeks had added to what was already highly charged enthusiasm. He specified the government shutdown and the departure of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis.

“We added 5,000 people to our list this morning; we added 10,000 people to our list yesterday,” Steyer said. “Just look at the turnout on November 6: It broke records, and we think the people on our list turned out something between 75 and 80 percent. And subsequent to that, they literally can’t get [an agreement] to keep the government open, and the most respected member of his Cabinet resigned!”

Progress Iowa drew about 150 people to its 2014 meeting that featured Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Last month’s attendance doubled even though the roster included lesser-known potential candidates such as Rep. Eric Swalwell (Calif.), Sen. Jeff Merkley (Ore.) and South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

“We’ve seen massive jumps,” said Matt Sinovic, the group’s executive director. Online donations are also up, he said.

This jolt of Iowa energy for Democrats began in early 2017, as Trump took office and Republicans assumed control of both houses of the legislature and retained the governor’s mansion here, he said.

“Now that we have the chance to take on President Trump directly, now that he’s on the ballot, you’re going to see that continue to grow,” Sinovic said.

Republicans have noticed the enthusiasm.

“The Democrats are in a constant hissy about President Trump. It is sustained year around,” said David Kochel, a GOP strategist who oversaw Iowa campaigns for Mitt Romney in 2012 and Jeb Bush in 2016. He predicted that Democrats will see a big caucus turn out in 2020.

“They’ve been hungry for this presidential campaign to start in a real way,” Kochel said. “That’s what you’ll see with attendance and turnout early this year. They are chomping at the bit to get started.”

For Warren, a Friday night event in Council Bluffs meant for 300 people drew an extra 200. “I’m sorry that there’s not enough room to get inside, but I’m glad you’re all here,” she said. She would repeat that apology Saturday when several dozen couldn’t squeeze into a panel discussion at a Storm Lake community center.

The crowds coming out are eager to engage. In Sioux City, when Warren told the audience there that she couldn’t do anything about Trump’s insults, Glenda Verhoeven, a 63-year-old farmer, shouted, “Yes, you can!”

Verhoeven, who did not caucus for any Democrat in 2016, said that she considered the senator a strong challenger to Trump because the president seemed obsessed with her.

“Any time he starts calling people names, they’re the people who bother him,” Verhoeven said. “She already knows the enemy, and he knows her.”

Verhoeven, whose farm and investments have been hurt by the administration’s trade war, said Trump’s actions make her more interested in the election.

“He’s embarrassing,” she said. “The tariffs are just blackmail, no less than the blackmail he’s doing now, refusing to open the government unless he gets his way.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/iowa-democrats-fill-events-to-the-rafters-with-13-months-left-before-the-2020-caucuses/2019/01/05/18b5a63a-1128-11e9-84fc-d58c33d6c8c7_story.html

One of the most widely anticipated provisions of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act are the one-time stimulus checks promised to Americans in the coming weeks. But some seniors and disabled adults have been left understandably confused about whether and how they will receive the $1,200 per adult checks.

After seeing a variety of headlines and conflicting information, millions of seniors might be anxious over what’s true. Do they get a stimulus check? Yes, definitely. Do they need to file a tax return if they don’t normally have to do so because their income is low? Not if they get Social Security benefits, but they might want to anyway in certain cases.  

Here’s what seniors need to know about their COVID-19 stimulus checks—and what they need to keep an eye on as the situation continues to develop.

Start at the beginning. What happened?

President Donald Trump signed the CARES Act into law on March 27. This stimulus package included numerous provisions to grant Americans financial relief during the coronavirus crisis, including one-time stimulus payments to help keep them afloat. The payments are $1,200 per adult (meaning $2,400 for a married couple filing jointly), plus an additional $500 per qualifying child. These payments get lower as incomes rise; the total phaseout amounts, meaning adjusted gross income is too much to qualify for a stimulus payment, are $99,000 for single filers and $198,000 for married couples filing jointly.  (That’s for couples without qualifying children; payments for children begin to phase out at those levels.) 

One key thing to know: The stimulus checks will be based on 2019 tax returns (or 2018, for those who filed in 2018 but haven’t yet filed for 2019).  

So what about the 20 million or so Americans who rely on Social Security and don’t file tax returns each year because their income is too low for them to owe taxes? The CARES Act includes a special provision to make sure these individuals still receive checks. The act clearly stated the Treasury could use information contained on 2019 SSA-1099s—a form reporting Social Security benefits to both the recipient and the IRS— or similar RRB-1099s, to send stimulus payments to those individuals.

But on March 30, the IRS issued guidance that went against the CARES Act, stating “some seniors and others who typically do not file returns will need to submit a simple tax return to receive the stimulus payment.”

Then, the confusion (and outrage) began. Making these individuals file tax returns seemed to go against the explicit wording in the CARES Act and to present logistical challenges for seniors who might not have internet access or a way to get help filing even a simple return, what with tax preparation businesses and volunteer tax assistance centers shuttered. 

Was the IRS wrong?

Yes, it appears so.

Forbes contributor Kelly Phillips Erb, a tax attorney, reached out to the federal government asking for guidance on the confusing IRS language. It turns out she wasn’t the only one; 41 U.S. Senators wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and the Social Security Administration expressing alarm over the guidance, and demanded it be fixed. 

On April 1, after normal business hours, the Treasury and IRS issued a statement backtracking on the requirement of tax returns for Social Security beneficiaries. 

“The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service today announced that Social Security beneficiaries who are not typically required to file tax returns will not need to file an abbreviated tax return to receive an Economic Impact Payment. Instead, payments will be automatically deposited into their bank accounts,” reads the statement.

So, I don’t need to file a tax return?

According to the most recent IRS statement, no. Social Security beneficiaries do not need to file a tax return in order to receive their stimulus payments.

But I heard I need to do something if I have qualifying dependents.

That is correct. 

Individuals who don’t normally file tax returns but have dependents were instructed to use the Non-Filers Tool to send additional information to the IRS, since qualifying dependents are eligible for an additional $500 in stimulus payment. The deadline for Social Security and railroad retirees (RRB recipients) to provide this information was April 22. If you are included in this group but did not file additional information to the IRS, you can receive your extra $500 per qualifying dependent after filing a tax return (for 2020) next year. 

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Veterans Affairs (VA) beneficiaries who don’t normally file tax returns and have qualifying dependents have until May 5 to provide additional information to receive the $500 per qualifying dependent. You can provide your information using the Non-Filers Tool on the IRS website.

What if I get my Social Security benefits on a government debit card instead of direct deposit? How will I receive my stimulus check?

If you qualify for a stimulus check, you will receive it on your existing Direct Express card. If you don’t have a Direct Express card, you cannot sign up now to receive your stimulus payment on the card.

This federally-issued debit card is designed specifically for Social Security and other federal beneficiaries who don’t have bank accounts. Some  4.5 million Americans use Direct Express and most of them are unbanked, meaning they don’t have bank accounts to receive direct deposits.

The original Treasury announcement on April 1 didn’t give specific guidance on if these debit cards would be utilized for stimulus payment. Retirement experts pushed for clarity, stating that putting stimulus payments on these cards would be the smartest and safest way to get these payments to qualifying seniors without bank accounts as quickly as possible.

Now, the IRS has and Direct Express have confirmed that these cards will be loaded with stimulus payments. 

“IRS will pay Economic Impact Payments automatically to the existing Direct Express® card accounts of most eligible Social Security, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Veterans, and Railroad Retirement Board recipients,” reads the Direct Express FAQ on stimulus payments, which can be found as a PDF on the website’s homepage

The Direct Express FAQ adds that cardholders can sign up for text or email alerts for deposit information, or can log on to their account online and check there. Cardholders also have the option of calling the toll-free phone number on the back of their card, but due to the COVID-19 situation, call wait times will probably be longer than usual. If you have access to the internet, you’re probably better off logging online and checking your account.

So when can I expect my money?

It depends. 

Direct Express’ FAQ says most eligible recipients with a card will receive their stimulus payments by early May.

SSI and VA beneficiaries likely won’t see payments until after May 5, which is the deadline for providing additional information about qualifying dependents.

Those who are waiting for paper checks will have to wait even longer to see their money. The IRS will begin sending out paper checks at a rate of 5 million per week, starting in early May. Low-income households will be first on the list to have checks mailed to them.

The IRS does have a tool that lets individuals check on the status of their stimulus checks, called the “Get My Payment” tool. This tool is notoriously glitchy, and since the deadline for SSI and VA beneficiaries to submit additional information about qualifying dependents hasn’t passed yet, those individuals cannot check the status of their payment

So far, the IRS has delivered over 89 million stimulus checks, equaling $160 billion. That’s more than half of the 150 million payments expected to be sent out in total. 

Full coverage and live updates on the Coronavirus

Source Article from https://www.forbes.com/sites/advisor/2020/04/30/what-social-security-beneficiaries-and-other-seniors-should-know-about-their-stimulus-checks/

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

El miércoles se debe iniciarse la sesión para votar si se enjuicia a Rousseff.

El presidente de la Cámara de Diputados de Brasil, Waldir Maranhão, revocó la decisión de anular la votación que autorizaba a iniciar el juicio político para suspender a la presidenta del país, Dilma Rousseff.

La anulación la anunció el lunes por la mañana, y a última hora de ese mismo día se echó para atrás.

Maranhão, del Partido Progresista, escribió dos cartas informando de la decisión final, una dirigida a la Cámara de Diputados y otra al presidente del Senado, Rennan Calheiros (PMDB-AL).

El titular de Diputados había solicitado al Senado que el proceso volviera a la cámara que preside para ser reconsiderado.

Sin embargo,el del Senado anunció que seguirá adelante con el cronograma previsto.

“Es una decisión intempestiva”, que “no tiene ninguna cabida” en el proceso democrático y que “no puede ser aceptada”, dijo el presidente del Senado, Renán Calheiros.

Es decir, el miércoles se debería iniciar la sesión para votar si se enjuicia a Rousseff.

Y de pasar por mayoría simple, comenzaría el “impeachment” y la mandataria sería suspendida de inmediato por hasta 180 días.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/05/160510_brasil_presidente_camara_diputados_waldir_maranhao_revoca_decision_anular_impeachment_juicio_politico_destitucion_presidenta_dilma_rousseff_lv

Image copyright
EPA

A man has died of the coronavirus in the Philippines in the virus’s first confirmed fatality outside China.

The patient was a 44-year-old Chinese man from Wuhan, in Hubei province, where the virus was first detected.

He appeared to have been infected before arriving in the Philippines, the World Health Organization said.

More than 300 people have died in the outbreak so far, the vast majority from Hubei, and more than 14,000 people have been infected.

The US, Australia and an increasing number of other countries have barred the arrival of foreigners from China and are requiring their own citizens to undergo quarantine.

The number of coronavirus cases worldwide has overtaken that of the similar Sars epidemic, which spread to more than two dozen countries in 2003. But the mortality rate of the new virus is much lower, suggesting it is not as deadly.

What do we know about this death?

The man travelled to the Philippines from Wuhan, via Hong Kong, with a 38-year-old Chinese woman who also tested positive for the virus last week, the Philippines Department of Health said.

Officials said he was admitted to a hospital in the capital, Manila, and then developed severe pneumonia.

Rabindra Abeyasinghe, the WHO representative to the Philippines, urged people to remain calm: “This is the first reported death outside China. However, we need to take into mind that this is not a locally acquired case. This patient came from the epicentre of this outbreak.”

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

People in Manila rushed to buy face masks after the first case of coronavirus was confirmed in the Philippines last week

According to local news outlet Rappler, Health Secretary Francisco Duque III said the patient was “stable and showed signs of improvement”, but his condition deteriorated rapidly over 24 hours.

“We are currently working with the Chinese embassy to ensure the dignified management of the remains according to national and international standards to contain the disease,” Mr Duque said, adding that the man would be cremated.

The Department of Health was now trying to track down people who were on the same flight as the man so that they can be quarantined, he said, as well as any other people the man and woman may have come into contact with, such as hotel staff.

The man’s death was confirmed shortly after the Philippines announced it would also immediately halt the arrivals of any foreign travellers from China.

It had previously restricted only those from Hubei, which is at the epicentre of the outbreak.

What is the latest from China?

Authorities said 45 more deaths were recorded in Hubei province by the end of Saturday, bringing the death toll in the country to 304.

Across the country there were 2,590 new confirmed infections. The total number of infections in China is now 14,380, State TV quoted the National Health Commission as saying.

Media captionThe BBC’s online health editor on what we know about the virus

Estimates by the University of Hong Kong suggest the total number of cases could be far higher than official figures suggest. More than 75,000 people may have been infected in the city of Wuhan, which is at the epicentre of the outbreak, experts say.

Which countries are restricting arrivals?

The US and Australia have said they will deny entry to all foreign visitors who had recently been to China, where the 2019-nCov strain of the coronavirus first emerged in December.

Other countries including New Zealand, Russia, Japan, Pakistan, Italy and Singapore have also announced travel restrictions.

US citizens and residents returning from Hubei will be quarantined for 14 days. Those returning from other parts of China will be allowed to monitor their own condition for a similar period.

On Saturday the Pentagon said it would provide housing for 1,000 people who may need to be quarantined after arriving in the US from abroad, until 29 February. Four military bases in California, Colorado and Texas would provide up to 250 rooms each.

Another confirmed case in the US on Saturday – in Massachusetts – brought the number there to eight.

Australia said any of its own citizens arriving from China would also be quarantined for two weeks.

There have also been a number of evacuations from China as foreign governments work to bring their citizens back.

What restrictions are there in China?

Wuhan is in lockdown and other major cities across the country have suspended non-essential business.

The mayor of Huanggang – a city of six million people to the east of Wuhan – has warned that the number of cases there is set to spike in the coming days, state media said. Up to 700,000 people had returned to the city from Wuhan before travel out of Wuhan was banned.

Huanggang has now imposed severe restrictions on residents, only allowing one designated person per family to leave home once every two days to buy food and other supplies, Chinese media reported.

Hubei officials have extended the Lunar New Year to 13 February and said that marriage registrations would be suspended in an effort to discourage public gatherings.

Meanwhile hospital workers in Hong Kong have voted to go on strike from Monday unless the territory’s border with mainland China is completely closed. The Hong Kong government has refused to do so, citing WHO recommendations to introduce screening measures at borders instead.

Do the travel bans work?

Global health officials have advised against the bans.

“Travel restrictions can cause more harm than good by hindering info-sharing, medical supply chains and harming economies,” the head of the WHO said on Friday.

Media captionInside the US laboratory developing a coronavirus vaccine

The WHO recommends introducing screening at official border crossings. It has warned that closing borders could accelerate the spread of the virus, with travellers entering countries unofficially.

China has criticised the wave of travel restrictions, accusing foreign governments of ignoring official advice.

What other international action has been taken?

  • India has evacuated 300 citizens from Wuhan. About 100 Germans have been flown home. Thailand and Russia are due to evacuate citizens from Wuhan and Hubei province in the coming days
  • China asked the European Union to facilitate the sending of medical supplies from member countries
  • Vietnam Airlines suspended all flights to China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Other airlines, including Qantas, Air New Zealand, Air Canada and British Airways, cancelled or scaled back flights
  • North Korean leader Kim Jong-un offered his condolences in a letter to China’s president
  • Hotel chains, including Hyatt, Radisson and Hilton, extended their cancellation policies for guests travelling to China
  • Apple said it would temporarily close its stores in China
  • The UK announced it would pull dozens of Foreign Office staff out of the mainland
  • Russia said two Chinese citizens had been placed in isolation after they tested positive for the virus
  • Germany, Italy, and Sweden confirmed further cases in Europe

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51345855

The Pennsylvania woman accused of directing pro-Trump rioters to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office during the Capitol siege, stealing a laptop in Pelosi’s office, and allegedly trying to send it to Russia has been arrested.

Riley June Williams

Federal authorities say Riley June Williams, who was on the run with possibly the laptop computer or hard drive, surrendered, according to multiple reports.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office online database of those charged in the Capitol riot listed Williams as being “arrested 1/18/21 in the Middle District of Pennsylvania.” There were no further details available just before midnight Monday of her arrest, but the “statement of facts” in the case was included.

The FBI tip line for the deadly Capitol insurrection has been flooded with calls since Jan. 6. One witness who made several calls into the FBI’s tip line was Williams’ former partner, the feds said.

Her ex said they saw Williams in video footage from inside the Capitol building. She was directing rioters up a staircase, according to the ex, named “W1” in the criminal complaint.

“W1 also claimed to have spoken to friends of WILLIAMS, who showed W1 a video of WILLIAMS taking a laptop computer or hard drive from Speaker Pelosi’s office,” the complaint reads. “W1 stated that WILLIAMS intended to send the computer device to a friend in Russia, who then planned to sell the device to SVR, Russia’s foreign intelligence service.

“According to W1, the transfer of the computer device to Russia fell through for unknown reasons and WILLIAMS still has the computer device or destroyed it,” the complaint states. “This matter remains under investigation.”

The feds have watched YouTube videos of Williams inside the Capitol.

“She can be heard in the video repeatedly yelling, ‘Upstairs, upstairs, upstairs,’ and can be seen physically directing other intruders to proceed up a staircase,” the feds wrote.

“I have confirmed with U.S. Capitol Police that the staircase depicted in the video does, in fact, lead to Speaker Pelosi’s office,” the feds added, also writing, “The maps confirm that there is a nearby staircase, which leads to the office of the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi.”

Williams apparently fled soon after, the feds said. Her mother told law enforcement officers in Harrisburg, Pa., that Williams packed a bag and left her home. She would be gone for a couple of weeks, Williams told her mother.

“WILLIAMS did not provide her mother any information about her intended destination,” the feds wrote. “Sometime after January 6, 2021, WILLIAMS changed her telephone number and deleted what I believe were her social media accounts on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, Telegram, and Parler.”

Expand

Source Article from https://www.bostonherald.com/2021/01/18/fbi-tip-line-for-capitol-attacks-woman-stole-laptop-from-nancy-pelosis-office-tried-to-send-it-to-russia/

(CNN Español) – La crisis entre Venezuela y la OEA, un nuevo ataque sexual masivo en Alemania y el viaje de un polizón entre Shanghai y Dubai.

No te pierdas estas 5 noticas para iniciar bien informado tu día:

1 – “Métase su Carta Democrática por donde le quepa”

El presidente de Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, rechazó el informe presentado por el secretario general de la OEA, Luis Almagro, sobre Venezuela y calificó de un amedrentamiento inadmisible la posible activación de la carta democrática interamericana contra su país.

Lee más

2 – ¿Qué implicaciones tiene la Carta Democrática de la OEA?

La Carta Democrática otorga a los Estados miembro y al secretario general mecanismos para actuar cuando lo consideren necesario con medidas que pueden desembocar en la suspensión temporal de un país.

Lee más 

3 – Reportan otro ataque sexual masivo en Alemania

Más de dos docenas de mujeres denunciaron agresiones sexuales en un festival de música en Alemania, según las autoridades.

Lee más

4 – De polizón hasta Dubai para “hacer fortuna” como mendigo

Un adolescente chino fue detenido por viajar como polizón en un avión de Emirates entre Shanghai y Dubai, donde, según reportes, planeaba hacer una fortuna pidiendo dinero.

Lee más

5 – Ni Delhi, ni Beijing, esta es la ciudad más contaminada del mundo

Onitsha, ciudad portuaria en el sur de Nigeria, tiene el dudoso honor de ser etiquetada como la ciudad más contaminada del mundo por la calidad de su aire

Lee más

Source Article from http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2016/06/01/las-noticias-que-debes-saber-para-comenzar-tu-dia-6/

CNN political analyst April Ryan called for the firing of White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders on Thursday, claiming Sanders “lied” to the media following the release of the Mueller report.

In May 2017, following the turbulent firing of FBI Director James Comey, Sanders told reporters that “countless” FBI agents had lost confidence in Comey despite one reporter’s assertion that the “vast majority” of them supported his leadership. According to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office, Sanders told investigators her claim was a “slip of the tongue” and was “in the heat of the moment,” admitting that it was not founded on anything.

Ryan, who is also a White House reporter for the American Urban Radio Networks, blasted the press secretary on Thursday night for “lying” to the American people.

“Not only does she not have any credibility left, she lied,” Ryan told CNN anchor Erin Burnett. “She outright lied and the people, the American people can’t trust her. They can’t trust what’s said from the president’s mouthpiece, spokesperson, from the people’s house. Therefore, she should be let go. She should be fired. End of story. When there is a lack of credibility there, you have to start and start lopping the heads off. It’s ‘Fire Me Thursday’ or ‘Fire Me Good Friday,’ she needs to go.”

The CNN pundit suggested that since President Trump “won’t take the fall” that Sanders might instead.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Sarah plays a dangerous game in that room… The game is dangerous because she is lying to the American public,” Ryan continued. “Then, on top of all that, she says the press is fake when she’s faking reports from the people’s house. She’s calling us fake? We’ve had colleagues who’ve had to move from their houses because of threats. I have to have security because of being called ‘fake’ and a ‘loser’ and all sorts of things from that White House. It’s time for her to go.”

Sanders appeared on “Hannity” on Thursday night and reiterated that she shouldn’t have used the word “countless,” but insisted it was “not untrue” that “a number of current and former FBI agents agreed with the president” about Comey, whom she called a “disgraced leaker.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/cnns-april-ryan-calls-for-sarah-sanders-to-be-fired


President Donald Trump has repeatedly taken to Twitter to chastise unions and their leaders. | Andrew Harnik/AP Photo

White House

President Donald Trump lashed out against the International Association of Fire Fighters on Twitter Monday morning, claiming the organization will unfairly “always support Democrats.”

“The Dues Sucking firefighters leadership will always support Democrats, even though the membership wants me,” he tweeted. “Some things never change!”

Story Continued Below

The tweet came hours after Democratic 2020 hopeful and former Vice President Joe Biden secured an endorsement from the IAFF.

“I’ll never get the support of Dues Crazy union leadership, those people who rip-off their membership with ridiculously high dues, medical and other expenses while being paid a fortune,” Trump wrote in an earlier tweet. “But the members love Trump. They look at our record economy, tax & reg cuts, military etc. WIN!”

It wasn’t the first time Trump has taken aim at unions. In March, Trump took to Twitter to chastise General Motors CEO Mary Barra and the UAW over the closure of a GM plant in Lordstown, Ohio. In September of last year, he tweeted that remarks from Richard Trumka of the AFL-CIO, the largest federation of unions in the United States, were “against the working men and women of our country, and the success of the U.S. itself,” and that it was “easy to see why unions are doing so poorly.”

In 2016, he also called out Indiana union leader Chuck Jones of United Steelworkers 1999 on Twitter after Jones accused the president-elect of lying about how many jobs he was saving at Carrier Air Conditioning’s Indiana plants.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/29/trump-firefighters-biden-endorsement-1291841

Kyle Rittenhouse says said that his case was not about the contentious issue of race — and that, in fact, he supports Black Lives Matter.

“This case . . . had nothing to do with race, had to do with the right to self-defense,” Rittenhouse (inset), 18, told Fox News host Tucker Carlson in an interview set to air Monday.

“I’m not a racist person. I support the BLM movement and peacefully demonstrating.”

A jury cleared Rittenhouse of charges of homicide, attempted homicide and reckless endangerment on Friday in the deaths of Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and the wounding of Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, on Aug. 25, 2020.

He was 17 when he brought a semiautomatic rifle and a medical kit to Kenosha in what he said was an effort to protect businesses as riots broke out over the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a black man who was left paralyzed from the waist down, on Aug. 23.

His attorneys argued that the teenager acted in self-defense when he opened fire.

Rittenhouse insisted under cross-examination that he had no other choice than to defend himself and claimed the protesters were a threat to his life.

“I tell everybody there what happened. I said I had to do it,” he said. “I was just attacked. I was dizzy, I was vomiting, I couldn’t breathe.”

The high-profile case created debate over whether Rittenhouse used his legal right to use weapons during the violence in Kenosha or whether he was a dangerous vigilante who escalated the tension.

“I believe they came to the correct verdict and I’m glad that everything went well,” he said.

“It’s been a rough journey but we made it through it. We made it through the hard part.”

The jury deliberated for close to 3¹/₂ days before reaching a verdict.

Rittenhouse railed against his prosecution but said he believes his treatment was not unusual.

“I believe there needs to be change. I believe there’s a lot of prosecutorial misconduct, not just in my case but in other cases,” he said.

“It’s just amazing to see how much a prosecutor can take advantage of someone.”

Legal experts told The Post that prosecutors in the trial presented an overly complex case and might have had better success if they had sought lesser charges.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/11/22/kyle-rittenhouse-says-he-supports-blm-case-was-about-self-defense/

On the other side of the jihadist ledger is ISIS-K. The group is one of many affiliates that the Islamic State established after it swept into northern Iraq from Syria in 2014, and created a religious state or caliphate the size of Britain. An American-led campaign crushed the caliphate, but more than 10,000 ISIS fighters remain in Iraq and Syria, and ISIS affiliates like the Sahel or the Sinai Peninsula are thriving.

But ISIS-K has never been a major force in Afghanistan, much less globally, analysts say. The group’s ranks have dropped to about 1,500 to 2,000 fighters, about half from its peak levels in 2016 before American airstrikes and Afghan commando raids took a toll.

Since June 2020, however, under an ambitious new leader, Shahab al-Muhajir, the affiliate “remains active and dangerous,” and is seeking to swell its ranks with disaffected Taliban fighters and other militants, the U.N. report concluded.

“They have not been a first-tier ISIS affiliate, but with the Afghan commandos gone and the American military gone, does that give them breathing room? It could,” said Seth G. Jones, an Afghanistan specialist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

Even as the group’s overall ranks have declined in recent years, Mr. Jones said, ISIS-K has maintained cells of clandestine fighters who have carried out terrorist attacks.

United Nations counterterrorism officials said in the June report that the Islamic State had conducted 77 attacks in Afghanistan in the first four months of this year, up from 21 in the same period in 2020. The attacks last year included a strike against Kabul University in November and a rocket barrage against the airport in Kabul a month later. ISIS-K is believed to have been responsible for a school bombing in the capital that killed 80 schoolgirls in May.

“Kabul has been the target of the majority of ISIS-K’s most sophisticated and complex attacks in the past,” said Abdul Sayed, a specialist on jihadist groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan based in Lund, Sweden.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/25/us/politics/isis-terrorism-afghanistan-taliban.html

Los romances a veces llevan meses, pero acá pasamos del idilio a la nada”. Así resume Marcos Lombardi la desazón que existe en Raincoop. Según el delegado de la UNOTT y secretario general de ASCOT (Asociación Sindical de Cooperativistas del Transporte- Raincoop) en la cooperativa no hay dinero ni para el litro de leche. En los talleres, desde el 15 de diciembre los 25 trabajadores del área no reciben el litro de leche diario que le proporciona la empresa por trabajo insalubre, por eso y deudas salariales comenzaron un paro de dos horas en cada uno de los tres turnos. “Igual tampoco podrían trabajar las ocho horas porque no hay repuestos”, dice Lombardi.

Según la empresa, las medidas de paro de los funcionarios afectan la recaudación porque al no reparar vehículos no se puede salir a la calle.

Lo cierto es que de 151 coches que tienen 42 están parados, lo que afecta el cumplimiento del servicio. Además, el dinero para pagar la nafta de los ómnibus se saca de la recaudación de boletos vendidos en el día. Y a eso se suma que los trabajadores todavía no cobraron el 25% del salario de noviembre ni el 100% de diciembre ni el aguinaldo. La sensación es que se vive un día a la vez.

¿Qué ocurrió entonces con Lourdes Carbajal, la mujer que apareció el 20 de diciembre al rescate de la cooperativa cuando esta se aprestaba a resolver el cese de actividades para habilitar un proceso de absorción de los trabajadores y las líneas por parte de otras cooperativas y empresas de transporte?

“Quedó en nada”, dijo Lombardi. “El 16 de diciembre el banco cortó el sobregiro de los $ 13 millones y se complicó todo. Se hizo la asamblea y apareció ella y ofertó distintas posibilidades de salida de la cooperativa, y aunque nunca aseguró la llegada del inversor, la gente se entusiasmó igual y votó. Pero nunca apareció nadie ni con plata ni con nada y desde entonces el sacrificio lo están poniendo los trabajadores”, agregó. Según Lombardi en Raincoop ya no hay celebraciones como las previas a Navidad en que pareció verse una luz al final del camino.

En la asamblea Carbajal anunció la disposición a invertir en la empresa por parte de capitalistas que ella representaba entre los que se encontraba un empresario uruguayo radicado en el exterior al que prefirió no identificar. La propuesta inicial implicaba formar un fideicomiso de US$ 1,5 millones producto de dos activos, mantener la cooperativa con su actual conducción y montar un equipo de gestión de su confianza.

Posteriormente Carbajal —quien fue funcionaria de alto nivel en el gobierno de Fernando Lugo en Paraguay y gerente del Centro de Comerciantes de Neumáticos— se definió como la nueva “gerenciadora” y se hizo público un primer informe en el que se señalaba que la compañía debe US$ 15 millones a DGI, BPS y el Banco República. Recientemente Carbajal aclaró que la deuda solo con BPS es de $ 6 millones.

“Ella se mueve para todos lados con el consejo directivo y a la reunión en el Ministerio de Trabajo se presentó como asesora, pero no habló más del inversor desde la asamblea y no sabemos cuál será la salida; lo cierto es que el idilio duró poco aunque en alguno se mantiene”, dijo Lombardi. El País intentó comunicarse con Carbajal sin éxito.

El próximo domingo 24 de enero se reunirán en asamblea los socios para evaluar cómo siguen a futuro y dos días más tarde los trabajadores concurrirán al Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social a una segunda instancia de negociación tras el reclamo del pago de los adeudos. Todavía no tienen claro cómo se les pagará.

Por el momento si bien hay una decena de trabajadores que ha renunciado, el resto continúa trabajando ya sea para asegurarse el puesto laboral con la aspiración a cobrar en algún momento o para defender la participación accionaria en la cooperativa.

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/raincoop-agoniza-plan-salvador-no.html

The House will vote on a resolution limiting President TrumpDonald John TrumpGolden Globes host Ricky Gervais to celebs: Don’t get political Trump says he’ll sanction Iraq if US troops forced to leave Trump doubles down on threat to Iran cultural sites MORE’s military actions toward Iran following his decision to launch a drone strike that killed a top Iranian commander, Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiImpeachment battle lines harden ahead of pivotal week GOP rep: Pelosi is leaving a ‘sad’ legacy GOP rep: Democrats changing their mind on impeachment trial rules MORE (D-Calif.) said Sunday. 

Pelosi told Democratic members in a letter that the House will introduce a vote on a “War Powers Resolution” mandating that the administration’s military hostilities with regard to Iran would cease within 30 days if no further congressional action is taken. 

The resolution will be led by Rep. Elissa SlotkinElissa SlotkinThis week: House to vote on resolution limiting Trump on Iran after strike Trump enters uncharted territory with Iran US officials, lawmakers warn of potential Iranian cyberattacks MORE (D-Mich.), a former CIA and Department of Defense analyst specializing in Shia militias. 

Sen. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KaineCongress to clash over Trump’s war powers Sanders, Khanna introduce legislation to block funding for a war with Iran Kaine introduces resolution to block war with Iran MORE (D-Va.) has introduced a similar legislation in the Senate. 

Trump last week ordered the attack that killed Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani. Top members of Congress, including Pelosi, said they were not briefed until after the strike. 

Pelosi in the new letter called the administration’s decision a “provocative and disproportionate military airstrike” that she said endangered U.S. service members and diplomats. 

“As Members of Congress, our first responsibility is to keep the American people safe,” Pelosi wrote. “For this reason, we are concerned that the Administration took this action without the consultation of Congress and without respect for Congress’s war powers granted to it by the Constitution.”

In the days following Thursday’s attack, Trump has warned of further strikes if Iran retaliates against the U.S. He said on Twitter on Sunday that his “Media Posts” would serve as notification to Congress, seemingly referring to his tweets.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/476881-pelosi-house-to-vote-on-resolution-limiting-trumps-actions-against-iran

“First of all, this is insanity,” said Mike Loder, a contributor to Kiwi Gun Blog. “We know why he did it. He did it in revenge for a Muslim killing people with a truck. It wasn’t about guns.” Mr. Loder was referring to the shooter’s own widely reported account of his radicalization.

But compared with those in the United States, conversations about guns tend to be calmer and less ideological in New Zealand. Many New Zealanders seem eager to find some middle ground, with the latest round of arguments over the country’s gun laws inevitably being shaped by countervailing forces.

On the one hand, with its current gun laws, New Zealand had one of the lowest murder rates in the world, as of a week ago. But the horrific bloodshed at the two mosques has clearly shaken what had been the country’s prevailing sense of safety.

“We’ve lived in a utopia, but the world’s caught up with us,” said Chris Cahill, head of the Police Association, a union of police officers. “Our innocence is gone.”

A shift may already be rippling through the country.

On Sunday morning, Raymond Healey, 49, a member of the Christchurch Pistol Club, arrived at a local shooting range, hoping to get some time firing at targets. He was greeted with a white sign, painted in red capital letters: “range closed.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/16/world/asia/new-zealand-gun-laws.html

Un militar en Colombia fue asesinado a golpes este domingo tras matar a tres civiles, y dejar a tres personas heridas, entre ellas dos soldados, informó el Ejército, que investiga lo que calificó de “hecho irracional” y “nefasto”.

“En un hecho irracional (…) un soldado adscrito al Batallón de Infantería Mecanizado n°4 General Antonio Nariño, de la Segunda Brigada, produjo la muerte de tres personas, heridas a tres más y finalmente fue asesinado en el casco urbano del municipio de Montecristo, departamento de Bolívar (norte)”, señaló la Primera División del Ejército en un comunicado.

Según la versión oficial, el soldado José Amado Gómez Castaño abandonó la Base de Patrulla Móvil “en un acto de indisciplina” y regresó más tarde “en estado de alicoramiento y enajenado” para tomar su arma de dotación, aduciendo que en el establecimiento donde estaba le habían robado la billetera.

Allí mató luego a dos adultos, Deimer Eduardo Dávila y Luis Enrique Jiménez Ávila, y a la menor Yahira del Carmen Miranda Castro. Además, hirió a Sergio Jácome y a dos militares no identificados por el Ejército, que fueron enviados al lugar alertados por los disparos, señaló el texto.

Ante lo ocurrido, integrantes de la comunidad atacaron al soldado Gómez Castaño, hiriéndolo de gravedad. Las mismas personas terminaron asesinándolo a golpes cuando era trasladado al hospital, según el relato castrense.

“Este nefasto suceso, que enluta y entristece a la Institución y conmociona a la comunidad en general, será investigado con el rigor que corresponde”, dijo el Ejército.

Source Article from http://www.noticiascaracol.com/colombia/soldado-murio-linchado-tras-asesinar-dos-menores-en-montecristo-bolivar