Most Viewed Videos

New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez weighed in on billionaire Robert F. Smith’s offer to pay off the student loan debt of the entire graduating class at Morehouse College, saying that while she applauded the gesture, college students shouldn’t be forced to rely on the generosity of others.

“It’s important to note that people shouldn’t be in a situation where they depend on a stranger’s enormous act of charity for this kind of liberation to begin with (aka college should be affordable), but it is an incredible act of community investment in this system as it is,” she tweeted Sunday.

Smith, a billionaire investor who founded Vista Equity Partners, made the surprise announcement during the historically black college’s 135th commencement service.

“We’re going to put a little fuel in your bus,” Smith told the graduates. “This is my class, 2019. And my family is making a grant to eliminate their student loans.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

The extraordinary move comes as calls grow about the mounting burden of student loan debt across the country.

“Every Morehouse Class of 2019 student is getting their student debt load paid off by their commencement speaker,” the freshman lawmaker said. “This could be the start of what’s known in Econ as a ‘natural experiment.’ Follow these students & compare their life choices w their peers over the next 10-15 years.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ocasio-cortez-applauds-morehouse-college-billionaire

“I think it is so cruel what he is doing,” said Angelica Salas, the executive director of the nonprofit Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, or CHIRLA. “It’s clear that he has no sense of how this impacts real human beings.” What was particularly striking, Salas argued, was the “level of dishonesty, in that he’s using the fear and people as leverage for his demands on Congress.”

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-trump-immigration-sweeps-delay-anger-reaction-20190622-story.html

CLOSE

These are 4 things you need to know about E. Jean Carroll. The advice columnist is the latest to accuse President Donald Trump of sexual assault.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – Saying that “she’s not my type,” President Donald Trump on again denied Monday that he forced himself onto longtime advice columnist E. Jean Carroll.

“I’ll say it with great respect: Number one, she’s not my type,” he said during an interview with The Hill. “Number two, it never happened. It never happened, OK?” 

Since Carroll came forward Friday with an accusation that Trump sexually assaulted her over 20 years ago, the president has repeatedly denied it, calling her a liar and saying the two have never even met.

Shortly after the president’s latest comments, Carroll responded.

“I love that I’m not his type,” she said during an interview on CNN. She noted she only mentioned Trump by name once in her forthcoming book, “What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal,” which details the allegation, and that the book is not about him.

More: Before the White House, Trump faced an array of sexual misconduct accusations. As president, he faces another

More: These are the women who have accused Donald Trump of sexual assault or unwanted advances

Previously, Trump had a similar response when another woman accused him of sexual misconduct.

In October 2016, Jessica Leeds accused Trump of putting his hand up her skirt on an airplane in the early 1980s. Days after she came forward, Trump said during a rally that Leeds was not physically attractive enough for him.

“Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you,” he said.

Carroll wrote in her book that Trump forced himself on her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. New York Magazine published an excerpt from the book, which included a photo of Carroll wearing the coat dress she said she wore the day of the alleged attack more than two decades ago.

Carroll wrote in the excerpt that she ran into Trump while shopping at the elegant New York City department store. She said that he stopped her and greeted her as “that advice lady,” and she responded by greeting him as “that real-estate tycoon.”

He asked for her help to buy a present for a “girl,” Carroll wrote. She pointed out handbags and hats, but Trump pointed out lingerie and asked Carroll to try on a piece, she said. Near the dressing room, Carroll claimed, Trump forced himself on her.

“The moment the dressing-room door is closed, he lunges at me, pushes me against the wall, hitting my head quite badly, and puts his mouth against my lips,” Carroll wrote. “He holds me against the wall with his shoulder and jams his hand under my coat dress and pulls down my tights.”

Carroll claimed Trump “opens the overcoat, unzips his pants, and, forcing his fingers around my private area, thrusts his penis halfway – or completely, I’m not certain – inside me.” The episode lasted no longer than three minutes, Carroll said. It was the last time she had sex, she wrote.

Analysis: Writer E. Jean Carroll accuses Trump of rape. Why are we so reluctant to talk about it?

A timeline: Misconduct allegations against President Trump

The incident was not reported to the police, and Carroll said she told only two close friends, whose names were not made public in the story. One told her to go to the police. The other told her to forget about it, she wrote.

At least 15 other women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct. The president has denied all allegations.

On Friday, the president said in a statement released by the White House that the advice columnist was trying to just sell books.

Monday, Trump also said that Carroll was “totally lying” about her allegation.

“Totally lying. I don’t know anything about her,” he said Monday. “I know nothing about this woman. I know nothing about her. She is — it’s just a terrible thing that people can make statements like that.”

Contributing: Christal Hayes

Like what you’re reading?: Download the USA TODAY app for more

CLOSE

President Trump has been accused by at least 15 women of sexual misconduct. The most recent accusation is his first as president.
Wochit

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/24/trump-e-jean-carroll-shes-not-my-type/1554116001/

On Saturday, Rep. John Garamendi, a senior member of the armed services committee spoke with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss Russia’s invasion.

He joined a one-hour briefing with 50 members of Congress.

Garamendi, who represents parts of Northern California between Sacramento and San Francisco, shared his candid conversation with Zelenskyy.

“He knows that he is at the top of the kill list, and he knows that his life is in jeopardy but he has pushed that aside to lead this nation. An incredible man of courage and leadership,” Garamendi said.

Garamendi said Ukraine’s president emphasized that Russian forces are moving away from targeting the Ukrainian military and are now attacking communities.

| MORE | The Latest: Putin says Ukraine’s future in doubt as cease-fires collapse

“He went into detail about high schools, kindergarten schools, apartment buildings, government buildings, presumably with the intent of breaking the wheel of the Ukrainian people,” Garamendi said.

Zelenskyy asked the U.S. for more help.

“The Ukrainian people are determined, in his words, to be free — to not be subjects of Putin and Russia but, rather, to be Ukrainians. To set their own course to make their democracy,” he said.

The war has led to higher gas prices.

“Is there price gouging going on by the oil companies the answer is absolute, yes,” Garamendi said.

California drivers are paying more than $5 for a gallon of unleaded gas which is sparking talk about investigating the six major petroleum companies.

| RELATED | California’s average gas price tops $5 a gallon for a new record

“I think the American people are willing to accept the reality that this is not just about Ukraine if Putin is successful. If the sanctions are to be forgotten and Russian oil is allowed to flow freely around the world and Putin is able to finance his government and finance his military then we should be very very aware that Putin has his eyes on more than Ukraine,” he said.

When asked if there is an end in sight, Garamendi said: “I think there is. The sanctions, together, with the extraordinary bravery of the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian military, should continue to receive American military support, financial support. Those sanctions are hurting Russia. The military offense that Putin planned is stalled.”

The U.S. has vowed to keep helping Ukrainian refugees.

“The United States most definitely has the back of the refugees that have left Ukraine and those that are continuing to leave,” Garamendi said.

Those helping with the humanitarian effort said a financial donation is best.

“Generally, in these kinds of crisis situations, it is best to send money to credible organizations that can then assemble the necessary supplies.”

| MORE | People around the world are booking Airbnbs in Ukraine with no plans to check in. Here’s why

Source Article from https://www.kcra.com/article/rep-john-garamendi-speaks-ukraine-president-volodymyr-zelenskyy/39337159

Media captionBoris Johnson: “In the last few days there’s been a sort of dawning realisation in Brussels and other European capitals”

Boris Johnson has said the chances of a Brexit deal are “touch and go” – having previously said the odds of a no-deal Brexit were “a million to one”.

In a BBC interview at the G7 summit in France, he said it “all depends on our EU friends and partners”.

When pressed on the chances, he said: “I think it’s going to be touch and go. But the important thing is to get ready to come out without a deal.”

Mr Johnson has repeatedly said the UK will leave the EU on 31 October.

Asked if people would still be able to get their medicine if there was a no-deal Brexit, the prime minister said: “That is certainly a guarantee that we can make.”

But he added: “I do not want at this stage to say there won’t be unforeseen difficulties.”

Mr Johnson has previously said the UK must leave on 31 October “deal or no deal”, but that the chances of a no-deal Brexit happening are a “million to one”.

Speaking at the G7 summit on Sunday, he said: “I think in the last few days there has been a dawning realisation in Brussels and other European capitals what the shape of the problem is for the UK.”

He said he was an “optimist” and thought the EU would understand there is an “opportunity to do a deal”.

The PM also said if there is no deal, the UK would keep a “very substantial” sum of the £39bn Theresa May had agreed to pay the EU in her withdrawal agreement.

The G7 summit – a get-together of most of the leaders of the world’s largest economies – comes with just over two months until the UK is scheduled to leave the EU at the end of October.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Mr Johnson and other world leaders have gathered for the G7 summit in Biarritz, France

Mrs May struck a withdrawal agreement with the EU – the so-called “divorce deal” – but British MPs rejected the deal three times.

Mr Johnson wants to remove the Irish backstop from the deal but the EU has consistently ruled this out, saying it will not reopen negotiations over the agreement.

If implemented, the backstop – a last resort should the UK and the EU not agree a trade deal after Brexit – would see Northern Ireland staying aligned to some rules of the EU single market.

It would also see the UK stay in a single customs territory with the EU, and align with current and future EU rules on competition and state aid.

This week German Chancellor Angela Merkel suggested there could be an alternative to the backstop but the onus was on the UK to find it.

But the next day French President Emmanuel Macron said the backstop was “indispensable” to preserving political stability and the single market.

On Sunday, the PM met President Donald Trump to discuss a trade deal between the UK and the US.

Mr Johnson said the US’s aim to strike a deal within a year was “going to be tight”, adding: “These [Americans] are tough guys.”

Meanwhile, former chancellor Philip Hammond has written to the PM about the leaked Operation Yellowhammer documents on preparations for a no-deal Brexit.

He said it was now apparent the document was dated August 2019, and therefore could not have been leaked by a minister from Mrs May’s government.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/49465298

The Texas Republican is criticizing calls for a boycott because the Hispanic food company’s CEO praised President Donald Trump.

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz on Friday said calls for a boycott of Goya Foods because its CEO praised President Donald Trump were an attempt to “silence free speech.” But one year ago, the Texas Republican encouraged people to boycott Nike after the company halted plans to sell shoes featuring the Betsy Ross flag that some say glorifies slavery and racism, according to NPR.

On Thursday, Goya Foods CEO Robert Unanue praised president Donald Trump in a ceremony at The White House. Goya bills itself as America’s largest Hispanic-owned food company.

“We’re all truly blessed at the same time to have a leader like President Trump who is a builder, and that’s what my grandfather did,” said Unanue. “He came to this country to build, to grow, to prosper. And so we have an incredible builder, and we pray for our leadership, our president, and we pray for our country that we will continue to prosper and to grow.”

That sparked an immediate reaction on Twitter, where hashtags like #BoycottGoya, #GoyaFoods and #Goyaway began trending. Hispanic leaders, including former Texas congressman and presidential hopeful Julián Castro, responded with anger, noting that the president has villainized and attacked Latinos “for political gain.”

“Free speech works both ways. @Goyafoods CEO is free to support a bigoted president who said an American judge can’t do his job because he’s ‘Mexican’, who treats Puerto Rico like trash, and who tries to deport Dreamers,” Castro tweeted on Friday. “We’re free to leave his products on the shelves. #Goyaway.”

The League of United Latin American Citizens, the nation’s oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization, also defended the boycott.

“GOYA is turning its back on our community to appease a President who attacks and demonizes Latinos daily,” said Domingo Garcia, National President of the League of United Latin American Citizens on a statement on Friday. “I will recommend adoption of a national boycott against GOYA Foods unless Mr. Unanue issues a public apology and formal retraction by 5PM EST Saturday.”

But Cruz criticized the backlash.

“Goya is a staple of Cuban food. My grandparents ate Goya black beans twice a day for nearly 90 years. And now the Left is trying to cancel Hispanic culture and silence free speech,” Cruz tweeted on Friday.

Yet Cruz last year said that he wouldn’t buy any more Nike products, after the brand decided to pull the sneaker designed with the the 13-star Betsy Ross flag. This decision came after former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick “expressed the concern to the company that the Betsy Ross flag had been co-opted by groups espousing racist ideologies,” according to The New York Times.

“I love America. I stand for the anthem, respect the flag & honor the men & women who fought to defend our Nation,” Senator Cruz tweeted in July 2019. “I respect Free Speech & I’m exerting mine: until @Nike ends its contempt for those values, I WILL NO LONGER PURCHASE NIKE PRODUCTS. #WalkAwayFromNike RT if you agree.”

Cruz’s office did not respond to a request for comment late Friday.

In an interview with Fox News on Friday, Unanue said he visited The White House as part as the unveiling of president Trump’s Hispanic Prosperity Initiative, a public-private initiative to promote education and entrepreneurship within the Hispanic community. He called the boycott a “suppression of speech.”

Correction: A previous version of this story misstated Julián Castro’s experience in public office. He is a former U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

     

Source Article from https://www.salon.com/2020/07/11/ted-cruz-tries-to-explain-why-his-nike-boycott-exerted-free-speech-but-goya-boycott-silenced-it_partner/

West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin spoke with Fox News’ Bret Baier Wednesday on “Special Report” about the implications of the Virginia governor‘s election as well as the tight New Jersey race.
 
Republican Glenn Youngkin defeated former incumbent Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe in a neck-and-neck election widely seen as a referendum on President Joe Biden’s policies. In New Jersey, the Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, is projected to win by a narrow margin against Republican Jack Ciattarelli. 

Virginia Republican gubernatorial nominee Glenn Youngkin speaks during his election night party at a hotel in Chantilly, Virginia, U.S., November 3, 2021. REUTERS/ Jonathan Ernst     TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

“I just saw it to confirm that we have a divided country … I hope it’s a wake-up call for all of us,” Manchin said. “I’m concerned. I’ve been talking about our debt, I’ve been talking about inflation, [and] I’ve been talking about the [economic] fallout we may have [from the spending bills].”

HOUSE LOOKS TO PASS SPENDING AND INFRASTRUCTURE BILLS ON TUESDAY

Democrats should pay more heed to the immediate needs of the American people, such as rising gas prices and infrastructure, according to Manchin. “Why don’t we do more drilling and why don’t we do more basically production in the United States? I’m not depending on OPEC. I’m not depending on other countries for energy anymore. We know how to do it. We have the technology. We should be relying on ourselves.”

Baier asked whether the Democratic Party left Manchin, who is generally considered a moderate. 

U.S. Reps; Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) hold a news conference after Democrats in the U.S. Congress moved to formally condemn President Donald Trump’s attacks on the four minority congresswomen on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 15, 2019. REUTERS/Erin Scott

“I’m a West Virginia Democrat, but I don’t know. I don’t know where maybe I belong at times, but I believe I’m fiscally responsible and socially compassionate. And you know what? I have a lot of Democrats who feel the same as I do. I have a lot of Republicans feel the same as I do.”

Manchin added that he respectfully disagrees with the progressive Democratic wing’s guiding philosophy. 

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) participates in a discussion with billionaire philanthropist David Rubenstein, chairman of The Economic Club of Washington, in Washington, U.S., October 26, 2021. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“This is a shame when we start this war of words … We can have a difference of opinion – the rhetoric around here has gotten so harsh and so toxic that you can’t agree to disagree anymore. You can’t sit down and say, ‘OK, I disagree with you.”

“What scares the bejesus out of me – I don’t hear people saying, ‘This is good for our country.’ It’s more or less on both sides – It’s is better for my party, this is better for the 2022 elections.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/joe-manchin-virginia-governors-election-results-wake-up-call-joe-biden-agenda-infrastructure

A coalition of conservative groups has filed an ethics complaint against Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy Pelosi50 Cent meets with Pelosi, lawmakers on Capitol Hill Democrats raise stakes with impeachment vote Overnight Energy: House passes bill to prohibit mining near Grand Canyon| Union says EPA refuses to renegotiate contract | Climate protesters occupy Pelosi’s office over California fires MORE (D-Calif.) claiming that she has usurped authority from the executive branch and “weaponized” the impeachment process.

In a complaint to the Office of Congressional Ethics, 40 conservative groups led by Jenny Beth Martin of Tea Party Patriots Action wrote to the board’s chairman, David Skaggs, arguing that Pelosi was carrying out an unconstitutional, partisan investigation.

The letter also argued that a vote scheduled for Thursday on a House resolution laying out the process and some procedures for impeachment was “insufficient” to dispel their worries about a partisan investigation.

“Speaker Pelosi’s conduct is an encroachment across the constitutionally-mandated separation of powers. She has no business examining or investigating the president’s legitimate exercise of his authority to determine the foreign and national security policy of the United States,” the complaint stated.

“In launching her ‘official’ impeachment inquiry without benefit of a vote of the full House of Representatives and without indicating anything remotely qualifying as ‘treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors’ that is the subject of the inquiry, Speaker Pelosi has weaponized impeachment,” the complaint continued.

“She and her Democratic colleagues are using the impeachment process as a weapon of partisan political battle, rather than as the means to defend the Constitution our Framers meant it to be,” the complaint added.

In a statement to The Hill, Martin said that “the genie cannot be put back into the bottle” after Democrats began the impeachment inquiry without a formal House vote.

“Speaker Pelosi’s latest impeachment gambit — at last, a vote of the full House! — is merely a continuation of her ongoing roughshod-running,” said Martin.

“The genie cannot be put back in the bottle. All that ‘evidence’ that has been gathered before the casting of a single vote is tainted by the corrupt, secret process in which it was gathered. It is poisoned, and must be discarded for the sake of fairness,” Martin added.

Pelosi’s office did not immediately return a request for comment.

Allies of President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump congratulates Washington Nationals on World Series win Trump hints that dog injured in al-Baghdadi raid will visit White House Vindman says White House lawyer moved Ukraine call to classified server: report MORE have argued that the impeachment process is being conducted in an insufficiently bipartisan manner as Democrats bring in a steady stream of witnesses to testify about pressure from Trump on Ukraine to launch investigations into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenPompeo says Trump-Zelensky call was ‘consistent’ with administration policy Alyssa Milano to co-host Biden fundraiser next month House panel advances resolution outlining impeachment inquiry MORE and the Democratic National Committee.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/468204-40-conservative-groups-sign-ethics-complaint-against-pelosi

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/


“To reduce violence, we must also ensure that criminals with guns are put behind bars and kept off the streets,“ President Donald Trump said. | Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo

White House

09/01/2019 09:12 PM EDT

Updated 09/01/2019 09:37 PM EDT


Following Saturday’s shootings in West Texas, President Donald Trump on Sunday remained firm that his “administration is committed to working with Congress to stop the menace of mass attacks” but did not include universal background checks as part of the solution this time.

Trump largely attributed the shootings to mental health issues and said the mass attacks have “been going on for a long time” and that he wants to reduce them.

Story Continued Below

“It would be wonderful to say — to say ‘eliminate,’ but we want to substantially reduce the violent crime — and actually, in any form,” he said at the start of a briefing on Hurricane Dorian. “This includes strong measures to keep weapons out of the hands of dangerous and deranged individuals, and substantial reforms to our nation’s broken mental health system.”

The president added: “To reduce violence, we must also ensure that criminals with guns are put behind bars and kept off the streets.“

After the early August shootings in El Paso and Dayton, Trump called for changes to mental health laws but also took to Twitter to mention discussions in Congress over “meaningful background checks” for people who are purchasing firearms.

“Serious discussions are taking place between House and Senate leadership on meaningful Background Checks,” Trump wrote on Twitter days after those shootings. “I have also been speaking to the NRA, and others, so that their very strong views can be fully represented and respected.”

Trump also added that he is the “biggest Second Amendment person there is, but we all must work together for the good and safety of our Country.”

Polling has indicated that the idea of universal background checks is extremely popular with the American public, even among people who do strongly favor the right to own firearms. In contrast, focusing on mental health has been a more popular approach with those who would prefer there be no new restrictions on guns of any kind.

In his Sunday remarks, Trump said, “Public safety is our No. 1 priority,” but reiterated his support to “protect our Second Amendment.”

He lauded the actions of the local law enforcement who responded to the shootings in West Texas, and also said he spoke with Attorney General William Barr.

“We will provide all possible support from the federal government in the aftermath of this wicked attack,” he said.

Earlier Sunday, as he returned to Washington from Camp David, Trump dismissed the usefulness of universal background checks.

“Background checks — I will say that for the most part, sadly, if you look at the last four or five, going back even five or six or seven years — for the most part, as strong as you make your background checks, they would not have stopped any of it.”

Trump’s previous remarks on background checks had been seen as encouraging by those who were pleased to see the president taking a position notably different from the National Rifle Association.

That has turned to impatience and frustration. “The biggest lies that the president has told include that he would do something about universal background checks,” Democratic presidential candidate Julián Castro said Sunday on NBC‘s “Meet the Press.”

A gunman Saturday in the Texas communities of Odessa and Midland killed seven people and wounded 22 others after a traffic stop; among the dead was a postal worker whose truck he hijacked. On Aug. 3, a gunman killed 22 people in El Paso, Texas; on Aug 4, a shooter in Dayton, Ohio, killed nine people.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/01/trump-mass-shootings-background-checks-1479452

Mr. Buttigieg’s jump in recent polls, along with Mr. Biden’s staying power, could suggest a persistent appetite for more unifying voices. Pundits and party leaders have long pushed the notion that the Democratic base skewed to the progressive tastes of its most vocal activists, especially in the early-voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire. This mirrored what had been a sustained rise by Ms. Warren over several months, along with the ongoing struggles of more consensus-themed candidates like Senators Cory Booker of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado and a host of others who are no longer in the race.

Polls released in recent weeks, however, indicate the appeal of a more moderate, less combative Democratic message has been perhaps undervalued. A New York Times/Siena College survey of primary voters in battleground states showed a preference for a candidate who would seek common ground with Republicans, rather than one who would push a bolder and less compromising progressive agenda. Ms. Warren appears to have lost ground, both in national surveys and in Iowa, while Mr. Buttigieg has become increasingly less shy with his criticism.

“It’s definitely not unifying,” he said aboard his campaign bus in Iowa when asked about Ms. Warren’s and Mr. Sanders’s approaches. If nothing else, Mr. Buttigieg argued, he represents a more pragmatic alternative that is characteristic of his age cohort — or at least the part of it not screaming itself hoarse at Warren and Sanders rallies.

“The fighting is not about being at people’s throats,” countered Ms. Warren in an interview after a rally in Exeter, N.H. Emphasizing a willingness to “fight,” she said, demonstrates commitment. “Fighting is about throwing your whole self into making the changes,” she said. “The big fights define who we are. The big fights inspire people to come out. The big fights signal just how important this is.”

“Fighting,” she added, is a proxy for the “big structural change” her campaign is promising, as opposed to what she calls the “nibbling around the edges” philosophy. This is essentially Ms. Warren’s critique against what she considers the small-bore mind-set some in her party embrace.

Other progressives have joined her in this criticism, often directed at Mr. Buttigieg. He has been attacked over his past employment at McKinsey & Company, the international consulting firm, and his ties to Mark Zuckerberg, the C.E.O. of Facebook. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the luminary freshman from New York and a supporter of Mr. Sanders, castigated Mr. Buttigieg for adopting a “G.O.P. talking point” in his dismissal of tuition-free public college proposals.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/30/us/politics/2020-democratic-candidates.html

House Democratic Caucus Chair Hakeem JeffriesHakeem Sekou JeffriesSunday shows preview: Washington gears up for next round of impeachment hearings The Hill’s Morning Report – Wild Wednesday: Sondland testimony, Dem debate take center stage USMCA deal close, but not ‘imminent,’ Democrats say MORE (D-N.Y.) on Sunday dismissed a poll showing declining support for the House’s impeachment inquiry, noting other polling contradicting the result and saying Congress’ job is “to follow the facts.”

On “Fox News Sunday,” anchor Chris WallaceChristopher (Chris) WallaceKennedy walks back comments on potential Ukraine interference: ‘I was wrong’ Democrats look to next steps in impeachment Swalwell on pace of impeachment: ‘There’s an urgency to make sure the election and the ballot box have integrity’ MORE asked Jeffries to respond to polling finding support for impeachment had fallen to 48 percent over a two-month span after initially enjoying majority support.

“Democrats have been making your best case to the public for two months now, you just finished 30 hours of public hearings and the public apparently isn’t buying it,” Wallace said, noting Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiPelosi heading to Madrid for UN climate change convention Mexican negotiator says US trade deal needs work, could be finalized next week Adam Schiff’s star rises with impeachment hearings MORE (D-Calif.), before the start of the inquiry, had said the House would only seek impeachment with bipartisan support.

Jeffries countered with other polling indicating 50 percent support for impeachment, as well as polling indicating 70 percent of Americans believed President TrumpDonald John TrumpHouse Intelligence Committee to review impeachment investigation report Monday Comedian Rosanne Barr to speak at Trumpettes’ Gala at Mar-A-Lago Israeli, Palestinian business leaders seek Trump boost for investment project MORE committed wrongdoing with regard to Ukraine.

“Our job is to follow the facts, apply the law, be guided by the U.S. constitution and present the truth to the American people no matter where it leads, because no one is above the law,” Jeffries said. “That’s what we have been doing, that’s what we are doing, that’s what we’re going to continue to do moving forward.”

Wallace also pressed Jeffries on Republican complaints that the impeachment inquiry is moving too fast for the White House to adequately defend itself, asking “how can you ask the White House to participate in a hearing three days from now when they don’t even know who the witnesses are going to be?”

Jeffries responded by noting the numerous witnesses who already testified before the House Intelligence Committee, many of whom were Trump appointees, and that several of them testified to the existence of a quid pro quo conditioning aid to Ukraine on investigations of the 2016 election and former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHouse Intelligence Committee to review impeachment investigation report Monday Biden canvassers join Teamsters union California Rep. John Garamendi endorses Biden MORE’s son Hunter.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/472508-top-judiciary-democrat-dismisses-poll-showing-declining-support

El número de víctimas mortales del incendio que arrasa desde este sábado el centro de Portugal aumentó este lunes a 64. Foto: AFP

Según el último balance de las autoridades, el 70 % del fuego está dominado. Foto: EFE

El número oficial de muertos fue actualizado por un teniente de la Guardia Nacional Republicana (GNR), que no reveló si la cifra de heridos también ha aumentado. Foto: EFE

El presidente de la Liga de los Bomberos portugueses, Jaime Marta Soares, confirmó la muerte de un bombero de 40 años que estaba hospitalizado y en estado de gravedad. Foto: EFE

El 30 % restante del incendio genera preocupación a las autoridades. Foto: EFE

El incendio inició en la tarde del sábado en el municipio de Pedrógão Grande, en el distrito de Leiria, al impactar un rayo en un árbol seco. Foto: EFE

El fuego, en el que trabajan miles de bomberos apoyados por medios aéreos de España, Francia e Italia, se extendió también a los distritos de Coimbra y Castelo Branco. Foto: EFE

“El fuego nos sorprendió a todos y avanzó muy, muy rápido”, explicó Fernando Lopes, de Villas de Pedro, una aldea en la que viven 30 personas. Foto: AFP

Este es uno de los siniestros más mortífero de la historia reciente de Portugal. Foto: AFP

Se presume que hay alrededor de unos 60 heridos, sin embargo las autoridades no descartan encontrar otras víctimas en los pueblos devorados por las llamas. Foto: AFP

“Nuestro dolor es inmenso, como nuestra solidaridad con las familias de la tragedia”, declaró el presidente, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa. Foto: AFP

Aviones tipo Canadair españoles, franceses, italianos y varios refuerzos terrestres han llegado para ayudar a los bomberos portugueses. Foto: AFP

Source Article from http://www.noticiasrcn.com/nacional-bogota/reportan-explosion-una-granada-el-sur-bogota

An accompanying release said the impact of more central bank intervention could impact “the future of [China’s] public debt ratio and China’s rating.”

Reductions in credit ratings often translate to higher interest rates for a country’s bonds. China’s debt is currently equivalent to $5.3 trillion in U.S. dollars, or about 43% of its GDP.

DBRS, the fourth-largest ratings agency in the world, has China rated “A,” which is its third-highest classification. However, it recently changed the outlook to negative as the tariff issues pile up.

“China remains a middle-income country that generally lacks the historic openness, institutional credibility and transparency of the major global financial centers,” the firm said in an earlier note.

Negotiators on both sides say they remain optimistic a deal can be reached, though markets have been focused on the more immediate impacts of existing tariffs and threats of ones to come.

The U.S. this month hiked its tariffs to 25% from 10% on $200 billion of Chinese goods. China retaliated by raising its tariff rate from 10% to 20%-25% on $60 billion of U.S. imports. The U.S. is seeking a number of concessions, particularly focused on opening Chinese markets and halting the theft of intellectual property and forced technology transfers.

Should the U.S. not get what it is seeking, President Donald Trump has threatened to slap tariffs on another $300 billion in Chinese imports. The U.S. had a $419.2 billion trade deficit with China in 2018, on $539.5 billion in imports and just $120.3 billion in exports. The deficit through the first three months of 2019 was just shy of $80 billion.

Other ratings agencies have noted the danger to further intensifying relations.

“An abrupt breakdown in trade talks, if that were to occur, will inject considerable policy uncertainty, increase risk aversion and lead to an abrupt repricing of risk assets globally,” Moody’s analyst Madhavi Bokil said in a note. “In China, increased US tariffs will have a significant negative effect on exports amid an already slowing economy.”

Fitch said China could offset the additional tariffs with more monetary easing, but noted it expects GDP to fall to 6.1% this year from 6.6% in 2018.

Should the U.S. extend its sanctions, that could knock off another half-point from the growth figure, the agency said.

“But if trade tensions eventually lead to blanket U.S. tariffs on all Chinese goods, the potential rating impact could be greater, as it may tempt the authorities to abandon their restrained approach to policy easing, and adopt credit stimulus measures that exacerbate the country’s already significant financial vulnerabilities,” said Brian Coulton, Fitch’s economist.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/17/china-faces-possible-hit-to-credit-rating-if-the-trade-war-isnt-resolved.html

All movie theaters, gyms, bars and restaurants will close in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut at 8 p.m. until further notice to help curb the spread of coronavirus, the governors of each state said Monday.

Source Article from https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-coronavirus-ny-nj-conneticut-shutdown-bars-gyms-casinos-restaurants-20200316-svnnwq7pfbh4fanr6fnjx2zsva-story.html

Florida now has more than 12,000 hospital patients with the coronavirus — the highest number since the start of the pandemic. Schools are about to open in the state, and the governor says new COVID requirements are out of the question.

Inside Memorial Healthcare System in Broward County, ICU beds are once again filling up fast, CBS News’ Manuel Bojorquez reports.

“It has gone up 400% in the last six weeks,” said Aurelio Fernandez, the president and CEO of Memorial, which recently added 266 beds to keep up with demand.

Hospitals are also facing staffing shortages. Sixty percent of hospitals in the state could see a critical staffing shortage within the next week, according to the Florida Hospital Association.   

President Biden called out hot-spot governors this week, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, for failing to implement restrictions, including mask mandates in schools. 

“If you’re not going to help, at least get out of the way of people trying to do the right thing,” Mr. Biden said on Tuesday.

DeSantis signed an executive order late last week barring school districts from forcing students to mask up, despite guidance from the CDC saying masks should be required of everyone inside K-12 schools. He signed it to “protect parents’ freedom to choose” whether their children wear masks in schools.   

DeSantis said of the president on Wednesday, “He thinks that should be a decision for the government, well I can tell ya in Florida, the parents are gonna be the ones in charge of that decision.”

The governor argued during a press conference in Panama City that Mr. Biden’s immigration policies are responsible for the COVID surge, claiming, without any evidence, that undocumented immigrants are causing the virus to spread.

“Why don’t you get this border secure, and until you do that, I don’t want to hear a blip about COVID from you,” DeSantis said of the president.  

The rise of COVID of Florida is because of the highly-contagious delta variant, and because of permissive behavior, said CBS News medical contributor Dr. David Agus.

“With low vaccination rates and … going out without masks and in large groups you’re going to get significant spread of the virus, period,” he said.

The surge in infections in the state includes children. As of Wednesday, 135 children under 18 in Florida were hospitalized with COVID, the highest it’s ever been.     

John Moreno Escobar, who is running for the Broward County School Board and whose son, Luca, will begin first grade this year, said, “the minimum we could do to protect all of the people who decided to get vaccinated or not is to put our mask on, even if we’re vaccinated.”

He believes it’s up to parents to convince those who are hesitant.

“We are protecting others by putting the mask on,” he said. “Putting a mask is protecting the life of someone else, and life is sacred and we should protect it all as a community.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/desantis-biden-clash-florida-covid-19-surge/

A woman exits a voting booth with curtains depicting the European Union flag in Baleni, Romania, on Sunday.

Andreea Alexandru/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Andreea Alexandru/AP

A woman exits a voting booth with curtains depicting the European Union flag in Baleni, Romania, on Sunday.

Andreea Alexandru/AP

Europe’s traditional centrist coalition lost its majority in the European Union’s parliamentary elections Sunday, with far-right populist parties and liberal, pro-European Union parties both gaining ground. The results suggest a complicated future for the EU, as voters look for new ways forward.

More than 50 percent of European voters turned out last week to vote in the parliamentary elections, the highest turnout in two decades and a sharp increase from the last election in 2014.

Here’s what you need to know from the results.

The center-left, center-right coalition lost its majority

The center-right group known as the European People’s Party (EPP) and the center-left Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) held 54 percent of the seats before the vote. Now they’re down to 43 percent, according to Sunday’s results. The two blocs together lost more than 70 seats, along with the majority they held for decades, according to NPR’s Sylvia Poggioli.

The results suggest that European centrists will have to reach out to and unite more broadly with liberal coalitions in order to affect change — and maintain authority — in the EU.

The far-right gained ground — but not as much as expected

Matteo Salvini, Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister and leader of the right-wing League party, speaks at a news conference following the European Parliament election results on Monday in Milan.

Emanuele Cremaschi/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Emanuele Cremaschi/Getty Images

Matteo Salvini, Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister and leader of the right-wing League party, speaks at a news conference following the European Parliament election results on Monday in Milan.

Emanuele Cremaschi/Getty Images

Populist, euroskeptic parties across Europe saw gains, but less than what some pre-election polls had predicted — and what pro-EU forces had feared. And the various nationalist parties’ differences over issues like migration and attitudes toward Russia could cloud prospects for a united right.

“What happened was not really what a lot of people were fearing, that there would be a surge of the far-right populists,” former Swedish Prime Minister and now co-chair of the European Council on Foreign Relations Carl Bildt told NPR on Monday. “There was an increase by the far-right, but fairly marginal and far less than what people had predicted.”

Because the gains were smaller than expected, the far-right likely won’t be able to reshape the future of Europe by itself, says NPR’s Poggioli, but it may be able to obstruct the legislative process. Many attribute the victories on the far-right to high unemployment rates, security concerns after several terrorist attacks and tensions over migration.

In France, the far-right National Rally party of Marine Le Pen narrowly beat French President Emmanuel Macron’s party coalition. Though Le Pen’s party won by less than 1 percent, with 23 percent of the vote, she dubbed it a “victory for the people” on Twitter.

The League, Italy’s far-right populist party led by Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, saw a sweeping victory, garnering more than 34 percent of the country’s vote.

“Not only is the League the top party in Italy, Marine Le Pen is the top party in France, Nigel Farage is the top party in the U.K. So Italy, France, the U.K., it’s a sign of a Europe that’s changing,” Salvini said at a press conference after the victory.

In Hungary, the nationalist Fidesz party of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán took more than 52 percent of the vote.

In Austria, conservative Chancellor Sebastian Kurz’s Austrian People’s Party won the election Sunday, but Kurz was ousted Monday when he lost a no-confidence vote stemming from a scandal that erupted last week over its coalition partner, the far-right Freedom Party. That party fared worse than it had in the previous European election.

Though many of the far-right parties of Europe share the goal of weakening the European Union, they clash on other pressing issues. In Italy, for instance, Salvini, though anti-immigration, has advocated for the relocation of asylum seekers across the EU. Hungary’s Orbán has pushed to close borders.

“We reject migration; and we would like to see leaders in position in the European Union who reject migration, who would like to stop it and not manage it,” Orbán wrote in a statement after casting his vote Sunday.

Europeans are concerned about the environment

The Greens, a party coalition focusing on environmental issues, went from 52 seats in the European Parliament in 2014 to 69 in 2019, making them the fourth largest voting bloc in the EU.

Members and supporters of the Greens coalition celebrate in Berlin after the announcement of the first forecast for the European elections.

Kay Nietfeld/Picture Alliance Via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Kay Nietfeld/Picture Alliance Via Getty Images

Members and supporters of the Greens coalition celebrate in Berlin after the announcement of the first forecast for the European elections.

Kay Nietfeld/Picture Alliance Via Getty Images

The results, the strongest ever for the Greens, indicate that many Europeans are growing increasingly concerned about climate change and the environment. Recently, across northern Europe, young people have been protesting what they see as governmental inaction on combating climate change.

In Germany, the Greens took 21 percent of the vote, second only to German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats, part of the center-right EPP European parliamentary bloc. Since the last election in 2014, Merkel’s party lost 6 percentage points, while the Greens gained nearly 10 points.

The Greens also saw gains in France, the Netherlands, Ireland, Finland, Denmark and Belgium, among others.

“The Greens and the Liberals were the winners of the day,” Sweden’s Carl Bildt told NPR.

The U.K. doubles down on Brexit

Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage arrives at a Brexit party on Monday in London.

Peter Summers/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Peter Summers/Getty Images

Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage arrives at a Brexit party on Monday in London.

Peter Summers/Getty Images

Voters in the United Kingdom weren’t initially even supposed to participate in this election; they were supposed to have left the EU by the end of March. But with several delays — and plans for leaving now set for October — U.K. voters had to take part, and gave the new Brexit Party, led by populist Nigel Farage, more than 30 percent of the vote.

In contrast, Prime Minister Theresa May’s Conservative Party ended up in fifth place, with 8.7 percent of the vote. “This is the worst showing by the Conservative Party since the 1830s,” says NPR’s Frank Langfitt.

The Labour Party also fared poorly, down 10 percentage points since 2014. Both the Labour and Conservative parties wavered on finding a clear position on Brexit, and the vote seems to indicate, Langfitt says, that voters rewarded clarity on the issue of leaving the EU. Liberal Democrats and other pro-EU parties did well.

“Never before in British politics has a new party, launched just six weeks ago, topped the polls in a national election,” Farage said after his election as a member of the European Parliament. “There’s a huge message here, a massive message here.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/05/27/727293356/4-takeaways-from-the-european-parliament-election-results

Media captionClashes, chaos, fire and smoke engulf Quito

The UN says representatives of Ecuador’s government and the country’s indigenous groups will hold their first direct talks later on Sunday in a bid to end days of violent protests.

Protesters are demanding the return of fuel subsidies which the government scrapped as part of austerity measures.

Reports say President Lenín Moreno has agreed to reassess the subsidies, but not necessarily repeal them.

Nearly two weeks of unrest have left much of the capital, Quito, in chaos.

On Saturday, President Moreno announced a curfew would be imposed in Quito and surrounding areas, enforced by the military.

“I’ve ordered the joint command of the armed forces to immediately take steps necessary to re-establish order in all of Ecuador,” he said in a televised address.

The armed forces said movement would be restricted across the country for 24 hours. Ecuador is already subject to a two-month national emergency.

Mr Moreno also revealed that protesters had agreed to direct talks for the first time.

In a statement later on Twitter, the UN said talks between the two sides would take place in Quito at 15:00 (20:00 GMT).

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Police have fired tear gas to try to disperse angry crowds

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Women’s groups marched through Quito demanding a peaceful solution to the crisis

Members of the indigenous umbrella group CONAIE had previously rejected calls for the talks but agreed on the condition that they be broadcast and not held behind closed doors, according to reports.

Earlier on Saturday, protesters attacked a television station and newspaper office in Quito. The Teleamazonas channel broadcast pictures of its broken windows and a burning vehicle. El Comercio newspaper tweeted that a “group of unknowns” had attacked its offices. No injuries were reported in either incident.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

TV station Teleamazonas was targeted by protesters

Elsewhere, masked men threw petrol bombs at a government building in Quito housing the comptroller general’s office and then overran it.

On Twitter, Interior Minister Maria Paula Romo said the area around the building was being evacuated so fire crews could put out the flames. She said 30 people had been arrested outside the building.

What’s the background?

Protests began after the government announced an end to fuel subsidies as part of public spending cuts agreed with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in return for a loan. The deal reached in March will allow Ecuador to borrow $4.2bn (£3.4bn).

Mr Moreno has said the fuel subsidies, introduced in the 1970s with an annual cost of $1.3bn, were no longer affordable. Eliminating them is part of his plan to shore up Ecuador’s flagging economy and ease its debt burden.

Media captionProtesters in Quito chant: “Women united will never be defeated!”

Petrol prices soared and thousands took to the streets. In recent days, they set up barricades, stormed buildings and clashed with security forces, who have tried to disperse the crowds with tear gas.

Protesters have also entered some oil fields, affecting production in the Andean nation, a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Some have also called for the resignation of the president.

Indigenous-led protests have toppled three presidents in the past few decades. Since the current unrest began, protesters have taken dozens of officers hostage in various locations throughout the country .

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-50030720

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Pakistan says Indian aircraft crossed into its territory and dropped bombs on Tuesday without causing casualties, in the latest escalation between the nuclear-armed rivals since a deadly attack on Indian troops in the disputed Kashmir region sent tensions soaring.

Maj. Gen Asif Ghafoor, a military spokesman, said the Indian “aircrafts” crossed into the Pakistan-controlled Muzafarabad sector of Kashmir, which is split between the two countries but claimed by each in its entirety. He said Pakistan scrambled fighters and the Indian jets “released payload in haste,” near Balakot, on the edge of Pakistani-ruled Kashmir.

Balakot police chief Saghir Hussain Shah told The Associated Press that he had sent teams to the area, which he described as a mostly deserted wooded area.

“There are no casualties, there are no damages on the ground because of the dropping of the bombs,” he said.

Pakistan’s Inter Services Public Relations released this photo it says shows a payload dropped by Indian Air Force aicrafts in a hilly terrain of Pakistani territory.AFP / Pakistan Inter Services Public Relations

There has been no immediate comment from India. India’s Cabinet Committee on Security, presided over by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, was to meet Tuesday, New Delhi Television reported.

The incursion could have been in retaliation for a deadly Feb. 14 suicide bombing in India’s half of Kashmir that killed at least 40 troops. The Pakistan-based militant group Jaish-e-Mohammad claimed responsibility. The bomber, who made a video before the attack, was a resident of Indian Kashmir.

It was the worst attack on Indian forces since the start of the 1989 insurgency in Kashmir. Insurgents have been demanding either outright independence or union with Pakistan. India routinely accuses Pakistan of arming and training militants who cross the mountainous Himalayan region.

Kashmir has been the cause of two previous wars between the uneasy neighbors. They fought a third war in 1979 over East Pakistan, which gained its independence with the help of India and became Bangladesh.

Tensions have been high since the attack earlier this month. Pakistan has outlawed Jaish-e-Mohammed and seized its properties in south Punjab’s Bawahalpur area, including religious schools and mosques. India has demanded that Jaish-e-Mohammad leader, Azhar Masood, be listed as a terrorist by the United Nations, but has been stymied by China.

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi condemned the incursion, saying New Delhi “endangered” peace in the region for political gains.

“We are a responsible nation and our forces are capable to defend each every inch of our motherland,” he told a local television channel.

Associated Press writers Kathy Gannon, Zarar Khan and Munir Ahmed in Islamabad, and Aijaz Hussain in Srinigar, India, contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pakistan-says-indian-jets-dropped-bombs-its-territory-n975996

Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenBiden and Obama take another literary spin as crime-fighting duo Trump confidant: Acosta will be gone in weeks The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump under pressure to jettison Labor secretary MORE is hanging on to the top spot in the Democratic primary field, leading his nearest rival Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenSteyer rolls out largest TV ad buy of Democratic primary so far: report Trump confidant: Acosta will be gone in weeks The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump under pressure to jettison Labor secretary MORE (D-Mass.) by 5 points, according to an Economist-YouGov poll released Wednesday.

Biden notched 22 percent support among likely Democratic primary voters in the poll, while Warren finished in second place with 17 percent. In third was Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisTrump confidant: Acosta will be gone in weeks The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump under pressure to jettison Labor secretary Biden campaign looks to correct early stumbles MORE (D-Calif.), who took 14 percent support in the survey.

Rounding out the top five candidates were Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersSteyer rolls out largest TV ad buy of Democratic primary so far: report Biden campaign looks to correct early stumbles Progressives face steep odds in ousting incumbent Democrats MORE (I-Vt.) with 11 percent and South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegMellman: Meeting in Miami How Mayor Pete can win the presidency with one precise letter Biden tax returns show .6M in 2017-18 income MORE, who received 5 percent of the vote. 

The Economist-YouGov poll is the latest showing some shuffling in the Democratic field.

Sanders has held the second-place spot behind Biden in most public surveys for months, but some recent polls have shown Warren and Harris nudging past him.

The RealClearPolitics average of polls still has Sanders in second place, trailing Biden by nearly 12 points.

Harris saw a significant bump in the Economist-YouGov survey following her confrontation with Biden during the first Democratic primary debate late last month, jumping from 7 percent in the poll to 15 percent in the week that followed.

That confrontation centered on the former vice president’s opposition to school “busing” during his early years as a senator in the 1970s. 

The most recent Economist-YouGov poll suggests, however, that Harris’s post-debate surge may be slowing down as attention shifts to the next round of primary debates set for later this month.

The poll surveyed 1,500 people, including 1,140 registered voters, in web-based interviews from July 7-9. It has a margin of error of 2.6 percent for the entire sample and 3 percent for registered voters. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/452414-poll-biden-leads-2020-democratic-field-by-5-points-followed-by-warren-and