Most Viewed Videos

Oklahoma has approved 235,000 out of about 590,000 claims, with about 2,000 still under review as of June 21, but the state also has denied a whopping 350,000 claims, said Shelley Zumwalt, the interim director of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission. Zumwalt said a small portion of the denied claims — about 47,000 — are people who have applied for the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), a program for gig and self-employed workers who must get rejected from regular unemployment insurance before qualifying for the expanded benefit for gig workers.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/07/13/unemployment-payment-delays/

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Para el editor para América del Norte de la BBC, Jon Sopel, será casi imposible frenar a Trump.

Las elecciones primarias para elegir a los candidatos a presidente en Estados Unidos son una carrera de resistencia: estado tras estado, los candidatos recorren todo el país desde febrero hasta junio.

Pero para algunos analistas la carrera –al menos la del Partido Republicano– ya tiene un ganador seguro: Donald Trump.

Este martes, el magnate se impuso claramente en los caucus de Nevada, su tercera victoria en las cuatro contiendas celebradas hasta la fecha.

Y las encuestas también lo dan como favorito para el “Supermartes” del 1 de marzo, cuando más de una decena de estados elegirán a su candidato.

El editor para América del Norte de la BBC, Jon Sopel, explica aquí por qué cree que el empresario ya es imparable.

___________________________________________________

Imagina que vas en un avión y tienes que decidir entre las tres opciones de comida

Elijes la pasta con pollo pero la azafata te informa que ya no queda, y tienes que optar entre el salmón sin gusto o la carne demasiado cocida.

Sí, estás decepcionado. Pero inmediatamente adoptas una nueva mentalidad: ya no importa lo que prefiero. Ahora lo que tengo que elegir es qué me importa menos.

Ése es el dilema que enfrenta el Partido Republicano.

Los candidatos más fáciles de digerir como Jeb Bush o Chris Christie ya no están en el menú, y otros como Marco Rubio o John Kasich no han aparecido en la primera página.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Los líderes republicanos tienen que elegir entre Trump y Cruz y prefieren al primero, dice Sopel.

Ninguno parece estar en condiciones de hacerles frente a los dos insurgentes, Donald Trump y Ted Cruz.

Hasta ahora, los “moderados” en vez de unirse para tratar de elegir quién de ellos tiene las mejores oportunidades para enfrentar a Trump o a Cruz, parecían haber formado un escuadrón de fusilamiento en forma circular y están ocupados tiroteándose entre ellos.

Es por ello que importantes sectores de la dirigencia republicana aceptaron a regañadientes que Trump no sólo es la opción menos mala, sino que es virtualmente imparable en la carrera por ser su candidato.

La conclusión que alcanzaron es que pueden vivir con Trump, pero no con Cruz.

El empresario negociará acuerdos y conciliará posturas, Cruz no lo hará. Trump es obediente, Cruz no lo es.

Trump presidente

Dado este escenario, a menos que hubiera enormes sorpresas en el largo proceso de votación, es probable que Trump sea nominado como el candidato republicano para las elecciones generales de noviembre.

De ganar, sería el primer presidente que nunca ocupó un cargo electivo o estuvo en las fuerzas armadas.

Pero volvamos al tema del apoyo de la dirigencia republicana a Trump. ¿En qué evidencia me baso?

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Para muchos Trump es invencible.

Pocos líderes de la vieja guardia son considerados más sabios que el senador Bob Dole. Este veterano de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, de 92 años, y excandidato presidencial ha hecho y visto todo.

Hace unas semanas declaró que la elección de Cruz –un senador de Texas– como candidato sería “cataclísmica“.

“Si él es el nominado tendremos pérdidas masivas en el Congreso y en oficinas estatales, gobernaciones y legislaturas”, dijo Dole, quien ejerce como legislador desde hace 35 años.

Otro de los políticos más representativos de la dirigencia republicana es Orrin Hatch. Ha dicho que se está “acercando” a Trump.

También el líder de la mayoría republicana en el Senado, Mitch McConnell, de Kentucky, ha mantenido conversaciones con el magnate.

Otro que, inusualmente, se metió en la contienda fue el gobernador de Iowa, Terry Branstad. Consultado de manera frontal sobre si quería ver derrotado a Cruz respondió sin titubear: “Sí”.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Algunos atribuyen el éxito de Trump a que su rival más cercano, Ted Cruz, es detestado por muchos líderes republicanos.

¿Se puede frenar?

El empresario ha conectado con algo más grande, que es el profundo y visceral enojo que sienten muchos hacia esa cosa amorfa en Washington, que es el “establishment”, la clase dirigente tradicional a la que pertenecen los centenares de congresistas que ocupan un escaño en el Capitolio, algunos desde hace décadas.

El periodista del Financial Times Edward Luce lo describió de manera brillante cuando escribió sobre la aparición de Trump en Iowa junto con la excandidata a vicepresidenta Sarah Palin, alguien de un perfil similar.

“Cuanto más Palin parecía enredarse en sus palabras, más la apoyaban sus simpatizantes. Cuanto más se mofaba de ella la prensa, más exultantes se ponían sus fanáticos. Trump ha elevado esa estrategia a una forma de arte”, señaló.

En una era en la que el conocimiento es considerado señal de elitismo, la ignorancia es poder. Y también es una forma genial de hacer marketing (mercadeo)”, consideró

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Trump y Palin, los dos son amados por quienes odian a los políticos tradicionales del “establishment”.

No obstante, el proceso de las primarias es extenso y los primeros estados no marcan el pulso de toda la nación.

La historia de las primarias está llena de casos de políticos que brillaron al comienzo y se fueron apagando.

También es posible que las encuestas –que en todos los casos dan como favorito entre los republicanos a Trump– estén equivocadas, o que las personas que más apoyan al millonario no sean del tipo que se molesta en ir a votar.

_______________________________________________________

Los rivales

¿Cuáles son las posibilidades de los rivales que quedan en la competencia contra Trump?

  • A la cabeza: Ted Cruz

Cruz ha mostrado como el principal rival de Donald Trump, algo sorprendente para un candidato que según el The New York Times tenía muy pocas posibilidades de ganar cuando entró en carrera.

No es el favorito de los líderes republicanos pero enfrentados a la disyuntiva de no tener la opción de la pasta con pollo, se están volcando decisivamente, con gran pesar, en contra de la alternativa del pescado escurridizo y a favor del curtido y bronceado bife.

Si el magnate de Nueva York llegara a decaer, él heredaría a sus simpatizantes. Sin embargo, el repunte de Marco Rubio le ha afectado y el senador de Florida no se lo va a poner fácil.

Cómo podría ganar: Si lograra sumar victorias tras victoria en las primarias del Sur podría lograr un liderazgo insuperable.

  • En segundo nivel: Marco Rubio

Con buenas actuaciones en los debates y una campaña exitosa, muchos esperaban que Rubio surgiera como el principal rival de Trump. Un protagonismo que ha tardado en llegar.

Después del traspié en uno de los debates en el que fue ridiculizado por el ya exaspirante Chris Christie, la remontada en Carolina del Sur y el buen resultado en Nevada le han llevado a competir directamente con Cruz.

Rubio puede ser uno de los más beneficiados con la retirada de Jebh Bush si consigue mantenerse y aglutinar el voto “moderado”.

Cómo podría ganar: Si logra solidificar el apoyo de los votantes tradicionales, permitiéndole perseverar hasta Florida y obtener triunfos en los estados más moderados a partir de marzo.

  • Los estancados: Ben Carson y John Kasich

Carson, un neurocirujano retirado, empezó buenos resultados en las encuestas, pero su trayectoria ha ido en descenso.

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

Algunos creen que Ben Carson no tiene el liderazgo fuerte que requiere EE.UU.

El énfasis puesto en los liderazgos fuertes, tras los ataques de París, dejó a este sosegado candidato en una posición tenue, y un masivo éxodo de sus líderes de campaña reforzó la imagen de que es como un barco que se hunde.

Cómo podría ganar: Si logra el apoyo de los evangélicos y obtiene un buen puesto en alguna de las próximas primarias, renovando el interés en su candidatura.

Kasich, el gobernador de Ohio, apostó todo a New Hampshire, pero tras los favorables resultados iniciales ahora está a la par de los otros candidatos de la tradicional esfera política, el “establishment”.

Si logra hacerse con los simpatizantes de Marco Rubio tendrá oportunidades. Sino, será el fin para el gobernador.

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

John Kasich solo podría repuntar si le va muy bien en New Hampshire, opina Zurcher.

Cómo podría ganar: Si sale entre los primeros en las próximas primarias podría ser visto como una alternativa sensata.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/02/160129_elecciones_eeuu_2016_trump_imparable_vs


Carrie Lam, Hong Kong’s chief executive, speaks during a news conference on July 2, 2019, in Hong Kong. | Anthony Kwan/Getty Images

South China Morning Post

07/09/2019 09:52 AM EDT

This story is being published as part of a content partnership with the South China Morning Post. It originally appeared on scmp.com on July 9, 2019.

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor gave her strongest pledge yet on Tuesday morning when she declared the highly unpopular extradition bill that sparked several mass protests was “dead”, changing from an earlier script that it “will die” in 2020.

Story Continued Below

While protesters had demanded a full withdrawal, Lam stressed her stance on Tuesday had already been definitive.

Speaking before the weekly meeting with her advisers in the Executive Council, Lam described the government’s work in amending the law as a “complete failure.”

The chief executive acknowledged there were lingering doubts that the government could restart the amendment process within the Legislative Council’s current term, which ends in 2020.

“There is no such plan, the bill is dead,” Lam said.

She admitted her stance on Tuesday did not differ much from when she announced last month that the legislative process would be suspended, adding: “In some sense, even if [the bill] is withdrawn today, it can be retabled at Legco within three months.”

The bill would have allowed Hong Kong to transfer suspects to jurisdictions it lacks extradition agreements with, including mainland China. Critics feared it would remove the legal firewall between the city and the mainland, exposing suspects to opaque trials across the border.

Lam, however, stood firm on not setting up a top-level probe into clashes between police and protesters.

She said the Independent Police Complaints Council would launch an investigation, and that all parties involved in the demonstrations, including protesters, police, media and onlookers, could provide information.

There have been widespread calls for a judge-led commission of inquiry (COI) to be set up, with former chief justice Andrew Li Kwok-nang the latest to add his voice, in a commentary asking for such a commission that was published in the Post on Tuesday.

“While I respect [Li’s] views … I’m afraid on this particular issue of an independent COI, the view has been taken for the IPCC to perform this role,” Lam said.

Lam also touched on the 2014 Occupy movement, during which protesters had called for the implementation of genuine universal suffrage.“Five years ago, we finished Occupy Central, we moved on, without addressing those fundamental problems,” Lam said. “But this time I don’t think we can continue to ignore those fundamental and deep-seated problems.”

Asked if she would restart discussions on political reform, Lam said she was “not targeting a particular issue.”

She added: “It could be economic problems, it could be livelihood issues, it could be political divisions in society.”

The chief executive also said she was “willing to engage in an open dialogue with students without any preconditions.”

Student leaders from eight universities said they would only talk to Lam if she agreed to their two conditions on Friday: meet them in a town hall-style open meeting and promise to exonerate protesters.

Lam reiterated that the government did not call a protest on June 12, during which there were violent clashes between police and protesters, a “riot.”

She also said it would be against the rule of law to grant an amnesty to arrested protesters “at this stage,” without investigations and prosecutions.

The weekly Exco meeting was the first at the Chief Executive’s Office since June 11. A meeting last week was held at Government House, while two others were canceled due to the recent protests.

Among protesters’ demands are that all references to clashes on June 12 as a riot be retracted.

“In the coming three years, there must be officials stepping down to fulfill the accountability system,” Tien told a radio show, referring to the time left for the current administration.

Tien, however, refused to say who he had in mind.

Speaking on the same program, Liberal Party lawmaker Felix Chung Kwok-pan said it was not possible for Lam to step down at the moment. He also suggested that if ministers were to quit, it would be difficult to find others to replace them.

“Given now how hot the kitchen is, which is almost burning, who would be willing to join and work for the government?” Chung said.

Instead, he suggested changes in Exco.

“Exco is one of the most important advisory bodies for the chief executive … Now there are problems, should there be changes in Exco? At least there is action to show the government is not only saying it will change or listen,” he said.

Tien, a lawmaker of the Roundtable group, also suggested that Exco members should not have background links to political parties and should remain politically neutral.

Additional reporting by Elizabeth Cheung

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/hong-kong-extradition-bill-carrie-lam-1402272

This week’s much-anticipated hearing with former special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerTop Republican considered Mueller subpoena to box in Democrats Kamala Harris says her Justice Dept would have ‘no choice’ but to prosecute Trump for obstruction Dem committees win new powers to investigate Trump MORE promises to be full of high political drama. But election security — a key focus of the Mueller report — isn’t likely to garner much attention from lawmakers.

Mueller is scheduled to testify before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees in back-to-back hearings Wednesday to discuss the findings of his 448-page report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

The first volume of the report was devoted to Russian efforts to interfere in the elections through social media and hacking operations, with Mueller later emphasizing in rare public remarks that election security is an issue that “deserves the attention of every American.”

“I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments, that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our elections,” Mueller said in a public statement to the press in May.

His lengthy report detailed how Russian actors hacked into the computer system of the Democratic National Committee, engineered a social media disinformation campaign that favored President TrumpDonald John TrumpLiz Cheney: ‘Send her back’ chant ‘inappropriate’ but not about race, gender Booker: Trump is ‘worse than a racist’ Top Democrat insists country hasn’t moved on from Mueller MORE and conducted “computer intrusion operations” against those working on former Secretary of State Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonGeorge Takei: US has hit a new low under Trump Democrats slam Puerto Rico governor over ‘shameful’ comments, back protesters Matt Gaetz ahead of Mueller hearing: ‘We are going to reelect the president’ MORE’s presidential campaign.

In the wake of the report’s release, election security debates ramped up on Capitol Hill, with Republicans and Democrats strongly disagreeing on what steps, if any, Congress should take ahead of the 2020 elections.

The Democratic-led House has passed several election security bills, while the GOP-controlled Senate has mostly avoided voting on them and others, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellMcConnell challenger faces tougher path after rocky launch Funding a strong defense of our nation’s democratic process can’t wait The Hill’s Morning Report: Trump walks back from ‘send her back’ chants MORE (R-Ky.) citing concerns about federalizing elections and claiming agencies already doing enough to address the problem.

Both chambers were briefed by senior administration officials this month on efforts to secure elections heading into 2020.

Still, members of the House Intelligence Committee, which published its own report on Russian interference in the 2016 elections, are not expected to focus many of their questions on the topic when Mueller testifies.

A committee spokesperson declined to comment on whether Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett Schiff10 questions for Robert Mueller Court filings show Trump, Cohen contacts amid hush money payments House passes annual intelligence bill MORE (D-Calif.) planned to question Mueller on election security but noted that Schiff plans to hold an “open election security hearing with relevant public officials following the August recess.”

The House is set to return from its annual monthlong recess on Sept. 9.

A spokesperson for ranking member Devin NunesDevin Gerald NunesHouse passes annual intelligence bill Democrats’ opposition research got exposed — this time, not by the Russians GOP consultant sued by Nunes asks for help paying legal costs MORE (R-Calif.) did not respond to a request for comment, but Nunes last month described the Mueller report as a “hit piece” designed to bolster Democrats’ calls for impeachment.

Some members of the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees expressed a keen interest in pursuing the issue of election security but indicated it will not be a priority during the hearing.

Rep. Val DemingsValdez (Val) Venita DemingsHouse gears up for Mueller testimony The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Acosta resigns amid controversy over Epstein plea deal The Hill’s Morning Report — Trump retreats on census citizenship question MORE (D-Fla.), a member of both committees, told The Hill recently that she “really wished we had time” to discuss election security, citing “loose ends.” But she added that “we’re going to be focused specifically on his investigation and his report, more about meetings the Trump campaign or the administration had with Russian officials, the president obstructing justice, and the conclusions about not exonerating the president.”

Rep. Cedric RichmondCedric Levon RichmondHere are the 95 Democrats who voted to support impeachment Alarm sounds over census cybersecurity concerns Harris hops past Biden in early race for Black Caucus support MORE (D-La.), chairman of the House Homeland Security cybersecurity subcommittee and a member of the Judiciary Committee, told The Hill that he did not plan to question Mueller on the topic as he thought “that part of the report is sufficiently detailed.”

Another Intelligence Committee Democrat, Rep. Mike QuigleyMichael (Mike) Bruce QuigleyFunding a strong defense of our nation’s democratic process can’t wait The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump touts handshake with Kim, tariff freeze with Xi Repeat of border aid battle expected with Homeland Security bill MORE (Ill.), said a major roadblock to bringing up election security is the five-minute time constraint each member has to ask questions and the multitude of other issues to address.

Quigley, who has been one of the more active House members on election security, added that while it was too early to say what his questions would be, he hoped Mueller would address the portion of the report on Russian hacking and social media interference efforts in 2016.

“The first time, and the only time that Mueller spoke to the American public, eight minutes, people forget that half of it, he was talking about election security,” Quigley told The Hill. “I think the most important thing he can do is to reiterate and expound upon that, what the threat was, why the threat is still there, and why we need a bipartisan response.”

Two Intelligence Committee members — Rep. Joaquin CastroJoaquin CastroImmigrants on edge over prospect of ICE raids Here are the 95 Democrats who voted to support impeachment The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by JUUL Labs – Trump attack on progressive Dems draws sharp rebuke MORE (D-Texas) and Brad WenstrupBrad Robert Wenstrup58 GOP lawmakers vote against disaster aid bill Step therapy forces patients to fail first: Congress can fix that Key doctors group faces political risks on guns MORE (R-Ohio) — separately told The Hill that while their questions aren’t decided, they hoped Mueller would be able to offer advice on what Congress should do to secure elections.

Castro added that he hoped Mueller would address “whether he believes, based on his investigation, that the United States election system is protected as well as it should be and whether he has seen sufficient efforts between when he started his investigation and now to better secure our U.S. election system.”

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.), a Judiciary Committee member, said she wished the panel “would focus more on the actual interference in our elections by the Russians instead of going after the Trump administration constantly.”

While committee members may have been noncommittal about whether they would ask election security questions, at least one former top official was not.

Former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien Comey10 questions for Robert Mueller Comey pens blog revealing what he would ask Mueller in upcoming testimony FBI’s spreadsheet puts a stake through the heart of Steele’s dossier MORE on Friday detailed the questions he would ask Mueller in an article for Lawfare. Among them was whether Mueller discovered if there were contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign members and if so, whether the Trump campaign reported those contacts to the FBI.

Comey was involved in investigating Russian interference efforts in the 2016 election before being fired by Trump in May 2017.

Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerTop Democrats demand security assessment of Trump properties Senate passes bill making hacking voting systems a federal crime Senators unload on Facebook cryptocurrency at hearing MORE (D-Va.), the ranking member on the Senate Intelligence Committee and a co-sponsor of various election security measures, said that even though he won’t have the opportunity to question Mueller, he hopes the former special counsel will use the national spotlight to issue a stark warning to the American public.

“He needs to reinforce the message that he made at his press conference, that the Russians attacked our democracy in 2018. They’ll be back,” Warner said.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/453968-election-security-to-take-back-seat-at-mueller-hearing

An attack last week against former Chicago police Officer Jason Van Dyke in his Connecticut prison cell reflects “the mentality out there … that people won’t rest until he is either given a life sentence or killed in prison,” his lead trial attorney said Thursday.

Daniel Herbert joined Van Dyke’s wife, Tiffany, in demanding to know why Van Dyke was transferred to an out-of-state federal prison and why he was placed in the general inmate population, where he was beaten in the face within days of his arrival.

“They put my husband in a setting to be harmed because of the fact that he was a white man who harmed a black gentleman in the line of duty,” Tiffany Van Dyke said at a news conference. “He is a police officer who was convicted for doing his job, and at the basic minimum they were supposed to keep him safe.”

Attorneys stressed the danger Van Dyke faces in custody — just days after prosecutors filed a legal petition before the state Supreme Court that, if successful, could significantly lengthen his sentence.

Source Article from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-jason-van-dyke-laquan-mcdonald-prison-attack-20190214-story.html

(CNN)More than 50 million people are under threat of hail, heavy rain, strong winds and isolated tornadoes Sunday as several storms move east, according to the National Weather Center.

    ‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘weather/2017/04/05/what-is-tornado-watch-warning-jpm-orig-mobile.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘body-text_12’,theoplayer: {allowNativeFullscreen: true},adsection: ‘const-article-inpage’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170405165111-tornado-watch-v-warning-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:307,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170405165111-tornado-watch-v-warning-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”http://www.noticiasdodia.onlinenewsbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/170405165111-tornado-watch-v-warning-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170405165111-tornado-watch-v-warning-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170405165111-tornado-watch-v-warning-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:1600,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170405165111-tornado-watch-v-warning-full-169.jpg”,”height”:900},”mini1x1″:{“width”:120,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170405165111-tornado-watch-v-warning-small-11.jpg”,”height”:120}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = false;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘body-text_12’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/19/us/midwest-weather-sunday-wxc/index.html

    Health experts agree the COVID-19 vaccines have proved to be extremely effective against the virus, including providing protection from the highly contagious Delta variant.

    Those safeguards are highlighted by the percentage of people who are now testing positive for the coronavirus in Los Angeles County, where more than 10,000 new cases have been reported in the last week. In an alarming spike in cases, 99% of new infections involve people who have not been vaccinated.

    And now, in the wake of that increased transmission, local officials are requiring not only the unvaccinated but also those who have been inoculated against the disease to wear masks in public indoor settings.

    Why?

    L.A. County now requires masks in indoor public places, opening a new battle line as the coronavirus is rising significantly among the unvaccinated.

    All those hospitalized for COVID-19 in L.A. County’s public hospitals have not been fully vaccinated

    L.A. County’s massive public hospital system has not had to hospitalize anyone for COVID-19 who has been fully vaccinated, Health Services Director Dr. Christina Ghaly said.

    “We have not admitted any single person for COVID who is fully vaccinated — with either the J&J, Pfizer or Moderna vaccines,” Ghaly told the county Board of Supervisors last week.

    L.A. County’s public hospital system has a vast reach and primarily serves people especially vulnerable to COVID-19. There are four county-run hospitals.

    Those hospitalizations could be mitigated by the vaccines, health experts say.

    “The vaccines are extraordinarily effective (even against the delta variant),” tweeted Dr. Monica Gandhi, infectious diseases expert at UC San Francisco.

    99.8% of COVID-19 deaths in L.A. County have been among unvaccinated people

    Between Dec. 7 and June 7, unvaccinated people in L.A. County made up 99.6% of the region’s coronavirus cases, 98.7% of COVID-19 hospitalizations and 99.8% of deaths.

    San Diego County has reported similar numbers.

    Residents there who are either unvaccinated or partly vaccinated represent 99.1% of coronavirus cases, 99.88% of COVID-19 hospitalizations and 99.8% of deaths.

    ‘Anything is on the table if things continue to get worse, which is why we want to take action now,’ the L.A. County health officer said.

    Of fully vaccinated people in L.A. County, 0.06% subsequently tested positive for the virus

    In Los Angeles County, about 4.67 million residents have been fully vaccinated.

    Of them, 0.06% have subsequently tested positive; 0.004% were later hospitalized for COVID-19; and 0.0004% died.

    The vaccines are as effective against the Delta variant as other strains

    Among L.A. County coronavirus cases that were further analyzed to identify its strain in June, only a small percentage were among fully vaccinated people.

    Officials said that 89% of identified Delta variant cases in June were among people who weren’t fully vaccinated.

    The results were similar to the Alpha variant: 91% of identified cases were among people who weren’t fully vaccinated.

    Well-done studies elsewhere point to high effectiveness against Delta

    Data from Britain cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government’s top infectious-diseases expert, say that the two-dose course of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is 96% effective in preventing hospitalization from COVID-19, 88% effective in preventing symptomatic infection and 79% effective in preventing lab-confirmed infection. Experts believe the Moderna vaccine — because it’s based on the same technology as Pfizer’s — is similarly effective.

    Fauci also expressed confidence in the Johnson & Johnson vaccine’s effectiveness. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses technology similar to one used in the AstraZeneca vaccine, which studies in Britain show is 92% effective against hospitalization and 60% effective against either symptomatic disease or lab-confirmed infection.

    Invariably, there have been scattered reports that have occasionally raised questions about whether vaccines have lowered effectiveness against the Delta variant, including one that emerged out of Israel suggesting that the effectiveness of vaccines available there to protect against symptomatic illness had fallen to 64%, although they remained 93% effective in preventing hospitalization.

    The differing results of the Israeli report may be caused by different methodologies, such as rigorously testing vaccinated people for a coronavirus infection even though they had no symptoms, while other studies might test only those who are visibly ill, said UCLA epidemiologist and infectious diseases expert Dr. Robert Kim-Farley.

    “Bottom line, however, is that all these studies continue to show very good efficacy against severe disease and death,” Kim-Farley said. “The vaccines continue to do what we need them to do most.”

    In addition, the Israeli report reviewed just 300 patients, and small studies can be inaccurate, said Gandhi, the infectious diseases expert at UC San Francisco. Studies from Britain, Canada and Singapore — reviewing records of many more people — showed 80% to 90% vaccine effectiveness against any symptomatic infection and 93% to 96% effectiveness against severe disease.

    A growing contingent of medical experts is questioning the conventional wisdom that healthy children should get COVID-19 shots as soon as possible.

    How can children be protected if they’re too young to be vaccinated for now?

    Children under the age of 12 do not have access to vaccines for now, and it’s important that as many adults around them get vaccinated, Gandhi tweeted.

    “The best thing we can do for children right now is to get as many adults vaccinated as possible while young children clinical trials of [vaccines] are ongoing, especially anyone who will be teaching children or sending them to school (e.g. teachers/parents),” Gandhi wrote.

    Young children already are less likely to contract the coronavirus because they have far fewer proteins called ACE2 receptors in their noses that the coronavirus needs to access to infect the body.

    Officials described the mask mandate as a minimally disruptive tactic to blunt rapidly rising coronavirus transmission. But does it make any sense?

    So why wear a mask?

    L.A. County officials say there’s a real need to take action now. Though infections and serious COVID-19 illness are still only a fraction of what was seen over the fall and winter, daily coronavirus cases are now six times what they were on June 15, when California fully reopened, and COVID-19 hospitalizations have doubled since then.

    In its reopening last month, California implemented a statewide honor system: Unvaccinated people still had to wear masks in indoor public spaces, even though businesses were under no obligation to verify their inoculation status.

    L.A. County officials are now worried that unvaccinated people instead responded by not masking up in required settings. And with cases and hospitalizations growing, authorities say they hope reinstituting masking as a social norm will help reduce disease transmission.

    “We’re not where we need to be for the millions at risk of infection here in Los Angeles County, and waiting to do something will be too late given what we’re seeing now,” said Dr. Muntu Davis, the county’s health officer.

    In essence, they hope requiring everyone to wear masks indoors will force the unvaccinated to do so, giving them more protection.

    Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-07-19/covid-vaccines-work-why-is-la-mask-mandate-necessary

    The man suspected of stabbing two Asian American women on a San Francisco sidewalk was reportedly released early from a 25-year prison sentence due to a left-wing criminal justice diversion program.

    Years before allegedly stabbing two elderly woman at a Tenderloin bus stop, Patrick Thompson, now 54, was charged with assault with a deadly weapon in 2017 and sent to a mental institution, according to the San Francisco Chronicle – but he was granted entry into a mental health diversion program in 2019, “successfully” completing it in August 2020.

    A spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation deferred questions to San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, noting the CDCR is not responsible for sentencing decisions.

    2 ASIAN WOMEN STABBED ON SAN FRANCISCO STREET, SUSPECT ARRESTED, POLICE SAY

    Boudin’s office did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment. He was elected in November 2019, and it was not immediately clear how much of a role, if any, he played in Thompson’s release.

    <strong>Aerial images above the scene show multiple police vehicles present at the San Francisco intersection where a double stabbing took place. (FOX 2 Bay Area)</strong>

    On Twitter, where his handle currently includes Chinese characters that approximate the pronunciation of his name in solidarity with Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, who are facing a nationwide rise in hate crimes, he said he met with the victims and their families earlier Thursday before he announced the charges against Thompson.

    Graphic video shows the man, who police allege is Thompson, walking up behind two elderly women as they stood at a bus stop near the city’s Tenderloin Station, a thriving commercial district, in broad daylight Tuesday.

    He pulls out a knife and slashes them both before bystanders rush over and he eventually flees.

    The victims, 84 and 63 years old, and suffered multiple stab wounds and remained hospitalized as of Wednesday.

    Thompson faces two counts each of attempted murder and elder abuse charges. 

    San Francisco police said Wednesday they were looking into whether racial bias was a motive in the attacks as anti-Asian hate crimes spike around the country.

    San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin speaks to reporters before his Jan. 8, 2020 swearing-in ceremony in San Francisco. 
    (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)

    In late March, horrific video showed an Asian woman being punched, robbed, and then dragged by a vehicle in a San Francisco neighborhood in broad daylight. A national Asian American advocacy group, Asian Industry B2B, called on the Biden administration last month to take action to address the spike.

    Boudin, whose own parents were convicted on felony murder charges in connection with the deadly 1981 Brinks’ heist, had lobbied New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to grant his father, David Gilbert, clemency earlier this year.

    His mother, Kathy Boudin, was paroled in 2003.

    Gilbert, the unarmed getaway driver, is still serving a 75-years-to-life sentence for his role in the robbery, which left two Nyack police officers, Edward O’Grady and Waverly Brown, and a Brinks security guard, Peter Paige, dead.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Before the robbery, Boudin’s parents dropped their then-14-month-old son off with Weather Underground leaders Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

    As an adult, he used his upbringing with incarcerated parents as a campaign talking point and called for criminal justice reforms.

    But in January, he was forced to defend his office’s actions after a parolee allegedly ran a red light on New Year’s Eve in a stolen car in an incident that left two pedestrians dead.

    Then in March, he drew backlash in another case involving an unprovoked attack on an Asian American. In that case, he caused an uproar when he referenced a 19-year-old suspect’s “temper tantrum” in the killing of an 84-year-old Thai immigrant, but not racial animus.

    Fox News’ Jackie Zhou and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/san-francisco-double-stabbing-suspect-early-release

    A malfunctioning software program aboard the Max 8 planes is a central focus of investigators. The software program, called M.C.A.S., was installed in the new Max 8 planes as a way of preventing stalls and worked by forcing the nose of the plane down.

    In the Indonesian flight, there are indications that the system acted in error and that the pilots had trouble overriding the software’s actions. They ultimately lost their battle before the plane plunged into the sea.

    The data from the Ethiopian Airlines flight recorders, or black boxes, has not been publicly released. Experts generally caution that conclusions at this stage of an investigation are far from certain and note that there are many possible causes for crashes.

    [When the 737 Max was introduced, Boeing and regulators agreed that pilots didn’t need additional simulator training.]

    Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/17/world/europe/ethiopia-737-crash-data-recorders.html

    Protests against racism and police brutality are not isolated to the United States. George Floyd’s death has struck a chord all around the world. Elizabeth Palmer reports from London. 

    Subscribe to the “CBS Evening News” Channel HERE: http://bit.ly/1S7Dhik
    Watch Full Episodes of the “CBS Evening News” HERE: http://cbsn.ws/23XekKA
    Watch the latest installment of “On the Road,” only on the “CBS Evening News,” HERE: http://cbsn.ws/23XwqMH
    Follow “CBS Evening News” on Instagram: http://bit.ly/1T8icTO
    Like “CBS Evening News” on Facebook HERE: http://on.fb.me/1KxYobb
    Follow the “CBS Evening News” on Twitter HERE: http://bit.ly/1O3dTTe
    Follow the “CBS Evening News” on Google+ HERE: http://bit.ly/1Qs0aam

    Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8

    Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! http://bit.ly/1OQA29B


    The “CBS Evening News” premiered as a half-hour broadcast on Sept. 2, 1963. Check local listings for CBS Evening News broadcast times.

    Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBgxupJQKns

    Image copyright
    AFP

    Image caption

    Emmanuel Macron delivered an address to the nation – his fourth since the outbreak began

    French President Emmanuel Macron has announced a number of coronavirus restrictions are being lifted.

    From Monday cafes and restaurants can open across France and travel to other European countries will be allowed.

    People will also be able to visit family members in retirement homes, which have been hit particularly hard by the Covid-19 outbreak.

    It comes as a number of other countries in Europe re-open their borders between EU countries on Monday.

    In a televised address, Mr Macron said France had won its “first victory”, but warned the virus could return.

    “As soon as tomorrow we will be able to turn the page on this first chapter across all our territory,” he said.

    Restaurants, hotels and cafés were allowed to reopen in many parts of France earlier this month – provided distancing rules are observed.

    Mr Macron confirmed that from Monday this would also happen in the Paris region, which recorded the highest number of cases in the country.

    He also said that schools would reopen from 22 June – except for high schools.

    However, the president added, “this does not mean that the virus has gone and that we can completely drop our guard. The summer of 2020 will be a summer unlike any other and we will need to watch the evolution of the epidemic to be prepared in case it comes back with renewed strength.”

    Which other EU countries are reopening their borders?

    The European Commission encouraged all internal border restrictions to be lifted from Monday; however, only a small number of nations have announced they will re-open.

    Belgium, Croatia, Switzerland and Germany fully open their borders on Monday, with traffic police and officials enforcing the restrictions no longer present.

    The Czech Republic is allowing unrestricted travel to and from 26 states but is still banning people from Belgium, Portugal, Sweden and the UK.

    Greece has opened its borders and is allowing travellers from farther afield such as Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea to enter.

    Italy already reopened its borders on 3 June as has Poland, which opened to EU travellers on 13 June.

    Image copyright
    Reuters

    Image caption

    German tourists will be able to visit Spain’s Balearic islands as part of a pilot scheme

    Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said the country would allow free travel with EU countries from 21 June, except for Portugal. However Spain is allowing German tourists to visit its Balearic Islands from Monday as part of a pilot scheme to boost its tourism sector.

    Its border with Portugal remains closed until 1 July.

    Austria will lift its restrictions on 16 June but a ban on travellers from Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom remains in place.

    Sweden and Luxembourg never closed their borders.

    France to hold delayed elections

    Mr Macron confirmed that the second round of municipal elections, originally scheduled for March, will go ahead on 28 June.

    But, he said, mass gatherings will need to remain “tightly controlled” because “they are the main occasions for spreading the virus”.

    The announcement means that all of mainland France will now be in the “green zone” virus alert level.

    The overseas territories of Mayotte and French Guiana will remain at the “orange” alert level. Both territories still have high numbers of cases, which are threatening to overwhelm their hospital systems.

    More than 29,400 people have died of coronavirus in France, and the country has had almost 194,000 confirmed cases – although the number of new cases has slowed markedly in recent days.

    President Macron first imposed a strict lockdown on 17 March. These remained in place until 11 May, when the country began to cautiously ease restrictions.

    His latest announcement marks the most significant lifting of restrictions since lockdown began.

    Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52978327

    Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Wednesday that the department hasn’t decided if it’ll comply with a demand by a key House Democrat to deliver President Trump’s tax returns, and won’t meet a Wednesday deadline to do so.

    The news came a day after Mnuchin faced off in a contentious exchange on the issue with the chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, California Rep. Maxine Waters. Mnuchin, who testified for more than three hours, said he would rethink whether to reappear before the committee, based on Waters’ behavior.

    In a letter to House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., who asked for Trump’s returns a week ago, Mnuchin said Treasury would consult with the Justice Department and further review the request.

    WATCH: MNUCHIN SPARS WITH MAXINE WATERS, TELLS HER TO ‘BANG THE GAVEL’ AS SHE GOES WIDE-EYED IN SHOCK

    “The legal implications of this request could affect protections for all Americans against politically-motivated disclosures of personal tax information, regardless of which party is in power,” Mnuchin wrote.

    He said Treasury respects lawmakers’ oversight duties, and would make sure taxpayer protections were “scrupulously observed, consistent with my statutory responsibilities.”

    Earlier Wednesday, Trump, who has broken with decades of presidential tradition by not releasing his returns, told reporters he wouldn’t do so while he’s under IRS audit. He said much the same thing last week.

    Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testifies Tuesday before a House Appropriations subcommittee during a hearing on President Trump’s budget. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

    “I would love to give them, but I’m not going to do it while I’m under audit.”

    Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told Fox News on Sunday that Democrats would “never” see Trump’s returns.

    The IRS says there’s no rule against subjects of an audit releasing their tax filings.

    The brouhaha comes as several other Democrat presidential contenders have vowed to release their returns or have already done so. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts released her 2018 tax returns on Wednesday, showing she and her husband earned nearly $1 million last year.

    And Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., announced Tuesday that he’ll release 10 years of tax returns on Monday — filings expected to show that the self-declared Democratic socialist made millions from book sales.

    Trump’s position has long been that he is under audit and therefore unable to divulge his returns. But in recent weeks, he has added to the argument, saying publicly and privately that the American people elected him without seeing his taxes and would do so again.

    “Remember, I got elected last time — the same exact issue,” Trump said, echoing Mulvaney’s remarks in his “Fox News Sunday” interview. “Frankly, the people don’t care.”

    The president has told those close to him that the attempt to get his returns represented an assault on his privacy and a further example of the Democratic-led “witch hunt.”

    Trump has repeatedly asked aides about the status of the House request and has inquired about the “loyalty” of the top officials at the IRS, according to one outside adviser who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.

    “Frankly, the people don’t care.”

    — President Trump

    Democrats didn’t expect the department to comply, but they haven’t sketched out their next steps. Rep. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., speaking before Mnuchin’s response was delivered, said it may take Neal a couple of days to issue his own response.

    House Democrats are at a party retreat in the Virginia suburbs of Washington.

    Neal has adopted a methodical approach to seeking Trump’s returns. He has the option of eventually seeking to subpoena the records or go to court to get them, but it’s not clear if he’s prepared to ratchet up the confrontation.

    2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders greets supporters after a rally, Saturday, March 9, 2019, at the Iowa state fairgrounds in Des Moines, Iowa. (AP Photo/Matthew Putney)

    Neal’s initial letter didn’t lay out any consequences for the IRS if it didn’t comply, and a spokesman said a likely course would be a second, more insistent, letter.

    “We intend to follow through with this,” Neal said Wednesday. “I’ll let you know fast.”

    The request for Trump’s tax filings is but one of many oversight efforts launched by Democrats after taking back the House in last fall’s midterms. Neal is relying on a 1920s-era law that says the IRS “shall furnish” any tax return requested by the chairmen of key House and Senate committees.

    CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Mnuchin told lawmakers that his department will “follow the law,” but he hasn’t shared the department’s interpretation of the statute.

    The White House did not respond to questions as to whether the president asked Mnuchin or the IRS head to intervene.

    The president’s outside attorney also did not respond to a request for comment.

    Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Paulina Dedaj, Chris Wallace, and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mnuchin-says-treasury-wont-meet-house-dems-deadline-to-provide-trump-tax-returns

    Protesters in Hong Kong fear they are being monitored by the local government and potentially by China, a country at the cutting edge of mass surveillance. So demonstrators have developed hacks to avoid arrest and hide their digital tracks.

    Photo composite: Sharon Shi

    More from the Wall Street Journal:
    Visit WSJ.com: http://www.wsj.com
    Visit the WSJ Video Center: https://wsj.com/video

    On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pg/wsj/videos/
    On Twitter: https://twitter.com/WSJ
    On Snapchat: https://on.wsj.com/2ratjSM

    #WSJ #HongKong #HKProtests

    Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32KTKXZZ-BI

    Pete Buttigieg, the 37-year-old mayor of this northern Indiana city who in just weeks has vaulted from being a near-unknown to a breakout star in the Democratic Party, officially started his presidential bid here on Sunday, presenting himself as a transformational figure who is well positioned to beat President Trump, despite being young and facing off against many seasoned rivals.

    “I recognize the audacity of doing this as a Midwestern, millennial mayor, but we live in a moment that compels us each to act,” Buttigieg said in front of thousands of supporters, jacket-free with his sleeves rolled up. “It calls for a new generation of leadership.”

    Buttigieg added, “It’s time to walk away from the politics of the past and toward something totally different.”

    The scene for Buttigieg’s rally was a hulking former Studebaker assembly plant, whose closure decades ago rocked this region’s economy. The site has since become a data and education hub pushed by his administration — and central to his technocratic, hopeful pitch that he is ready to help communities still struggling with the effects of globalization.

    “Change is coming, ready or not,” Buttigieg told the crowd. “There is a myth being sold to industrial and rural communities: the myth that we can stop the clock and turn it back,” and he touted his attempts in the city to assist the workforce with training and skills programs.

    Some attendees drove from around the country after being inspired by Buttigieg’s message and the historic nature of his campaign as a gay presidential candidate.

    For Buttigieg, Sunday’s upbeat gathering on a dreary, snowy mid-April afternoon was an important political juncture: a reintroduction to a party that has only begun to pay attention to this mayor with a hard-to-pronounce name, but is now certainly listening closely as it searches for a standard-bearer.

    Following a string of buzzy podcast and television appearances, increasingly crowded stops in early voting states, and the release of a best-selling memoir, Buttigieg is suddenly a contender in a crowded Democratic field, with a $7 million fund­raising haul in the first quarter of the year and a rapid rise in the polls.

    Meanwhile, his husband, Chasten, has become a favorite of Democrats on social media, and Buttigieg has landed on the cover of national magazines, including New York magazine this week, with the headline “How about Pete?”

    As rain fell on this city of roughly 100,000 on Sunday morning, thousands lined up under umbrellas and bundled up in jackets, waiting to enter the facility, holding homemade signs and carrying coffee cups and copies of his book, “Shortest Way Home.”

    One of them was Ashley Pawlowski, 34, a self-described independent from South Bend who works at a local nonprofit. “The South Bend we all grew up in was very different. He changed this city and brought a new attitude,” she said. “He’s got this ability to help people deep down in his bones.”

    Buttigieg’s challenge in the coming months: translating this meteoric momentum and goodwill among Democrats who are eager to cheer a confident, youthful voice from the Midwest into a sustained national campaign that can outpace candidates whose careers have made them popular with activists and donors.

    Buttigieg has worked to rub off the heavy sheen of implausibility from his upstart candidacy, insisting that being a two-term mayor of a city in the middle of the country gives him more governing experience than Trump and that he is the face of a new generation that wants to bypass the partisanship and rancor that has gripped Trump’s Washington.

    “My face is my message,” Buttigieg often tells voters on the campaign trail, a catchall way of referring to a calm persona that has drawn comparisons to President Barack Obama and to his own political profile: a gay Midwestern mayor, a retired Navy officer who served in Afghanistan and a Rhodes scholar who, if elected, would be the youngest president in U.S. history.

    Buttigieg’s path will be anything but a glide. While some once-unknown outsiders, such as Jimmy Carter in 1976, have captured the Democratic nomination, others with electric starts have seen their bids fade.

    Buttigieg has generated a swell of enthusiasm among several top Democrats and Obama allies, such as veteran strategist David Axelrod — and Buttigieg has met privately with Obama, who has praised him. Other Democrats remain muted about the mayor.

    In recent days, Buttigieg’s record in South Bend has come under scrutiny. His administration’s efforts to knock down blighted houses in the city have been criticized by some Democrats as a policy that was overly aggressive in revamping lower-income areas that are home to many minority voters. South Bend also continues to grapple with a quarter of the city hovering on the poverty line.

    Buttigieg’s record on race has drawn criticism from Democrats as well, particularly his demotion of South Bend’s first black police chief, Darryl Boykins, in 2012. Buttigieg has cited a federal investigation of Boykins as his rationale for the ouster, but Boykins went on to sue the city for racial discrimination.

    Solomon Anderson, a 57-year-old banker from South Bend, said some in the city’s black community remain unsettled by Buttigieg’s handling of that incident, even as he and others cheered on the mayor’s campaign at the rally on Sunday.

    “Not everyone is over it,” Anderson said. “He has tried to be a healer, to be inclusive, but it hasn’t always been easy.”

    Axelrod, watching Buttigieg’s crowd from afar, noted on Twitter that the crowd “seems very large, very impressive but also very white — an obstacle he will have to overcome.”

    And Buttigieg’s 2015 comment that “all lives matter,” which has been called insensitive by those in the Black Lives Matter movement that seeks to address issues facing black Americans with law enforcement, prompted him to reassure a civil rights group this month that he understands their concerns and stands in solidarity with their cause.

    Buttigieg’s campaign is aware of the growing spotlight on his mayoral decisions and is determined to showcase his record and make the case that running a city like South Bend enables him to understand vexing national issues from a ground-level perspective. Sunday’s rally featured introductory speeches from mayors from other states who have become allies, following Buttigieg’s work in mayoral groups and his unsuccessful run for Democratic National Committee chairman in 2016.

    “The horror show in Washington is mesmerizing. It’s all-consuming. But starting today, we’re going to change the channel,” Buttigieg said.

    Nan Whaley, the mayor of Dayton, Ohio, called Buttigieg “the polar opposite in every way to Donald Trump.” Steve Adler, the mayor of Austin, endorsed him and said it seemed as though “the world is arriving in South Bend.”

    Underscoring themes of generational change and his interest in reaching out to religious voters and working-class voters who drifted toward Trump have been priorities of Buttigieg and his aides as they have mapped out his campaign, believing he can make overtures to them and liberal Democrats at the same time.

    The energy surrounding Buttigieg was evident over the weekend here: His campaign headquarters in South Bend was bustling with volunteers, who streamed past a wall painted with tall-lettered guidance on how to pronounce his name: “Boot Edge Edge.” Chasten Buttigieg greeted supporters and shared a playlist of songs from bands such as Fleetwood Mac and Phish for those taking road trips.

    “5 years ago I came out to my family,” tweeted one supporter, Matthew Miller. “I never thought 5 years ago I’d be driving 8 hours through the night with my Republican father right by my side to go see the first openly gay man announce he’s running for president.”

    Buttigieg’s policy proposals have been relatively broad compared to others in the field and so far tethered to his belief that American democracy needs to undergo a systemic renewal that includes a debate over possible changes to the U.S. Constitution, including expanding the Supreme Court and making the confirmation process less partisan and eliminating the electoral college.

    On Sunday, he spoke out against the rise of white nationalism, voter disenfranchisement, gerrymandering and the influence of corporate money in campaigns.

    “Sometimes a dark moment brings out the best in us,” Buttigieg said.

    Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pete-buttigieg-says-he-can-beat-donald-trump-in-2020/2019/04/14/ea22a7b8-5e5d-11e9-9625-01d48d50ef75_story.html

    The Trump administration has rescinded a rule that would have required international students to transfer schools or leave the country if their colleges hold classes entirely online next semester because of the coronavirus pandemic.

    United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced the decision as a court hearing was getting under way on a challenge to the rule by Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

    US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Massachusetts said the US government and the two universities that sued over the measure had come to a settlement that would roll back the new rules and restore the previous status quo.

    Burroughs was nominated to the court in 2014 by former President Barack Obama.


    The suit brought by Harvard University and MIT argued that the policy was created unlawfully and that it contradicts previous guidance from federal immigration officials. The colleges had been asking the court to block the rule at least temporarily.

    Under the policy, international students in the US would have been forbidden from taking all of their courses online when classes restart. New visas would not be issued to students at schools planning to provide all classes online, which includes Harvard. Students already in the US would face deportation if they did not transfer schools or leave the country voluntarily.

    The rule created a dilemma for thousands of foreign students who stayed in the US after their colleges shifted to remote learning due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    As part of the policy, ICE had told colleges to notify the agency no later than Wednesday if they plan to hold all classes online this term. Other colleges would have until August 1 to share their fall semester plans.

    The policy had drawn sharp backlash from higher education institutions, with more than 200 signing court briefs supporting the challenge by Harvard and MIT. Colleges say the policy puts students’ safety at risk and hurts schools financially. At least seven other suits have been filed by schools and states opposing the policy.

    On Monday, 17 states and the District of Columbia filed their own lawsuits, arguing the rule is politically motivated and an attempt by the Trump administration to force universities to hold in-person classes when classes resume for the new school year.

    Immigration officials issued the policy last week, reversing earlier guidance from March 13 telling colleges that limits around online education would be suspended during the pandemic. University leaders believe the rule is part of Trump’s effort to pressure the nation’s schools and colleges to reopen in August and September, even as new virus cases rise.


    Harvard and MIT argued that immigration officials violated procedural rules by issuing the guidance without justification and without allowing the public to respond. They also argued that the policy contradicted ICE’s March 13 directive telling schools that existing limits on online education would be suspended “for the duration of the emergency.”

    The suit noted that Trump’s national emergency declaration has not been rescinded and that virus cases are spiking in some regions.

    Immigration officials, however, said they told colleges all along that any guidance prompted by the pandemic was subject to change. They said the rule is consistent with existing law barring international students from taking classes entirely online. Federal officials also said they were providing leniency by allowing students to keep their visas even if they study online from abroad during the fall semester.

    Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/07/trump-administration-rescinds-rule-international-students-200714192506182.html